on this let's speak with fergus hudson from the political a political analyst from the future of freedom foundation. so russia and china traditionally stand together to resist u.n. resolutions on syria put forward by the west now this is kind of like a big issue that's tough to put in a nutshell i guess but why is there such a division between these two permanent security council members and the rest of them so they have a closer relationship with syria only much more reluctant to support interventions . of the russian. military and naval capacity as it has a base in syria so there are various reasons why i wouldn't i wouldn't say it's a distinction as you might have characterize it because china has said that it basically taking a neutral position on this and not necessarily supporting or opposing what syria is doing. so far russia has taken most of the criticism from the west for the double veto with china why do you think the reaction why do you think china's decision seems less harsh here. they have made the point clearly that they are not taking a position either way they're not a lot of thems

go the american future of freedom foundation i don't think group that we go home and so would a final resolution on syria looks like the west will think he needs a new on motion for its own agenda in the region. that's the whole idea of these resolutions that their condition no matter how tightly they are constructed they will always be construed to do whatever the u.s. government the british government want to do well one thing's for certain this is a problem for the syrian people to resolve not for the u.s. government the british government the united nations this is a problem for the syrian people so obviously that the main thrust of u.s. foreign policy is regime change we've seen that time in common humanity and begins with sanctions those into embargoes blockades but ultimately the quest is to remove a recalcitrant dictatorship install a u.s. regime even if it happens to be a dictatorship so this is another classic example of where the u.s. is but in india other people's affairs when it really has no business doing so. right now on our website i. think will be called the u.n. sec