the parts that had to do with it, that were related to how cardinal george pell responded to some oflegal actions against him. and it is only after his acquittal last month by the high court that we are now seeing what the commission has found. and it does make for some damning reading, really, as far as cardinal pell is concerned because it found out that george pell knew about sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, being committed by the clergy as early as the 1970s but that he had failed to take action or protect children on more than one occasion. it goes on to give examples. back in 1973, at the dioceses of ballarat, in the state of victoria, and specifically to behaviours that have to do with gerald ridsdale, a priest that had later admitted to abusing hundreds of children, but that george pell was publicly supportive of. another example from back in 1989 where george pell was the axillary bishop in melbourne and this had to do with allegations, sexual abuse allegations, of father peter searson. at the time, he himself had received complaints about father searson but failed to take