daniel garrido amplia desde caracas. >>> los incidentes con armas de fuego se registraron el fin de semanantes ajusticiados frente a familiares ihab tantos del lugar. a escasos k kilÓmetros 4 jovenes de 17 y 21 aÑos murieron acribillados. >>> distintas clases de tiro, ametralladoras, revÓlveres y caÑones sonaban. >>> se trata de una guerra no contÓ las detonaciones pero el tiempo que durÓ el tiroteo, frente a su casa. >>> el tiroteo durÓ media hora. >>> bandas rivales o karz narn las matanzas segÚn la policÍa y los delincuentes desatan la violencia los inocentes caen vÍctimas de sus balas. >>> hace como 2 meses mataron a un niÑo de 13 aÑos allÁ arriba. >>> segÚn la policÍa la mayoria de las vÍctimas por armas de fuego son jÓvenes entre 15 y 25 aÑos de edad la tasa mÁs alta de homicidio se registra en la ciudad capital. >>> tenemos una violencia en las calles, bastante fuerte sol fue a buscar a la morgue capitalina el cadÁver de su esposo, uno de los 9. 5 cientos asesinados de lo que va del aÑo. cifra que representa 8% mÁs que los 8.830 homicidios ocurrido en el primer semestre del pasado a

i will skip ahead to garrido slides. usually it would be carried out with much difficulty and expense. it is a very over-simplified definition. it sounds easy but it is not in actual case in point. what may be affordable for one defendant may not be affordable for the other. for one property owner to another, to one tenant to another. congress intended to be flexible and left a -- it vague. it is a case by case basis. it is not possible to have one- size-fits-all. that leaves part of the problem. each business's circumstances are different so you will not enough -- have necessarily one size fits all. i want to go back one slide. the ada through the department of justice which is the agency that is charged with setting forth guidelines to enforce the law through regulations, had a list of priorities for folks, business owners, and property owners to identify, to address. here are some that i have on the slide. the first one is access from the sidewalk or parking lot to the front door. when she never moved those barriers,

not to go given conditions on the ground with the war on drugs, places like veracruz, parts of the garrido, there were no observers. we did not know what happened there. there might have been coercion. we do not know. i retracted by saying great credibility, legitimacy, to what has that become conventional wisdom, which is, the election were legal because it is impossible when to start opening ballot boxes, to distinguish different kinds of votes. sincere from non-sincere. you cannot do it. the point is, it is out there. illegitimacy is an issue which very spirit is a matter of public opinion. today, one out of every three mexican police said this was not equal. as joyce told us, jorge before, this was from the very beginning, the candidate of the establishment. like the perspective of about pena nieto being seen and scrutinized as an incumbent. more of a referendum on him, when in fact, he should of been the opposition. that was the other surprise. legal but not legitimate. what does this mean? probably that the p.r.i. will have to cede some more in terms of negotiations. because they did