i used to wonder whether huxley was right or george orwell was right. it turns out they are both right. what we first got was huxley and as we were fleeced as we reach a stage where we can't get credit where all of the cheap manufactured consumer products are no longer easily accessible and that is called access to cheap credit and consumerism one of the two primary forms of political control. once those are removed we increasingly get the iron boot the iron fist that george orwell predicted. it turns out george orwell and huxley were both right and we are seeing that transformation. as we get a huge underclass pushing 50% of this country in terms of poor and near poor, unable to sustain a living, chronic underemployment or unemployment which statistics mask once you stop looking for work you are no longer counted as unemployed or if you have a part-time job at walmart, most workers at walmart, at average, still below the poverty line so you are given applications for food stamps and qualified. we subsidize the walton family making $11,000 a year. i thi

. >> yeah, george orwell said within every joke is a tiny revolution i don't think we should trivializetant jokes are to american culture. comedy is about fun and i think fun sets us apart from a lot of the world. and i think this is actually good that political correctness is starting to infringe on stand-up comedy. john: really? >> people say whoa whoa whoa don't mess with my fun. i think and i hope that comedians are starting to say enough is enough. david till said stand-up comedy is dead chris rock said he's never doing colleges again. john: because? >> comedy has a free market of ideas. like you're watching a scientist at work in the lab. he might make a rape joke or use a joke with racial epithets and it will bomb. that doesn't work the comedian will scrap that and you got to see it live. john: he's scrapping colleges. >> they would record it with cell phones and that would be on the guy's record forever. that mistake that he felt. when someone starts a business it bombs and they are forever associated with the failed business, it's not fair and bad for the economy. john: aren't

it's like george orwell. freedom is slavery war is peace. white is black. they created a mechanism never seen before that pairlee liesed -- paralyzed the mine minds of millions of russians and they say quite a while before country can go back to normal. >> host: your mother is still live nothing moscow? >> guest: yes. she has sisters nephews nieces. so it's a big family, and difficult to move outside of the country we were born. we all were born -- but it was part of the former soviet union when the soviet union collapsed we moved to moscow, which is the capital of the state we were born. we grew up in the russian -- within the russian culture russian education russian history, and seeing the demolition of the greatness of the country the heritage, social and cultural, scientific areas, it's very painful because russia has a lot of bad things that happened throughout history, but also it has huge positive influence over culture and today it has been almost thrown away, and we can just only hope that one day rather sooner than later our country will start bu

orwellian double speak is a reference to george orwell's book animal farm.dead for 65 years but uses words he coined cold war thought police. oppressive governments and how they manipulate words. orwell wrote political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable. they give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. people who want to get elected will say just about anything orwell's work gives us another reminder why we ought to keep politicians' powers limited. that's our show. see you next week. . neil: welcome everybody, i'm neil cavuto. and america we have a problem. a trust problem. across the nation, we're seeing a loss of faith in all our institutions. among all political ties. investors burned by the financial crash staying out of the stock market. homebuyers singed by the real estate meltdown staying out of the housing market. a generation of kids exposed to both showing little interest in either. trust and institutions town. their faith in marriage itself at an all-time low. parents who have lost confidence in a school syst

orwellian double speak is a reference to george orwell's book animal farm.an. he's been dead for 65 years but uses words he coined cold war thought police. oppressive governments and how they manipulate words. orwell wrote political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable. they give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. people who want to get elected will say just about anything orwell's work gives us another reminder why we ought to keep politicians' powers limited. that's our show. see you next week.ave you back. you and your wife had a wonderful vacation. >> you have a great weekend. gerri: hello everybody. i'm gerri willis. this is the willis report, the show where consumers are our business. a great jobs report for wall street. stocks soar as payrolls rebound. >> where is there the 400000 a month that we got under ronald reagan? >> we'll take a look at what today's report means for the rest of the country. the clinton machine goes into overdrive to try and smear the author of a book that could derail hillary's shot at t

orwellian double speak is a reference to george orwell's book animal farm.lian. he's been dead for 65 years but uses words he coined cold war thought police. oppressive governments and how they manipulate words. orwell wrote political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable. they give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. people who want to get elected will say just about anything orwell's work gives us another reminder why we ought to keep politicians' powers limited. that's our show. see you next week. coming up next is "strange inheritance." thank you for joining us. announcer: 100,000 creepy crawlers. >> spiders that will cover your whole face. announcer: all collected from the far reaches of the world. talk about a bug's life. >> old is he wanted to buy the collection. announcer: there is a bigger story behind this request. >> that was a bigger eye-opening experience than the film. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ ♪ of. jamie: i a

orwellian double speak is a reference to george orwell's book animal farm.n dead for 65 years but uses words he coined cold war thought police. oppressive governments and how they manipulate words. orwell wrote political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable. they give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. people who want to get elected will say just about anything orwell's work gives us another reminder why we ought to keep politicians' powers limited. that's our show. see you next week. is here for you and your money. >> meanwhile, "the willis report" is next. gerri: hello, everybody. i'm gerri willis. this is a special edition of "the willis report" with a fox business exclusive investigation on the faa's new hiring policy. "trouble in the skies.". >>> a diversity program for america's airports comes into question. >> the faa takes dramatic changes to the way they're hiring our air traffic controllers. this is troubling. >> they threw you away, what do you think of this? >> they don't know what they want. >> reporter: a

hand the fbi sweeping up thousands of accounts and archiving forever anyways feels like 1984 by george orwell explaining decisions, can also defuse the greatest because moving forward, we are in a world whether real or imagined grievances can catch on very quickly and the u.s. can think of what it should do to minimize the usb anda target. >> good. thank you all. >> i was handed the vote that has been scheduled. >> thank you to all of you had after reading your testimony. my main line of questioning was about how you create to the future groups. i would like to have a detour and follow. dr. gartenstein-ross, between traditional and social media and all so wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers. could you unpack more your comments, please. >> yes. he didn't have much social media penetration. when you look at what is being broadcast i say started out with information dominance. reporters couldn't get an a to fact check. both of their reporters have gotten executed in the past couple of weeks. not a good place to do fact checking. when they have the information

we want to be safe, but we do not want george orwell's big brother looking over our shoulders every timeo do something. president bush understood that very well and tried very hard to wind that balance and perpetually keep that in front of us on the hill so that we stayed between the lanes between serving the united states of america and keeping it safe on the one hand without getting into the private or the civil rights of citizens that we all represent. so i would say that the way it finally came out, if i had to give just a few words, is the hallmarks of the bush doctrine, once we saw what we were up against after the horrors of 9/11 were strength, commitment and engagement, and i think that the president did an extraordinary job of getting us energized at a time when there was an audience in the world that was listening and watching to see what the united states of america was, indeed, going to do. i think the president was let down somewhat by the information he got. i do not feel that the intelligence community, as good as it is -- it wasn't as good then as i say, it had been hollo

fbi sweepings up thousands of accounts and archiving them forever, that feels like the 1984 by george orwell. so thinking these threwthrough possibly explaining what we're doing, can help to diffuse the grievance. because moving forward we're in a world where grievances, whether real or imagined, can catch on very quickly and the u.s. should think of what it can do in those evolving structure of communication to minimize the u.s. being a target. >> thank you all. >> i was handed a note, our vote that was scheduled at 10:30 has been moved to 2-so we won't have any interruptions. senator. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and thank you to all of you were hog near. after reading your testimony my main line of questioning was going to be about how you creating strategic brand damage to icele and future jihadi groups but i'd like to have a detour and follow dr. gardenstein roes, your comments about the inare play between traditional and social media, and the media cycles of people wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers on social media. can you unpack your dyrna. >> dyrn

thousands and thousands of accounts and archiving them forever, that in many ways seems like 1984 by george orwell. i think it can help diffuse part of that grievance. moving forward, we're in a world where grievances, weather real or imagined can catch on quickly. the u.s. can feel what it should be to minimize the u.s. being a target. >> good. thank you all. >> thank you senator carper. our vote that was scheduled at 10:30 has been moved to 2:00. so we won't have interceptions. senator sass. >> thank you mr. chair manned all of you for being here. after reading your testimony my mainline of questioning was going to be about how you create strategic brand damage to eye sill and future jihadi groups. before we go there, i'd like to have a detour. dr. gartenstein-ross, your comments about the interplay between traditional and social media and obviously the media cycles of people wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers on traditional media. can you unpack your der nah comments. >> der nah was a case in which you didn't have much social media. isis essentially started

thousands and thousands of accounts and archiving them forever, that in many ways seems like 1984 by george orwell. thinking these through publicly and explaining decisions and what we doing i think it can help diffuse part of that grievance. moving forward, we're in a world where grievances, weather real or imagined can catch on quickly. the u.s. can feel what it should be to minimize the u.s. being a target. >> good. thank you all. >> thank you, senator carper. our vote that was scheduled at 10:30 has been moved to 2:00. so we won't have any interruptions. senator saaa. of. senator sass: >> thank yochair manned all of you for being here. after reading your testimony my mainline of questioning was going to be about how you create strategic brand damage to eye sill and future jihadi groups. before we go there, i'd like to have a detour. dr. gartenstein-ross, your comments about the interplay between traditional and social media and obviously the media cycles of people wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers on traditional media. can you unpack your der nah comments.

thousands and thousands of accounts and archiving them forever that in many ways seems like 1984 by george orwell. i think it can help diffuse part of that grievance. moving forward we're in a world where grievances, weather real or imagined can catch on quickly. the u.s. can feel what it should be to minimize the u.s. being a target. >> good. thank you all. >> thank you senator carper. our vote that was scheduled at 10:30 has been moved to 2:00. so we won't have interceptions. senator sass. >> thank you mr. chair manned all of you for being here. after reading your testimony my mainline of questioning was going to be about how you create strategic brand damage to eye sill and future jihadi groups. before we go there i'd like to have a detour. dr. gartenstein-ross, your comments about the interplay between traditional and social media and obviously the media cycles of people wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers on traditional media. can you unpack your der nah comments. >> der nah was a case in which you didn't have much social media. isis essentially started ou

there was a book called "1984," by george orwell, and people thought that was a bad thing. that is what the country is going to. who decides who is iteris? it could be because you are a member of the nra or the tea party. where does the end -- it and? host: sender mitch mcconnell was on the senate floor last friday. [video clip] senator mcconnell: one more opportunity to act responsibly to not allow this program to expire. this is a high threat period and we know what is going on overseas. we know what has been tried here at home. my colleagues, do we really want this law to expire? we have a week to discuss it. we will have one day to do it. we better be ready next sunday afternoon to prevent the country from being in danger by the total expiration of the program. host: that was senator mitch mcconnell urging the extension of the nsa surveillance program on the senate floor. c-span will be covering the delusions -- deliberations on this issue starting tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. on c-span two. our next caller is joni from indiana. what do you think the senate should do? caller:

thousands and thousands of accounts and archiving them for ever that in many ways feels like 1984 by george orwelling these through publicly come explained decisions i think it also help defuse part of that grievance because moving forward we are in a world where grievances whether real or imagined can catch on quickly produce should think of what it can do 10 this structure documentation to minimize the use been a target. >> good. thank you all. >> by the way i was handed a note. our boat has been moved to 2:00 so we won't have any interruptions. senator sasse. >> thank you, mr. chairman thank you all of you for being you. after reading the testimony my main line of questioning was going to be about how you could strategic brand damage to isolate anti-future jihadi groups but before we go to our life have a detour and follow, mr. gartenstein-ross, your comments about the interplay between traditional and social media and, obviously the media cycles of people wanting to make news today on social needed to be picked up by produce on traditional media, could you unpack the more your comments? >> abs