garamendi, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garamendi will vote yes on h.res. 233. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamborn of colorado, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lamborn will vote no on h.res. 233. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. schneider, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. snide already vote yea on h.res. 233. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. buchanan of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote no on the adoption of h.res. 233. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated by h.h.s. meng -- ms. meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on

garamendi, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garamendi will vote yes on h.r. 1085. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from kansas seek recognition? ms. davids: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. allred, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. allred will vote yes on h.r. 1085. as the member designated by mr. cleaver, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cleaver will vote yes on h.res. 1085. as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on h.r. 1085. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated by ms. bush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. bush will vote yes on h.r. 1085. as the member designated by ms. kuster, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. kuster will vote yes on h.r. 1085. and as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h.r. 1085. the speaker pro tempore: f

garamendi will vote yes on h.j.res. 17. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lamborn of colorado, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lamborn will vote nay on h.j.res. 17. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kahele, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes. >> as the member designated by ms. pingree of maine, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. pingree will vote yes on h.j.res. 17. the speaker pro tempore: have all the members voted? does any member wish to change their vote? the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new jersey seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. schneider, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. schneider will vote yes on h.j.res. 17. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recog

garamendi who i have known for many years. look it, one way to look at this, neil, this is about infrastructure but so much it is not. so. of it is just the largest expansion of government we will ever see going back to the great society or even the new deal. the piece in "the wall street journal" is worth reading. it's a very long piece about this. basically in the name of infrastructure going to go into the green new deal which will essentially take out fossil fuel energy which will be a tremendous job loser, prosperity killer, make us uncompetitive worldwide. you will also go into social policy. you were mentioning that to the congressman. look, you have got stuff in here, not just free community colleges. it is child care. it is child tax credits. it is dependent credits. this is heading for universal basic income. already we're told that unemmoment insurance and the other assistance measures are going to be made permanent. the checks, for example, will be made permanent from the last stimulus package. this is a huge expan

congressman john garamendi is a senior member of the house transportation and infrastructure committee. and earlier today he spoke with us about how the president's plan will benefit. the bay area. >> well, the benny specific projects in the bay area that i spent some time and solano county talking about infrastructure projects on interstate 85. '05. infrastructure projects. i in the bay area. we do know that there will be lot about me. but the systems we're talking, but we're talking buses were talking about electrification, the purchase of electric buses. the changing of the electrical grid. so that weekend i distribute the appropriate renewable energy that we can cure rate must created california. >> congressman garamendi also said that the bill will include money to update california's water system to help the state recycle water during a drought. here's what's just enough to the kron 4 news room shipments of the johnson and johnson vaccine have been stopped after 15 million doses were ruined because of a human error. the fda is now investigating the situation that happened at a pl

joining us now, democratic congressman, john garamendi of california.your reaction to this news that investigators are looking into contacts between some republican congress members and the people who invaded the capitol? >> i'm not at all surprised. all you need to do is take a look at the rally before. three members of congress were down there encouraging the mob to be violent. in one case, one of our colleagues wanted to make sure that asses were kicked. so i'm not at all surprised. >> how surprised would you be if it does turn up that there was a level of coordination between either the members themselves or the staffs and the people who took over the capitol? >> they ought to be thrown out of congress. and if it's a prosecution is warranted, they ought to be prosecuted. this was a violent attack on people. i've seen a lot of things in my life, but i've never seen such a violent mob attacking police. and if any member of congress was involved in any way, to encourage or enable that, a, they ought to be thrown out of congress, and if appropriate, the

i spoke with congressman garamendi. he is a democrat from california.e said the administration is not putting a price tag number right now, that they want to actually look at all of the projects that have to get done, but that is going to be the biggest question. what is the price tag number that republicans would be able to get on board with? this is a massive undertaking, and again, coming shortly after you are spending $1.9 trillion. the price tag of the infrastructure is where it is going to be incredibly controversial. the american society of civil engineers put out a proposal early this week that is said to address all of the infrastructure problems it would be more than $2 trillion. lisa: i'm going to disagree with tom on your behalf. tom said you don't care about that conversation we were having about treasury yields. this is the key to what is happening with spending in the washington, d.c., with rising interest rates, rising borrowing costs crimping some of these ambitious plans. i'm wondering how much you are hearing in capitol hill, lots of

i even go out to lawmakers like tom garamendi. he has urged for there to be more diversification.hink you will see over the next couple of weeks and months people like senator chris coons, a democrat from delaware, put together some type of package as it relates to china, but the hope from what i am hearing, based upon my reporting, is tha t this type of package will be a nonpartisan bill that will move through congress, similar to the bill a few years ago that senator schumer and i believe senator cotton were able to push through in terms of investment to diversify supply chains. lisa: a nonpartisan bill is hard for me to wrap my head around right now. i imagine a fraction of $3 trillion. how could this be constructed? what could the size of the consensus bilby? does that mean that this effort really has to be piecemeal, a number of different bills spread out over months or even years? kevin: i think this is the type of legislation that, quite frankly, doesn't really get the attention of the mainstream press. it is more in the wonk world, and the policy weeds that we focus on. wh

look, what republicans are doing, and you talked about this in the last hour with john garamendi from california, republicans have struck an initial pose which resembles the pose that they struck at the beginning of the obama presidency in 2009 of total resistance to what democrats are trying to do. and so the purpose of ron johnson's stunt, enforcing that reading and delaying the consideration of the bill was to demonstrate undoing every possible thing i can to slow this down. that's consistent with republican party strategy. it's also consistent with ron johnson's political strategy. assuming he runs for re-election in wisconsin, he's trying to say i'm the number one target for democrats because what that identification gives you is a whole lot of fundraising, a whole lot of conservative energy to his side. so that's the mission that he's on. democrats are on the mission of holding the party together, getting through this process and putting this on president biden's desk in the next couple of weeks. and all signs suggest that's going to happen. in fact, it's notable that we're wond

congressman garamendi will be with us as well. this is bloomberg.g. ♪ ♪ jonathan: spend, spend, spend. from new york city, the countdown to the open starts right now. equity futures positive six points, a .2%. let's get straight to it. we begin with the big issue. a $2.25 trillion infrastructure plan. >> the lesson from the 2017 experience was specifics matter. >> it an ambitious program. >> is it going to drive overheating? >> there are a lot of details we do not yet know. >> is in it in part of this infrastructure spending might be financed by tax increases. >> we'll be looking at a different tax structure. >> when it is 25% or 20%, it is up from 21%. >> is a regime change. >> higher taxes on companies, higher taxes on capital gains. >>

place and i would expect you to call me back here and say okay, where are you going to cut here, garamendiman. you might notice that half the capitol was open today. not the house side. there was concerns about some violence or threats. we don't have a lot of the details. but we know that capitol police are very worried. about what exactly after this. voiceover: riders. wanderers on the road of life. the journey is why they ride. when the road is all you need, there is no destination. uh, i-i'm actually just going to get an iced coffee. well, she may have a destination this one time, but usually -- no, i-i usually have a destination. yeah, but most of the time, her destination is freedom. nope, just the coffee shop. announcer: no matter why you ride, progressive has you covered with protection starting at $79 a year. voiceover: 'cause she's a biker... please don't follow me in. >> neil: you know, the house was not in session today. the senate was. all we know is because of a possible plot -- reading verbatim here -- to breach the capitol. that's all we know. jennifer griffin on what she he

garamendi: the house of representatives and senate have passed the rescue bill and there is money for vaccinations, there is money to open the schools, money for small businesses, the opportunity to revise and rebuild our economy is at hand. the president will soon sign this legislation and help is on the way. i yield back my time. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> request unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. zeldin: i rise today to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the jewish war veterans of the united states of america. jewish war veterans was founded on march 15, 1896, by 63 jewish civil war veterans after several anti-semitic commends were made claiming there was a lack of jewish participation during the civil war. since then, the jewish war veterans have made it their mission to fight anti-semrism and advocate for jewish service members and veterans from all walks of life. whether it was supporting jewish se