basically, you're saying that the content, the positive that george kennan outlined in, i think early fifties, late forties wouldn't work. now just because these conflicts are simply like wars anymore. like with germany, it was a direct conquest of territory. i think back in world war two. whereas now it's more a conflict between ideologies like communism versus capitalism, essentially. so you're saying that it would have worked better if the adversary had been the british empire, for example, when the values were comparable and it was just a matter of straight power. i'm not sure if i would say that, but. well, i mean, let me let me just put it to you this way. why? why was why was the vietnam war so unpopular? after all, was it was containment in action? because there was no really like end goal. they didn't want to push with north vietnam to expel communists from there. they just wanted to basically prevent the north north, the north vietnamese invading south vietnam, basically keep the economy out of south vietnam because, you know, because it's in other words, it doesn't meet the