as we're adding in these other changes where we're closing down an on ramp going north from geneva geneva, that's going to move traffic to ocean avenue as well. i think we should be being lewing at in this -- looking at this in the ways we're changing to getting on and getting off of the 280. is that something that's being proposed? >> when the circulation study was done, we assumed that the changes to the routing proposed by the tep was in place. the analysis done already included those. we will continue to include those and coordinate with mta on which elements are moving forward versus which have changed since the tep was written to ensure we're including the changes correctly in the traffic analysis. this would be more detailed and we will include those improvements to make sure it's holistically evaluated. >> great, i'm concerned that we're diverting more congestion into ocean avenue that will lead to huge impacts to the speed which we're trying to address with our changes to on ramp -- >> it's a valid concern. it's the first thing we will do to make sure these projects can continue

going through hol lie wood and connecting the shipyard developments and to geneva avenue and this will be a alternative while the geneva extension that is the long term. and the other one is on red on the slide and going south, and going through, what is now, betty avenue and this option is less certain given the plans to expand the campus and the release for the nop for the eir and so we are really just weighing the pros and cons for these two alternatives. and the concerns with circulation and the parking lots and it provides us a more direct connection to cal train and so it is just a question of looking at these two options. the request that they are bringing for you today is to complete the study and look at this new alternative in addition to carrying out additional rounds of out reach. we will be having the translation and it is the opportunity for them to voice the concerns or the opinions on the project before it moves to the next phase, with the sfmta which is the preenvironmental work and we are happy to take any questions. >> thank you very much. >> any questions? >> i do have a request on the presentation

wonton united nations had in geneva pashtun one time united nations in geneva and ban ki-moon invited iran. bite out of that because pressure of the united states. they canceled the invitation, but behind it you have other cooperation recent about isis. iran already cooperated about tikrit, but you didn't have coordination or officially saying that iran is at least one stakeholder in the region and invite them and respect them, talk to them like right now you're talking with iran. i think it's almost two years, about just nuclear. you didn't have this opportunity. we didn't have this opportunity to invite iran and recognize iran as a partner, not as an enemy. i think you should answer this question. >> quick comment spam i want to come back to something howard imagine what you think is very important, and that is not a know that our sunni allies in the region, particularly saudi arabia and jordan, are very fearful of a rapprochement between united states and iran and they see it as their living influence, iran gaining influence. i think israel has some concerns that i you are spot on

look the geneva connection is very clear about when you hold prisoners you don't do it in legitimate targeting areas. unfortunately they don't follow the good geneva convention. one other thing we need to keep in mind human intelligence is very important in these operations. i fly intelligence surveillance reconnaissance. i did that in the air force and still do. you can only get so much information by looking at a facility. people are a blur. you can't identify specific targets necessarily. it's that human intelligence on the ground which we let kind of go away. capturing people instead of killing them. taking them back and getting information from them and unraveling like we did in the surge in iraq which was so effective. >> why don't we have human intelligence. with isis and use it more with isis? >> because it's high risk. i think this is a risk adverse president. i give him credit for taking out bad guys when he can find them in some cases. he is he risk averse, he doesn't like to put special forces on the ground for smash and grab missions. it's much easier to to have a drone in an area and drop a missile that way. again, i support using th

geneva convention that considered it and her name is attached to it those interested in exploring barton's role in all of this might want to visit the red cross museum in geneva, switzer land. they think highly of ms. barton there. there's an entire room devoted to her, perhaps a more fitting memorial than the rest stop on the new jersey turnpike that we have named for her. [ laughter ] the third path-breaking effort made in 1865 was to devise a system of medical service that could be organized before any hostileities started. her idea was that once the shooting began it was too lit to start collecting supplies or recruit appropriate personnel. she wanted something that would be ready to go whenever it was needed. this again was in sharp contrast to the experience of both sides in the civil war, which had to scramble to put together medical arrangements while the chris skies are was upon them. the first thing barton proposed was that warehouses be built where supplies could be collected and stored so they could be quickly pulled off the shelves and made available. her own house was living proof of this. during the war, barton had solicited supplies as well as distributed them and she had lived with piles of blankets and bandages and bottles of brandy stacked all around her. if you visit her 1865 offices on 7th street you will see how this works. outwardly, you see parlor and desks and some business equipment. but she built a false ceiling above the rooms that when opened was a kind of alad.'scave, holding every sort of medicine and hospital stores all clearly labeled, all ready to be used. it's a wonderful indication of barton's personality and the way she so intricately combined her life and her work. her idea was that the government could use this model on a vast scale, ensuring its ability to react instantly to a military crisis. however, warehouses filled with military stores were not enough for barton. she wanted to have personnel in place, on call, to be brought in to work at a home's notice. and she wanted them trained. bart.shared the war department's skepticism about well-meaning amateurs pouring onto fields or into hospital wards a lot of them, she said, were just in the way. but she didn't think that everybody needed a medical degree to be useful. her idea was to have civilian men and women, schooled in the procedures needed to deal with emergency cases, trained in the proper way to bandable wounds, familiar with medical language so they could respond quickly to doctors' orders, knowledgeable about medicines of the day. she wanted them capable enough and ex-peer whied enough that they could leap into the breach before professional medical help arrived. in short barton wanted the volunteers to be qualified. and then she wanted something more. she wanted each trained worker to have a small kit made up of the most commonly needed supplies for an urgent situation. in 1865 she put a knife, bandages plan day, a salve she had made from laudanum and lan know line, matches and smelling salts in her own kit. she wanted those kits to be handy and she wanted them to be portable. she took one with her to andersonville and required them for staff during the years she headed the red cross. later, she named them first aid kits. army men, of course, ininitially rejected these notions. some of the suggestions, the idea of dparpd earning stores before bat began, for example, also been proposed in the first geneva convention, though barton had not heard of it in 1865 and recalled that the u.s. had declined to agree to that convention. the army said it didn't have time or space to collect supplies. they wanted to discourage volunteers, not train them. they thought any treatment even an urgent situations, ought to be handled by the surgeons. today, of course the military has embraced all of barton's ideas but they only adopted them after they suffered dreadful and unnecessary casualties in the spanish american and first world wars. 1865 barton shared her thoughts with military doctors she had worked with and they liked them. one of those surgeons dr. james dunn, looked at this remarkably advanced program of fixing problems before they happened..a program that would revolutionize emergency assistance. and he sent these words to his wife. "now what do you think of ms. barton," he said? "in my feeble estimation all the generals with all laurels seek into insigg dance beside her, the true heroine of

geneva convention that considered it and her name is attached to it those interested in exploring barton's role in all of this might want to visit the red cross museum in geneva, switzer land. they think highly of ms. barton there. there's an entire room devoted to her, perhaps a more fitting memorial than the rest stop on the new jersey turnpike that we have named for her. [ laughter ] the third path-breaking effort made in 1865 was to devise a system of medical service that could be organized before any hostileities started. her idea was that once the shooting began it was too lit to start collecting supplies or recruit appropriate personnel. she wanted something that would be ready to go whenever it was needed. this again was in sharp contrast to the experience of both sides in the civil war, which had to scramble to put together medical arrangements while the chris skies are was upon them. the first thing barton proposed was that warehouses be built where supplies could be collected and stored so they could be quickly pulled off the shelves and made available. her own house was living proof of this. during the war, barton had solicited supplies as well as distributed them and she had lived with piles of blankets and bandages and bottles of brandy stacked all around her. if you visit her 1865 offices on 7th street you will see how this works. outwardly, you see parlor and desks and some business equipment. but she built a false ceiling above the rooms that when opened was a kind of alad.'scave, holding every sort of medicine and hospital stores all clearly labeled, all ready to be used. it's a wonderful indication of barton's personality and the way she so intricately combined her life and her work. her idea was that the government could use this model on a vast scale, ensuring its ability to react instantly to a military crisis. however, warehouses filled with military stores were not enough for barton. she wanted to have personnel in place, on call, to be brought in to work at a home's notice. and she wanted them trained. bart.shared the war department's skepticism about well-meaning amateurs pouring onto fields or into hospital wards a lot of them, she said, were just in the way. but she didn't think that everybody needed a medical degree to be useful. her idea was to have civilian men and women, schooled in the procedures needed to deal with emergency cases, trained in the proper way to bandable wounds, familiar with medical language so they could respond quickly to doctors' orders, knowledgeable about medicines of the day. she wanted them capable enough and ex-peer whied enough that they could leap into the breach before professional medical help arrived. in short barton wanted the volunteers to be qualified. and then she wanted something more. she wanted each trained worker to have a small kit made up of the most commonly needed supplies for an urgent situation. in 1865 she put a knife, bandages plan day, a salve she had made from laudanum and lan know line, matches and smelling salts in her own kit. she wanted those kits to be handy and she wanted them to be portable. she took one with her to andersonville and required them for staff during the years she headed the red cross. later, she named them first aid kits. army men, of course, ininitially rejected these notions. some of the suggestions, the idea of dparpd earning stores before bat began, for example, also been proposed in the first geneva convention, though barton had not heard of it in 1865 and recalled that the u.s. had declined to agree to that convention. the army said it didn't have time or space to collect supplies. they wanted to discourage volunteers, not train them. they thought any treatment even an urgent situations, ought to be handled by the surgeons. today, of course the military has embraced all of barton's ideas but they only adopted them after they suffered dreadful and unnecessary casualties in the spanish american and first world wars. 1865 barton shared her thoughts with military doctors she had worked with and they liked them. one of those surgeons dr. james dunn, looked at this remarkably advanced program of fixing problems before they happened..a program that would revolutionize emergency assistance. and he sent these words to his wife. "now what do you think of ms. barton," he said? "in my feeble estimation all the generals with all laurels seek into insigg dance beside her, the true heroine of