. >> gabbert is at the center of a storm against extreme ideology as it promotes itself as a haven forree speech amount look at the role played in the brazil pole. to our top story. i.b.m. hats thrown its hat into the cloud computing ring. hey are bying red hat though barr 33 about the. they spoke to bloomberg earlier about the sale. >> we have been working with i.b.m. for many, many years. and really over the course of this entire year we started to do more together. we made some big announcements in may at our summit of more work we are doing together. we started speaking more seriously back in april, and so it has been something that has kind of continued to evolve, and it became a natural next step. in terms of why we see so much value for red hat is we do see tremendous opportunity for open source in the enterprise, and as the leader there, we see a large market and a growing market in front of also. what we have lacked is scale in our go to market. we have lacked a depth of customer relationships because we are a newer player coming up. we have lacked deep industry vertical exper

. >> gabbert is at the center of

i recently passed a piece of legislation with gabbert from hawaii and veterans who want to visit their national memorials and honor the work they did will not be charged fees. believe it or not there is a fee that groups would have to pay. moderator: mr. lamb. your response. rep. lamb: i recently had the chance to visit both v.a. hospitals in pittsburgh because of my role on the veterans committee in the house. and i was struck by the dedication and love of the doctors, nurses, even the custodians that work there that they have for their patience, that they have for these veterans. the people that worked there are on a mission. a mission to do good for these veterans. and so i think one of the best things we can do is support the people that work at the v.a. unfortunately, the accountability act, that mr. rothfus mentioned, has operated to go after a lot of low level people who i do not think are primarily responsible for the problems that we've had. the problems have been at the top. and there are a lot of unfilled leadership posts at the v.a. both parties in congress are frustrated b

representative gabbert? >> thank you, madam chair. thank you, gentlemen. it's been estimated by several sources and confirmed by general dunford publicly that there's approximately 20,000 to 30,000 al qaeda terrorists in a s and jihadist terrorists holed up and in yol control of the city of l in syria. we recently heard in the last several days threats from your administration of quote/unquote dire consequences for military offensive by syria, russia, iran, by the al qaeda terrorists in idlib. james jeffrey stated the u.s. will not tolerate, quote, an attack, period, and that any offensive is to us objectionable as a reckless escalation so considering the fact, mr. karem, you noted many times just in this hearing that our troops are in syria operating under the authorization to use military force that was passed after al qaeda attacked1 and we're supposed to be at war with al qaeda, my question is how is it in the national security interest of the united states, instead of going after al qaeda, the u.s. is making these threats and essentially acting as the