people and i don't think you can solve this simply breaking up companies you have to put something g.d.p. ours an attempt to go there at the european union level didn't go anywhere near far enough i get that it's tough to throw elizabeth warren a lifeline because she is not somebody they would want to get a lot of oxygen because. overall the policies seem completely divorced from let's say market realities and however the problem of monopolization of the tech sector whether it's apple computer or. you know facebook alphabets last google it seems it seems you know palpable it seems rail you know there there are there's a pricing problem going on i mean look at we've talked about amazon karl i mean amazon certainly is becoming a predatory monopolist now is on has been a predatory monopolist for a long time are you i will remind everybody that one of the first things they did when they were just a bookseller was they spammed my customer base. you know i made a lot of noise about the fact that i caught them at it and they tried to go oh no we didn't do what you spammed me personally guys i mean co

g.d.p. on it. our allies are not paying their fair share. you have to pay the minimum required two percent of g.d.p. increased defense spending the countries we are defending must pay must pay what they owe. and as we're just hearing you know he's pressuring and pushing and pushing for that super side but let's have a closer look at the military presence of the united states and china across the globe the united states currently has iraq the all profs in the eight hundred military bases all over the world were china only has one that is an africa and inch of booty now the united states has been saying that they're keeping that to maintain peace around the world but china is pretty much saying the same thing that their military base is for a piece. of a plane from beijing thanks very much for the everything on the thank you. full that pension security analyst michael maloof told us the u.s. is seeking conflict including with china to justify its own military spending. the united states. has a budget that's about five and a half times larger th

in terms of the economy, our g.d.p. grew by 3.1% over the four quarters of fiscal year 2018 while many claimed we were guilty of wishful thinking. we have met our economic forecasts two years in a row. the first administration to ever do that. we are confident that the president's historic tax reforms, deregulation, trade policy unleashing american energy will continue our economic growth. economic policies in this budget will generate more than enough revenue to pay for the tax cut. the president's budget outlines a number of key prites for the administration to continue to pursue. the budget supports public and private school choice through a federal tax credit of up to $50 billion over 10 years. while this sfration has made major progress streamlining our infrastructure permitting, we continue to request $200 billion to level up to a trillion dollars in total spending. it's the government's responsibility to protect the american people, the homeland and american way of life. it requests $750 brillion for national defe

look, we spent 16% of g.d.p. on our healthcare. the average other country does.points. anyone who writes a piece of garbage like this is not interested in solve ago problem. i think we can both agree on that. chris hahn thank you very much. >> thank you. >> tucker: leaked phone call shows how google, the most powerful company in the history of the world not opposed to congress apparently in its pocket. google tried to control the conservative's movement on immigration by cpac with own puppet. cpac is going on. last year we have the audio exclusively just ahead. democratic presidential candidate has a warning about artificial intelligence. he joining us. we are happy to have him join us after the break. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: big technos about you in some cases more about yourself. they know where you go and what you eat. may know what you think. the only thing you can't control is what your thoughts are but they are working on that too. in a 2018 phone recording obtained exclusively by this show. the head of u.s. public policy explains to google employees company was spo

him to go he spoke of our g.d.p. but in this case so where are the only people that. we should listen to eat we can learn something from he bought last practice in a nice way week in spain likely beat forget about their big deal as you go if you listen to a lot of united people. now you know then booked away and that at the state we produce them just to see how they are almost all in but he doesn't include their own if you will be and not get. less than a master of wrong doing by listening but one of the many people as well asylums even criticised by ordinary people for your saying a call for the left to embrace its radical western roots as well as what he said about refugees there are tens of thousands drowned in the mediterranean thanks to the cameron sarkozy war in libya not just europe the weather troops doc don't of these problems what mate if you look or are you just exploitation off i think i'm count that it's what happened in kiryat in iraq who cooked up the guys you spat and so on and so on if you're just open up it's bar dust then it could be a catastrophe b

percent of our g.d.p. number two all the love that we got to be a look at the productive projects or they can be from the project to the lawn so i don't see that much problem but the economic growth that was supposed to happen on the back of infrastructure development hasn't yet materialized g.d.p. growth has hovered around five percent in the last five years while that can be considered a pretty solid number for some countries it's below the government's target of seven percent and it's not enough for indonesia's development needs and ambition. economists generally agree indonesia has to keep spending and not just on building roads railways and other facilities but we also need the soft infrastructure what i mean about this stuff infrastructure is for instance capital human capital to float one which i think. is one of the up by at the of the government education in health care for instance have been given bigger allocations in the state budget physical infrastructure but jakarta's newly opened m.r.c. is

according to the center for american progress, ending daca would cost our -- would cost our g.d.p. $460 billion. let me say this again, madam speaker. ending daca will cost our g.d.p. $460 billion. that's because it would mean removing 685,000 workers out of the work force. if president trump wants to promote economic growth as he says, then why would he make such a horrible decision? i leave it up to the american people to sort out that mystery. perhaps they can do it at the polls, the ballot box, in a couple of years. perform p.s. recipients. whaths worse, madam speaker. dreamers aren't the only group president trump has decided to throw into legal limbo. over the course of his two years in office, the president has ended also temporary protective status, and i know you know that very well, madam speaker, because you represent the state of florida. for thousands of individuals, the temporary protected status end.een attempted to t.p.s. is an incredible program. it allows individuals to stay and remain in the united states for an extended period of time if some emergency erupts in thei

be able to ask about, not only on our debt and deficit but just for basic consumer spending and our g.d.p. and the growth of our economy. we deal with a lot of issues on federal workforce. we deal with regulatory reform. we walk through some of the hardest issues about how we're taking care of our veterans and what's happening to be able to take care of things like health care and transition them to vocational work because we feel it's important. we dug into small programs. for instance, an i.t. development program for veterans in muskogee, oklahoma, because if you're in the veterans service center in muskogee, they're one of the largest veteran service centers? the country. you -- centers in the country. you handle a lot of different documents. as you go through the process for the great employees that are there and there are really solid people that are there, they have to log in multiple times and use a whole list of workarounds in their system that bogs down. each employee there spends 45 minutes a day just going through the logistics of logging in and changing around their system to

association meetings in january that show that would tax cuts that were designed the way ours are designed should increase g.d.p. growth by -- last year they should have increased it by about a percent and at the beginning of the year, our forecast showed with a baseline forecast of about 2%, then we got tomb a forecast of 3.1 for 2018, based on a massive amount of liltture that showed with careful mathematical modeling that showed that we would get to 3.1% in 2018 if the tax cuts were advanced. the first g.d.p. was 3.1. the report we got in week revised it down to three so i'm off by a 10th. that's not a statistically instant error. you could say sure, maybe the tax cuts were going to affect g.d.p. but the model tells you that if this thing is going to go up by that much, that thing is going to go up by that much. capital spending should go up by 9%, example. capital spending went up by 9%. it's not because the c.e.a. is brilliant, it's because economics has become a science. against that backdrop, you'd think economists would be celebrating the victory of their science but instead it seems like, at least in t

for the first time in 13 years our g.d.p. is at 3.1% last year. that's amazing. and when i go to southeast missouri, where the folks i represent, their median income is $40,000 a year and they tell me about how they have benefited from the tax cuts and jobs act. i don't listen to this political debate and jargon saying that it only helps the wealthy because i can take you to countless individuals in southeast missouri where they came up to me and they're like, you tell president trump thank you for my $1,000 bonus that i got at the at&t call center in missouri because of his tax cuts bill. i said, no, i helped write it. the president didn't write it. i was one of the 23. he was like, thank you. or the young lady who had two broken car seats at lowe's in raleigh, missouri, and she said, because of the benefits from the tax cuts and jobs act, i was able to buy new car seats. o i want you to not have a doubt how successful the economy is going and how well the tax cuts and jobs act are affecting real americans who don't think $1,000 are crumbs. they know it's a coup

started out kind of on wednesday saying, we're lowering our inflation expectations, we're lowering our g.d.pously decreasing the rate hikes we see. so investors said, all right, we have to reprise for. that all of a sudden you combine that with really weak numbers out of europe today. >> ugly. >> sort of confirms that maybe the fed really is sort of thinking that there is a global slowdown and we have to sort of react to that in the bond markets. that's why you see the bond yield turning negative and the treasury yield curves follow shortly thereafter. >> lisa mentioned that in the past has proven to be a pretty reliable gauge indicator of recessions. give us the rundown on what has happened in the past and how long it takes before recession actually follows. >> that's what i was sort of looking at, sort of -- because the headline, of course, is that it's the lowest since 2007. first time it's inverted since 2007 of but in 2007 it was on the way up. it was inverted and then coming up. the first time it dipped from positive into negative was january, 2006. so it was about two years before the

to have to reach not zero emissions by the middle of the century on our present growth rate trajectory in terms of growing global g.d.p. and so on we're going to expand the size of the global economy by about three times in that same period which means almost three times more energy demands which makes our task of switching over to renewable energy three times more difficult than it needs to be and so the argument i make is that we need to actually scale down global energy demands and the best way to do that is to scale down the material throughput of the economy so basically rich nations like the u.k. and the u.s. need to consume less stuff in aggregate there are a whole bunch of initiatives that you recommend you see a complete ban on corporate built in obsolescence and the right to repair and the idea for any business is to increase turnover of your products so if you make long lasting products that you know people use for their entire lifetimes of course that's a horrible business model right. if you're under pressure to grow as a company you're not going to think much about long lasting products but we can we can

motor magazine this week a super sporting issue skoda introduces the kodiak our ass tearing up the track in the key of proceeds g.d.p . and the latest from the geneva international motor show.

knock out energy transportation, airlines, jobs, businesses we would probably lose 10 to 15% of our g.d.pry of energy rick perry has said we are on a fast track to burn clean energy. if people are really serious about the environment. they would go nike larr and they would go natural gas. both we lead the world. in people don't want to do that you can't have both. because even if you go electric. guess what powers those fuel plants that power up the electric car? coal. so you can't have one without the other. and also, to point out, too. there is something else going on. while democrats clearly have momentum in many ways and certainly have the house and certainly like to put the spotlight on their investigations, cpac is going on, which is this enormously successful conservative conference that started yesterday. one of the invitees was van jones. van jones, a famous confidante of barack obama, and a famous democrat and liberal has been praising the president, played a vital role in delivering democrats for the president's criminal justice reform. but, never did i think that he would be o

g.d.p. is five percent of total exports is palm oil. funded i thank you very much. more on this story on our website as d w dot com slash business to bangladesh now which has made big strides forward in fighting stream poverty one sector has helped the country like few of us the textile industry has been booming for years after china bangladesh exports more textiles than any other country in the world but the industry also struggles with a bad reputation. a textiles factory in the special economic zone on the outskirts of dhaka shows that it has come here every day for the last couple of weeks to ask for work to no avail he isn't willing to take just any job done i want to go not in many small factories they don't even pay the state minimum wage equivalent to about one hundred euros a month they might only pay eighty i don't want that in those bad factories they sometimes make you slave away i'm told through in the morning. his wife actor big on weights back home she earns the equivalent of around one hundred fifty euros a month as a seamstress it's hard for a shot to be dependent on his wif

g.d.p. on defense. and well this two percent actually kind of rings a bell we remember the presidential has been pressuring its nato allies to increase and to spend more and their and their national defense. our allies are not paying their fair share to get a second paying your bills you have to pay the minimum required two percent of g.d.p. increased defense spending the countries we are defending must pay must pay what they owe. but when we actually have a closer look of the united states military and other countries and china is it's it's a big big gap the united states has reportedly eight hundred military bases across the world and some of them are actually at the doorstep with china and south korea and japan but beijing only has one and that is in djibouti in africa. but as the united states has long been seeing about these military bases the cmos china they are keeping it for peace. ok evangelos ships us thanks very much for the overview there reporting from beijing. from pentagon security on this michael maloof told us the u.s. is seeking conflict including with china to justify its own military spending. the united states. has a budget that's about five and a half times larger than c

this is $3 trillion higher than our annual g.d.p. and equates to over $67,000 in debt to be borne by each and every american. i understand this debt is the culmination of choices that all seem responsible in the moment. my colleagues and i entered public office to serve the country and too often it is tempting to fix society by throwing money at our problems. mr. spano: however, this tactic mortgages future generations for the benefit of the present. congress has a duty to serve not only their own generation, but generations to come. and we must exercise prudence to balance the desires of the present with the needs of the future. this $22 trillion problem will require strong resolve from strong leaders. our nation looks to us this congress to correct the spending mistakes of the past and i looked for to working with you all to clear a path for our future. madam speaker, i yield back. i ask that the house do now adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the motion to adjourn. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the a

in the united states, we spend 18.5% of our g.d.p. on health care costs, and yet, we have the worst health outcomes of any peer country in the world. so today in the united states, we have the highest maternal mortality rate, right? we know what that is, that's moms dying in childbirth. we have the highest infant mortality rate. that's kids dying at young ages. and we have the lowest life expectency rate of any of our peer countries. in fact, we're the only country in the world, industrialized country in the world where life expectency is going down and not up. so we don't even have good health outcomes to show for our health care system. and that is why representative dingell and i and our 105 additional co-sponsors of the bill and representative talib and many others are part of this effort have introduced the improved medicare for all act of 2019. what this bill does is it offers, first of all, comprehensive coverage to everyone in the country and we say that that includes primary care. it includes vision, dental, hearing. it inclu

lives and i think that we'll be wise enough to clean up our own nest i think the evidence suggests that if you can get people in general above. g.d.p. of about five thousand dollars a year they start to become quite concerned with their environmental conditions and to work diligently to try to make they. this circumstances in which they live. sustainable in the long run but in conditions of dire poverty and. immediate day to day war and it's very difficult for people to attend to anything that might be remotely concerned with long term environmental sustainability professor jordan peterson thank you well someone who certainly supports the need for vigilance in the protection of the human rights of diverse groups the next guest the first muslim female peer in the house of lords berrisford and she joins me now parachuted welcome to going on the ground first of all before we get to twenty five doris' suspended result of over your reaction to the week's atrocities in birmingham five attacks four mosques hit the west midlands police saying at the time immediately after the motive behind it yet to be established i'm not surprised ok that

the same time, our economy has grown, the u.s. g.d.p. has grown 324% since 1970. while emissions of major air pollutants have dropped precipitously. over that same time frame, emissions of six common lute pluthtapts -- lead, air zone, particles, carbon monoxide, nitrogen die ox sid and sulfur dioxide have fallen 73%. for much of the history of c.a.a. this was achieved through rule making with input from industry, the states and the federal government was carefully considered to reach attainable targets. despite these success the previous administration eroded this doctrine, create cree ating inefficiencies and ways to -- and waste at the federal and state levels. the opa ma e.p.a. mandated c.a.a. regulations with minimal collaboration with the states. the regulations also ignored and exaggerated the feasibility of commercially available control technologies. this led to a lack of regulatory coordination between states and the e.p.a., and jures -- and some jurisdictional lawsuits resulting. most notably, 26 states went to the supreme court and asked for relief from

g.d.p. norms. i know many of our colleagues have other ideas, i'm anxious for the committee to consider themism support this amendment in the spirit of bipartisanship in which it's offered. any other comments? i know there are a lot of others that have ideas for budget reform that we want to make sure happen and budget reform gives a much more extensive opportunity for debate than the budget. >> may i say i appreciate the chairman's commitment to a process so all of us can have a voice and with any luck come to a strong consensus erned the leadership of the chairman and ranking member. senator enzi: thank you. nart brown. yesterday in the opening statement i reflected the same thing. i have to says the most inspirational moment i've had in the senate. if we can do what we talked about yesterday, making this the most important committee because we put some real essence to the process, my time spent here would be something i'd be very happy with. thank you. senator enzi: senator -- all time has expire thasmed will be set aside for a vote at a later time. thank you. senator america lee was supposed to be

hoping that they will do up to two percent our allies are not paying their fair share to get a second you have to pay the minimum required two percent of g.d.p. increased defense spending the countries we are defending must pay must pay. what the. so let's have a closer look of the military presence of the united states and china was overseas beyond their borders of the united states has more than eight hundred military bases all around the world where china has all the one that's in africa in djibouti while the u.s. has been seeing that they have these bases to maintain peace among the world the chinese simply just say that the just wanted to be there to protect their national interests. and panic and security analyst michael maloof told us the u.s. is seeking conflict including with china to justify its own military spend. the united states. has a budget that's about five and a half times larger than china it needs conflicts all the time in order to justify that kind of spending china as it improves on its economy and grows stronger and bigger and and seeks to branch out they need a military that can. project power so i envision that confl

thousand barrels a day so as you know laura our oil revenues are the backbone of libya's national income which represents more than ninety eight percent of the g.d.p. now this of course has has affected the. libyan treasury because many people have been complaining of not cashing their salaries on time many services in the country many state institutions have been paralyzed because of the lack of like liquidity especially the lack of hard currency which basically comes from the oil revenues ok good i'm glad he has many thanks for explaining the situation to us from tripoli in the u.s. the democratic party has launched its most ambitious investigation yet into alleged obstruction of justice and abuse of office by donald trump targeting people in the president's inner circle including his family members denounced it as part of a political hoax but says he will cooperate as our white house correspondent kimberly harker's. it's a sweeping and wide ranging demand on monday the judiciary committee from the democratic controlled house of representatives ordered eighty one individuals and entities tied to u.s. president donald trump including the presiden

economic progress to include how our families are doing, how our children are doing., and things that would matter tos the american people. g.d.p us off a cliff. you know, robot trucks are great for g.d.p. terrible for many, many american communities. get with the program and figure out how to actually make this economy work for people. y >> tucker: i sit with my jaw open i agree with you so strongly. let me ask you finally whyn' isn't this a central question in the campaignyb of everybody running for president on any side, and why instead are they talking about issues that are really are kind of frivolous? why aren't they talking about this? >> it's a good question, tucker. one of the reasons i'm running for president is to push this in the center of the mainstream agenda where every candidate should be talking about what we are going to do about the fact that we're automating away the most common jobs in the economy right now. as we are sitting here together, the labor force participation rate in the united states is 63.2%. the same level as ecuador and costa rica. and if anyone thinks that's where america ought to be, that n

our defense base. in the eisenhower years, the united states spent on average 10% of its g.d.p. on defense in the 1950's. today we're at about 3.3%. obviously the size of the economy is very different baugh huge sum on investing in defense. the man who did so much to alert us to the dangerous of the military industrial complex did a lot to build that complex. the u.s. nuclear arsenal soared from just over a few hundred weapons to over 20,000 war heads. the b-52 bombers, the atlas and titan intercontinental ballistic missiles. all these came online in eisenhower's term and he delighted in the details. he pored over the plans. he was deeply engaged in pushing these developments forward. the purpose of these weapons was to deter the communists, to keep the peace. this was the beginning of the formation of the peace through strength strategy that waged and won the cold war. we can debate whether it was the right choice but every presidents since has followed it and it was very much the advantage that helped to win the cold war. ike is a paradox in this regard. he wanted to end the w

because of our political trouble mystically and i think since the who has taken power although they try to claim that they have managed to restore confidence and growth in the economy showing bided g.d.p. growth coming up to three to four percent we might say that that could be one way of looking at it but if you look at the long term thailand has been in this kind of political uncertainty for a long time and that adds to the opportunity cost for the country we spend so much of our energy and i will resources talking about how to get rid of sin or how to get rid of the junta and the task at hand is that thailand is not alone in this region and why us moving not moving forward and other people moving forward thailand's economy is now you know not doing the best in the south east asian region and although we are performing three to four percent which is world average growth but i think that thailand would have to be concerned about its economy is global and regional competitiveness and its structural challenges that we have to address for example the reform of the education the reform of the public sector and the increase of the productive u.-t. all those area major and if thailand rema

unfortunately that our big game that claim for the last decade with the regulators is they're trying to i got monsters right e.p. of german. so they are they are much greater than the g.d.p. of germany they live villainies of deutsche bank if they were made all by germany germany would cease to exist as a country so what they have to do they have to they have to hope that there is a consortium of central banks around the world like was the case of long term capital management long term capital management got the central bank of central banks around the world to bail out american banks so that yacht owning scathed in greenwich connecticut would miss a payment on their boat you know that's unfortunately we live in this type of world where if you have influence on wall street you are above the law as eric holder had said and you get to participate in racketeering schemes with impunity as we pointed out on the show and many show shows before but you know we seem to hold these bankers up us having the divine right of gods and we can't upset them because they might not favor us with their trinkets every now and then anyway richard fascinating stuff we got to go thanks for bein

but also in terms of how it's like building confidence in our work that i'm here but it also like to say that with one point five per cent g.d.p. for twenty times before we've made a commitment to the night to nato not really and that will naturally impact on the structure of cooperation within the european union about which does not have to fulfill the expectations of everyone up in the alliance but the commitments that we have made do want to stick to i stand for this and the german government has committed to this through this book let's have a plan and it's going to take a lot of and introduced i think they actually followed another thing that we often talk about european armed forces we talk about how we need to develop european would pop up weapons systems and of course this can only be done a cooperation of a nation gentleman. and i'm not pointing think my fingers here but it is absolutely clear that without a shadow of a doubt that's connected to our cooperation when it comes to acquiring new weapons systems a new tank under german auspices or a new plane under french auspices this new that this requires reliability be

g.d.p. so every little bit lighter darling very much in focus today with a possible know that will be right back this is the the view new. live from the land funny more as well at our website interview dot com thanks for being with us. to explain. he's the president of ukraine but only in a television series. so far at least let him use alinsky really enjoys the role so much so that he's decided to run for real the servant of the people i'm afraid to yeah playing with a sense of humor no political experience but powerful backers. in sixty minutes on w. lou sarno just couldn't get this song out of his head. musicologist began searching for the source of these captivating sounds. and found them deep in the rain forest in central africa. the buying of the people. going out. and the like to bring in the fleet even less. money leave that. he was needed by their culture that he stayed. only a promise to a son made something only of the jungle and returned to the concrete and glass john . the result reverse culture shock. you realize how strange artificial is really connected to life. the prize winning come command tree from the forest starts people first on t.w. . the da

start to stainlize -- stabilize, confirming our view that the first quarter is, indeed, a soft patch. and the number for the full year g.d.p. will be north of that. alix: a lot of c.e.o.'s i talked to are looking at more volatility in the oil price but we're not seeing that in the index. you got the move index, and oil volatility. all low. what do you do with volatility? julian: we think in general in an environment where if you look back to the beginning of 2018 you had a number of volatility spikes. are you in a world of geopolitical uncertainty. you have elections in 2020. asset price volatility in general is too cheap. we think volatility moves higher. david: what about the long-term disruption in terms of renewables? julian: it's an issue. but those are the kind of things they are phase-ins. david: over what period of time? years? five years? 10 years? julian: i would say it's measured 10 years, decade-type of thing. alix: when you say talking about volatility, does that mean you want to be buying vol here? selling it? julian: for us if you think about it in terms of the equity market, we have come a very, very long w

because of our political trouble mystically and i think since the who has taken power although they try to claim that they have managed to restore confidence and growth in the economy showing bided g.d.p. growth coming up to three to four percent we might say that that could be one way of looking at it but if you look at the long term thailand has been in this kind of political uncertainty for a long time and that adds to the opportunity cost for the country we spend so much of our energy and i will resources talking about how to get rid of sin or how to get rid of the junta and the task at hand is that thailand is not alone in this region and why us moving not moving forward and other people moving forward thailand's economy is now you know not doing the best in the south east asian region and although we are performing three to four percent which is world average growth but i think that thailand would have to be concerned about its economy is global and regional competitiveness and its structural challenges that we have to address for example the reform of the education the reform of the public sector and the increase of the productive u.-t. all those area major and if thailand rema

because of our political trouble mystically and i think since the who has taken power although they try to claim that they have managed to restore confidence and growth in the economy showing by the g.d.p. growth coming up to three to four percent we might say that that could be one way of looking at it but if you look at the long term thailand has been in this kind of political uncertainty for a long time and that to the opportunity costs for the country we spend so much of our energy and i will resources talking about how to get rid of sin or how to get rid of the junta and the task at hand is that thailand is not alone in this region and why us moving not moving forward and other people moving forward thailand's economy is now you know not doing the best in the south east asian region and although we are performing three to four percent which is world average growth but i think that thailand would have to be concerned about its economy is global and regional competitiveness and its structural challenges that we have to address for example the reform of the education the reform of the public sector and the increase of the productive u.-t. all those area major and if thailand remains