santos. >> good evening, gabe santos, make ready. i think the board might understand about the confusion of the permits for the different addresses. i just chicken scratched a little piece of paper here to kind of show where our confusion was. where we have 472 -- i'm still confused -- 472 union right here, when we initially got this project we had assumed that all 4 buildings were 472 union. so where we're talking about 7 and 9 today, one of my colleagues had pulled the permit and he put 472 union, unit 7 and unit no. 9. we weren't aware that that had happened until after the first complaint that said we were working without a permit. we then went down to the building department and corrected the permits for all three units, two in this unit, 7 and 9 and then one other here at 15 nobles no. 2. all those addresses have been corrected. at the time we pulled the first permit, lead notice signs were put up everywhere in compliance with the building department. we got to give adjacent notice to adjacent buildings, exterior of the working

. >> that is correct, gabe santos. that notice we put out the minute we start talking with the building owners and will start work eventually. we always throw those signs up there, something simple, to know there's more work forthcoming, more notices forthcoming, we put our phone numbers out there. we have 30 trucks around the city, we put our phone numbers on everything. we are available to anybody who has a concern or a question. one thing about mr. duffy, what he read about the lead abatement from mr. yee, he read one notice but didn't read the second notice. he may find it before we close up here tonight, but there is a second notice and dennis yee was out there and photographed all the notices and their proper presence wherever they were supposed to be, adjacent buildings, i mean i was there myself, i might even be in a picture. actually he had me point to one, actually. so i'm sure we're going to find the other nov that will cancel out the one that he read to you tonight. >> thank you. anything further? >> we wou