galvin, and mr. quinn, are well respected. i believe the department of building inspection has heard the concerns of this board and will give this some weight. i believe what is best suggested is to continue to september 22. if mr. quinn wants to withdraw the permit he is free to do that. i do not understand why we would want to overturn the project, to take that permit away. the other processes are still available to him. vice president goh: if there are not other comments, i would make a motion. commissioner fung: i have one, for the record. my request for the permit history -- i have received it. vice president goh: we would be able to discuss that on september 22. and make a motion to move to september 22. president peterson: call the roll on that, please. >> the motion is from the vice- president to continue to september 22. the hearing remains held and closed. it is to allow time for the ceqa appeal to take place at the board of supervisors. commissioner fung: aye. commissioner garcia: aye. president peterson: no. commis

whether or not the court should wait for the supreme court to act on the petition in simmons and galvintor general has been asked for her brief. the second is the amendment of the washington statute so that the washington statute so that in fact it is really just prisoner disenfranchisement. presumptively, once someone is no longer incarcerated, they are generally restored the right to vote. would you comment on those two elements of the analysis? >> the supreme court might be waiting to see what the court does on this matter. [laughter] [applause] >> i would not be sure about that. >> you do not want to win here. >> on the second question, the aclu points out that washington amended by and continued non- incarceration of people continuing to live under custody, meaning in effect that there are more people living under disenfranchisement. it actually disenfranchises more people that are not incarcerated the incarcerated. >> which one is before? your claim has to do with which version? the one that is moot? >> not at all. what it does not do is alleviate the racial discrimination in the