so a lot of different things going into this. >> cris, gary kaltbaum here. how are the agents looking at this or taking this? have you been getting a lot of phone calls from them? are you going to be doing straight business through them also for them to get a better idea of what they can negotiate with? >> agents are some of our best friends and worst enemies. no matter what the negotiation is, you've got the teams that take all the positive attributes that we assign to the players, and you have the agents, you know, who will take the other side of that equation. what we see are a lot of massive debates with our data, and sometimes people are friendly about that, right, depending on which side of this thing you're on, but i'm not sure that there's any contract negotiations going on currently that don't involve pro football focus and exactly what our data means to that particular player. >> so the teams are actually using your data now in ascribing salaries to their players, and what does the union have to say about this? >> well, no, let's make it clear, we'

joining me from the panel today, jonathan hoenig, john burnett, gary kaltbaum and zachary carabell. do you think the president's right or is this really just about political polarization? >> well, the whole country has moved to the left. the democrats have moved explicitly to the left. many of them embrace socialism now, they embrace it in their words and even their policies, whether it be wealth redistribution, government control, government-run health care system. these are socialist ideas. i know you are probably saying it's democratic socialism or it's a different type of socialism. the main fundamental is there, that your life is not your own. you are a sacrifice to the greater good. that's just the antithesis of the american idea, individualism, your right, your liberty. the democrats are not on board with those basic ideas. >> we are going to keep having this debate. it's not going to be resolved. the fact is, this is exactly the reaction when medicare was proposed in 1965, it was obviously the reaction when obamacare passed in 2009. this idea if you vote for democrats -- >>

the great gary kaltbaum is back with us. he was with us earlier. kevin kelly. expert and lance ulanoff as well. kevin, real quick from you, we might get the numbers. i will jump on you what is the big thing to look for apple? everybody is talking about services looking at that versus the iphone. what are you looking at? >> i'm looking at what they're going to be talking about in regards to china because that is the next leg of growth. their phones are very expensive. they have a hard time say staying in the top five. connell: kevin, let me jump on you one minute. susan will be back in one minute. she is actually on the phone with the chief financial officer. the earnings report themselves is now just crossing on the tape. apple in the third quarter earning 2.18% share. that is eight cents better than estimates, okay? the revenue is also better than expected. 53.81 billion versus 53.39 billion. the stock is up 2% after-hours. we'll dig deeper into segments. susan is about to sit back down, in terms of what the cfo told her. kevin, continue your thought. apapprox

joining me today, jonathan hoenig, kristina partsinevelos, gary kaltbaum and liz peek. swalwell is out but reports are swirling that california billionaire and anti-trump donor tom steyer is considering jumping in to 2020 -- the 2020 race as early as tomorrow. sources say one of steyer's first attacks could be on president trump's claims that the economy is now thriving under his leadership. with president trump's approval rating now at an all-time high, including his handling of the economy over 50%, how can he, steyer, or any democrat, win by arguing that the economy's bad? >> i think it's an incredibly tough road to make that case. americans are convinced because they see it in their daily lives through higher wages, through job opportunities they haven't seen before, et cetera, that they are doing better than they've done in decades. so i think this is not what is going to bring him into the fore. what he really wants to talk about is climate change and impeaching donald trump. i don't think he's going to get anywhere blasting this economy. >> may i say there's stil

fox news contributor gary kaltbaum. all right, gary, that is a big number. how do you beat that in the election of 2020 when you're a socialist? >> if we get to november 3rd and the market's strong and we're at 3.7% unemployment it's going to be tough. i must tell you, i talk about this every day, yesterday the left came out with another tax proposal, a $2.8 trillion climate change proposal that does nothing to help the climate. i don't think there is a tax they have not proposed in the last few months and i don't think that's going to sell, and they better get it right or else. stuart: okay, we'll have more from you at the end of the block. stay with me, please. >>> now let's get to tesla. a whopping loss for the stock, down about 11%. they reported a loss after the closing bell yesterday. this morning premarket, as we showed you a moment ago, we are down 11%. that is a gigantic drop for tesla. car guy gary is with us now. how do they turn it around? >> they actually delivered more cars than they made so the loss could have been the other way around had the

joining me now, gary kaltbaum, a fox business contributor. gary, great to see you.; stock market at an all-time high, job market booming, wages up, manufacturing up, gdp above 3%, interest rates low. so is it fair to give president trump a lot of the credit for cutting taxes, regulations and a aggressively promoting government spending? >> my father herb always says it's under who is the president that things matter, and guess what? it's under this president we're seeing that. and i have to tell you one thing that's not talked about a lot is the regulatory front. every time i see a regulation cut, it says obama next to it. president obama, with all due respect to him, loved regulation and i really think hamstrung the economy. i think he should have been doing 5% a year, but all those regulations just stopped business in their tracks. so with president trump getting rid of that, that's really helped. and i speak to businesses all the time, they're all saying the same thing. they have less money to spend on compliance and more freedom to do what they do best, and that

back to gary kaltbaum. lf all right, i'm reading between the lines and this seems to open the door to climate litigation, a lawsuit avalanche if this passes. what do you say? >> oh, and taxes and more taxes and more taxes. i keep hearing from elizabeth warren that she's a capitalist, then she keeps telling us what she's going to do to this company, that company, this industry and that industry and it all comes down to more rules, more regulations, more fees, fines, mandates and taxes. there is nothing in capitalism that's defined by what she says and does. stuart: i doubt that this reintroduction of this legislation is going to actually pass, and i doubt that elizabeth warren is going to be the nominee for the democrats in the presidential election. i don't know that, but i'm speculating here. so is there really anything to worry about here? >> i don't think so. i also think a lot of this talk in the primaries from the democrats on climate change is for the base. i think they know better that once you get t

jonathan hoenig, kristina partsinevelos, gary kaltbaum and gary b. smith, who is here in new york. this bill would boost government spending by $320 billion over an already huge amount of money. what do you think of it? >> well, i'm so happy today. you know, let me just say this in all serious. i think we need to have like a two million person march on capitol hill to let these people know what we think. basically, the future is being destroyed and i don't know whether it's 20 years, 10 years, 5 years, i don't know what number it's going to be but eventually the bond market's going to crash to account for all this debt which means the stock market will crash which means the economy's going to crash and each party will blame each other and guess who will do the bailing out? we will. it is a cesspool brought to us by the socialists and what i call the republic-cons that continue to b.s. us on the size of government and what they will do going forward. >> wow. i don't know how to follow up with that. >> you can't. >> but $320 billion in spending and it's only going to be offset by $75

talk about this with foxnews.com columnist liz peek and kaltbaum capital management president gary kaltbaum, both fox news contributors. we had a jump in the market when the news came out this afternoon. i don't know by the fact that these guys are heading to shanghai next week makes it more likely we'll get any deal anytime soon, how do you read it? >> i think you have month and months before a deal gets done but it is good to see but, i don't think china will give away anything at this point in time. it has been, what, 15 month. all we keep hearing they're weaker than us, they have to do something and they haven't. i think all said and done before the election, we'll get a deal done. it will be more after truce. people will feel better about it. connell: gary brings up a interesting point on timing, liz, right before the election we might get a deal done. what about the president's motivation? on one hand there would be motivation to do that if the economy were slowing down and this might help. on the other hand if you're president trump, maybe you want to delay it, some would argue until

advisor, danielle dimartino booth, heather zumarriaga, and kaltbaum capital management president, gary kaltbaum. let me start with you, danielle, when you sat down, you think 50 basis point in july back on the table? >> he was so much more dovish i think the the greatest optimists were hoping for. by the time he finished his testimony the markets priced in 33% probability of a 50 basis point cut in july? that had been completely priced out prior to this testimony. so that is how much he is delivered. i think everything keys off of one word that you hear both in his testimony, in his statement and in the minutes. that is many. there is a broad consensus or at least the fed is trying to communicate that there is a broad consensus. remember just a few months ago, when bullard dissented, the idea -- charles: right. he was the lone maverick. >> but minutes from that meeting revealed there was a lot of dissent, a lot of disagreement on the committee. this is the flip side. the complete opposite of it. they're painting a picture of cohesive unit outside of one or two super hawks. but otherwise focus o

courtney dominguez, a group i'm not affiliated with, gary kaltbaum, kaltbaum capital management. nifer schoenberger. i thought i was hearing gary k. for a moment there. >> well, look, i look root canal a little more than i like the fed but i'm a big believer the fed stayed too easy for too long, eight years 0% rates for eight year hurt and screwed savers. i have no problem with powell easing a little bit now, why? because the markets is cooperating. when you have the 10 years at 2%, fed at 2.25, lower it down to 1.75 to be fine. to think the economy is suffering because they raised rates in the 2% range is ridiculous. that is where i completely disagree with navarro on that. charles: jay powell spoke in paris. the fed will continue to keep the economic expansion going. he said something pretty interesting, in a sense monetary policy in one country can influence economic and financial conditions throughout the world, throughout financial markets. jennifer, did you see anything else that was similar to that in the "beige book"? >> i mean, no, the "beige book" was more focused today,

joining me today, gary kaltbaum, kristina pa

kaltbaum capital management president, gary kaltbaum joins us now.ou reluctantly became a bull. it paid off big time. it is interesting somebody like you knows markets inside and out. you are not happy with what catapults market higher. no disputing the fact it is going higher. >> charles, i'm not sure the question is in my purview but i will be glad to answer today. for me there is one motto in the markets. it is not the news, but how markets react to the news. best example i can give you, texas instruments, 9% drop in sales and guidance for 11% drop in sales the stock is up $9. that defines a bullish market. in bull markets, bad news is good news and good news is fantastic news. you're seeing it in something like chipotle in bear markets it is the exact opposite. it should be evident we're still in pretty good shape, as i told you a dozen times, watch the semiconductors. i don't know what they're selling or doing, but these stocks are en fuego to the upside almost going pair roll lick. no way -- parabolic, no way the semiconductors and financials a

gary kaltbaum from kaltbaum capital management. he is also a fox news contributor. adam johnson, bull's-eye brief author. thanks for joining us. >> thanks, liz. melissa: what do you make of this? >> i love it. jamie dimon is absolutely right, thank goodness for the u.s. consumer. businesses are not spending. with all uncertainty around trade involving china. cfos basically held up on capitol expenditures. they're not building inventories, but good ol' american consumer is out there. employment is highest ever been, they're spending and that is what jamie dimon is talking about. melissa: rising wages, gary, that is what jamie dimon said. he is looking at consumers that have the healthy evident, best balance sheet than they have had in very long time. >> you have a strong stock market. you have people with jobs, much more johns than they have had in many years. they fell wealthier. they will tend to spend. everything is in decent shape. i really don't have very much complaint. the biggest story for me of the last week, the transports, industrials, economically sensiti

gary kaltbaum from kaltbaum capital management. they're both fox news contributors. liz, what do you make of the analysis from the non-partisan cbo? >> it kind of segues into the conversation about raising the minimum wage as a arbitrary determinant of raising the cost of labor. when you raise the price of labor you will get less of it. the cbo basically said not only could you lose 1.3 million jobs, the number was, it could be as much as 3.7 billion for admittedly a modest boost to low income worker pay. so it's a real tradeoff. my problem, melissa is with the whole thing, when you raise the price of labor you will encourage automation. yes, you will lose jobs. those jobs will never come back. the more companies weigh the opportunity to automate that is a decision they will never reverse. melissa: gary, it was never a coincidence, we saw amazon saying they would raise their minimum wage to $15 an hour. it wasn't very apart from the announcement we read about more robots, more automation. that is how this works, no? >> when you mandate more expenses to any business o

await the president's remarks on the census, liz peek, kristina partsinevelos, jonathan hoenig and gary kaltbaum. >>> first, let's go to edward lawrence at the white house. edward, multiple legal setbacks for the president on this. what kind of action do you think he could take today? reporter: yeah, it went all the way to the supreme court, got kicked back. sources are telling fox news that the administration will plan to sign an executive order here directing the commerce department to find another way to figure out how many citizens are in the united states. my sources are telling me that it could be an option that they have been looking at in an ongoing basis, the so-called alternative option they have looked at. that would be the administration's plan to link the census system with other systems like the tax system and social security system as well as other federal and state systems to figure out how many citizens are actually in the united states. now, senator chuck schumer says the citizenship question itself is very cynical by the president towards minorities and not very moral. david:

bears, i'm christina partsinevelos and joining me on the panel today, jonathan hoenig, liz peek, gary kaltbaum but first let's go to susan li in minnesota where you have the amazon fulfillment workers striking actually right behind you. susan what are they telling you? well in what they said is the first of its kind across north america we do have workers at the amazon fulfillment center just outside minneapolis, minnesota walking off the jobs on one of the most important days for amazon and what they are protesting not wages because we do have amazon listing the minimum wage up to $15 an hour, in fact amazon says the average wage is around 16 to $20 and that includes benefits but they are upset with worker conditions in these unfair stressful productivity quotas that are placed on to these workers meaning they have to pack a lot of goods in a very short amount of time and also they're upset with the fact they haven't been hiring full time staff but talk more about what all of this is about let's bring in captain michael russeau, whose actually a pilot that works for one of amazon's contractor

market watcher gary kaltbaum joins us. i know you are no fan of the federal reserve, but -- i know you're not. you want to disband them, i think. so what's your reaction to ayanna pressley? >> i have absolutely no clue what she is talking about. i don't know where that comes from. i don't know what she is reading. the free flow of money in this country is one of the great things that we have at this point in time. the dollar is the main currency of this world so you know, i really do not know what she's reading on that. but you are right. i don't think -- i think the fed's overrated. i think they enabled the housing bubble. i think they screwed savers for eight years with 0% interest rates. i would love them abolished but that's not going to happen any time soon. stuart: you got that right. definitely right there. all right. let's get serious. talk to me about netflix. that stock is taking a huge hit. i think because they had a decline in the number of subscribers in the united states. does that mean that their growth is j