not only in general assembly about security council, so he's on the arena for these kind of pressure. so i'm quite sure that our colleagues from e 10, unfortunately couldn't leave up to the expectations of pursuing a totally independent line and presenting their own views in the in this question. this is also very disappointing. i'm. i'm very much grateful to our chinese products. baby is displayed, displayed bravery, and disregard. and i think that was the right thing to do because they're also very concerned. as a mr. polanski, which is explaining the america, the u. k. and france have blocked a un investigation into americas bio weapons labs in you crane. read more about that at all. ah, ah. a august 2022 for several months. the city's been on the intent showing from the ukrainian on a house with those resemble military and summaries most designated with wins coolest by euclid. the shells from various mines and shrapnel with us before 3 for our own way, which in digital with us currently being part of teach kids with stations are among the most common operations here. these days. p

colleagues insecurity, council phase from united states and its allies not only in general assembly about security council also. ready he's on the arena for these kind of pressure. so i'm quite sure that our colleagues from each turn, unfortunately, couldn't leave up to the expectations of pursuing a totally independent line and for presenting their own use. only this in this question, this is also very disappointing. i'm, i'm very much grateful to our chinese colleagues. they be displayed or displayed for bravery in this regard. and so i think that was the right thing to do because they are also very concern. ah, my pam hair, who previously served as the head of this cia and the top you as diplomat under then president donald trump, is being sued on claims that he spied on several journalists as they visited julie and i thought i backward, dorian and busy in london, as onto the organization, we weeks has released this video. ah, we have 2 lawyers and 2 journalists who have filed a lawsuit claiming that their 4th amendment rights were violated. that their private information was surveilled by the us gover

support and we know what kind of pressure or calling some security council fees from united states and its allies. not only in general assembly about security council. so he's in the arena for these kind of friendship. so i'm quite sure that colleagues from e 10, unfortunately couldn't leave up to the expectations of. ringback pursuing totally independence wine and presenting their own use in this question. this is also very disappointing. i'm very much grateful to our chinese colleagues baby displayed, displayed bravery regardance. ringback i think that. ready was the right thing to do because they're also very concerned. these are any prime minister ya lap. it has congratulated benjamin netanyahu on his election. victory comes as the final result showed. netanyahu was coalition block, and 64 of the 120 seats in parliament. the victory clears the way for nathan yellow to form the most right wing government in the history of israel. some of his coalition partners are religious bodies which have work to keep control of israel's religious establishment. his main allies, the right wing religious zionism party which gained 5th been the

about this. well, we know what kind of pressure our colleagues insecurity, council face from united states and its allies. not only in general assembly about security council also is on the arena for these kind of pressure. so i'm quite sure that our colleagues from e 10, unfortunately couldn't leave up to the expectations of pursuing a totally independent line and presenting their own use in the in this question. this is also very disappointing. i'm. i'm very much grateful to our chinese colleagues. they displayed, displayed bravery, disregard, and i think that was the right thing to do because they are also very concerned as for the others. well, i don't want to go personal about, of course they could have been more principals in these regards. i remember, for example, representative of mexico at some early stages saying that, ok, you have some kind of concerns. thank you. patients. so frame, it's within the, within the international law, there is biological weapons convention. there are mechanisms pleased in that to this mechanism. so what we actively smoke and now the representative of mexico is saying, well, we don't think that the, the, these

this is about 300 billion dollars, however, the resolution itself was adopted by the general assembly. it is not mandatory. unlike the resolution of the security councilsand in general, in fact, we are talking about an attempt. as the permanent representative of our country put it, legalize what is not legalized from the point of view of current international law. with this sua, the authors of the document noted he cannot but be aware that the adoption of such re. resolutions will have consequences that can boomerang back to them. no general assembly or mechanism can override the sovereign immunity that state assets enjoy under international law. countries that supported the relevant decision of the general assembly will be involved in the illegal expropriation of the sovereign assets of a third country and the next excess of the powers of the general assembly in the interests of the west at the whim of the west alone, the assets of sovereign states have already been frozen. true, they are in such volumes as in russia at one time, the selectivity of an order based not on international law, it was felt by abstract rules venezuela afghanistan libya iran

resolution adopted by the general assembly and it is not binding on the execution, in contrast to the resolutions of the security council. and in general, in fact, we are talking abouts the legalization of our country was put, what is not legalized from the point of view of the current international law will be a separate group, we emphasize that there is no general assembly , or the mechanism cannot cancel the sovereign immunity to which state assets have in accordance with international law. countries that supported the relevant decision of the general assembly will be involved in the illegal expropriation of the sovereign assets of a third country and the next excess of the powers of the general assembly in the interests of the west for such clearly unfriendly steps, russia has not yet declared experts confident in our country. as a last resort, it will also be found that it is possible to seize foreign goods. over the past few years , a lot has been done to make russia attractive in terms of foreign investment. in terms of business rating, until recent years, we have consistently raised higher and higher, presenting opportunities for a foreign company to invest

should be made by the un security council, not the general assembly body where the united states took this resolution. here is some more of what the russian ambassador had to say about today's resolution shibley's trooping. so you are inferior already of this initiative is obvious from a legal point of view, the provisions of the draft to not stand up to any criticism or legally no. and void, it's an attempt to legalize what can't be legalized from the point of view of current international law uses. this is a classic example of the concept of rules based order when a group of states does not act on the basis of international law, but seeks to sanctify lawlessness using the authority of the general assembly and positioning it as a judicial body, which by definition, it is not as just close to it now, the russian ambassador also pointed out that one of the key deceptions from those supporting the resolution was this claim that somehow the money that was being used would go to help the ukrainian people when in reality the money was going to be used to prolong this conflict to supply ukraine with more weapons, to carry out more military actions and prolong the conflict