garethjenkins lurked in the twilight of those civil proceedings, a ventriloquist the doctor wording,ntriloquist the doctorwording, mr proceedings, a ventriloquist the doctor wording, mr parker and perhaps many others had he not. but this was not disclosed in the horizon disclosure trial. i return to seema misra, how can one begin to justify this protracted group error that denied seema misra the precious prospect of securing justice in the nearly eight years following the clerk advice until the ruling of the court of appeal in hamilton? the most deluded people, as mr warmington pointed out at the end of his witness statement, choose to disregard what they already know. how much knowledge, skill and practical expertise in the application of the law one would have to compartmentalise, ignore, forget or overlook to commit such a collective catastrophic failure of judgment. think of the people in that room on the 9th of september 2013. the combined experience of that room was vast, yet no one spotted the obvious duty of disclosure that would have speedily quashed seema misra's conviction