had to parallel busing struggles going on and one was the struggle going on in boston when judge garrityuled that something had to occur in that way and then you also had on capitol hill for many years beginning in the early 1970s after the supreme court had ruled in a case of swan versus charlotte-mecklenburg, the supreme court ruled that school systems could use busing to integrate their schools. there was all sorts of anti-busing sentiment on the floor of the house of representatives and in the u.s. senate and house members would enter one anti-busing bill after another saying it's illegal to bus a child passed their closest school. anyway they could get the anti-busing bill on the books they would do it. these bills often pass the hou house. for time period they were stalled in the senate where people like ed brooke could filibuster them are people like willow park or ted kennedy or other liberal senators could stop it. they did this throughout the early 1970s but then in 1970 for busing hit boston and white americans started to review the issue a little differently. they started to

just after it was repealed by legislature, judge garrity of boston, federal district court, ruled thate boston school committee had indeed segregated into schools and di did not only sacred schools by accident, by some accident of housing, geography, but had done through a series of intentional decisions over many years, transferring students from one school to the other, we drawing district lines and intentionally keeping certain -- >> host: lawsuit brought by the naacp. >> guest: and garrity ruled the boston schools had to be integrated and had to do it by sending white children on buses to rock prairie which was -- >> host: the black ghetto track and not only any white student, but white students from white boston. >> host: wow. >> guest: and sending students from rock very to south boston. a race struggle at the same time and there was great outpouring explosion of racial violence throughout the city, mostly this started out as whites attacking african-americans. there was some retaliation. but basically you had a city on fire for a couple of years. >> host: when i read the history

many years he exceeded to the racial balance that but after was repealed by the legislature judge garrity boston federal district court ruled that the boston school committee had indeed segregated schools and had not only segregated schools by some accident of housing, geography but had done it through a series of intentional decisions over many years, transferring students from one school together to the other, redrawing district lines intentionally keeping certain schools. >> host: laws by the naacp. >> guest: lawsuit brought by the naacp said garrity ruled the boston schools had integrated than they had to do it by sending white children on buses to roxbury which was the black ghetto and not only any white students but white students from south boston and then sending students from roxbury to south boston. >> host: yet a class struggle and array struggle all mixed together. >> guest: a racetrack with the same time and there was a great explosion of racial violence out the city. mostly it started out as whites whites attacking african-americans and there was some retaliation. basically

. >> tim: that was mike garrity, 57, that almost had an interception.y, who started the season as a starting running back got hurt. nick wilson was discovered. and hard to get playing time after 1,000-plus yards for the freshman. >> joel: jones-grigsby one of the seniors, will leave arizona as one of the most successful group of seniors the school has seen. three-straight years of big wins. this, a ten-win season. a division championship. a lot to be proud of for those 19 seniors. >> tim: there's something to be said for perfect fits. and rodriguez, in so many ways, is a great fit at arizona. that pass is thrown to the back shoulder. but incomplete. it did hit the dirt. greg byrne is the young athletic director for arizona. helped install what became successful for them. if you think about rich rodriguez, this is, nationally a basketball school. no one's going to get in his way or be critical of the way he wants to win football games, which was the case at michigan. >> joel: you're right. >> tim: third and five. scroggins, tries to keep the play alive.

hey, garrity! what? look! ( siren blaring )

let us know what you think and we'll bring in david garrity with the panel. 15 years in the making but00 mean anything to you? >> we have to look at the base level in terms of earnings and from that standpoint we have certainly consistent growth, a better mix of companies generating higher profits and arguably given the macroeconomic outlook of lower oil and interest rates, probably in a situation here and probably going to accelerate economic growth in 2015 and carrying into 2016. so in that respect, the fundamentals would probably favor moving through nasdaq 5,000 and probably have a 15% to 20% upside for nasdaq in 2015. >> wow. and that's so in other words saying it's not a sell signal. it's a buy signal and partly because the nasdaq of today isn't like what the nasdaq of 2000 was. >> certainly. the composition is far better in terms of companies producing earnings and granted companies are coming public not necessarily profitable. we can look at some crazy valuations for some private companies like uber and basically a glorified cab company. beauty is in the eye of the beholder and

pat garrity from florida blue , i'm interested in hearing where you think health care is going now that you see we are living with a law that has flaws clearly and did not go through a we havece process -- had the debate going on a full repeal but i think most of us feel that we need to fix what we have got, what is the opportunity that you see going forward to have some compromise around fixing what we have. wanted to you jack there is enormous uncertainty right now. there is a case working its way through the courts that may say the federal exchange, 36 states have it including ohio there may not be an ability under the law to subsidize. i don't know of chris would agree with me but i think that undermines the entire obamacare project. there is a lot of uncertainty. i mentioned earlier that i thought we should focus on these economic growth issues and currently health care is one and when i go back home and talk to my business community and small business owners they are concerned rub the costs of health care which have accelerated. "the wall street journal" today. wages going up and