each item would be stamped with words such as "genetically engineered," or "partially produced with genetic engineering," or "may be partial produce which amendewith genetic engineering." if californians vote yes on proposition 37, the state will become the first in the country to require such a labeling system, possibly affecting industry labeling practices across the nation. numerous items are already sold in grocery stores containing genetically modified corn and soy, but companies are not required to inform consumers. advocates of prop 37 say consumers have a right to know what they're putting into their bodies. >> we all have the right to know what is in our food. that is why so many consumers say yes to proposition 37. it gives us the right to know if there are genetically engineered ingredients in our food, with clear information on package labels. that is the very same rights consumers in nearly 50 other countries already enjoy. yes on 37. we have the right to know what is in our favor. >> that that was free -- was released by "yes on 37 california right to know campaign." upon it s

are they genetically modified?pose that's the question of the day. >> the other is what is weather going to be like. cloudy but those will dissipate. cloudy skies, distinctly cooler. santa rosa manages just 70 degrees. 62 and observing lane, 69 degrees. fremont up to 70. livermore, just 74. last weekend, livermore was 70 degrees. cooling in a week and we're going to continue to keep it on the mild side. there is a possibility maybe of some showers late tuesday a and early went. it's worth mentioning instead of putting a rain drop in there. we'll stay tuned to that to discuss how the models are changing and shaping up for that. next weekend, things will begin to warm up. we have high pressure moving in back saturday. warm next weekend. in the meantime, pretty nice to cool week. >> are you still hedging your bet, not willing to put the written drop. >> that is from a lifetime in weather. >> very good >>> here is a story that's proof that doing good can bring you karma. >> mailman ross fox of kansas lost his wallet wi

of six to eight a package indicating whether a product is genetically engineer. and some of the opponents of prop thirty seven jeffries say that the food choices will decrease and prices will increase how do you respond to that. there are sixty one countries that have labeling requirements for genetically engineered foods and not one has increased the cost of shoots to consumers in fact the same companies that sell g m o's in the united states craft nationally as hershey's and have either labeled it overseas or removed it entirely at no cost to consumers if they wanted to trust the entire cost of hiring an artist to place the actual label would cost about seventy three cents per person per year however the biotech industry claims that it's going to be four hundred dollars per year and that it's going to cost the california government over a billion what in fact according to the california government it's at most two point seven cents per person so what they're doing is they're trying to scare people away from voting for their best self-interest sure i mean the co

. >> yeah, genetically modified food should food be abled if it has any part of the genetically modified food in it? >> right, and we're going to sit down with our political insider to look at last week's debate and see how they did or go did not and what to expect from the second part of the ticket. >> and. >>> first, developing news. >> that's right, the search continues for the suspect behind a death of a woman in hercules. the neighbor found her body in the house on ash court friday night. and someone believes that they entered the house from the back. ko suffered a traumatic injury. >> we have the supporters to honor her and a great woman a blew outback with the license plate one a1f680 and investigators are still working on a motive from the crime is. -- crime. >>> one day down, san francisco is bracing for more visitors today during the busiest weekend of the year and that begins at 11 this morning with the street fair and we have hardly strictly blue grass and golden gate park. america's park and flight week events on the bay this afternoon. and along with the north beach italian

so we don't have genetic proof, ultimate proof, but the evidence is very strong for genetic transmission in both bipolar and unipolar illness, but it's strongest in bipolar. so rodney probably inherited a predisposition for bipolar disorder from his mother, mostikely a dysfunction in how the brain works. in this highly schematic drawing, nerve cells in the brain carry information in the form of electrical impulses along the length of the cell. r the impulse to cross the synapse-- the space between the cells-- a chemical called a neurotransmitter must be released into the synapse. the neurotransmitters move across the space and lock into specific receptor sites on the next cell. that's normal brain function. the theories of mood disorders-- that includes both depression and mania-- are dominated today in today's knowledge base by our knowledge of neurotransmitter function in the brain. in major depression, a person may not have enough neurotransmitt at the synapse. in a person who is manic, there may be too much neurotransmitter at the synapse. summing up, there is no single cause of majo

the liberals or progressives or run a genetic modification.that is so while i see myself playing and the role we play on cochlear science. as to how do you approve, that's a $64,000 question. scientists don't have a strong lobbying group in washington. i mean, there's a small handful of science lobbying groups and scientists don't tend to go and vote en masse. when they're at seven something come you don't see white lab coat people protesting. it just doesn't happen. >> i feel that's intentional on the site is to try out though as to not appear biased. he mentioned some understudy to question because they were activists. i am a scientist. how do we communicate without appearing to be biased? >> it is the most delicate tightrope walk you can imagine. it is giving the science and then if you feel compelled to say what policy you think they should follow, say now i'm speaking as a policy advocate and i think we should do this policy. okay, because that is a different discussion than the underlying science and i think making that distinction cryst

>> most of the target crops for genetic modification of the commodity crops. maize, wheat, cotton, soybeans. those are not the crops that you worry about having the old artists and variety. when you talk about food quality, more generally talking about pomegranates, etc.. that is such a small market, generally, we will not see genetic modification there. >> but high fructose corn syrup is a terrible food stock. it is so on healthy. -- it is so unhealthy. the because it is cheap. it is cheap because it is subsidized. >> is there a problem that we expect food on demand. that is one thing we take for granted. we expect asparagus in peru, strawberries year round. we make unrealistic demands on the market. >> but we are so disproportionately rich that we make those demands. the upshot is we are taking this out of the market and preventing people who are actually hungry and cannot afford to eat properly from being able to afford it. if you are paying someone to grow asparagus where they could be growing something that could feed a lot more people without being a cri

opponents argue the fda says genetically engineered foods are safe to eat. >> genetically modified food or engineered ingredients are no different than any other type of ingredients or crop. that's why they don't require labeling today. >> we do believe genetically engineered food specifically are problematic. health concerns links to allergies and other affects that have been showing up. environmental problems. >> the latest polls show that voters favor problem significance 37 by a margin of 2-1. >>> at this exact minute, it is official sundown. by the sun comes back up tomorrow morning, the changes you need to know about as eyewitness news continues right here on cbs 5. ,, ? ,,,,,, [ male announcer ] the career landscape of america is changing. new jobs are here, and by 2025, we could have millions more that demand qualified college graduates. many in the bay area. at devry university, our market-responsive bachelor's and master's degree programs can give you what you need to succeed in today's careers and the ones on the horizon. get the know how you need for a new tomorrow at our 4

bioengineered food or genetically engineered food has been looked at.y the national academy of sciences, world health organization and american medical association. they found it safe for people to eat and proposition 37 is really much more than just a simple labeling. i know that is the way it is promoted but shake down lawsuits against grocery retailers, retailers and increase state bureaucracy and increase grocery bills. it contains a number of loopholes for food that can contain ge. every editorial paper has urged voters to reject it. >> cheryl: the opponents say it's going to add more bureaucracy and cost millions and evening opening the door to lawsuits. should those people be protected? >> we're hearing a lot of misinformation. many of you have seen the ads over and over, they are called misleading by all the major papers. in the last week, the no on 37 campaign had to pull down the first ad because it misrepresented stanford university. academy of knew tryingists had been misrepresented and this is massive misinformation come panned. monsaton an

there clearly are genetic risks. people do differ as a function of something that's being transmitted genetically from family to family. when you look at certain family complexes, you see these multi-generational, multi-affected families where the risk is just so high for the people becoming alcohol or drug users or abusers. certainly we know that in the alcoholism area, children of alcoholics are at about a threefold risk of becoming alcoholic themselves compared to children of non-alcoholics. and appropriate controlled studies have been done with adoptees and with twins to indicate that this is a genetically determined vulnerability. there have been very elegant studies showing that, for example, if one of the pair of identical twins is a cigarette smoker, the co-twin is more likely to be a heavy drinker. and that suggests that it's the same genes that are involved in smoking and alcohol drinking just being expressed differently in different people. so this co-occurrence may represent a general vulnerability factor

prop 37 would require labels on foods that are genetically modified. teresa garcia reports the fight is getting loud and expensive. >> reporter: supporters of california's proposition 37 took to the streets of oakland. the organic consumers association has gathered over 200,000 signatures in support of the measure. it calls for labeling foods containing genetically modified organisms or gmos. on the other side corporations have contributed $35 million to fight prop 37 with biotech giant momsanto leading the way. >> i'm a very worried grocer. >> reporter: labels would be a costly burden for the voters this man said. >> every shipment we get, every product every time, we need to keep records, written records of that. >> reporter: the vast majority of corn and soybeans grown in this country come from genetically modified seeds engineered in a lab to resist insects and pesticides. those crops are then used in a huge variety of processed foods from cereals to sodas. prop 37 would inform shoppers those products contain gmos. the food giants claim the labels

amyris discovered a way to genetically modify yeast to produce an antimalarial drug.nother company, ls9, has altered the genes of e. coli bacteria to produce fuel. but all of them are modifying a few genes, not designing all of them. venter's rivals say his method is commercially impractical, but he's made a career out of bucking the scientific establishment and earned lots of enemies with his brash behavior and his knack for grabbing research money and the spotlight. so what are your faults? >> probably impatience is the-- you know, the biggest one. i don't suffer fools too well. that--you know? i'm not going to ever win a political contest. >> a lot of people have said you're a self promoter, an egomaniac. true? partially true? not true at all? >> you know, if we hold a press conference, it's considered self-promotion. but somebody at a university, the university holds the press conference, and that's not self-promotion. >> overly ambitious? >> i'm sure i'm very guilty of that. [ticking] >> coming up... >> you accomplished all this stuff, and you got fired by the co

are caused by inherited genetic conditions, according to the study.more led the research team at children's mercy hospitals in kansas city. he's the director for the center for pediatric genomic medicine there. dr. kingsmore, welcome, and thank you for being with us. first of all,-- >> thank you very much. >> warner: how big a breakthrough is this? >> this is a big breakthrough. we've been working toward this goal for a coup of years now. there has been a big gap between the knowledge that we have of genetic diseases, about 35% of them, and the ability for doctors to identify which of these was a problem in any given child with an illness. >> warner: and up until now, how much have you been able to diagnose the d.n.a. abnormalities? how quickly? i mean, i said it can take weeks and weeks, but what's the process that's making it so slow now? >> well, typically, the way that this has been tested is for a doctor to pick the leading candidate gene or part of the d.n.a. code, and to look at just that. it's kind of like fishing with a single fishing line. i

genetic counselors who specialize in prenatal testing operate on genetic abnrm mallities. >> counseling staff will increase in the u.s., and they now number over 1,800. >> the test may soon be available in japan, here too people are debating the ethics. >> reporter: researchers at this tokyo hospital are preparing a clinical trial. >> we take a blood sample of 20 ccs and send it to the testing company in the u.s. >> the number of japanese women aged 35 and over having babies has roughly doubled over the past decade so more than 250,000 per year. for this age group, the chances of a fetus acquiring down syndrome rise significantly. only a few percent of japanese women currently under go down syndrome testing. but an increasing number of parents may learn that their child has down syndrome. what japan still lacks is a support system for decision making if the test is positive. this couple had no advice available. they gathered enough information on their own. finally they found a specialist to consult. after learning what down syndrome meant, they decided to have the baby. >> there was no

supported the proposition 37 say genetic engineering forced insecticides. >> in fact, genetically modified food or engineered ingredients are no different than any other type of ingredients. that's why they don't require labeling today. >> we do believe genetically engineered foods are problematic. leads to health affects that are showing up in the studies. environmental problems. >>> the latest polls show voters favor proposition 37 by a margin of 2 to 1. >> we have our san francisco giants and game 2 action hosting the reds. 58 degrees at game time. your back to work forecast as eyewitness news continues. ,,,,,,,,,,,, vo: for years, sacramento politicians have chopped away funds for our schools. today, we're forty-seventh out of fifty in per-pupil funding. now these politicians say unless we send more tax dollars to sacramento, they'll cut education again. here's a new approach. prop thirty-eight sends billions in new education dollars straight to our local schools, and guarantees the politicians can't touch it. thirty-eight will restore the education cuts from sacramento. so remember th

modified corn monsanto genetically modified rice what how does the g.m.o. business fit into all this well as as i was on the trail of trying to figure out why almost a billion people are hungry on earth i heard a lot of murmurings from scientific institutions genetically modified organisms can help feed the world and so i said all right let's take a look at it and i spent about a year traveling from one genetic modification laboratory to another i found one woman whose life's goal was to create the square tomato so that you could get more in the box i met another woman dr pamela ronald out at u.c. davis she had actually created a rice through the methods of genetic alteration that was resistant to the number one asian rice light something called xanth ammonia is a potentially. hunger saving rice now those are two very different things a square tomato and a blight resistant rice i think that we have to be careful when we lump all science together in one barrel and throw it out which are i i am totally against the monopolistic and really really evil practices

it calls for labelling foods containing genetic modified organisms. or gmos. on the other side corporations have contributed $35 million to fight prop 37 with biotech giant monsanto leading the way. >> i'm a worried grocer. >> reporter: ray martinez said labelling would be a costly burden for grocers. >> the paper work alone is a nightmare. every shipment we get, every product, every time, we need to keep records, written records of that. >> reporter: the vast majority of corn and soy beans grown in this country come from genetically modified seeds engineered in a lab to resist insects and pesticides. those crops are then used in a huge variety of processed food from cereals to soda. prop 37 would inform shoppers those products contain gmo. the food giants claim the labels will make consumers think there's something wrong with the food. the pro labelling side insist as growing number of studies are linking genetically modified foods to possible health risks including obesity and allergies. >> americans have a right to know what's in their food. and corporation

backers say you have the right to know whether what you eat has been genetically modified. opponents say it will drive up the cost of food. >> in a green house, the director is working to develop a lettuce seed that will german yait in hot weather. a colleague trying owe to produce rice better able to tolerate drought. >> the difference could be he more news. >> he says man nip plating genetic material in plants can help us deal with global warming and rising sea levels.. >> we need these tools to be able to keep up he fears the requirement of a label will scare consumers and set back corporations. >> 15 years, over 90% of the soy beans has been produced using genetic engineering. no one has gotten sick related to that. >> he calls prop 37 an unnecessary burden, supporters say it's all rit to know. >> this takes a decision to the california voter. let's them decide. >> a spokesman says it's simple. >> they're proud of the products they should put a label on it. >> in the early 1990s, he showed me one of the labels. >> we had opposition but... once the tomato made it to groc

i think it is a genetic thing. we have genes. we can't deny the genetic disposition. long-lived people have children who live longs. >> are there drinkers and non-drinkers who would be 100? >> yes. >> in that case, you would conclude that the reason why they live is genetics. >> gics plays a big role, that's correct. >> but you're telling me that you're going beyond genes now, or in a different direction from genes. you're saying that their longevity is also controlled by the actively of the brain. >> yes. >> not by concentration. >> yes. >> by what? >> by the things that they're interested in. you have changed -- the genes can be altered, just like we give drugs for depression, the drugs go in there and eventually alter the genetic programming through the messages that are sent out through the genes. >> what drugs do you give out for depression? >> various ones. one is levaxer and other drugs? >> prozac? >> prozac, paxil, zoloft, the whole raft of them, and there are rother antidepressants. >> you sound like you know your drugs. >> well, i'm a psych -- psychopharmaco

now, if genetics are involved, then this could lead to new biological treatments. as many as one in five young women who suffer from anorexia will die from the disorder. they could really use a new approach. >> they can detect that genetic makeup early. >> look for who is most susceptible and also look at, you know, new medications, new treatments in that fashion, as well. we have to do something. >> all right. thank you. we'll be right back. ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >>> quick reminder we don't have a 6:00 newscast tonight because of the presidential debate. the "cbs evening news with scott pelley" who is in denver is next. and right after that, cbs news will begin its special coverage. debate. we'll leave you with live pictures from the debate floor in denver. the latest news and weather are always on cbssf.com.

doctor, tell us what role do genetics play? >> that's a great question. it's very clear that the research is showing that cancer in general is a genetic disease due to mutations in some of the dna in our cells and tissues that allow transformation of a normal cell into a cancer cell. so understanding the genetics of the tumor can help us understand the outcome, can predict response to therapy and help define new targets for therapy that will really continue the advances we've seen in our research to find cures for breast cancer. >> when picking a physician, when picking a hospital, why is it so important to have the right question that you're armed with information. >> information is empowering, the more that you know about your own situation, the better questions you can make and the better decisions you can maifnlgt cans -- make. cancer is a very scary situation. when you hear the word cancer, the pan pick button goes off. after that to get information from a variety of sources. there are online prints resources and to really come in and be able to firs

proposition 37, seeks to require labeling on foods, containing genetically modified ingredients when the food, raw or processed are offered to sale to consumers in california, what is your position on this miss dillan? >> i think that it is a good idea in principle and i think that it is a good idea that the market is amplely equipped to take care of my husband and i personally shop and look for foods that are fish, for example, that is caught in california, and caught in the sustainable mat and her that is our choice and we pay more for that. at the same time, there are a lot of people who would like the choice to be able to buy those gmo, products and the labeling that is required by the proposition is very flawed in my opinion. it treats dog food in the same way as it treats food for humans. and it is defining the genetically modified in such a way that heirloom tomatoes that are a mix of old tomatoes seeds would fall under from category. while i support the idea that i would like to know personally where my food comes from we being not ignore the huge cost, and i oppose it and i

to label or not to label genetic processed food. this state would be the first to require mandatory labeling. >>> plus, the works of engineer ard rickard. they shed light on communities not often seen. coming up next. >>> good evening. i'm belva davis, and welcome to this week in northern california. joining us is lisa krueger, science reporter. and regional political reporter. and cory cook, political scientist. cory, let's start with you. you teach this stuff, you study this stuff. tell us, what are we seeing that is so new this year? >> i think the sheer amount of money we're talking about is new. you had in september alone both mitt romney and president obama raised the most money individually than the two candidates spent in 2004 combined. on the presidential level, we're talking about 2 or 3 billion spent for a local election, magnitudes increase over previous years. >> give us the roots. >> a lot comes from outside groups. our new campaign finance system encourages groups to spend money despite the campaigns. american crossro

. >> reporter: the seeds are genetically modified to resist insects and require less water. >> the onlycan survive in california is we have to be on the cutting edge of the latest technology. >> reporter: at the strauss family farm, organic dairy farmer albert strauss is pushing back against genetically modified technology. >> i have my own concerns about what affects it has on land, what affects it has on animals. >> reporter: he worries that bio engineering crops can contamination organic crops like his cow's feeds. these two california farmers represent the two sides of this war. people have if right to know if their foods is made from gmo. >> we're saying put it on the label and let people make choices for themselves about what they buy and eat. >> reporter: but opponents say requiring labels on genetically modified foods will make people think they are not healthy. >> by putting a scary sounding label on food products giving people the impression that the foods are somehow unsafe when they are simply not true. >> this technology has been tested more than anything. >> reporter: she

the brain isn't simply created by genetics and it's very much shaped by environment. and so my mentor john monaghan likened the problem of predicting violent people to predicting violent storms. when you think of meteorology, you think of the difficulty of classifying a hurricane and tracking a hurricane, making judgments about such complex behavior that has sort of chaotic premises underlying it, you're going to make lots of mistakes. you're going to make lots of mistakes in both directions. sometimes you're going to make a mistake when you think the storm is going to hit and it doesn't and sometimes you're going to make mistakes where you think the storm is not going to hit and it does. and i think one of the great challenges, quite frankly, for the legal system, is understanding statistics well enough to make that judgment about where you draw that line that anita was referring to about where do you want to avoid the errors. you want to avoid the errors, a category five hurricane is going to hit miami but there is only a 40% likelihood that that hurricane is going

it's the genetical engineered food labeling initiative. if approved it will require that food made with genetically modified ingredients say such. the chamber of commerce is not a campaign contributor but says prop 37 would be bad for california. >> it exposes people to litigation, unnecessarily, without any gain on any scientific basis. >> according to the no on 37.org campaign the proposition will raise food prices by $400 a year for the average family and it would not properly inform people of what's in their food. >>> and coming up next, hometown pride in pleasanton. giants shortstop brandon crawford's coach takes us back to the field where it all began. >>> and speaking of pleasanton, we saw highs today in the low 80s. outside right now, if you have evening plan, still, 80 degrees out by livermore. 70 in san francisco. santa rosa, 82 degrees. we have clear skies right now. but rain is coming back. your seven-day forecast. we'll let you know when it's going to arrive when we come right back. >>> 1 in 88 children born in the united stat

backers say you have the right to know whether what you eat is genetically modifie modified. opponent say it's unnecessary expense that will drive up the cost of food. here's mark's report. >> we are losing. >>reporter: in green house at uc davis the director of the seed biotechnology center is working to develop a lettuce seed that will germ nature in hot weather. his colleague tries to produce rice better able to withstand drought and salt waichlts the difference it's norm us in the global situation. >>reporter: he says manipulating the genetic material in plants can help us cope with global warming and rising sea levels. >> we really need these tools to be able to kind. >>reporter: but he fear that is prop 37 requirement to label genetically modified food will scare consumer and also set back corporations that fund university research. >> 15 years over 90 percent of our so i bean, 88 percent of the corn. canolli a oil all proud genetic engineering and nobody has ever goten sick in any documented way related to that. >> bradford calls prop 37 an unnecessary burden. supporte

prop 37 requires that food made with genetically modified ingredients be labeled as such.t is a good idea or will it cost you more money at the grocery store? here is nbc bay area's kris sanchez. >> reporter: non-gmo is something you'll see on in of whole food markets items. they support prop 37, the genetically engineered labeling initiative because they say they want consumers to buy what they're buying. >> this is about food and proper labeling for the customers. and we do feel really strongly customers have a right to know what is in their food and how it is produced. >> reporter: according to no on 37, it will raise food prices by about $400 a year. many major california newspapers have come out against prop 37, some of them taking issue with the author of the measure, who they call lawsuit happy. the san francisco chamber of commerce is not a campaign contributor to the no side, but says prop 37 would be bad for california. >> it exposes people to litigation, unnecessarily, without any gain on any scientific basis. >> reporter: a sonoma wine grape farmer told us by p

. >>> one of the state ballot items has to do with genetic engineering with foot. opponents say the foods are fda approved and safe. >> genetically modified foods are no different than any type of crop and that's why they don't require labeling today. >> we believe they're problematic, links to allergies and other effects showing up in studies and environmental problems. >> reporter: latest polls show it is favored by 2 to 1. >>> we told you there was plenty to do in san francisco today. the 39th annual astro street fair. many set up stages and booths. the event raises more than $75,000 every year for charityies. it was a parade to celebrate it tall ya. 114th italian heritage parade. it included hand crafted floats and marching bands, lots of italian mealing and wine. >> no rain on that parade. it's live, high deaf doppler radar, in search of showers as we continue on the cw. thanks, roberta. ...ahead, today the 49ers we the hammer... >> good evening everybody. yes, it's back and life, high def, we can pick up any kind of rain jobs. we have absolutely nothing going

or not, but what sort of genetics do you have in cancer itself and personalizing the therapy like our new drug. liz: these are tumors, but what would show promise to the point of the fta will fast-track it, getting success. >> don't know how the fda will look from 113, but the community is excited about the results, we present result the results a cof weeks back in europe the first clinical data, take for example one of the genetic markets, a subset of these genetic forms of lung cancer and virtually every patient that retreated whether they were at the beginning of treatment had a response. the tumor shrank, patients felt better and even if they had tumors that had spread to the brain, which happens in about half of lung cancer patients, it went away. liz: if i'm somebody who has lung cancer and trying things, i am thinking dr. harvey berger's drug may be my last chance. fast tracking now, that is for leukemia types of drugs going through the blood. tell me about when that will be available for patients who other therapies have already failed. >> is for chronic myeloid leukemia. it i

>> you shouldn't know whether your food is genetically modified. >> know if you're buying geneticallyince he's done with answering questions, it's impossible to know where mitt romney stands on the issue. todd stanhouse represents the yes on 37 right to know campaign in california. he joins us live there sacramento. good afternoon. two biggest producer of genetically modified foods are monsanto and dupont. why would they resist informing consumers about what they are eating when 61 other nations, including china and india, already label these products? >> well, that's a fair question, martin. it's a really fair question. i mean, at the end of the day all we're talking about here is a label. one can only assume that for monsanto and dupont they simply don't want consumers to know what's in their food, which quite frankly, is a stunning indictment of their credibility. >> why do they not want to know, tom? why do they not want us to know, todd? >> they're fearful, i think, that if consumers do know what's in their food, whether it's insecticides or bacteria or viruses, but we're really

. >>> and a boy ordered to move to another school because of his genetic makeup. we'll explain after a check of your local news. looks like your bags didn't make it. we'll send them to your hotel. [ sad music playing ] this is fun. [ sad music continues ] [ knock on door ] your bags, sir. thanks. both: finally! one taste, and you'll understand. enjoy delicious dunkin' donuts coffee anytime. best vacation ever! pick some up where you buy groceries. america runs on dunkin'. ♪ ooh, yeah, ooh-ooh, yeah ♪ ooh, yeah, ooh-ooh, yeah ♪ i love ya ♪ ooh, yeah, ooh-ooh, yeah [ female announcer ] introducing new special k popcorn chips. with 28 buttery chips for 120 calories, you can bring the flavor of the movies home and still stay on track. freedom to enjoy. what will you gain when you lose? find them in the cracker aisle. yep...doh. [ boy ] slurpably fun and a good source of calcium. dads who get it, get go-gurt. zach canton's dad gave him a pep talk about asking out the cutest girl in algebra. the metcalfe brothers had a staring contest to see who'd get the last bite of d