they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying it was decided that g m o's would be generally regarded as safe and not need testing as would befit a novel food or drug product this designation was given without a single long term food safety study backing it dmoz are on our plates because of a single sentence of the f.d.a. policy would says that the agency is not aware of any information showing that humans are significantly different and because of this sentence they say no safety testing is necessary they say that monsanto could put a g.m. crop on your plate without even telling the f.d.a. because they say months or two could tell if the foods are say. you know you might say i'm talking about bud santo the same coverity that swore p.c.b. were safe and got fired seven hundred million dollars for quietly poisoning the town in anniston alabama dick's their p.c.b. factory the monsanto the told us all know d.d.t. is safe it's go

they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying it was decided that g m o's would be generally regarded as safe and not need testing as would befit a novel food or drug product this designation was given without a single long term food safety study backing it dmoz are on our plates because of a single sentence of the f.d.a. policy would says that the agency is not aware of any information showing that humans are significantly different and because of this sentence they say no safety testing is necessary they say that monsanto could put a g.m. crop on your plate without even telling the f.d.a. because they say months or two could tell if the foods are say. you know you might say i'm talking about blood santo the same cody that swore p.c.b. were safe and got fired seven hundred million dollars for quietly poisoning the town in anniston alabama next the p.c.b. factory the monsanto the told us all know d.d.t. is safe it's good for

they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying it was decided that g m o's would be generally regarded this. safe and not need testing as would befit a novel food or drug product this designation was given without a single long term food safety study backing it d m o's are on our plates because of a single sentence of the f.d.a. policy would says that the agency is not aware of any information showing that you moods are significantly different and because of this sentence they say no safety testing is necessary they say that monsoon could put a g.m. crop on your plate without even telling the f.d.a. because they said it was suited to tell if the foods are say. you know your blood sample talking about blood santo the same covertly that swore p.c.b. were safe or got fired seven hundred million dollars for quietly poisoning the town in anniston alabama next to their p.c.b. factory the monsanto the told us all know d.d.t. is safe

they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent to comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying it was decided that g m o's would be generally regarded as safe and not need testing as would befit a novel food or drug product this designation was given without a single long term food safety study backing it dmoz are on our plates because of a single sentence of the f.d.a. policy would says that the agency is not aware of any information showing that humans are significantly different and because of this sentence they say no safety testing is necessary they say that monsanto could put a g.m. crop on your plate without even telling the f.d.a. . because they say they want syria to tell if the foods are say. you know you might say i'm talking about blood santo the same covertly that swore p.c.b. were safe or got fired seven hundred million dollars for quietly poisoning the town in anniston alabama ticks their p.c.b. factory the monsanto the told us all know d.d.t. is safe it'

g. m o's approved for food and feed were unsafe he published the results in the peer reviewed international journal of biological sciences three knowing if g m o's are safe for people to eat or do we not know that yet well at least we know that they are unsafe only tested and they present signs of toxicity we don't the mary show variants out tested there are actually two around that she is feeling with her on the it is not it is not excluding rhonda they're having side contains a lot more like jose which makes it a lot more toxic geisel said itself the active principle of front up is not herbicide by itself it needs there to chance it needs adjutants it needs other products inside the bottle in order to be really active. also considers most of genetic engineering is for herbicide resistant it's spring. and that kills all the weeds except killed all the plants except for the crops that were genetically engineered while this life was saved itself can get into the water and this herbicide but not only the but the other chemicals they use there cerf octant and other chemicals in the made of the

they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent to comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying it was decided that g m o's would be generally regarded as safe and not need testing as would befit a novel food or drug product this designation was given without a. long term food safety study backing it dmoz are on our plates because of a single sentence of the f.d.a. policy would says that the agency is not aware of any information showing that you moods are significantly different and because of this sentence they say no safety testing is necessary they say that monsoon could put a g.m. crop on your plate without even telling the f.d.a. because they say one suiter could tell if the foods are say. you know you might say i'm talking about blood santo the same covertly that swore p.c.b. were safe and got fired seven hundred million dollars for quietly poisoning the town in anniston alabama ticks the p.c.b. factory the monsanto the told us all know d.d.t. is safe it's good fo

any scientists who tells you they know that g m o's are safe and not to worry about it is either ignorant of the history of science or is deliberately lying nobody knows what the long term effects will be geneticists dr david suzuki genetically engineered foods go through a rigorous review before they are approved the review includes analysis of the trams sharing plant versus its parent and there's a standard that you have to meet called substantial equivalence they have to be equivalent in terms of nutrients have to be equivalent in terms of processing they really have to be basically indistinguishable except for the transgenic trait the concept of g m o's being substantially equivalent to comes from the first bush administration when under heavy industry lobbying.

the countries that are part of the t p p peru they just had a ten year moratorium japan they label g m o's and when there's a contamination a vent in the united states as we've recently had an oregon over a week they block imports from the u.s. so. these are targets monsanto and the government are both working to to stop the so called barriers to trade but you know it alexis it's ok because when santa along with du pont just launched this new website called juno answers dot com where they answer was this is a lot of splaying to do like this and they answer a lot of grievances and they talk about how healthy g m o's are providing transparency of course the issue why do you think now i mean you know this web site are they really feeling the mounting pressure here for what is going to happen eventually in the united states will probably pass the labeling law and washington this year in november it'll be a ballot initiative and we expect it to pass that's the beginning of the end of this type of secrecy where consumers don't know what they're eating you know month santo democracy because democ

boy cult the current number one target monsanto tuneup with government to block even labeling of g m o's month mto did noise the charge thing you can help end world hunger forbes knows has been voted the most evil corporation on the planet under competition from britain's most boycotted firm nestlé four thousand children are dying every day because the not being breast fed woman's unicef mislay says that those who accept breast is best but it's spend billions on lies about syria and dangerous nuclear subs to counter the nail dominee much of the world knows campaign group baby milk action is called made to my prey he joins us thanks a lot for coming on why is misplaced so disquieted. which we think you stay the worst of the companies it promotes the milk around the world striving it. has these layers all the time highlighting specific gradients or as i say the evidence just support the claims made through them but there is a roach in trying that they form it will protect babies in trees if the baby settles for me it's more likely to be sick and i breastfed it in conditions of poverty it's

called the current number one target mom son totoo not with government to block even labeling of g m o's month i'm too did noise the charge thing it can help end world hunger forbes knows has been voted the most evil corporation on the planet under competition from britain's most point call to firm nestlé fulfills and children of dying every day because the not being breasted woman is unicef mislay says that those who accept breast is best but it's been billiam boma law is about inferior and dangerous to the hound of the dominee much of the world knows campaign group baby milk action is called me to my pretty joins us thanks a lot for coming on why isn't this place. which we think you stay the rest of the company's it promotes the milk around the world striving it. has these layers all the time highlighting specific great answers as i say the evidence doesn't support the claims made for them but there is a roach in trying that they form it will protect these entries it's a baby step down for me it's more like six and i breastfed it in conditions of of it's a small boy like. national is r

eaten them and not even known it one study from french scientist eric serra leni found a link between g m o's and cancer dr robert byrne hoff explained a fairly new study in this way then france there is a good study two years that it's getting to work or him to read but it's early and he'd be this great goalie of rats and sure the standard cancer since his arrest as it has an answer institute uses and eighty percent of the government's got breast cancer i think that's significant oh sixty percent of the male rats got up on the cancers and the vets are giving after being fed months into his roundup ready g.m.o. corn the roundup herbicide for two years according to the sara lee new study female rats produce massive tumors on mammary glands and gulf in their body for male rats testicular and abdominal cancers occurred both sexes displayed on the liver as well as kidney failure and yet month santos was just awarded a major humanitarian award for its contributions to society food and drug administration declined to comment on dr sara lee new study as well as the effects of bromides found in commo

any scientists who tells you they know that g m o's are safe and not worry about it is either ignorant of the history of science or is due.

any scientists who tells you they know that g m o's are safe and not to worry about it is either ignorant of the history of science or is deliberately lying nobody knows what the long term effects will be geneticists dr david suzuki genetically engineered foods go through a rigorous review before they are approved the review includes analysis of the trams sharing plant versus its parent.

any scientists who tells you they know that g m o's are safe and not to worry about it is either ignorant of the history of science or is deliberately lying nobody knows what the long term effects will be geneticists dr david suzuki genetically engineered foods go through a rigorous review before they are approved the review includes analysis of the trams plant versus its parent and there's a standard that you have to be called so.

a lot of splaying to do and they answer a lot of grievances they talk about how healthy g m o's are providing transparency of course of the issue why do you think now i mean you know this website are they really feeling the mounting pressure here for what is going to happen eventually in the united states will probably pass the labeling law and washington this year in november it'll be a ballot initiative and we expected to pass that's the beginning of the end of this type of secrecy where consumers don't know what they're eating you know month santo hates democracy because democracy works against them the new york times just did a poll showing that ninety three percent of americans want to know what they're eating and whether it contains genetically modified organism also in that poll it showed that more than half of us would not be modified food if we did if we know so clearly democracy doesn't work for months they have to use other means and they have to use tens of billions of dollars of propaganda campaigns this website the prop thirty seven and the prop thirty seven campaign i mean spea

any scientists who tells you they know that g m o's are safe and not to worry about it is either ignorant of the history of science or is deliberately lying nobody knows what the long term effects will be geneticists dr david suzuki genetically.

and not even known it one study from french scientists real eric serra leni found a link between g m o's and cancer dr robert byrne hof explained the sara lee new study in this way in france there was a study through your study of eating g.m. our core into rats but it's early any. goalie rats are sure this better cancer sensitive breast as a national yes or institute uses eighty percent of the reds got breast cancer i think that's significant because fifty percent of the male resco develop cancer as an investigator after being fed months and as roundup ready g.m.o. corn the roundup herbicide for two years according to the sara lee new study female rats produced massive tumors on mammary glands and golfing their body for male rats testicular and abdominal cancers occurred both sexes displayed lesions on the liver as well as kidney failure and yet months santos was just awarded a major humanitarian award for its contributions to society food and drug administration declined to comment on dr sara lee new study as well as the effects of bromance found in common processed foods we're told her

the sunny side hotel across the street we've met with the howard garden group and contract o-m-g and pearls burgers up the street. we have a letter that we printed or presented before district 6 i believe they'll be sending a letter of support. this is going to be a great project. the group has fairly deep pockets and i think some of my conversation with officer chin has been if you don't have enough money to meet payroll and to keep the rent paid you start taking risks and this group can pay rent and never have people's no. one show. there have been no incidents in the night clubs expect a couple on broadway and that's because it was on broadway. i think it's going back going to be a great project and i request a conditional grant and if you have any questions we'll answer them >> do you contact the building dribble above you. >> yes, that's the lawrence hotel. >> we did have with club 6 there was quite a bit of sound issues and charles came in and when the black room or the darkroom was done there was a bunch of work but through charles and associates there was a lot of sound done

o casos para dererterminar quiene califivccan para vis visa "u" ee paÍs . >> es todo por mi parte adelante . >> gracias por la informaciÓn . >> en este mismo esfuerzo en g chicago autoridades de mcon la ayuda a vÍctima de trafico humano o de vdoiolencia domÉstica tambien grabacion de t traficante que le dieron cadena perpetua por golpear, secuestro y la prostituyo y la marco coen cuello . >> en texas inmigrante casi mu r muere asfixiada en camiÓn de d mudanza el vehÍculo parado por p policÍa despuÉs de viraje en u , decena de indocumentados abren las puertas y corren pero sond e etenidos en la escena . >> en chiapas, mÉxico, tragedia matan a mujer y secuestran a sus j hijos, busca la policÍa a esp a esposa, es espos esposespos esposo, es muersstra de la vul a vulnerabilidad . >> mil recuerdos lo que paso d nadie lo olvida . >> los hermanos fueron secuest a secuestrados, desupiuÉs que l d madre es asesinatoda y enterrad en el patio por su esposo . >> supuestamente ella trabajaba . ,>> y el hombre? . >> el cuidaba a los bebes . >> teniÍan una semana en chiapa, el gobierno del estado comenzÓ c la alerta amber por los niÑos, tienen nombres de angÁngeles p e el padre parece demonio,

the o-m-g insider starts at entertainment tonight at 7:30. look at 'em.on cloud nine with that u-verse wireless receiver. you see in my day, when my mom was repainting the house, you couldn't just set up a tv in the basement. i mean, come on! nope. we could only watch tv in the rooms that had a tv outlet. yeah if we wanted to watch tv someplace else, we'd have to go to my aunt sally's. have you ever sat on a plastic covered couch? [ kids cheering ] you're missing a good game over here. those kids wouldn't have lasted one day in our shoes. [ male announcer ] add a wireless receiver. call to get u-verse tv for just $19 a month with qualifying bundles. rethink possible. >> catherine: still to come. we'll recap our top stories. >> catherine: restaurant worker who was injured in last night's rally for trayvon martin in oakland.. how he's doing -- next >> reporter: i will explain in the next edition of people behaving badly coming up. >> jacqueline: low clouds already booming backhand with an knight of foggy conditions on with normal weather had. [ man ] we hav

say a-b-c-d-e-f-g h-i-j-k-l-m-n-o-p i'll be damned if i let them grow up without a father like i did.'t know who my daddy is, so if i was to ever meet him, i'd probably hit him in his mouth. dude's been making up songs. >> does he? >> he got one called "my money in my pocket." ♪ my money in my pocket, money in my pocket ♪ >> while voltz strives to be a father to his children, he must also reconcile his relationship with deuce's mother. >> thank you for sending that money or giving them the money to send. >> check. >> raise it to me. >> i got me some hygiene products. i ain't ordered no food yet. i haven't cried in a long time. tell him i love him. spider-man! all right, child, i got to go. >> money in his pocket. >> he got money and he ain't [bleep] me up. and one day, i heard him singing that. >> money in his pocket. >> trying to be influential to my kids. i mean, that's my life. that's my sunshine. when i talk to my kids, i brighten up. other than that, i got to get back to reality, and this right here what you see is reality. >> for deamon beavers, reality is 23 hours a day in a se

artie's debate program cross talk could love l o b asking his guests whether an army backed coup could well be imminent a preview of what's to come at a thirty am g m t. two questions i heard on the one was do you think that this will actually be a coup or just a means of transition by other means and also what about the the money going the way there's a dissenter going to who. brian right well when the military is coming in and taking a level of authority away from a democratically elected regime then that meets my standard of a coup we can call put lipstick on a pig and say it's a transitionary phase or but i think of those are the words that have been uttered in every coup that has ever taken place throughout human history also the words this is not a coup have been said in every all i'll take the power and i'll give it back to you maybe in the future ok sounds like algeria to me one hundred ninety two in two thousand and eleven i don't think that we have a reason not to trust that the military will do the generals until we did a remarkably good job in my opinion given the challenges that he faced when he was head of the army into those eleven a