the royal college of g.p.'s, the royal college of nursing, the royal college of midwives, the royal college of radiologists, the faculty of public health, the chartered society of physiotherapists, the community practitioners and health visitors association, and the patients association. mr. speaker, doesn't it ever occur to him, mr. speaker -- mr. speaker, doesn't it ever occur to him that just maybe they're right and he's wrong? >> he didn't mention the national association of primary care supporting the bill, the n.h.s. alliance supporting the bill, the association of chief executives of voluntary organizations supporting the bill, the foundation trust network supporting the bill, lord darsi, labour minister, he was the surgeon you hired to run the health service. here we are, four weeks in a row of n.h.s. questions but not a single question of substance, not one. all of our process, all of our politics, never about the substance. mr. speaker, we all know it's leap year so maybe just this once i get to and t

>> it's g.p. and the fergs epilogue. [meow] [laughter] craig: you think that that astronomer was on the level? geoff: i didn't trust him, pal. craig: why are you talking like that? you never talk like that. geoff: this is the voice i always use when i do this segment. craig: no you don't. you talk in your normal voice. you were going like -- you sound like that wilford brimley thing that you were doing. geoff: wilford brimley. diabetes. talking like wilford brimley? nut munchers! craig: what did we learn on the show? geoff: we learned a lot actually. [laughter] craig: we learned what happens if you say no to a lady in denmark. say goodbye to your glove collection. geoff: we learned that, yes. craig: i also have -- michael told me to keep this really short. [laughter] yeah. [laughter] you want to go out after? geoff: yeah. craig: let's go to that restaurants, squealers. we'll see you at squealers, everybody.,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, the sheriff's wife says was meant to embarass her into 0001 >>> other than this [ bleep ], how i

to g.p.'and hospital doctors may need to keep a closer eye on them. >> the furniture giant ikea has been accused of accessing police files to spy on customers and staff at stores in france. the swedish company alleged to have paid private security firms to carry out the checks on its customers and potential employees. >> it's a company with a stringent code of conduct for its suppliers, less stringent for the security companies it was ploying in france. the swede inbound giant is accused of accessing political files on a valley held database. secret checks were carried out on customers and potential employees. france's newspaper printed i mails which suggests over 200 people investigated with request for criminal record and vehicle registration checks. this e-mail asked on one who made global san diego remarks someone who raised concerns internally of a terrorist attack. ikea's head of security is alleged to have authorized payments for up to $100 for each of the checks made. the information i

>> it's g.p. and the fergs epilogue. [meow] [laughter] craig: you think that that astronomer was on the level? geoff: i didn't trust him, pal. craig: why are you talking like that? you never talk like that. geoff: this is the voice i always use when i do this segment. craig: no you don't. you talk in your normal voice. you were going like -- you sound like that wilford brimley thing that you were doing. geoff: wilford brimley. diabetes. talking like wilford brimley? nut munchers! craig: what did we learn on the show? geoff: we learned a lot actually. [laughter] craig: we learned what happens if you say no to a lady in denmark. say goodbye to your glove collection. geoff: we learned that, yes. craig: i also have -- michael told me to keep this really short. [laughter] yeah. [laughter] you want to go out after? geoff: yeah. craig: let's go to that restaurants, squealers. we'll see you at squealers, >>> it made a huge impact i think on me. >> new at 11:00. remember scared straight? tonight we take local teens inside a shock

here tens of thousands of people cheering the candidate who gave an emotional speech earlier to his g.p. aggrieved among the crowd. already docked a victory rally and based on those latest exit polls it could be just that now the crowds here expecting and i hear it's from the prime minister in just a short hardcores be addressing the crowd probably thanking them for their show of support over the course of this presidential campaign so far now when it comes to winning and at least polling very well in this campaign last year based on one key message which is sold quite well with the crowds here and around the country that his post had been his to see that the number of fact was already in the crowd and was thrilled to me is for the average russian is an increase when it comes to dinner a way of dos that increase in pensions as well all of the promise of a free since political tenure he has also faced criticism he's needed to support perhaps more so than ever as he faced criticism from the protest movement on the campaign a sore throat feels not just muscovites but is just muscovites in

we cannot remain competitive if this debt bomb continues to build or if we keep a debt to g.p. 00% for five years. we won't be competitive and you cannot be strong politically, diplomatically or militarily if you're not strong economically. ultimately if you're going to diminish the standard of living of the american people so ultimately i hope and believe we will get a handle on it. how you get a handle on it, the only way you can do it is to get the two parties together and reach some sort of accord or accommodation on spending restraint revenue cree. rond ragan did this. ronald reagan did this in 1983 for social security. it's the only solution. it's going to have to happen again and it will happen again the fight is going to come on how much for spending restraint and how much for revenue increases. and one other thing president reagan was right about when he said the american people are not undertaxed, we overspend and that's true. and i think there's been some recognitn, hope there's bee inthis current administration that the spending cuts are going to have to exceed the revenue