she is is already in full swing, if with regard to the syrian crisis one could say with words from gaidar's, as if the wind smells, either smoke from fires, or funerals from explosions, then the ukrainian crisis. it will also come from there, trouble, from where they did not expect, but there are a lot of us because of the black mountains, damned bourgeois, bullets are already whistling again, shells are already exploding again. and the nations are bad guys. set up with vodka surrender their country and there is no need for illusions. having occupied ukraine and using it as a bridgehead, they attacked us, they attacked russia. bandera ukraine-a us colony is a battering ram. from the west against russia, konstantin leontiev once said that the czech republic is a weapon that the slavs recaptured from the germans and directed against the amazing world. today, at the right time, he says that ukry is a weapon that the west recaptured from the russian world and directed against it, so that the slavs would kill the slavs with porridge brewed on our western border. she is littered with her family o

it is already in full swing, if with regard to the syrian crisis one could say with words from gaidar'swind smells, either smoke from fires, or funerals from explosions, then the ukrainian crisis. it will also come from there, trouble, from where they did not expect, but fell on us from behind the black mountains, the damned bourgeois, bullets are already whistling again, shells are already exploding again. and the bad guys lagged behind with a burnt hand over their country and there is no need for illusions. occupying ukraine and using it in as a bridgehead attacked us in russia bandera ukraine-a colony of the united states is a battering ram. konstantin leontiev once said from the west against russia that the czech republic is a weapon that the slavs recaptured from the germans and directed against below, stunning today at the time says that the ukry is a weapon that the west recaptured from the russian world and directed against it so that the slavs kill the slavs with porridge brewed on our western border. she was thrown into the family on her head and our geopolitical adversary wil

it goes along to the river, through this river, we successfully overtook them, next, where on the gaidarar, again. such in fact, we are talking about the road there, and there is also a river there, i forgot the name, something there is red or something like that, well, what can be done with this road, build a big embankment on it, everything that will not be passed by ukrainian tanks well, it is unlikely that there are any natural obstacles there, actually geographical or demographic, and on the basis of this, there is no argument that they will succeed better than on the shard, whatever, whatever, whatever, but still, i don't see any natural obstacles. well, maybe they will, i don't know, make some kind of voluntary participation, salt is like you they like to say that because they are strong-willed, well, something seems to me that they will drag the wrong thing and the wrong place in general. it will be very shameful . lymani, where did they go and how many of them were left in general, because it is not entirely clear, did they withdraw all of them or partially? what happened to the

the enormous abilities of some friedman chavin well, i saw him, and he was the minister of coal, gaidar were the minister of voters would also become a millionaire a billionaire i apologize when you are in the government that distributes billions well, it is somehow strange that you do not take yourself, measure yourself a billion well, you will go there because you can put on the smartest face for yourself, but the question arises and what did you do after that what's wrong with your business, what did you develop, well, you have this money, well, i have a bank that enjoys state patronage, they say that this bank even has some fate of putin . well, of course, all this will grow because you can all this is to be used, and what is the business, we know, like the business of steve jobs, we know what business musk was sitting on, you can’t help but like your passport, but he is full of ideas, we know what business henry ford had there, we know what business billieta a i apologize to friedman's business, it 's the bank's fault that they did such a thing, and what kind of business did some s

gaidar, if i were a minister, anyone would also become millionaire billionaire i'm sorry when you arevernment that distributes billions well, it's kind of strange that you don't take care of yourself, measure yourself a billion well, you will go there because you can put on the smartest face for yourself, but the question arises and what did you do after that, what about your business, what such developed, well, you have this money, well, i have a bank that enjoys state patronage, they say that this bank even has some fate of putin well, of course, all this will grow because you can use it all, and what is the business, but we know how and the business of steve jobs, we know what kind of business they ate on masks and lampas , but he is full of ideas. the business of some scumbag over there. he was given the state plant and the sixth plant. well, that is the question. well, that’s what i’m talking about. they’re just drones that were attached to the former state budget, everything and of course these people had to be deprived of these absolutely no no not in the normal the method of s

economy and before the collapse of the ussr, so in ninety-two in ninety-three, when i worked for the gaidarernment and tried to attract financial assistance for russia, i saw that no one in the american leadership was interested in this approach, especially these people evolved when towards the end of bill clinton's second term of the knut. joined more four countries had a lot of provocations. expansion of nato bombing of serbia war. in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003, the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008, and finally, the covert operation to overthrow assad in 2011, the overthrow. gaddafi forces minato in 2011 everything. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the united states played a leading role, which is why i hold them responsible for the decline of relations with russia russia the united states are great powers and between them there is always a risk frontation. and this seems to me to be the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state? because when two big countries do not agree, in

i, uh, was a soviet teenager who grew up on soviet literature on the books of gaidar and paustovsky andand mayakovsky, and uh, this is a reproach to everyone. ah, the shrines of my youth of my childhood. it was very painful for me. so, in fact, of course, the very form of existence of that russia, it was even a media one, it reproduced the current ukraine just hmm in some amazing likeness, because the current ukrainian leading there are famous there, let's say savik shuster or kiseleva there didn’t find experience. their kiselyov, they were our main, leading our tv channels. they spent all their evening talk shows, these media prayers, and they said exactly the same thing as today, that russia is just a country of evil, that we just fit into europe or some other us states, and that’s the only way we actually we will become people when crimea saw the impending catastrophe and decided to return to its native harbor. prilepin realized what was happening before his eyes, such a story. hmm. or maybe mythology. or maybe be a real story. i've been told by people of at least high status. they s

that they will have an eternal future, that having finished off the red empire, they created their gaidarro-western allergic state ; i just thought, well, you could just put the squeeze on to develop. well, the fact that the soviet power at first in russia hmm allow the church. to listen to the church, the culture that has always been called russian would grow out of the church again. and at the same time , it would be possible to develop the communist idea russia yes, i think that this could be done. it needed to be done. there was a return to the soviet ideology of the vertical of the transcendent religious divine orthodox. perhaps stalin was doing this, but after the steel, a monstrous skating rink, khrushchev's, cut off all these sprouts. this did not happen, alas. maybe these are the words of our union, you said about stalin. and your father really knew stalin personally. well, that's loud. my father once came from tiflis and brought a bottle of khvanchkara, which was sent stalin's friends and relatives gave him this bottle. yes, a bottle of wine. these are the details of their meeti

economy and before the collapse of the ussr, and in ninety-two ninety-three, when i worked for the gaidart and tried to attract financial assistance for russia, i saw that no one in the american leadership was interested in this approach, so more these illusions developed when, by the end of clinton's second term, four more joined nato the country was a lot of provocations. the expansion of nato to the bombing of serbia, the war in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003, the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008 and finally, the covert operation to overthrow assad in 2011, the battle of gaddafi with non-nato forces in 2011, everything. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the us played a leading role, which is why i blame it. they are responsible for the decline of relations with russia russia and the united states are great powers and there is always a risk of confrontation between them. and this i think is the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state, because when two big countries do not agree

economy and before the collapse of the ussr, so in ninety-two ninety-three, when i worked for the gaidarand tried to attract financial assistance for russia, i saw that no one was in the american leadership i am interested in such an approach, all the more so. these people developed when, by the end of clinton's second term, four more countries joined nato, there were many provocations. nato expansion to the bombing of serbia, the war in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003, the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008 and finally, the covert operation to overthrow assad in 2011, the overthrow. gaddafi forces names something in 2011 everything. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the united states played a leading role, so i laying. on them responsible for the decline of relations with russia, russia and the united states are great powers and between them always remains the risk of frontation. and this seems to me to be the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state, because when two big countries

economy and before the collapse of the ussr, and in ninety-two ninety-three, when i worked for the gaidarernment and tried to attract financial assistance for russia, i saw that no one in the american leadership was interested in this approach, so moreover, those people developed when, by the end of the second term, the white clinton joined nato four countries had a lot of provocations. expansion of nato bombing. the war in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003, the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008, and finally, the secret operation to overthrow assad in 2011, the overthrow of gaddafi's forces by minato in 2011, everything. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the us played a leading role, which is why i hold them responsible for the decline of relations with russia russia and the us are great powers and between them there is always the risk of frontation. and this i think is the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state, because when two big countries do not agree, in opinion, on many issue

economy and before the collapse of the ussr, and in ninety-two ninety-three, when i worked for the gaidarl assistance for russia, i saw that no one in the american leadership was interested in this approach, so more these illusions developed when, by the end of clinton's second term, four more countries joined nato , there were many provocations. expansion of nato bombing of serbia the war in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003 the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008 and finally, the covert operation to overthrow assad in 2011 the overthrow of gaddafi by minato forces in 2011 everything. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the united states played a leading role, which is why i hold them responsible for the decline of relations with russia russia and the united states are great powers between them always remains the risk of confrontation. and this seems to me to be the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state, because when two big countries do not agree, opinions on many issues need to be l

soviet economy and before the collapse the ussr did the same in 1992 in 1993, when he worked for the gaidarnment and tried to attract financial assistance for russia, he saw that no one in the american leadership was interested in such an approach, all the more so these illusions developed when clinton was killed by the end of her second term four more countries joined nato there were many provocations expansion to the bombing of serbia the war in afghanistan in 2001 and iraq in 2003 the invitation of ukraine and georgia to nato in 2008 and finally, the secret operation to overthrow assad in 2011 gaddafi's overthrow of minato's forces in 2011, that's it. this step by step led to the complete failure of the alternative approach to world politics and again the us played a leading role, which is why i hold them responsible for the decline of relations with russia russia and the us great powers between them there is always a risk of confrontation. and this seems to me to be the simplest explanation. why ukraine should be a neutral state, because when two big countries do not agree, in opinion,

gaito-gazdavanov is more than my love for the crocodile gaidar or mikhail shokhov, and, of course, nicholas talking about ukraine right away in parallel, stalin is also remembered as the creators of independent ukraine, it seems that any child knows that independent ukraine began to be created after the liberal bourgeois february revolution of 1917 and existed exactly until the lenin bolshevik detachments destroyed all this petliura separatist independent quasi-statehood, therefore in present-day ukraine, lenin is so hated and monuments to him are brought down, because he killed their independent ukrainian statehood in the bud, and in the next time independent ukraine arose already in 1991 after another liberal-bourgeois revolution and through the fault of gorbachev and yeltsin, who in today's ukraine have no complaints, but everything seems to be clear and transparent, but for some of us it is incomprehensible and not transparent. but then we will explain again. i remember what lenin was very briefly and very clearly told by the right-wing publicist, ideologist and wonderful kingdom of hea

here is the gaidar spill, as it was called, which was stealing apples from timur's opponent of his team here andrei anatolyevich, he is right. i agree with him, it's not just impossible. walking from the site he and he is a very important indicator indicator. i even looked at how ordinary people discuss an amazing fact, ordinary people discuss. how many voted for russia how many abstained how many are against this alignment of forces is there a question? no , there are questions. and why one way or another vote venezuela. why do some states leave and i have a question, but we talked with these states and explained to them their uh, the russian position or not explained, but a lot depends on this. we are talking about why the allies behave this way, and is there a model that we sometimes mercilessly criticize here, but which allowed the west to challenge this challenge with all its shortcomings, the other would not allow it is unknown that it was putin who allowed this to do if to you the shortcomings that are there are not eradicated. the rot of perestroika and that failed attempt to bu

why today we live in the realities of gaidar's fairy tale, we would only stand for a day and hold outy has it come to this? this is not to the fact that we need the guilty, but to the fact that we need a clear understanding, and where will the strategic retreat stop? how much more settlements? we will have to give back, give people confidence. and no one will run anywhere, and no one will do anything. do not consider every voice with criticism or every voice with pain as an enemy manifestation, god forbid now regarding elon musk is a very important topic, actually elon musk if you remember, he respects the soviet space program very much. he also remembers that today is just the sixty-fifth anniversary of the launch of the first satellite of the earth. and if someone wants to, he can read stephen king about how in the united states, for example, this is his personal memories reacted to from the first satellite, because it was not perceived as a miracle of science. and as an opportunity to place a nuclear warhead somewhere above, which can be dropped on the united states with impunity,

we are all in childhood arkady petrovich gaidar timur was read by his team. gathered around, it’s just around this and the power around helping the families of those who went to the front even then this tradition was. it is natural for our people and the president, as the president of a democratic country, relies not only on the state, which is everywhere in one form or another, he operates civil society as an apparatus of violence, he appeals to public organizations. here is a very important point. this sharply distinguishes us from what is happening in first of all, in ukraine, where a terrorist dictatorship has actually been established and dispersed by a party that does not support zelensky, they are banned and expelled, including the second largest in the name of the supreme at one time was banned and what is happening. excuse me in the west, where the majority, for example, in france, does not want ukraine to be supplied with weapons, and against this will , the french government supplies these weapons. a lot of so uh going on where actually and the uk