we represent the appellants for the waterfront, gary botto and fred. on the question of the board's jurisdiction, it is a fundamentally simple question which is that there was no effective delegation from the port to the entertainment commission at the time that this permit was issued. therefore, the entertainment commission did not have jurisdiction in the first instance to issue any permit and, so, there's no permit for this board to assume jurisdiction over. also with regard to the amendments that have been requested, the same is the case. the m-o-u was not signed until two weeks after the permit was issued until a couple of days after the amendments that are before this board were requested. the port has said that essentially the delegation was effective immediately upon the legislative act of the report in delegating. the problem with that day is the port, when delegating the authority said it's subject to the m-o-u. there was no m-o-u. it was not signed until two weeks after this permit was issued. so, for that reason -- essentially, the procedur