see now you're saying that sheila barrett f.d.i.c she was basically forced to walk the plank and geiger is behind it all the mac to value and master and the result is a crime in a genic criminal enterprise and watch geiger he leaves where he goes well of course he's going to go to wall street somewhere to make a killing on all of his contacts the insider trading but the economic theory that is used to justify this crime spree comes under two had ngs there's the trickle down economics there's milton friedman monetarism or there's keynesian deficit spending and but they've tried both of those you've got record deficit spending and record monetary stimulus but the economy is still contracting why is that is just because the criminals of completely taken over and we should look at any economic theory any more dr michael hudson because it's not about economics anymore it's about rape and pillage well you're quite right max this is what makes the wall street financial oligarchy different from the mobsters in the night in thirty eight movie wall street does something that the mug can do they'v

thank you harley geiger for joining us. guest: thank you for having me. [video clip]. ♪ ♪ >> for dvd copy of this

. >> q: here we have a geiger counter. >> cooper: ...the eccentric mastermind behind 007's high- tech: these fire heat-seeking air-to-air missiles. >> cooper: ...which, over the years, got him out of many sticky situations. turns out some of q's gadgets are stored with other bond movie memorabilia at this nondescript warehouse on the outskirts of london. it's like something out of "citizen kane." meg simmonds oversees the collection of half a century's worth of artifacts. there was this box of crystals from "die another day." >> halle berry: no, leave it in, please. >> meg simmonds: one of those was in halle berry's belly button. we're not sure which one. please put on the gloves. >> cooper: she handles the most iconic bond props like museum pieces. the oldest one is from "dr. no." >> simmonds: oddly enough, a champagne bottle survived. >> dr. no: we'll have dinner at once... >> simmonds: that's from the scene when dr. no has asked bond and honey to his dinner table. >> dr. no: take her away. >> simmonds: dr. no's henchmen start manhandling honey. >> honey: no! >> simmonds: and bond c

but following paris island, i shipped off to camp geiger, north carolina, where i completed infantryraining, and after that i went off to hawaii where i would be stationed for the next four years. and this is where i also attended sniper school. so after attending sniper school, i quickly shipped off to iraq, and in iraq i didn't get to complete my tour because i was bitten on my right hand by a vicious enemy spider, and i suffered nerve damage. the enemy will stop at nothing, they even train their spiders to bite us. [laughter] so i returned back home for two years of additional training and working up and trying to get my hand back. and this is where i became a sniper team leader in charge of five other marines. and we were out in no halve i have viper -- mojave viber. my gunnery sergeant said we need five volunteers to go to afghanistan. i said, what's the mission? he said, we don't know yet, we just need volunteers. i raised my hand and said, all right, i'm ready to go. so i ended up being assigned as a small them of advisers, and this is different because it's not like normal mi

is his last name, and i have the impression that maybe every three or four months he pulls out a geiger counter oil and holds the thing to his last name, and as long as it goes [static] he turns it off and put away, and if he is still young enough and it does not happen, he will run. it is what it is. >> any other comments on that? questions? one more question back here and that will be the last question. >> do you think all the money that has been raised and spent is going to be a significant determinant of who wins? >> i do not. it raises a whole other question about do we want money to be that big a factor in american politics, whether it determines the outcome or not? it is a much bigger factor in the senate and congressional races where money can completely tilt the outcome, because folks running are not as well known. the presidential, there are so many other factors at play. it is not the money is not important at all, it is not just the most important. >> i do not think money will be a factor between now and election day because both sides will have enough money to get their mes

i have the impression that maybe every three or four months he pulls out a geiger counter and holds the thing next to his last name and as long as they goes -- then he turns it off and puts it away and as soon as it doesn't happen and if he is still young enough he will run. [laughter] but you know does what it is. >> and the other comments on that? other questions? other questions? one more question back here and that will be the last question. >> do you think all the money that has been raised and spent will be a significant determinant of who wins? >> i don't. i think it raises a whole other question about, do we want money to be that big of a factor in american politics weather determines the outcome or not? i think the much bigger factor in the congressional races where money can completely tilt the outcome because the folks running or not as well-known. i think of presidential there are so many other factors at play. it's not the money isn't ported all but i just don't think it's the most important. >> there is one place that money will be a factor between now and election day bec

i have the impression that maybe every three or four months he pulls out a geiger counter and holds the thing next to his last name. as long as it goes -- then he turns it off and puts it away. [laughter] and as soon as it does happen if you still young enough, he will run. but it is what it is. >> any other comments on that? other questions? [laughter] other questions? one more question back here and that will be the last question. >> you think all the money that has been raised and spent is going to be a significant determinant of who wins? >> i don't. i think it raises a whole other question about you now, do we want money to be that big of a factor in american politics, whether it determines the outcome or not? i think it's a much bigger factor in the senate and congressional races, where money can completely kill the outcome because the folks running are just not as well-known. i think in the presidential there are so many other factors at play. it's not that money is important at all. i just don't think is the most important. >> there's one place that i think money won't be a fact