he said george osborne was successful in persuading savage —— sajid javid in doing so.erpretations of borisjohnson doing so. cameron's interpretations of boris johnson supporting doing so. cameron's interpretations of borisjohnson supporting leave are quite stark. he said yes, it is about sovereignty and a relationship with the european union but he came to the conclusion that in order to further his career and a win over the support of the conservative membership he had to come up for a leaf even if he believed at the time that leeds would lose the referendum. supporters of boris johnson have come out today, the brexit secretary stephen barclay has said he does believe strongly that his boss believes in brexit and is determined to deliver brexit on the sist determined to deliver brexit on the 31st of october. but he mentioned michael gove, he described him in this newspaper extract that has been put out today as a form select faragist who left to the truth at home. particularly in reference to immigration that michael gove talked about during the referendum. he said he

and instead of taking that argument head on, david cameron and george osborne led that remain campaigne for staying in the european union, and sacrificing some of our own sovereignty, they traduced and insulted and patronised everybody who wanted to vote leave. and the consequence of that was tremendous bitterness and a tremendous alienation on the part of people who felt that in genuinely sincerely they wanted to leave the eu for what they considered principled reasons. that was a tragedy for david cameron and the consequence of it has been that they have had tremendous bitterness. it has distorted beyond recognition. because there was no acceptance of the fact that they had to have a legitimate argument. there had to be a debate. i don't want to spend too long in 2016 and in david cameron's book. brian, do disagree with that? i think to say that immigration came into it is to skate over what is the core issue. when you say that turkey is going tojoin the eu, and nigel farage has a big poster which says we're at breaking point and use words like swamp when britain was a member of the

deposit for a certain sector of the population anyway we called it a ponzi scheme and except for george osborne's mother thought it was a great program of course she thought it was a good idea. this is from the financial times 6 years 6 and a half years after we said this and this is how to buy has failed to make homes more affordable ok let's talk about this for a moment so the government injects a bunch of free money into the housing market and prices go up and as a result people find they are less affordable so the government puts in more free money to help people buy these on a form which as the effect of moving the price of the homes up again. so it's not that people can't afford houses that's not the problem the problem is that the central bank the bank of england and the banks in the u.k. keep injecting lots of. bailouts for home builders and the banks that support the mortgages and the homebuilders that's causing the prices to go up that's now it also has a corollary effect and that would be a moral hazard because people who buy into these homes and they keep the price keeps going higher

deposit for a certain sector of the population anyway we call that a ponzi scheme and except for george osborne's mother thought it was a great program of course she thought it was a good idea. this is from the financial times 6 years 6 and a half years after we said this and this is how to buy has failed to make homes more affordable ok let's talk about this for a moment so the government injects a bunch of free money into the housing market and prices go up and as a result people find that they are less affordable so the government puts in more free money to help people buy these on affordable homes which as the effect of moving the price of the homes up again. so it's not that people can afford houses that's not the problem the problem is that the central bank the bank of england and the banks in the u.k. keep injecting lots of bailouts for homebuilders and the banks that support the mortgages and the homebuilders that's causing the prices to go up that's now it also has a corollary effect and that would be a moral hazard because people who buy into these homes and they keep the price keeps go

fools and in fact in the united kingdom when you know there's a help to buy scheme and remember george osborne introduced that in the u.k. his mom loves the program and the fools that bought that are using it love the program but other people like us report might suggest it was a ponzi scheme we have the us like not and what are they doing with the help to buy scheme 6 years after we called it a ponzi scheme but the fact is the government is having to say well now you could take out a 35 year mortgage because member that's how we had greater fools you had less deposit down you extended the mortgage 3 times and you lowered interest rates so now our app and game we know what happened in france may be this could well if you look around the world and see the unrest that it's the beginning of that sort of thing when the assoc now falls apart right instead of having one revolution in france or in the russian revolution of the american revolution of a global insurrection against banker occupation. right and they're all one joining of forces the g.l.a. shah will join forces with the folks in hong kong

deposit for a certain sector of the population anyway we called it a ponzi scheme and except for george osborne's mother thought it was a great program of course she thought it was a good idea. this is from the financial times 6 years 6 and a half years after we said this and this is how to buy has failed to make homes more affordable ok let's talk about this for a moment so the government injects a bunch of free money into the housing market and prices go up and as a result people find they are less affordable so the government puts in more free money to help people buy these on affordable homes which as the effect of moving the price of the homes up again right.

hire right it came from bank of canada that it was a moved over to bank of england it came with george osborne and ladies friends of tam i think he sees that there's a sea change and now he's up to as you say it's a revolving door and you know. what this is just a they get of that because the revolving door between wall street and washington is quite profound shifted now it's so it's so washington to silicon valley so the new the new wall street is so a convolve you know wall street is is the ninety's nearly 2000 but post occupy wall street we now have silicon valley is the new ok of us i think so like you had you know goldman sachs all as their finger in every pocket type of thing they you know what you meant traditionally you would join up with the world bank or the i am out party become an advisor to some country and so they had this matt taibbi called it the vampire squid so you're detecting a shift a little shift now and that's lower value didn't tell you tell us a little more about that will the new goldman sachs's you know facebook or google or. and you can see it in the way that these

george osborne no it is in the evening standard here in london says that he said that we should incentivize shale gas extraction on afraid that fracking is a very real risk to our future in terms of climate change we should not be fracking . leakage of methane from the united states is causing more climate change than before me thane is about 100 times more serious as. a gas for climate change them carbon dioxide you've told successive governments this so when it's not going to head of the liberal democrats to cracking money why do you think that this current government. let alone the tourism a one said that what you're saying right is all worthy of attention so here's the here's part of the problem we have cameron government led by cameron saying action on climate change and i'm supporting it and then his minister in defra was cutting out all the legislation that was preventing us from overstepping the mark and this action was running against all the actions on managing climate change so it wasn't a coherent approach different ministers were acting in different ways can i just ask you thou

deposit for a certain sector of the population anyway we call that a ponzi scheme and except for george osborne's mother thought it was a great program of course she thought it was a good idea. this is from the financial times.

fools and in fact in the united kingdom when you know there's a help to buy scheme and member george osborne introduce that in the u.k. his mom loves the program and the fools that bought that are using it love the program but other people like chi is report might suggest that was a ponzi scheme we have the us like now out and where are they doing with a help to buy scheme 6 years after we call that a ponzi scheme but the fact is the government's having to say well now you could take out a $35.00 your mortgage for he's member that's how we had greater fulls you had less the posit down you extend at the mortgage 3 time and you lowered interest rate so now or apa and game we know what happened in france may be this could well if you look around the world the see the on arrest that it's the beginning of that sort of thing when the assoc not falls apart right instead of having one revolution and france or in the russian revolution of the american i'm a lucian him a global insurrection against bank or occupation giago right then they're all one joining on forces the g.l.a. shell well join forces

when he was former chief of staff to george osborne.tle bit of psychology in this . maybe it is the way the host, jean-claude juncker, telling boris johnson that it is going at is a -- going at a snails pace. right now we need to get to an eventful weekend, an event will first word news with viviana hurtado. crude's we begin with biggest jump ever, prompted by the attack on the saudi oil facility. brent jumped almost 20%. the attack removed about 5% of global surprise -- global supplies. i ran-backed rebels claimed responsibility. is directlyabia blaming iran. tehran is saying within days it a british tanker it has detained for almost two months. over to hong kong, that is where protesters set the entrance of a subway station on fire. they also threw gasoline bombs at the central government headquarters. police using tear gas and water cannons to disperse the crowds. this is the 15th weekend in a row of protests. 15,000 auto workers have gone on strike, the first uaw strike against gm in 12 years. gm offered $7 million of investment in

one of the things that last week, i think it was george osborn, the former chancellor said that britaining to face an awful choice between a hard brexit advocated by a party, that is boris johnson's tory party, and a socialist or even a marxist labor party leader, corbyn. why is it that the center left seems to have lost ground here. what you represented and what bill clinton represented, what is your diagnosis of that? >> my diagnosis is twofold. one, we stopped providing the momentum for change, in an era where people want change, if you're the guardian of the status quo, you're in trouble. the center left, center right appeared to be in that position. secondly, i often say to people, it's also because social media is transforming the entire way politics is conducted. but one of the interesting aspects of that is that social media creates the circumstances in which a takeover a political party is very easy. therefore, what i would say is, for example, in britain at the moment, a centrist proposition is not really on over. so when people say it doesn't work, well, it doesn't work for a

with me is helen thomas, who was formerly an adviesr for george osborne when he was chancellor of theoes he say to his party? the thing is, this is all part of a strategy, strange as it might look, that we know that this eventual election will be portrayed as the people versus the establishment. and of course the ruling todayjust throws the judiciary into that bulk of the establishment. the question is whether his party continue to think that a good strategy or not. the public like prime ministers to dig in but they don't like chaos and there is a whiff of chaos around all of this. i suppose there is in a sense but so far it's not really impacting the man on the street too much. it all looks like fuss and bother. not if you have strong views. if you have a strong view either side, all this does is entrench that position, what has happened today. is it a dangerous strategy? it is more divisive, isn't it? i know there was an electoral strategy behind it but it divides the country even further and it pulls the courts into it, as well. it is but i think deliberately so. as is predicated o

write, quote, i'm truly sorry to see the country i love so much suffer uncertainty and division george osborn book went further than that. he said, this is an understatement, david is distraught is that true are you distraught >> it is very difficult looking at britain today and recognizing we've had three years of uncertainty skbechand we haven' able to go forwards or go backwards and that's incredibly frustrating. we're still a successful economy, we're still growing, still have very low unemployment, still a great place to invest, but it is sfru frustrating and that pains me. >> has it been a very painful three years? have you been down, depressed? >> i've had a lot of time to reflect on the decisions i've made, good ones and less good ones i try to reflect that in the book i'm confident what we did for the economy, where we got rid of the biggest budget deficit in the world, created over 2 million new jobs, a million new businesses, that was a success but obviously, we're dealing with the consequences of my losing the eu referendum and it's very frustrating that three years on, we haven't

to know is whether he is committed to the so—called northern powerhouse concept conceived by george osbornewords northern powerhouse didn't escape his lips once but boris johnson powerhouse didn't escape his lips once but borisjohnson has made quite a few promises that people in the north might find appealing since he became prime minister. you might remember his pledge to create a high—speed rail link between leeds and manchester which would cut journey times between 50 minutes down to 30 minutes so i'm really keen just to down to 30 minutes so i'm really keenjust to get down to 30 minutes so i'm really keen just to get a sense of how committed he is to that idea and what he can do for the people of the north. thank you, rob parsons. we look forward to seeing with the prime minister has to say to you in yorkshire. let's bring you a line we're hearing from michael gove is going to confirm soon any changes to the no deal tariff. we haven't heard any more than that at the moment but we will bring you more as soon as we get it. michael gove is suggesting they will be changes to the no deal tar

if we remember philip hammond wanted to relax them from what george osborne had before. extra spending of about 1k billion plus a little on infrastructure so all departments get a first time in ages increase that he already told us ages increase that he already told us this over the last few weeks. basically schools are getting more, the nhs has already had some idea. some of it is extra and we have to look and see how much of that perhaps is a repeat of what has been said earlier and already assume. in reality, he has to do that because the economy has been slowing quite significantly and if the government does not put money in it will grow even more slowly and if anything the fear is that we will have a contraction in the next few months and possibly within a year if we leave with no deal although that is less likely. and you hear a headline figure of £14 billion and that sounds like an enormous amount of money. what difference does it make on the ground in hospitals? money. what difference does it make on the ground in hospital57m money. what difference does it make o

if there is any doubt, have a look at the evening standard, edited by george osborne.boris johnson decided to being blown open, says the paper, as borisjohnson decided to strip 21 mps. that is the headline headline writers are trying to beat for the morning papers. the decision to suspend parliament, the gina miller case, is being held tomorrow. that has been adjourned until tomorrow. a change of gear now. the existence of the loch ness monster is one of scotland‘s oldest myths. now scientists say the creatures behind repeated sightings could be giant eels. researchers from new zealand have tried to catalogue all living species in the loch by extracting dna from water samples. let‘s have a look at the weather. nick miller has that. one more weather system across the british isles and then high pressure comes infor isles and then high pressure comes in for the weekend and things will settle for a time. here is a look of a busy sky in shropshire earlier. some showers working through wales, the midlands, northern england and scotla nd the midlands, northern england and sc

george osburn told him he should hammerjohnson and gove. —— osborn.s, they are telling you, you have to destroy their credibility. and he didn't do it. so he was not prepared to counter their lies and fight for what he apparently believed in at the time. he was trying to protect the time. he was trying to protect the party, wasn't he? he has done a marvellous job of that. the whole thing has turned out to be a com plete thing has turned out to be a complete shambles. the one bit he mentions is that when michael gove went on about how they would be an influx of turkish migrants if the uk didn't leave the eu, cameron never made the point that actually, we could have vetoed turkey's membership of the eu. he mentioned those as mistakes. obviously the biggest mistake was calling the referendum in the first place. but he had always said he would if they won the election, and i suppose they we re won the election, and i suppose they were not necessarily expecting to win the election outright. i expected to be in a coalition again. he got it wrong all the way