now professor gary hart does a high crime and misdemeanor require an actual statutory crime no. it plainly does not everything we know about the history of impeachment reinforces the conclusion that impeachable offenses do not have to be crimes and again not all crimes are impeachable offenses we look at it again in the context in gravity of the misconduct and professor turley you recently wrote in the wall street journal and i quote there is much that is worthy of investigation in the ukraine scandal and it is true that impeachment doesn't require a crime that's true but i also added an important kaviak 1st failure it was a yes or no question did you write in the wall street journal there is much that is worthy of investigation in the ukraine scandal and it is true that impeachment does not require crime is that an accurate quotes or you've read it well so professors feldman carlon and gary hart you have identified on the evidence here there is an impeachable act high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power correct yes yes and professor feldman what does the constitution say is

impeachment generally agree that abuse of power is an impeachable offense yes they do professor gary hart do you agree that abuse of power is impeachable you know sir i'd like to focus the panel on the evidence they considered and the findings in the intelligence committee report that the president solicited the interference of a foreign government ukraine in the 2020 us presidential election. press professor feldman did president trump commit impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power based on that evidence and those findings on that evidence and those findings the president did commit an impeachable abuse of office professor karlan same question same answer and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous. professor feldman i'd like to quickly look at the evidence and the report on july 25th president trump told the president of ukraine and i quote i would like you to do us a favor though and he asked about looking into the bidens was the memorandum of that call it relevant to your opinion th

and gary hart brillianced like what? well, i know you're a greenie, al said. hearary said where did you that? well, my staff told me. watch me, gary said. was already pushing the boundaries with the people of the senate. he really was fearless in this way. so he and al and gary hart worked together. any established investigatory committee to investigate what happened at together. island on theeated a report incident that had some harsh words for how things were handled at three mile island and some steps that should be taken to nucleares regulation. and this was really -- this al -- i was really mean, he really cut his teeth 13 buts in the wyoming house on the national level, this was where he really cut his teeth showed he could work on both sides of the aisle. he's reallye that super -- became super wasledgeable about immigration. immigrationrest in was partly because of being immigration -- subcommittee on immigration but also, he was personally it.rested in his heart mountain relocation located very near to him. americansn japanese interned and that was dis

if we do that, we will win. >> did gary hart give you any advice? >> he did. he mostly gave me an -- inspiration. i was 1% in the polls once, too. he ended up going on to win the new hampshire primary because of a lot of people's help. his advice mostly was to get in the race. he's a big believer that it's important to be involved. understands that much of this process is putting one foot in front of the other until something good happens and you make your unlock in this world. >> let me put a hypothetical on the table. you are the president-elect. you are in the oval office eating with -- meeting with donald trump. what do you tell him? >> thank you. can i now take over? just try to have as quick a conversation as i can possibly have. what? >> what do you think of the president? >> he's a danger to our democracy. he's a symptom of our challenges , not the central cause. he's the symptom of 50 years of no economic nobility -- mobility. -- not somebody who had a clue about what this country needs. i think he's the weakest foreign president -- foreign policy pre

. >> there was also the editorial from gary hart. he said you have vision. what is your vision? sen. bennet: first of all, that democracy is vitally important to humanity. we have inherited an imperfect marker see -- an imperfect democracy. we have worked to make this country more democratic, more fair, and more free, and it is our obligation to provide the same to the next generation. they believe we are leaving to them a mountain of debt. they believe we are leaving a lack of investment they our infrastructure. they believe we are leaving climate change unaddressed. they believe we are leaving a broken democracy because of citizens united. these are all things we have to fix. on top of that, america has an incredibly important role to play in the world as the son of a woman, my mom, who survived the holocaust. warsaw and went to stockholm and then mexico city, and then came here. the only country in the world where they could rebuild their shattered lives. i know how important the idea of america is all over the world. it is not that we are perfect, but we are a beacon to the

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous yes the 3 law professors called by democrats rein in unison alarm bells that the country's democracy is under threat by the president.

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime in misdemeanor.

our nation is not allowed to do it is why last week the constitutional scholar professor michael gary hart said if what we're talking about is not impeachable then nothing is impeachable president trump's actions are impeachable offenses they threaten all the of law they threaten our institutions and as james madison warned us they threaten our republic and we also heard from the counsel for the democrats daniel goleman who calls trump a clear and present danger. 2 days ago president trump stated publicly that he hopes that his personal attorney rudy giuliani has taken his seat again now kimberly we will be back with you later of course keeping an eye on how president trump reacts to all of this in fact so far he has been tweeting the likes of read the transcript and also talking about the current state of the economy. sort of diversionary tactic almost away from what is happening on capitol hill so what we're hearing today a reminder that this is the house judiciary committee it is essentially the arguments being put forward by the legal teams of both sides the republicans and the democra

important to know before we get on to what their legal experts said one of the 3 professor michael gary hart said that if what we're talking about is not impeachable then nothing is so strong words as well from him in public it's good that we're learning all of this from these witnesses but are they basically telling congress things that lawmakers should know if they're already proceeding with impeachment proceedings. yeah basically what they're trying to do is i would line exactly what has happened already the investigations that have taken place what the witnesses have said and like i said you know the democrats have lined or at least hinted very obviously out what those potential at each moment articles might be and they're very clear and very easy to understand and very easy to understand for you know an american public which is pretty jaded in many respects with this ongoing impeachment inquiry they said that it be use of power and bribery is one of them obstruction of congress and obstruction of justice might be those in pietschmann to articles so you know it's going to be a busy day a

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous yes the 3 law professors call by democrats running in unison alarm bells that the country's democracy is under threat by the president's actions what has happened in the case today is something that i do not think we have ever seen before a president who has doubled down on violating his oath to faithfully execute the laws and to protect and defend the constitution this president has attacked each of the constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country in the simplest possible terms the president put his personal game ahead of the national security interest it's better to be on t.v. than by a whole. 4th scholar said if trump had tried to force ukraine to investigate a political rival in exchange for military aid it would be impeachable but the scholar wednesday's sole republican witness testified the case against trump has not been proven this would be th

our nation is not allowed to do it is why last week the constitutional scholar professor michael gary hart said if what we're talking about is not impeachable then nothing is impeachable president trump's actions are impeachable offenses they threaten our rule of law they threaten our institutions and as james madison warned us they threaten our republic let me begin where we must with the facts and evidence 1st it's important to understand why ukraine was so important to our national security ukraine was under attack by its aggressive and hostile neighbor russia they had already encroached on its territories the ukraine was at great risk that russia would again take further territory try europe had a stake in this and so did we i'm going to turn to an expert on this ambassador taylor who is one of the most highly decorated diplomats and recognized diplomats for over 40 years he served our country honorably and he was appointed by president trump himself to be in charge of the u.s. embassy in ukraine the russians are violating all of the rules treaties understanding that they committed to

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous yes the 3 law professors called by democrats rang in unison alarm bells that the country's democracy is under threat by the president's actions what has happened in the case today is something that i do not think we have ever seen before a president who has doubled down on violating his oath to faithfully execute the laws and to protect and defend the constitution this president has attacked each of the constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country in the simplest possible terms the president put his personal game ahead of the national security interest it's better to be on t.v. than by a whole. 4th scholar said if trump had tried to force ukraine to investigate a political rival in exchange for military aid it would be impeachable but the scholar wednesday's sole republican witness testified the case against trump has not been proven this would be the

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous yes the 3 law professors call by democrats running in unison alarm bells that the country's democracy is under threat by the president's actions what has happened in the case today is something that i do not think we have ever seen before a president who has doubled down on violating his oath to faithfully execute the laws and to protect and defend the constitution this president has attacked each of the constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country in the simplest possible terms the president put his personal game ahead of the national security interest it's better to be on t.v. than buy for. the 4th scholar said if trump had tried to force ukraine to investigate a political rival in exchange for military aid it would be impeachable but the scholar wednesday's sole republican witness testified the case against trump has not been proven this would be t

weighed in the president trumps ukraine scandal is an impeachable then nothing is and professor gary hart did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power we 3 are unanimous yes the 3 law professors call by democrats running in unison alarm bells that the country's democracy is under threat by the president's actions what has happened in the case today is something that i do not think we have ever seen before a president who has doubled down on violating his oath to faithfully execute the laws and to protect and defend the constitution this president has attacked each of the constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country in the simplest possible terms the president put his personal game ahead of the national security interest it's better to be on t.v. than by for being the 4th scholar said if trump had tried to force ukraine to investigate a political rival in exchange for military aid it would be impeachable but the scholar wednesday's sole republican witness testified the case against trump has not been proven this would

of the we have 3 more constitutional scholars to testify one of them who you mentioned michael's gary hart is going to say that the that president trumps conduct here is worse than that of any other president who has been impeached that of course would include not just bill clinton but richard nixon himself and i wonder whether. that claim is going to really get traction with people that that the conduct here with ukraine really does equal the sort of massive crimes we saw during watergate by richard nixon and then another interesting michael sorry to interrupt you well we're going to continue our conversation. to pam and across these town for a university law professor who is testifying since have the right to vote in free and fair elections today you're being asked to consider whether protecting those elections requires impeaching a president that is an awesome responsibility but everything i know about our constitution and its values and my review of the evidentiary record here mr collins i would like to say to you sir that i read transcripts of every one of the witnesses who appeared i

paint themselves as being morally superior, above other candidates, and a great example, i think gary hart'sbecause he was the moral crusader against ronald reagan. even though it didn't have anything to do with government, it sullied him and undercut him. i think that really is the risk with elizabeth warren too, as clair brought up, that she paints herself, she describes herself as a sort of moral crusader. you've heard other people on the debate stage actually complain about the fact saying elizabeth, you know, just because we're not doing it your way doesn't mean we're any less, you know, morally righteous. and so when you have that and then you have these concerns about, again, her possibly being hypocritical, it seems to cut her even more as a candidate and hurt her campaign all the more. >> she does seem to have a tremendous talent for self-righteousness and hypocrisy and it's been on display now for the american people for a lot of this election. the thing about trump, joe, he's the most prolific liar we've ever had as president of the united states, that we'll ever have as president

gary lineker said.... let's speak to a friend in the meantime. joining me on the phone from his home is the former tottenham player steve perryman, who played with martin peters for five years at white hartk you for speaking to us. you played with a martin peters for some five years. your reaction to the sad news? very sad. he was a wonderful person, a very intelligent footballer. he just person, a very intelligent footballer. hejust exuded class. it was a great pro. he lived the right way. he managed to score goals for us. way. he managed to score goals for us. he wasjust way. he managed to score goals for us. he was just a proper gentleman and all of those attributes that i've heard you read are just now are all so very well—earned. a great man. you were 18 when he joined the club. what was he like in the early days? we see his glory days here on the screen but what was like climbing through the ranks them? imagine that this young player, 17, got into the team, but by martin camei got into the team, but by martin came i was 18. he had been swapped with the jimmy came i was 18. he had been swapped with thejimmy greaves. so to wonderful players in the trench. imagine how big it was. he w