g.m. harrington about this and we knew that there was a half cent for four years proposal, the main question that we asked is will that give us the bond rating that the sfpc needs to do these projects and like installations on school buildings, city buildings, things like that so that we can actually create a program to go to all of these entities we are raising rates on that is a planned program. just like with item 12 where we say you need to have a plan. this is the same situation. perhaps in this resolution or a follow-up, the commission can say to staff, all right. let's do an energy efficiency plan. one that draws on information that will come from the build-out work, but not just that work but let's look at all of these city buildings and state buildings and schools we are raising rates on. muni. find out where the opportunities are to get efficiency and renewables on there so that we can reduce the pain or do a higher increase. i would second in a different way why not charge city hall more than a half cent per year. the key message is let's use the bonding authority as fast as we ca