the funds. so n. past board has approved conditions like upon full funding groement or adding oversight requirements. last but in the least i have a few on out reach approach. our goal to ensure we have inclusive planning for all of the work. won't want to provide an opportunity for folks to weigh in on the project priors themselves and also on the policies to guide the administration of the program. and our i will mention our committee made it clear it is important to the success of the plan that we have an inclusive process. here are a few tools i will not read out that we plan to use to support the planning process. few of them we would tloik have i targeted equity rounds table and provide an opportunity for the plan add sunrise we committee members to come together in an optional meeting and broader efforts such as virtual town hall and surveys. we are target action in john for the strategic plan. we acknowledge we may to extend past then. prop l effective april first the board can only appr

fund, that is, a pension fund.he social security fund united there was difficult, uh, for whom it's good state. i think it’s good for the state, because despite the fact that they will now exist for some time in parallel, but still this is a reduction resources from administration. well, it seems to me that for pensioners this is not bad, because it will all be, in principle, a one -stop shop, because there will be no functions, of course, functions. no, they also combined the fraction , because we really have a lot of older people here . well, and all those who receive, maybe some kind of social pension payments. uh, they used to have to contact their pension fund. absolutely what let's immediately decide before, uh, the official pre-retirement age 5 years before retirement now. it's hard to say how much because we now have a phased retirement, so 5 years before retirement before retirement. let's say televisually. it's there 55-65 years. yes, yes, you can say excellent. further, a significant change will also tak

fund, that is, a pension fund.nd the social security fund teamed up there complicated was uh, for whom it's good. i think it's good for the state, because despite the fact that they will now exist for some time in parallel, but still this is a reduction in resources and administration. well it seems to me that this is not bad for pensioners, because it will all be, in principle, a single window, because there will be functions, of course, functions. no united, because we really have a lot of faces. eh, older . well, and all those who receive, maybe some kind of social pension payments. uh, they used to have to contact their pension fund. in social from what let's immediately decide before uh official age, pre- retirement 5 years before retirement now? it's hard to say how much because us now phased retirement, so 5 years before retirement on before retirement. let 's say televisually. it's there 55-65 years. yes, yes, you can say excellent. further, a significant change will also take place, uh, which will relate t

with general fund state fund federal funds and stuff like that. i was thinking about it that way. >> ocoh funds are not- >> maybe instead of cannot solve homelessness in its entirety. then we go to coordination between-- >> (inaudible) i was thinking something similar and maybe more explicitly calling out and thinking the paragraph above of we need to look at all funding sources across the city and across the partners and not just ocoh funds and maybe more specifically calling out not just that we can't do it, but use of general funds and other sources will be necessary to meet the needs outlined in the assessment. >> yeah. sorry, i heard will be necessary- >> to meet the needs of people experiencing homelessness outlined in the assessment or people experiencing homelessness in san francisco. >> i like outlined in the assessment because it connects it back to that. >> is this one sentence enough here member friedenbach? i want to make sure i got it right. >> i think it is good with the sentence but julie put in or member leadbetter and the other s

fund provides funds allow you to report already vladimir on the organization of the compulsory medicalurance system in the territory of donetsk yes, and i just wanted to ask about these territories. well, they have recently become part of the russian federation and it is natural that all social obligations are in front of them. uh, before people who have become citizens of the russian federation, the integration of their legal field of the russian federation must, of course, first of all presuppose all social and e-health services that a citizen of the russian federation is entitled to, this must be done and not burdensome comfortable. how this work behaves in more detail already vladimirovich e, a feature of the implementation. e next year. territorial funds of new entities will, on their authority, vest and perform the functions of insurance e-medical organizations, namely, territorial funds provide the issuance of policies, and compulsory health insurance will carry out additional payments , provided medical care and will carry out quality control. help provided. and of course, prot

and the pension fund have merged the russian social fund into one structure.ged do i need new certificates? when will they pay? we ’ll tell you where to go now in 5 minutes in the instruction program, we’ll start with the most important advantage earlier , beneficiaries, often, had to knock on two different doors, for example, the pfr paid pensions to the disabled and the fss issued rehabilitation funds, now services are provided on a one-stop basis, and the social fund department it won't be difficult. find network social fund is almost 2.600 klin service offices. they are located at the usual addresses for citizens of the point of presence, we maintain them in all their territories, where there are offices and the merging of pounds takes place, the social fund will perform all the functions that were inherent in the pension fund and the social insurance fund combined client services. they will be with us, e, universal citizens will be able to receive advice from them on all types of services provided to pensioners, do not worry funds will be received on the

funded part.rence between an insurance pension and a funded one? so we started this insurance pension for all pensioners. those who have earned a pension, an insurance pension, are payments to pensioners upon the onset. naturally, retirement age from a common boiler. well here's the job the employer does contributions to the pension fund. yes, and this pension fund is spending money on the current 16% yes, it is also called the distributive system accumulates then distributed, and the accumulative system. it does not assume that these contributions that will be made, either the worker is in the system of mandatory pension insurance, or he himself will do it on his own individual account. come on, he can save it on his own from the non-state pension system, and it is not expected that this money will be spent on anything else, in addition to his own pension at the onset of retirement age, freezing is a very interesting point, that, for example, we receive an insurance pension with you upon the onse

fund. the general fund is primarily supported by property tax, business tax, sales tax, hotel tax and transfer taxes. general fund continuing is capital projects and discreet projects such as add back appropriations from the board of supervisors. in the darker gray pie piece, this is general fund operating and this is about 24 percent or $94 million. this represents a year over year increase of about 1 percent. this again is funding from the city general fund and supported by the same tax i just mentioned. general fund operating is annual allocation to support annual operations. we'll review more in detail later in the presentation. as a summary level if you think general fund operating this funds street cleaning. next is solid waste funds. this is 2.4 percent or $9.5 million. this is funding from the refuge rates and delivered to public works through impound account by department of environment. the process is administered by the controller office. next is the tree maintenance fund. this i

fund.n addition, in the soviet period, money was collected centrally and sent, of course, to the central office of uh in moscow, so this was the right question to ask. and where even the relationship to the peace fund was ironic joked, even through that right away. well, it's a peace fund. here what i say is that when there is a relationship, yes absolutely true, but today the situation is different today, all the funds are collected by belarusians. moreover, they remain in belarus with me, since we have a republican large-scale organization with 148 branches throughout belarus and seven regional and minsk city branches , and the principle is that the money collected in a certain region or in the city of minsk remains in these territories. yeah, they do n’t go anywhere, that is, the funds remain in the region itself and are allocated for needs. that's it of this region, the region does not unconditionally coordinate its actions with the main office. we have republican projects that have bee

, allocate funds, control funds accordingly in this direction of social in order for such a structureist, they are doing it in relation to what is directly happening in ukraine, so here this agency is being created accordingly, it is the most important thing - it is actually a certain replacement of ukravtodor, that is, it was ukravtodor, who was engaged in the construction of roads directly, and a new structure with greater powers is being created to expand the powers of ukravtodor. as i understand it, it does not work. because it is defined, and accordingly, they decided to create an agency that will have more powers than the powers that ukravtodor had, and in this context, just from the post kuprykova, who, as i understand it, will head this agency, and this is in fact. he says that they receive a certain certificate regarding anti-corruption policy there. that if we talk about parallels with large-scale construction from previous years, then there are many questions before this large- scale construction, many questions from the point of view of the fact that only a small number of

is this funding stream oversubscribed than the other acts of funding streams?ow many remediation projects in new jersey are clamoring for your prioritization? might that change in party in the u.s. house put a tourniquet on this funding stream, before it has barely begun? carlos: that is a great question. it's a world were a billion dollars as a whole lot of money. it's an oversubscribed program. we're in the final stages of selecting among the first bunch. the good news is it is the first dedicated funding. states can use their dollars to do this. i'm from new orleans. we have a project just like that. we have an interstate that runs right through a black, middle-class neighborhood and tore it asunder. but it's not just roads, railroads, courts and airports. the good news is, there's a ton of creativity out there. it's not always about getting rid of the highway are resources. sometimes redesigning an on-ramp or providing transit access. i think we're hoping to get it out early this year. in terms of the first round. the interesting challenge is, as the commis

the funds. so n. past board has approved conditions like upon full funding groement or adding oversight requirements. last but in the least i have a few on out reach approach. our goal to ensure we have inclusive planning for all of the work. won't want to provide an opportunity for folks to weigh in on the project priors themselves and also on the policies to guide the administration of the program. and our i will mention our committee made it clear it is important to the success of the plan that we have an inclusive process. here are a few tools i will not read out that we plan to use to support the planning process. few of them we would tloik have i targeted equity rounds table and provide an opportunity for the plan add sunrise we committee members to come together in an optional meeting and broader efforts such as virtual town hall and surveys. we are target action in john for the strategic plan. we acknowledge we may to extend past then. prop l effective april first the board can only appr

we have 40 funds over the size of $2 billion in the u.s. in europe, we have three funds.t the -- we do not have the means of supporting the creation or scale up of these firms. dani: you're coming from behind. the u.s. and asia is growing larger. how long do you foresee it to take to get to a place where you want to be at where those funds are readily available for european tech looking to refinance? alain: it will be quite fast for the europe initiative. the first investment should come in the first quarter out of this year. the idea that the ultimate goal is to finance about 15 to 20 big are funds, so beyond $1 billion, and making significant steps as big as other players in the world. doing that, we will be much closer to them and offering more support quickly in finances. dani: you mentioned that 22 member states are supportive of this and given all of the concerns around europe, fragmentation has been part of the conversation. in trying to get member states onboard, what would you say is the state of cohesion among eu board members? alain: this is a larger question.

which is still in the stage of accumulation of pension funds will be funds will be paid through banks, and to the accounts of these individuals upon application, which are the fund's client, participant. the fund will have to send. e to the agency to issue this application. it will be possible at home and send e, come with him to the bank agent that will be selected. how much will a contributor of a non-state pension fund receive in the event of an insured event. what amount is guaranteed to him? this, of course, is the most important thing at the accumulation stage. that is, if the pension has not yet been paid, but is accumulated on a nominal pension account, the maximum amount of compensation, taking into account investment income, will be 1 million 400,000 rubles. at the same time. if the pension has already been assigned, it will continue to be paid in the amount of no more than two sizes of social old-age pension today in non-state pension funds, citizens have placed a very impressive amount of about. one trillion six hundred billion rubles , the new law guarantees the protectio

it is to do with overall funding. i suppose the _ funding.nk you very much. let's bring in the _ key question. thank you very much. let's bring in the conservative i key question. thank you very much. let's bring in the conservative mp i let's bring in the conservative mp for west worcestershire and chair of the treasury select committee. first of all, has your constituency got money? of all, has your constituency got mone ? , ., , of all, has your constituency got mone ? , . , of all, has your constituency got mone?, , of all, has your constituency got mone?, money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled _ money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled to _ money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled to wake _ money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled to wake up _ money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled to wake up to - money? yes, i may west midlands mp and i was thrilled to wake up to the i and i was thrilled to wake up to the news this morning that our melbourne theatre bid has been succes

funds for the federal side of our program. and we generally are programed out on our own without the use of a public-private partnership. so, it would really be a major shift in our operations, but i think the one thing that we can do is start as d.o.t.'s to look at revenue sources that are different than those that come from the tax receipts on fuel or whatever the source may be, local option sales taxes and so, as we go forward with programs like the electric vehicle infrastructure, charging network, that would most likely built as a concession, what we're looking to do is to be able to award a contract to one, two or three that are going to build that out and charge for the ability for someone to use and d.o.t.'s because we're paying for them and paying for the systems should get a return and then we can use those funds differently perhaps. in order for us to -- we'd love to build, to look at the ability to use managed lanes more frequently at d.o.t., but that requires additional capacity and we can't convert a cart lane to

general fund, the tree maintenance fund, funded specifically by gas tax or road fund. we're going to really drive to the nature of the come flexity and all the funding sources. so on the capitol side, it's very common for us to touch hundreds of resources annually in addition to funds that are dedicated specifically to public works. i think the main thing that i would want to highlight if you look year after year at the line, our new budget is 107 tho positions which relevant 10% increase year over year and that's driven by two things. in the budget system, and the way budgeting works, you assume you cannot filet new position until the beginning of a second quarter. so the position is not fully funded. so a lot of increase is just relate today what we would consider the annualization of those positions, going from point 79 to 8.0. so each get appoint increase. that's part of the increase. and it's set by the deletion of some positions with the passagage of prop b1.0. we had a new director, new, general admin interest structure around it. identified in the ballot write-

so -- this is the position that fully funded. asking for funds to upgrade the position. moving on to a different division the ethics at work program a new team we built out. the funding for this position provide starting october first of 2021. it is a little over a year we had funding. at that time we wanted build out this team to address a lot of concerns regarding corruption. you know we saw the need to provide greater support and resources for city departments. had they are working on building out trin and materials that can be sdrkted departments and provide workshops and, trainings for the departments. something that we have not had the capacity toft do. but now the team fully red and built out and working on data available. the whole team all of the positions in the team their funding will expire the end of june next year. . we are asking to convert to permanent positions we seen the work and see this will be on going need to provide this support. so -- we are asking for on going funding for these positions. move being on to enforce am division. we were allocated 3

today's modificationed whiches a few funding source. there is federal funding via arpa funds.te allocation from the older adult recovery and resilience funding. and also local dignity fund dollars. become in september you approved one time only modification of 160,000 in order to ensure there was in the a gap in service as the institute on aging ramped up and launched the grant newly awarded them. the scope modifications i will walk through are additions from the september modification but worth noting is today's modification will also cover the prior one time only scope additions approved in september. today includes respite hours 2, 240 hours for this fiscal 22-23 and additional 4, 440 respite 94s fiscal 23-24. the rest the modifications are both for fiscal 23, 22, 23 and 23-24. individual counciling short term 100 hours in 22 and 23 and 2324. care giver support groups 120 hours both fiscal years. care giver counciling both fiscal years and public information for care givers 8 additional activities and resource both fiscal years. provides high quality services for care giver

but— fund in egypt. but unfortunately, i fund in egypt. but. unfortunately, there fund in egypt. there is no money, and will take i unfortunately, there is no. money, and will take another four, — money, and will take another four, five _ money, and will take another four, five years _ money, and will take another four, five years to _ money, and will take another four, five years to bring i money, and will take another four, five years to bring the l four, five years to bring the procedures, _ four, five years to bring the procedures, guidelines, i four, five years to bring thel procedures, guidelines, and then— procedures, guidelines, and then they— procedures, guidelines, and then they developed - procedures, guidelines, and . then they developed countries to put— then they developed countries to put money _ then they developed countries to put money. and _ then they developed countries to put money. and of- then they developed countries to put money. and of course l to put money. and of course although _ to put money. and of course although in— to put money. and of course alt

these bad-faith arguments we do not have sufficient funds, funding something as important as security of senior citizens, is just a ridiculous argument area i think the hold that ceiling should be eliminated. it makes no sense in the current framework of our monetary system , which is a sovereign currency. not a tax revenue-based currency model, which means we have the funds. the u.s. government can issue its own currency any value we want. we don't need to raise taxes, we do not need to do any of that. the way federal expenditures are funded, it is all issued currency. it is not from tax revenue. the arguments we have about the budget are irrational. host: to baltimore, william is on the line. caller: good morning, thanks for c-span. i am going to receive may vary for social security check on wednesday this year. it is quite an anticipated moment. my wife has been receiving checks for about a veer -- a year. we have worked hard in social security is the people's money. we earned it, paid taxes all her lives. republicans at every opportunity -- with this trickle-down economy fairytale

fund. when you incorporate the general fund into the picture, things look better and slightly more stable. this is partial due to the fact that, not all of our restricted revenue changes based on declining enrollment in the way that majority of our restricted general fund calculation forecast is developed. we do have to be deliberate and cautious in how we plan for restricted funding because it's unrestricted and we have to make sure we're a widing by requirement and understanding how the funds are intended to use. that said, state grantsds, new local measures, and now other sources of short-term funding, do present a new opportunity for sf u.s. d over the next couple of years for planning and prioritization to make sure that we are fully tapping into all of the funding sources that we have available to us. next slide. we're looking back to only unrestricted general funds. looking at the trend from first interim over the next two years, you'll see that our fund balance will be drawn down to

out of non-capital funds and on those are funds outside of the building inspection fund a small amount of general fund that was allocated to dbi by supervisors for um, prior specific projects i believe some sort of outreach effort and so you'll see all dbi expenditures are encompassed in this table and. next slide, please. . and in the final item we'll talk about is a look at the permit and you'll see from the numbers on the next slide year to date received a number of permits about 11 percent less, however, due to this one big project by broont preliminarily the total evaluation of all permit that the same as last year at the same time year to date. next slide, please. so here's the slide is similar to when has been present in the past that shows this year to date so july through november for last year and this year. both a number of permits and the evaluation and looking forward to working with you all to refine this and i'm available for questions.. next slide, please. last slide. thank you. >> thank you. president bito you wanted to add any commissioners have anything i don't know

of the funding going to end tia. this is deeply concerning. as i argue in congress, with the debating the infrastructure bill in tia fumbled to bring the broadband access to more communities. back in 2009 the stimulus bill allocated 4.7 billion to expand broadband access in rural and underserved areas. it didn't go very well. the agency struggled with implementation. if there were issues with a number of the project is the agency approved. others resulted in a significant amount meaning they resulted in the construction of additional broadband infrastructure areas that already had access to broadband add to the taxpayers expense. more recently last year end tia called for volunteers to help determine how to allocate to the $1.5 billion congress provided for certain broadband programs. that is unacceptable. and i'm afraid without stringent oversight, in tia will make and has already made the same mistakes managing the $42.5 billion broadband equity access deployment program in tribal broadband connected programs. that

a no funds provisioned is no funds can be spent to do x, y or z. those are debated when there is divided government. democrats to have riders in bills that were opposed by the trump administration. it goes both ways. sometimes, they can be successful appearance sometimes they get stripped out of the negotiating process, which would be with the white house saying we are not going to vote for a bill unless these things are taken out. it is a negotiation. >> to give one quick example, for epa for example, i happen to cover there has been one of these riders in the last several appropriations acts where there is an epa was prohibited from spending money on a certain collection of greenhouse gas reporting on a certain kind of agricultural facility. it is a very specific part of -- epa has not issued regulations. what comes down to for the agency as they cannot issue regulations that cannot collect information. there is a blank when it comes to data for that particular type of facility within this program. as the agency is trying to collect information o

that's how i think this year we can count on funds from the international monetary fund. eh are not necessaryhe fact is, but cooperation - the imf is necessary. the fact is that eh, western partners such as the european union, the united states, in principle, have already made such serious promises regarding the financing of the eh budget deficit of ukraine in this year and in in principle, these funds are sufficient and the attraction of additional financing from the imf is, well, let's say it is uncertain at the same time for the 24th year, next year we have to think about it, the funding source of funding is not yet available -e are not clear , perhaps it would be more national for the ministry of finance to postpone not taking money from the ministry of internal affairs now, but to count on these funds in the next year, while the very cooperation with the imf is the implementation of all these e-e mentioned beacons a signal to the owners of the donor countries that we are here we are moving in the right direction, that is, to conduct this kind of thing as an institution that checks the cr

christ in your person the staff of the fund promoting innovation the activities of the fund is the most important direction in supporting the technological development of our country all today's results in science in the future achievement is the subject of special attention of the president of russia the government and scientific technological impulses are capable of, but qualitatively change first of all, the lives of our people give new impulses to our economy, technologies and ensure the stable progressive development of the russian federation in the long term, a significant part of the fund's efforts is aimed at helping the initiative youth of our students to those who are not indifferent, and competitions for schoolchildren are held for innovations in science, young scientists are allocated and projects are being carried out in such promising areas as intelligence it is a solution that is now very popular among young people, please tell us about the work of the foundation in more detail what results were achieved in 2022, of course, youth is a priority for us. it is clear that it

of the swiss state fund.s is a program for the thermal modernization of public buildings in the city of zhytomyr. i will say that the losses are the normative losses of ukraine for enterprises of the heat and power industry. they are legal losses . should be at the level of 12 and 14%. to date , in zhytomyr, these losses in the network are only 4.5%. therefore, this is another way to reduce gas consumption. thank you, mr. serhiy serhiy sukhomlin, the mayor of zhytomyr, who is in the city. charles michel of the european council has already held talks with president volodymyr zelensky, and zelensky called them meaningful and expressed confidence that ukraine and the european union have achieved significant results in the historic rapprochement. before that, the head of the european council visited a rehabilitation center for ukrainian soldiers and there he said that he continues to work on increasing the supply of weapons for ukraine . this information is important. believes that ukraine and the eu have already

look at the pension fund, these private pension funds are what they seem like.e the war , i gave 16 annual pensions. and we multiply it by 20 years, then what goes around is a normal amount. well, here they are for you. yes, i don't know who gave such a figure, but because in 2014 it was already 49%, and in 2008, during the crisis, it should have been no less 25% yes, for many years during these 20 years, not only 16%, the return was negative, yes . if you want to see how much of this thousand you would have left today , i will tell you the scary figure of 378 uah per thousand of your investments. in 2004, it turned would be uah 378 in 2022 if you stupidly bought 200 you would have 8,000 dollars, so the effectiveness of these funds is precisely in this figure , why are they so actively being lobbied, why is the government so actively trying to introduce a mandatory accumulated system, emphasize once again that the word mandatory is not always used mandatory because the savings system in ukraine is in place for 20 years, now they want to force employees to save m

the funds. so n. past board has approved conditions like upon full funding groement or adding oversight requirements. last but in the least i have a few on out reach approach. our goal to ensure we have inclusive planning for all of the work. won't want to provide an opportunity for folks to weigh in on the project priors themselves and also on the policies to guide the administration of the program. and our i will mention our committee made it clear it is important to the success of the plan that we have an inclusive process. here are a few tools i will not read out that we plan to use to support the planning process. few of them we would tloik have i targeted equity rounds table and provide an opportunity for the plan add sunrise we committee members to come together in an optional meeting and broader efforts such as virtual town hall and surveys. we are target action in john for the strategic plan. we acknowledge we may to extend past then. prop l effective april first the board can only appr

i think transparency is needed when it comes to getting the funds and distributing the funds.ng nations. it's only in sri lanka. even some of the developed nations, the corruption level is there. but there has to, i think when it comes to loss and damage, there needs to be a proper system, a data management system. so if the data in there, then the loss and damage can actually give — the fund can actually give the amount according to that data, and then we can make sure that the money goes into the people that are needed, in need of the fund. so, and there has to be a transparent system as well so that... i mean, the developed nations, i mean, they are sending their taxpayers' money, and they need to know that their money is well spent. so it is up to us to make sure that they feel good about themselves as well and then show that there is not going to be any corruption here and everything should be transparent. natasha, what do you think about what you've heard the panel said? well, i mean, given the historic reported misappropriation of funds in — notjust in sri lanka, but ac

we have very good buyers working in the fund, i have a very cool one the director of the fund and theysome keys to people's hearts and i don't want to say what exactly, but we buy at such prices that, well, no other fund in ukraine buys this nomenclature if others find out about it market participants, they will simply sew up those dealers that we take, or they will simply stop shipping what we buy from the manufacturer's country, and it just so happens that i'm just not a big fan of losses in the volunteer environment, you know, ah, hmm. well, for example, we look at purchases there of our colleagues in the workshop and we understand that here people have purchased certain communication systems, for example, for 700 euros per unit. i know that we also took 435 euros each . cool, but these are not as cool as us, but this brutality would be natural, but then it means that you if you do not report on these units in order not to create things in the environment, they communicate well enough with our donors reporting, which we have always used when we show. this is what we buy, what we tak

funds. i also applaud the sec for authorizing several charges relating to mr. bankman-fried. i look forward to additional actions to hold him accountable and make customers more whole again. i yield back. i now recognize the ranking member of the committee, the gentleman from north carolina, mr. mchenry for five minutes. >> thank you, madam chairman. we have heard everything but the truth. tweets, dms, and interviews are no substitute for the fact. that is why chairman waters and i were together to get this hearing together. the first bipartisan hearing of this committee in the past four years. we have work together to invite to witnesses. one, mr. ray, who has proven to be a reliable witness. second, well, frankly, i look forward to getting his lies here on the record under oath. nevertheless, the arrest of sam bankman-fried's welcome news. it still does not get to the bottom of what happened at ftx, why it happened, and who else may be responsible. we need to understand the flow of funds b

, and 39 projects have already been funded. they are anticipated to create or preserve over 1000 units of affordable housing. in addition, the general assembly created a standalone department of housing that went into effect january 1 of this year. i am committed to building a capable department of housing that is up to the challenge and opportunity that this moment represents. my budget will create a robust state agency with additional funding to help our unsheltered population and set them on a pathway to housing. but one person, one department or even one entire administration cannot address this problem alone. the general assembly has and will continue to play a role. cities and towns have a role to play. developers have a role to play. nonprofits and foundations have a role to play. our institution of higher learning have a role to play. our business community has a role to play. we must come together and work as one team if we are serious about addressing this problem. our economic future depends on creating room for popu