my name is gabriel snyder. i am an opt mist in the future of journalism.ve in the golden age of communication many of you no doubt are reaching for your phone right now maybe you already have an instant review of the speech to tweet. go ahead this. is a brave new world or maybe you are texting a particularly clever emojiy combination to the person next to you. we have all been there. and you may be sitting throughout closing apiece with the editor stock stuck back home and working not a second drink. in some ways journalism never changes yes. we know that the magical device in your hands could not ektdz people in way that's were sients fiction two decadesing a and we have seemed unsure. whether the good thing for the the traffic and the publicer is have us that we will celebrate for tonight there are doubts on the journalism. and making calling can survive and thrive. of in the new digital age of course it can it this digital age, that of course we can because we must. a vibrant influential and independent craft is vital to democracy. we also know that the

gabriel snyder, a great addition on the web.e have more readers than we have had on average in the past year. we are convening quality conversations about policy issues, about culture, and we're going to do that in a way that is increasingly digital. anyone claiming this is the death of "the new republic" is claiming something immaturely -- prematurely. in my judgment and the judgment of the other staff that are there working every day, to create incredible journalism on our site, to build our product and apps, all the have to do is come down to her office and they will see something -- charlie: you moved to new york. chris: we open the office in 2012. over time it grew to be at the same size as our traditional headquarters in washington. it is a few heads larger than the original office in washington. we are absolutely committed to having a robust group in new york, designers, advertising partnerships, salespeople. for "the new republic" to be vibrant it has to have an ingredient in both of those cities. we have to have some of

my name is gabriel snyder, and i am an optimist in the future of journalism.e live in a golden age of communications. many of you no doubt are reaching for your phones right now. maybe you already have an instant review of this speech to tweet. go ahead. it is a brave new world. maybe you are texting for a clever -- you may be sitting out there closing a piece with an editor stuck back home while working on your second drink. in some ways, journalism never changes. yes, we know this magical device in your hands can ask people in ways that were better science fiction two decades ago, but we seem unsure as to whether that is a good thing for this craft and public service we celebrate tonight. there is doubt whether the journalists can survive in this digital age, that of course we can because we must. a vibrant influential and independent craft is vital to democracy. we also know that these tiny devices have rocked havoc -- brought havoc. the revenue stream that pays for that service, predicated on limited distribution and monopolies, have been totally undone by