, your amendment, wait a second, galina mykolaivna, i have this. you will put 175 and then 176, i am correct, yes, please, galina mykolaivna, thank you, 175 and 76, it concerns the payment of the national mediation and fitting service, we really voted on this bill in the committee in may, but we just passed the budget code, where we made grades for all state institutions, in particular for the national service, which works as a structure of the president, so there the problem that we you... about the payment of this structure was solved by the adoption budget for next year, therefore 175 it is rejected in the committee, please consider it, this is ivchenko's amendment, and the second amendment, i will not take a second minute, 176 the amendment, tsimbalyuk's amendment, it is taken into account, it must be rejected, so please put it on vote, cancel the rejected amendment, do not vote on it, and accordingly take into account now reject, do not get votes, dear colleagues, amendment 175, it is rejected , that's right, i put it on... consideration 175 amendment, i ask for your support, de

issue soldiers of ukraine, thank you and i count on yours, from the authors of the alternative galina mykolaivnatyakova, please 960. thank you for your word, 81.31 i am addressing the entire hall and very much beg you not to make the issue of assigning the status of a participant in hostilities part of a political one. in fact, the draft law, in general, the experience of a participant in hostilities, and our situation is quite unique, it should be clearly recorded, first of all, those who are in the reserve, and the ministry of veterans affairs, the ministry of defense also say this, and this means that those who is in the reserve, we have those who active military personnel today have the status and experience of participating in hostilities, and therefore the main register, as specified in the alternative draft law, and we must take this experience into account in the register of military personnel. in fact, the national security and defense council also said this, when it submitted to the committee a proposal that the bill should be an alternative one based on the register of military person