>> my father called me genghis khan.was the time he saw me burning all of my girly dresses. and it was my -- it was any outrage and it was my -- my way of explaining that i don't want to be a girl in that society. and the only thing i could say is i was young, but i could see a difference. i could see girls at home and i -- i am really strong. i'm not a very typical girl. i can be equally good as boys in playing sports but i just wanted to be outside and be part of that -- those fun games. i want to have -- i want to have equal freedom as boys have and that is why i burned all of my dresses and put on my brother's clothes. and i said from now on, i'm going to have the equal rights as boys have. >> so flash forward and now you are 12 years old and you take part in a national weight-lifting competition. >> yeah. >> and you are competing and you come second but this is a boy's competition. >> yes. until age 12, i lived all of my life as genghis khan. nobody knew i was a girl. and when i chose to play the first weightlifting

history but worse than genghis khan. idi amin ate people. first, you can't blame hilary for her husband's mistakes, can you? >> hilary was an enabler. >> larry: if by enabler you mean victim i think away agree. and who is donald trump to be lecturing anyone on women between rosie o'donnell and megan kelly. he's not woke on feminism. here to explain himself is donald trump. >> thank you for having me, larry. by the way, happy mother's day to all the mothers out there except the unbelievably mean, nasty enabler ones. >> larry: see, that's completely uncalled for. listen, why are you blaming hillary clinton for what her husband did? >> larry, this election is a clear choice between someone who treats women with class and the horrible clintons. i mean they're nasty. they're terrible people i said that even back when i gave them lots of money. >> larry: okay. how can you say that? i don't know how that's coming out of your mouth. you're in your third marriage and in your book you bragged about infidelities. >> when your mistresses are unbelievabl

genghis khan before them. time was on their side.ow many lives are we willing to spend in a futile effort as a result. i can remember going through villages and keep in mind some of you that maybe warned in vietnam, $400 a year it's all they lived off of and they are living on dirt floors, grass , no indoorectricity plumbing. hard-working, dedicated people. all the local south vietnamese people wanted was to exist and they got caught in the crosshairs. you see kids the viet cong had shot and wounded but they wanted to hang out with us. i could at least tell the difference between the envy of a and viet cong. they were thed farmers by day, fighters by night. we got a prison camp in cambodia and i was put in a five by six tiger cage with a 10 foot log around my ankles, i had been there probably with 17 shrapnel wins. the first time i was interviewed -- keep in mind there are five tiger cages, a guard stand with so the guy an ak-47 that took care of us spoke english fairly well. about an hourfor and a half sitting on a tree stump six in

i speak, of course, of history's most despotic leaders: genghis khan, benito musolini, cara delavigne but two things in common: absolute authority and a big furry hat! ( cheers and ( cheers and applause ) now that this hat is upon mine head, i am endowed with unquestionable power. this is due to my hat's main attributes-- it's bigness and its furriness. 're. any proclamations i make while wearing the hat are now and forever law. let us begin. ( cheers and applause ) henceforth, turkey bacon is not bacon. it shall be known by it's more accurate name: bird leather. ( cheers and applause ) henceforth, if you can make it back to your driveway before the police pull you over, they cannot give you a ticket. ( cheers and applause ) from now on, your car's cruise control lets you control tom cruise. the hat declares anyone who corrects you for calling a crocodile an alligator will be thrown into a pit of both. if someone upsets you and you don't think of a good comeback until later, you are allowed to whisper it in their ear as they sleep. ( cheers and applause ) "sweet and low" shall be rena

i think the last person to actually take semicontrol of afghanistan was genghis khan. >> slightly different tactics than this administration. >> slightly different tactics. oh, by the way, what he did was he killed all of the men of fighting age and then used the -- he used their wives and daughters as wives for his soldiers and they raised their sons and their sons killed their fathers. so, yeah, there's a lesson to be learned in afghanistan and that is, it's always going to be hard. the terrain's hard. the people are hard and the politics are almost impossible. >> so, we have at last count multiple thousands of u.s. soldiers still there. is this basically triage and just short of trying to keep the status quo alive so the taliban can't grow any stronger? >> i think it's to bolster the central government. >> what exist of it. >> it's mostly in kabul and some of the provincial capitals. when you get in the country side, the taliban are running the countryside. the strong horse used to be the united states. at one point. we had a control of certain areas where people were coming along with t

genghis khan succeeded as the great mongol leader because he insisted on the mongols obeying property rights lose he said you steal a horse or a wife and i will kill you. they said oh okay, we will stop killers -- stealing horses and wives. they became a great military power. it is commonplace to have property rights. in any case, so-called causes are intermediate. the spark as you call it is equality, equality before the law, social dignity. that is new and weird. by 1776 the notion that all men and by the way women are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness was somewhat commonplace among advanced european intellectuals and written by an owner of slaves but let's pass that by. only 100 years old, a clear political program in the 17th century. the idea that people were equal was viewed as extremely radical and dangerous and got to suppress these primitive communists and quakers and stop this stuff. >> i love to focus on ideas. a couple questions starting with this one. why are you economists