art laffer, jared byrne teen, professor george shultz, i'll think about that. please vote now.o keep this discussion going hot with a look at some of my picks, including, as i said, the late, great steve jobs. now, maybe the markets have fallen back into their fed anxiety mode. there are signs it might taper faster and more deeply than investors suspected. is that what's keeping the mark so stale? we'll have two top investors next up on "the kudlow report." want it ... until boom, it's bedtime! and your mattress a battleground of thwarted desire. enter the sleep number bed. designed to let couples sleep together in individualized comfort. he's a softy. his sleep number setting is 35. you're the rock, at 60. and as your needs change over time you can adjust your bed to sleep better together. 48-month financing available through february 2 only at your local sleep number store. find your sleep number setting and know better sleep. okay, here comes airplane. [ imitates airplane ] [ crying ] [ door opens, closes ] okay, here's choo-choo. chugga, chugga, chugga, chugga. hi. let me g

i am in good company there with william f buckley and milton freedman and george shultz, many conservatives who believe the current policy underminds the rule of law and makes kids in poor neighborhoods more vulnerable and doesn't do kneeing really to -- doing do anything to end real use. we need to change the policy. and i don't think we will ever get change coming from washington. that's not where changing comes from. it is always going to come from the grassroots. i agree with jason. the president has no right to go out there and say that marijuana is the same as alcohol. there is no medical evidence for that. in fact, there is a big debate about how dangerous it is, and it is more dangerous than when he used it because it has been -- >> so ped -- suped up. >> yes, suped up with more vibrant ingredients, and it can be dangerous for those whose brains are not totally formed. >> the grassroots colorado and washington legalizing, but what about the issue that jason zeroed in on. we have the laws on on the books, right? controlled substance act i talked about. if the president wants to chang

one of our advisory board members george shultz and secretary of state was ever been on a transport ship headed to japan for the invasion of japan when he heard the news of this new weapon that they believed had ended the '04. to this day he believes that saved his life and the lives of many others. it is the on going historic controversy if we needed to use the bomb. i completely understand why we did it. but by the time we use.the weaponry never intended to use it was to defend ourselves the on the bill to it because we thought hitler was building and we needed to get a device that was similar to deter him. the manhattan project cannot conceive of anyone using a weapon like this book by the end of the war, if immolated hundreds of thousands of people after the talk -- the races seemed like one more weapon but turns out that was not that strategic decision just automatic. historians say that truman never actually voted for the to drop the bomb he never stopped it wants the trade was in ocean. some of the scientists who built the baum wrote a report to a few months before urging the gove

one of our advisory board members is george shultz, secretary state coming he was a marine on a transport ship heading to japan for the invasion of japan when they heard the news of the new weapon that they believed had ended the war. to this day he believed that saved his life and the lives of many others. this is an ongoing the store controversy. whether we needed to use the bomb. i completely understand why we did it, and by the time we used it, this weapon that we never intended to use, when we started building the bomb it was to defend ourselves. we only built it because we thought hitler was building up and we had to get a device in kind to deter them from using it. it was the scientist to start the manhattan project couldn't conceive of anybody using the weapon like this. but by the end of the war, we had immolated hundreds of thousands of people interested in, fire raids over tokyo, nuclear bombs like one more weapon in a terrible, terrible war. so it wasn't that. as it turns out, it wasn't that strategic or a weighty decision to use it. it was almost automatic. historians say tha