it's not the same thing, but fyodor alexandrovich well, probably not the same thing, probably it is clears a certain mitigation. yes, so to speak, but here's the answer to this question. i, as such a standard historian, will always remember that how, in fact, this question was answered before me, yes, and here. in general, we can immediately say that , by and large, when it came to the laws of history, it was, in general, an attempt to transfer some rules of the game, say, from the natural sciences, yes , to the science of man. therefore, i would still, probably, not talk about the laws of history, more precisely, i would not say so. in the ordinary sense , in the sense that out of many people they are trying to create a certain system. yes, so to speak, which is like, as if there are atoms in it, they are people , yes, to say, who really seem to play there according to certain rules , so to speak, they do not intrude, yes, naturally, science, but a person is free, and in this sense he is, uh, far away, not always predictable. and it may be, by the way, that he is free - this is a certain