the editor-in-chief of the journal of russian global politics russia in global politics fyodor aleksandrovich lukyanovnsibly. i’ll just answer with his words, listen collision with rain normalization of the situation, a full-fledged cold war, in which there can be no ideological semitones, the side is chosen clear and unambiguous. under this lined up all the logistics and mat, providing a deviation from the canonical position of the corresponding block is not allowed and entails sanctions. that's exactly why the west does not allow freedom of speech, because the canonical position has been established in the west, which is that russia is evil and the west, respectively, is good , and everything that deviates from this canonical position , any semitones, they are suppressed and eradicated in violation. of course, this most notorious freedom of speech. we are in a new state in the new edition of the cold war, and which has in including the ideological and information dimension. actually. this is part of this new cold war - this is confirmation that this is what we are dealing with dmitry well, as you kn

i am glad to welcome you to our studio already fyodor aleksandrovich lukyanov is present, director ofat the valdai international discussion club, and fyodor aleksandrovich, editor-in-chief of the magazine russia in global affairs hello in the current crisis, erdogan, as a diplomat looks either a modern tolerant, or an honest bismarck broker, in your opinion, so whether he is sophisticated in diplomacy or others just made so many mistakes that, compared with them, the turkish leader looks so successful against their background. i think, that it is we who, at a historical distance, idealize this veranda and bismarck, and they seem to us to be some kind of hyperboreans, such supermen and super-diplomats. uh, it must have looked a lot different up close, much less avant-garde in that sense too. well, maybe you can compare. uh, later, there centuries or decades, at least, probably, turkey's policy during this period will be looked at as, for example, extremely sophisticated. in general, quite successful diplomacy, but he looks better compared to others, but it’s hard to say here. everyone

it’s not enough in the strategic world thank you very much for the excellent analytics fyodor aleksandrovich lukyanove continue our program. indeed, we talk a lot about the wise and cunning position of mr. erdokan, and now not since recently, the heading portraits periodically appears in our program. so right now i would like to tell our viewers in more detail . who is the turkish person mr. arkan please recep erdogan began his political career while still a student in 1975. he organized a youth movement for the icelandic national salvation party. however, after the military coup in 1980, lost his job because of his poly activities and was forced to join the army. after returning from service, erdogan again set his sights on politics from 1983 to 1994 , his political activities were entirely associated with the welfare party, which actively participated in the ruling islamic coalition, then erdogan was able to establish contact with the local residents of istanbul who in 1994 elected him mayor of the city from 2003 2015 erdogan was the prime minister of turkey in whose hands the main power in the cou

fyodor lukyanov, editor-in-chief of the russia in global affairs magazine, will join our airwaves. we continue the discussion in sasu program is authorized to declare. i am glad to welcome fedor aleksandrovich, director of research at the valdai international discussion club, and editor-in-chief of the magazine russia in global affairs, fedor aleksandrovich , are already present in our studio. , in your opinion, is it true that he is sophisticated in diplomacy, or that others just made so many mistakes that, if we compare turkish leaders with them against their background look so successful. i think that at a historical distance we are idealizing telegrams and bismarck, and they seem to us to be some kind of hyperboreans, such supermen and super-diplomats. uh, it must have looked a lot different up close, much less avant-garde in that sense too. well, maybe you can compare. uh, later, there centuries or decades, at least, probably, turkey's policy during this period will be looked at as, for example, extremely sophisticated. in general, quite successful diplomacy, but does it look better against the background of others, but here it’s hard to say everyone is good now so , to be honest, to c