george mcgovern saying i don't believe the polls. i see the enthusiasm and the crowds. you can't tell me this doesn't equal eight to something so i heard that echo in my mind. i kept remembering george mcgovern who was misled by those rallies. but i have to admit it took me off guard. i am portrayed as one of the few that said he might win. it's been a specialty of mine the evangelical vote and my wife, i think her because she was running everything on the book and my daughter is around here somewhere taking pictures, they were helping me do the research on the buck that one of the things we hit was the evangelical vote and a mistake that baracthey missedit but bard he called up their towards the end and said you are losing the white evangelical vote and you don't have to and they laughed at him. after the election was over, one of obama's assistants wrote an op-ed in the "washington post" said why did hillary lose the evangelical vote and the headline is she didn't ask for it. the fact turned out to matter because ed 1% of them vote

george mcgovern and bob dole work together in a bipartisan way during the 1970s to help strengthen our nutrition and empty hunger programs. we were our way to eliminating hunger in this country and then we began to reverse some of the progress we made. now, what i find is that this issue has become polarizing. you're never gonna find a member of congress that is pro- hunger. they will never say that to you. when you look at the voting records of some of my colleagues, i don't know how you could come to any other conclusion. what ends up happening is that they are chipping away at programs that provide the basic necessity of food to our children and two parents and two older people. when i look at the presidents budget were told that in that budget there may be cuts to programs like wic, women's infant and children program. basic nutrition for pregnant mothers and their young children after their born. it is important, it is important because if we neglect that then will have to pay in other ways on the line. again i hate to talk about this in terms of the bottom line in dollars and cen

george mcgovern said do you have a knife? he cut the apple up in little pieces and brought it around at all the kids ate the apples. i said that is amazing. some of these kids are losing their teeth. it hurts to bite into an apple. know your audience. those are the kinds of things that are so readily understandable when working in the field, in schools, working closely on these programs but not so clear in washington. i am sad to say. it is important you engage all of us in the coming weeks and months so we continue to move forward and not go backward. it is too important and let me finish with this. some people say i am a bleeding heart. i will tell you honestly my heart does bleed for people i bump into. when you see a child who is hungry it breaks your heart. when you see senior citizen who is regularly going without food and trying to afford prescription drugs in their food it breaks your heart but we can fix it and so i believe we can end hunger in our lifetime not only in this country but around the world. if we just ha

so george mcgovern said, you have a knife. he cut the apple up in little pieces and brought it around. all the kids ate the apple. he said, wow, that's amazing. some of these kids are losing their teeth. it hurts to bite into an apple. you have to know your audience. those are the kind of things that are so readily understandable when you are working in the field, when you are in schools, when you are working closely on these programs. they are always not so clear here in washington i am sad to say. so it is important you engage all of us in the coming weeks and months so that we continue to try to move forward and not go backwards. it is too important. i will finally finish with this. some people say i'm a bleeding heart. honestly, my heart does bleed for people that i bump into who are hungry. when you see a child who is hungry, it breaks your heart. when you see a senior citizen who m is regularly going withou food because they are trying to afford their prescription drugs and their food, it breaks your heart. we can fix it

george mcgovern said, do you have an any o knife? they gave him a knife and he cut the apple into little pieces and he passed it around and everybody ate it. he said, it hurts their teeth, they need it in pieces. those are the kind of things, when you're working in the fields, when you're in schools, working closely in these programs. they're not so clear when you're in washington, sad to say. so it's important that you engage all of us in the coming weeks and months so we continue to try and move forward and not go backward. it's too important. and i'll just finally finish with this. some people say i'm a bleeding heart. well, i will tell you, honestly, my heart does bleed for people that i bump into who are hungry. when you see a child who is hungry, it breaks your heart. when you see a senior citizen who is regularly going without food because they're trying to afford their prescription drugs and their food, it breaks your heart. but we can fix it. and so i believe we can end hunger in our lifetime, not only hear in this country b

that we are all shocked because, you know, was it meg greenfield who said she couldn't believe george mcgovernost because she didn't know anybody who voted for nixon. might have been reagan, but in any case, going outside of -- you know, it would be a lot easier if jeb bush or marco rubio had won, because republican pundits in this town are more comfortable with that sort of person. i think there is -- i think it is journalistic to go out and make an effort to hear from people who support president trump, and, no, i don't see really that much of a difference when it comes to having a liberal democratic pundit who shared his or her views and maybe sometimes sounds as though he or she is reciting talking points and somebody who supports donald trump. i really, honestly don't see that much of a difference. >> the issue is not only among journalists but in academia on neutrality, should we be neutral over time with trump? >> i don't think we should. >> let me do my homework. these are reports that i got from walter cronkite now that we're right here with him. this is what we wrote, he said, "early

in 1984 when walter mondale lost in a landslide, he went to george mcgovern who had done the same thingears before and said, how long does it take to get over something like this? mcgovern said, you know, i'll tell you when it happens. >> north korea nuclear site primed and ready. what is kim jong-un planning for one of the nation's biggest celebrations. we will go live inside north korea where few outsiders go. a broken nose, broken teeth, a concussion, new information on how severe the united passenger's injuries are. is there anything united can do to redeem itself and avoid court? stay with us. what makes this simple salad the best simple salad ever? heart healthy california walnuts. the best simple veggie dish ever? heart healthy california walnuts. the best simple dinner ever? heart healthy california walnuts. great tasting, heart healthy california walnuts. so simple. get the recipes at walnuts.org. i'm on it.ar does weathertech go to protect your vehicle? ♪ ♪ ♪ weathertech. made right, in america featuring ego's patented, 56 the #1 rated,volt,power+ mower. arc lithium battery te

ignatius who founded the jesuits saw god in all things and all people if he lost to george mcgovern -- he was crushed -- the next day was an opportunity to see god and the next experience. and i got that sense from my mom as well, that not every day was happy. there's a difference between joy and happiness. think this pope, pope francis, has joy in his life, and his completely free and i think that sense of freedom, not attached to anything to use the ignatius concept of disordered attachment. he is not attached to anything and that sense of joy any mom and dad and i see'll n him is the reason i jumpedded in and did the pilgrimage so that's a long answer to your question but the since of catholicism that my mother and father lived and breathed every day and enjoyed every day, i'm trying to get that in my life every day as well. >> let's talk about his jesuit tradition. you talk in the book about the features of the order of jesuits and how do they -- talk about how they impact the pope as being the pope -- you messengered the first jesuit peep we have had. >> a really important part o

begins the process of reorganizing the two major political parties and a continuous and 72 by george mcgovernwho picked the equilibrium liberal tom eagleton. the two parties represent pretty much monolithic ideology. they were able to work less together than they were a generation ago when reagan were put a moderate, democratic chairman of the house ways and means committee to reform the tax policy in america that we still live under today. the tax legislation in 1986. we still have essentially three tax bracket created by dan rostenkowski. also bipartisanship and national defense on the pershing two missiles. there is a lot more comedy between break-in and the boldly vote democrat than there is now between donald trump and the democratic party. that's to the democratic party sparrow because they are defensive, you know, how much has changed a generation or two. in 1975, they had near total democratic control of governorship in the legislature. republicans were down to 128 members of congress and couldn't stop in a democratic legislation. they were down to 32 senators which means they couldn'

and it continued and 72 by george mcgovern who was a liberal.the two parties today represent pretty much monolithic ideology. one is liberal and one is conservative. so we are able to work less together than they were say, a generation ago when reagan worked with -- he was the moderate democratic chairman of the house and ways and means committee who reformed the tax policy in america. that was to live under today. and we still have essentially three tax brackets which were created by reagan. there was also bipartisanship on national defense on the navy. there was a lot more comedy between reagan and the democrats done there is no between donald trump. and actually, they are defensive, it is that astonishing how much has changed. because in 1975, 49 states had near total democratic control of the governorship in the legislature. republicans only down to about 128 members of congress. they could have passed any legislation. it would up to 32 senators which means they couldn't filibuster. how much is change in just a generation. the republicans co

he specifically referenced the fact that back in 1972 "rolling stone" had backed george mcgovern whos a figure to bernie sanders. jan's reasons were well thought out. basically what he said was you cannot win an election running that far to the left. you cannot rely upon the enthusiasm of young people to carry forward. we have learned this leads to defeat and we need to win. we need to support hillary clinton. i asked permission to dissent from young. that is in this book. i gave my reasons white and i think this was true. hunter is not a live now but i would guess he would've been a bernie supporter because the things that he help mcgovern and other politicians he wrote about going forward, carter before he became president, he thought mcgovern was nerdy in a policy geek and was awkward but he loved the fact that he was honest. in the book mcgovern is almost like an angel for hunter. the book is like a religious quest for salvation. he is hoping that mcgovern or will win and carry us to paradise. it's more than a political book, it's a grand literary story. i think hunter was a roma

participants in a far left that i believe that joe lieberman doesn't recognize, that i believe george mcgovernuldn't recognize. this is how militant the left has become. and let me say this, and aye been saying this on programs, this is not in any way an exaggeration, it's not hyperbole on my part. this is not a media that are out to hold donald trump responsible. this is a, this media as an institution is committed to his removal from office. and mark my words on that. they are committed to his removal. they believe he should never have been elected. they were shellshocked that a they let him get elected over hillary clinton. they believe he's not fit to be in office, and they're going to hound him until they can remove him. that's the goal. and, of course, they'll deny it, they'll call me crazy. i'll stand by what i just said. stuart: following up on the susan rice, the burial of the story there, what about steve ban nonremoved from the national security council? how did they treat that? >> any attempt the cause discord in this administration, they're going to do. the idea of citing critics

begins the process of reorganizing the two major political parties and it continues in 72 by george mcgovern who will pick the equally liberal tom eagleton said that the two parties represent pretty much monolithic ideologies. when it's all liberal can one is so conservative. they are able to work less together than they were say a generation ago when reagan worked with dan rostenkowski who was the moderate democratic chairman of the house ways and means committee to refine the tax policy in america that we still live under today since 1986. we still have essentially three tax brackets created by reagan and dan ross caskey. there was also bipartisanship on the pershing two missiles. there is a lot more comedy between reggae and the bully about democrat then there is now between donald trump and the democratic party. and actually as to the democratic party sparrow because they are defensive, you know, it's astonishing how much has changed in a generation or two. in 1975, 49 states had near or total democratic control of the governorship in the legislature. the republicans were only down to 12