it's the largest amount ever paid in an enforcement action by the gambling commission. ompletely unacceptable and serious. entain group is one of the biggest gambling companies in the world and it said this was a business which put commercial considerations above compliance. to give you a couple of examples, on the social responsibility failures, it simply did not do enough to minimise the risks. 0ne customer who had gambled for hours overnight, deposited £230,000, more than that, in his account over a period of 18 months but yet there was only one online chat interaction with that customer. another shop customer was not escalated to a safer gambling review despite staking £29,000 and losing 11,000 of that in a single month. when it comes to those anti—money laundering failures, this is basicallyjust not doing enough checks to find where the source of the money was coming from going into these online accounts. 0ne customer who was living on social housing was able to deposit £186,000 in six months. this is the biggest financial penalty to date, it comes in the form of an

entain, which owns ladbrokes, coral and foxy bingo, has been ordered to pay £17 million by the gambling commissionmoney laundering. our business correspondent emma simpson is with me. tell us what the company did. well, first of all, jane, this is a record penalty. and it is for regulatory failures, both in its online business, and also in its betting shops, which the regulator said were just completely unacceptable. in a nutshell, entain simply didn't do enough to protect customers from gambling to match. so, for instance, there was a customer who spent long periods gambling during the night, who deposited more than £230,000 over 18 months, but entain had only contacted that customer once in our online chat. it also failed to do appropriate checks on where some customers upon no money was coming from. so, one person living in social housing, for instance, was able to deposit £186,000 in just six months. tim dieck this is the second time that entain has fallen foul of the rules, and the regulator says it could lose its licence, a very real chance of that, if there were further serious breaches. en

it's the largest amount ever paid in an enforcement action by the gambling commission. e space of about ten months, so you are talking about huge sums of money. very often gambling was taking place at night when people may be likely to be intoxicated and they may be suffering from mental health problems already, very little attempt was made to prevent them from gambling once they knew the level of vulnerability. in fact, when one of them had itself excluded and noticed they were addicted to gambling and decided to opt out, they were able to gamble with the other brands within the company. to what extent can you understand how people get into difficulties like this? you are a recovered gambling addict. it this? you are a recovered gambling addict. , , ., ,y this? you are a recovered gambling addict. , , , addict. it is very easy. it happens now very quickly. _ addict. it is very easy. it happens now very quickly, people - addict. it is very easy. it happens now very quickly, people start i now very quickly, people start gambling maybe recreationally and because of the pra

commission online u.s. stock and etf trades. for smarter trading decisions, get decision tech from fidelity. seen this ad? it's not paid for by california tribes. it's paid for by the out of state gamblings that wrote prop 27. it doesn't tell you 90% of the profits go to the out of state corporations. a tiny share goes to the homeless, and even less to tribes. and a big loophole says, costs to promote betting reduce money for the tribes, so they get less. hidden agendas. fine print. loopholes. prop 27. they didn't write it for the tribes or the homeless. they wrote it for themselves. new tonight cnn exclusive former president trump's lead team is in direct talk with the department of justice officials who are investigating, of course, january 6th, going to source more with the matter. they're telling cnn that trump's defense lawyers warned him indictments are possible. though the former president does in fact remain skeptical. the doj, meanwhile, is preparing for a court battle to force white house officials to testify about trump's conversations and actions around the attack. so, what is going to happen? let's talk about it with scott, jennings elliott williams and miles taylor. glad t