i think george soros or worn by federal me would kill for that type of return. so a dramatic increase in wealth. have at least a large part of that is connected to her political position. what about a republican? the speaker of the house immediately before her dennis faster from illinois when he became speaker in the late nineties had a net worth around $300,000. when he laughed less than one decade later it was in the millions and could be close to the 11 million. he did not in your money or win the lottery it is a function of him leveraging his position in order to enrich himself. those are two individuals but there are multiple other side talk about in the but. i name people from both parties this comes from their public financial disclosures and comparing their activities with what they work on with legislation and to sensitive information how is officials could leverage their position to make money? the first example is the ipo which i would consider simply a form of legalized bribery. one example is the john is in the united states senate i need a favor an

acorn welfare rights barack obama the financial crisis george soros it was really lunacy really crazy. but you know i think that this kind of lunatic propaganda. gives some people a kind of crutch through which they can understand the very difficult to understand changes that have overtaken the united states anyway and going back gave me a little megaphone to. attack and the term hartman shero of democracy now the new york times wrote about it the guardian. and the chronicle of higher education everybody wanted me to speak and then my publisher wanted to put together a collection. of all my writings from the very beginning. and the reason they want to do it is they thought that glenn beck would increase sales so that was nice yeah i guess there's some a silver lining in everything if you think that glenn beck and others on the right wing fringe have waged such a relentless campaign to demonize you either a because you know genuine philosophical disagreement and you have explicitly you know laid out your opinions in numerous venues over the years or b. because it's just kind of sloppy

the internationalists' like if i may say george soros, they want money, they want control of not just the united states, they are thinking about the world. they want to consult the world, and i don't think jefferson and adams and george washington were thinking about the world. i think they were thinking of the best interest of the united states of america and i don't see it anymore. >> you covered a lot of territory. >> you did, too. >> my question is -- >> i write in the book that i still to this day believe in our system of government, the founding of the republic which is why we must preserve the republic and yet what always messes it up, people. yet the system has a lot of rules in which we can play now if it is flexible and you can have something succeed for 200 plus years and not have the flexibility to adapt its flexibility, the need to understand that when we expand power for one party or one president, and you see this. remember george bush whether you agree or disagree there's a lot of conversation about the unity of the presidency come a lot of executive order, signing sta

you talk about george soros, lori about the international conversation. you cut the fiver sakes paid investment bankers on wall street, a recent study shows that 147 corporations basically control a majority of wealth on this planet. that is the planet, not this country. you know, did george soros of the world, and then many people think, well, that is the open society, a liberal agenda. the power is basically corporate power. when i say that it can be used well. it can be very good for the world, but it can also be bad. and when you allow the concentration of financial wealth and their pursuit of stock prices and big payouts for ceos in the creation over derivative worlds where we are not begin mortar building things , they are not -- there are about putting money in investment or used to beat philipp things that will build the domestic economy, but they're basically creating a casino analyst with the thought of a button on the computer they're making profits betting on both sides of the game and scrambling around in producing nothing. they produce mss t

the sandlers are members of george soros', a group that wants to push to the left.pieces given to cash strapped media organizations at no cost. ellen, i'm going to start with you. do you see a problem there. >> first of all, i think it's so dishonest to say pro publica is going with the soros, it's an alliance meets twice a year and just like the monday meeting is here and the tuesday meeting is in washington d.c., that's ridiculous. number two, what i think is really it go is that this very disingenuous, because, how many people-- yes, they are he' taking content from pro publicament how many people take the journalists take quote, unquote, content, from the press releases and other people build the stories from there, everybody is borrowing from everybody else and let's just face it. >> jim, let's start with two points. one, the media as they laid off all of their investigative operations are desperate for anyone to come along and hand them the story and they can have it free, who wouldn't? and i think the the fact that every time you turn on the tv and see some j

seen the recent involvement again the international criminal court which is a total creation of george soros and this court is being used to carry out regime change all over africa and this is the danger that people see in syria why have a policy of sanctions and all teary intervention why not have a power of diplomatic development and encouraging the country to resolve the problems as i think the russians and the chinese realise is the best way forward you're talking about regime change there in syria regime change was indeed affected by what the nato did during the libyan conflict not the un human rights chief has actually called for urgent action to protect civilians in syria that is reminiscent of what was said in libya wasn't it or about libya when that no fly zone was imposed. oh yeah look those are the key cold words when they start talking about humanitarian concerns and they really don't care at all about the people this is the same thing that was done against president bashir in sudan they used the key word humanitarian concern and this doctrine of tony blair the responsibility to

to pull that off because the presidents that leave the office make loads of money and live like george soros all democrats. republicans go back to the ranch and write a few books. so it would be very small tv show. i agree with you after obama they don't have any more democrats. >> maybe hillary. >> i want to add a point to that. this idea two options of mitt romney, or you find a right wing others and you stick with a democrat. they got nobody else after obama. >> greg: that is a good point. should obama move back to his homeland, kenya. [ laughter ] >> kenyan speaker corporate to see if there is any option. >> how is he doing right now. >> not great. down in the winter. they hate christmas. they hate it. thank you, thank you. >> greg: e-mail us, it's redeye foxnews.com. and still to come, andy levy, why is he leaving here. >> greg: welcome back. we got how are you feeling? >> great. >> i'm doing great. >> i'm doing pretty good on my own. >> that is good. i'm glad to see that. >> yeah. >> how about you? >> i knew what you.. >> just wanted to make it clear. stronger than ever. >> good. >> bu

morgan bank and george soros. have you seen the reports in "the wall street journal"? >> i looked quickly at "the wall street journal," yes. >> all right, thank you. i know you're not responsible for dealing with the bankruptcy proceeding for mf global. but is it true that once the wall has been reached between customer segregated funds and corporate funds, the money could have been moved to buy a whole range of intercompany transactions come into the repo's, et cetera, virtually any part of mf global or to the counterparties who were financing those on positioned? >> if the question is a possible, i believe it is possible. whether it happened or not we don't know. >> possible is fine. it strikes me that we have here is a situation where the segregated funds belonging to mf global, including the honest, hard-working families in my district money, were misappropriated, we did expect it to bet by mr. corzine and the board at mf global. since the bet was close in a transaction that i believe needs to be investigated further, we could be looking at an absurd and totally un

the sandlers are members of george soros', a group that wants to push to the left. some say hit pieces given to cash strapped media organizations at no cost. ellen, i'm going to start with you. do you see a problem there. >> first of all, i think it's so dishonest to say pro publica is going with the soros, it's an alliance meets twice a year and just like the monday meeting is here and the tuesday meeting is in washington d.c., that's ridiculous. number two, what i think is really it go is that this very disingenuous, because, how many people-- yes, they are he' taking content from pro publicament how many people take the journalists take quote, unquote, content, from the press releases and other people build the stories from there, everybody is borrowing from everybody else and let's just face it. >> jim, let's start with two points. one, the media as they laid off all of their investigative operations are desperate for anyone to come along and hand them the story and they can have it free, who wouldn't? and i think the the fact that every time you turn on the tv

after that is a tie between george soros and the koch brothers. i know they would love to be lumped together. eighth, pixar. nine, tyler perry. then verizon customer service. [ applause ] and finally me. the president. barely above pippa middleton. and. >> bill: super bowl is in minneapolis this year and madonna is the entertainment. ♪ ♪ >> bill: the woman is 53 years old. she will perform for about 20 minutes and earn gazillions. maybe next year they will take miller and me. i don't think so. check 5, if you don't believe we are looking out for you, click off right this minute. if you don't believe that get out of here. we have a new product, the factor words book based on our word of the day segment. this is for christmas and hanukkah. you buy a copy of killing lincoln on bill o'reilly.com you get the factor words book free, our gift to you. please remember all the money i get from bill o'reilly.com is donated to charity. that is reality check, pinheads and patriots starring an attack on fox news up next. >> pinheads and patriots. and first rest

i think they will go back and get much more organize and have more money from like george soros type.t obama. >> andrea: they are not tough enough to stay out in wintertime. not going to bathroom in the wintertime. two points, ironically a lot of protests are environmentalists. which is the ironic point they leave the garbage and debris and they're probably the same advocating for green energy. the people they claim to want to help, 99% are the ones that had to clean up their mess. >> greg: that is the thing. >> andrea: that is disrespectful. >> greg: a true failure in the fact that the people working overnight to clean this up are people they are supposed to fight for. the thing, eric, is the success of the protest is for some reason they have been able to convince a fair amount of people that capitalism is the problem. that is scary. >> eric: if you read the "communist manifesto" by karl marx that is what they are doing. saying that it's class ware fair. >> bob: glad you changed the subject. we spent four minutes on garbage. >> eric: they created their own class. >> greg: when the m

i believe george soros, some like that, is helping to fund them.some people are helping to fund these protests. there are these narratives that people come up with. that video, where i am thrown down, occupy is helping me, i have gotten a lot of hate mail from conservatives for putting that out. -- up. if that is the truth, i do not see the problem. >> here is some video that also went viral about education. the menu in to be it is a man named -- the man you interviewed is a man named matt damon. before we go to that, what was the point of this? why were you there? why were you interviewing him? >> i had just graduated from college. i was contacted and told they would be interested in me hosting a few of their videos. this was the first video. he and the cameramen, they told me, it is just going to be the small protest. people are probably not even going to be there. we can get you in there. see if you like to see how it works. i went. it ended up viral. >> we are going to show it in a second. who was the videographer? >> darina cousins. she is a g

to pay for this by raising the premiums for wealthier seniors so people like bill clinton and george soros warren buffet and other wealthy americans who are seniors have to pay a bigger premium than the working man or woman who has worked all their like and does not as much asset. >>neil: but the core issue of getting something that is really in the d.n.a. of the republican party, a tax cut, a one year extension, though seemed to have grabbed defeat from the jaws of easy victory. >>guest: i think the "wall street journal" editorial hit it on the nail. question now is how do the republicans get out it? there is only one way. the stay in washington. wait until president obama gets on airplane and heads to hawaii and hold a session of the house of representatives, vote the two month extension, and use it as an opportunity to beat up on the now long absent democrats and harry reid and the absent president and say, look, this is going to cause we, not be good for the companies that have to write the paychecks because we have heard from the people who process payroll checks this will be a proble

him and george soros, now warren buffett's in on it.nd it's like i don't want to dissuade them of that. i read on the internet last week, this was on the right wing blogs that i got $50 million. and i'm going like wow that would be really cool if i have 50 million, but don't deny it. >> how much have your movies grossed in total i don't have the number right off hand. >> what would you guess at? >> half a billion dollars? >> right. so you either have got the worst agent in the world or you must have made -- >> i have got a new agent now. "bowling for columbine" not only did i not make any money on it, i didn't get a paycheck. i made that movie for free. >> you wouldn't dispute that you have earned million of dollars. >> that is correct. my first film i made $3 million. they gave me a check from this company right here. thank you, whoever you are. that was in 1989. i had three or four good years where "fahrenheit 9/11," my book "stupid white men," those years i would be in the 1%. >> your argument is that you don't qualify every year. >>

corporate side of it, you're still allowing people like the koch brothers on the right or even george soros to spend millions and millions of dollars. so you need to get at the core of it and say money spent on elections is not speech. therefore the congress can regulate how much you can spend, if you can spend anything, and who can spend it. if you don't get at that fundamental committquestion, co really can't regulate. >> isn't it empirically observable that money is property? i have some money in my pocket right now, believe it or not, and the only plausible use can i think of for it is to acquire some type of property. i might be able to buy myself a cup or a mouse for my computer. i could even buy myself a telephone. this is a fancy new telephone. the battery always runs out, but don't spend too much money, but you can get one of these. where did we lose the concept that money is, by definition, property, and that property, by definition, is a fixed object that is not speech, obviously? >> well, i don't think the founding fathers ever really thought about the fact that people would be

how glad he is that we can guarantee $2 billion in loans to buy equipment from a company that george soros has invested in and then he goes on the say which was an astounding thing for an american president. he said i want to us be your best customer. now that's exactly backwards. we don't send the president of the united states around the world to be foreign purchasing agent. we send him around the world to be a salesman for america. [ applause ] so i am deeply committed if you look at the productivity of iowa we have to be in foreign markets to absorb our production and i'm deeply committed to finding the toughest most aggressive trial lawyer available and having them book our u.s. trade representative so we can take the right attitude in negotiating with china and other countries to open up markets on our behalf and make sure we in fact are leaning forward to sell our products overseas. but the -- [ applause ] . the second example of the president's absolute inability to understand the real world is the keystone pipeline. you know, it's one thing if the white house can't play chess. it'

we're not funded by george soros or other left-wing conspiracy kurds. us are just truckling to get by as much as many of you it in america are. host: john in pocahontas, go ahead and make your comment. caller: how're you doing? guest: hello in pocahontas. caller: amusing that the last caller said that. i enter your well, because a man that rides his bicycle to wealth is amusing to me. -- to work is amusing to me. trust me, you are not wealthy. that being said, i did not even know about this occupy des moines going on. but being told that obama failed as, he takes a lot of money from wall street. is also passed this unbelievable presidential power that is going to give him the right to lock up of american citizens? alaska's two questions. -- i will ask you two questions. one, where can i sign up for it? and can i get one of those t- shirts that they show up? guest: one of our local occupiers but together these t- shirts and i'm sure we could find a way to get you one of them. various ways of signing up. there is a occupy dsm, that's des moines, iowa, fac

george soros, by the way, is not funding this campaign, and i suspect elsewhere. there are so many myths being put out by people who want to discredit this movement. you need to look at the facts and pay attention to what is going on. i know there are some people that become the poster child for the opposition, the dirty guy, the homeless out, the person who does something violent. that is not the primary person involved with this movement. i can say it until i am blue in the face. we have goals, objectives. some of them are brought, some are specific. reinstating glass-steagall would be a huge benefit to the country. reinvesting the bank settlement appear that would be huge. i will keep saying it, and i may turn blue in the face. we have specific goals, objectives, we are not funded by some left-wing conspiracy group, and many of us are public to get by, as much as you, and many people in the country are. host: drawn from pocahontas, iowa. go ahead. caller: but we love you up here, you know that. i find it funny and amusing, the last caller, a man that rides his

nobody believes stevie cone or george soros or john paulson should pay half the tax rate of a fireman or a teacher. that is something everybody can agree on. there are a lot of things. break up the banks. a lot of things that are obvious solutions and more complicated policy discussions down the road. >> one reason i wrote a novel instead of nonfiction was because sometimes you have to take a break from yelling about the solutions. all the years i have been doing this it was sort of like let me go into another time. another period and look at this different way. the solutions aren't that difficult either. it is the will to get there. [inaudible] >> that is the will problem. >> my name is george. and have been to occupy wall street and number of times and my contribution -- it made me the press in the first fifteen seconds of the last week to send as. i hung that skeleton holding placards saying throw me some crumbs have the 99% certainly feel. it has been well photographed. my question. i am trying to get the groups to focus on what i think are the two most important overarching initi

>> so basically, just to wrap this up, whether it is done by the koch brother on the right or george sorosn the left, you hate this, and you want to see it changes? >> this is going to be a real blow to the american democratic process, no matter who is funding it. what t means in practical sense is that when somebody comes up to vote, walks up to the table in the senate and decides whether or not to vote against wall street, vote against drug companies, vote against the cowell cobalt cobathe coal companies, they think, if i vote next week, will this come back against me. so it allows countries who already have enormous power to have even more power. >> you weren't ready to endorse president obama's reelection last time we talked. have you made your mind? >> i think obama will be a strong candidate. i believe in president obama begins the fight of the working family, show working people he will stand up to big money interest, i think he will win this election and i look forward very much to supporting him. >> all right. that's a change from our last conversation. always good. senator twob s

as far as i am concerned, george soros is running our country.id several years ago "i will own at the democratic party, which he does as we speak. guest: the most important thing we need to do what america back to work. the most fundamental thing we can do is to make sure every single family that sits down at the dinner table that they note that there is security they're coming from the dignity that comes with a job in providing for your family. that is what i think congress needs to work them in providing them a financial security and making sure we have the appropriate safety nets within social security and medicare and health care for them. lastly, national security. on all three levels, the president of the united states has done a remarkable job. let me start by saying ending the war in iraq, capturing and eliminating osama bin laden, ending the conflict in libya without the use of one american troops on the ground, an incredible foreign policy achievement that he continues to build on. as far as getting the nation moving and attempting to r

you know, you hear numbers like that, and you think, oh, it's a bunch of george soros' a lot of family >> absolutely. and their money may have been lost, other money has been frozen, so they can't use it. let's not only focus on corzine here, okay? we've got to focus on the regulators. they've been telling us they need more authority to regulate the financial system. and here we are, they couldn't even use the authority they had, and they had plenty of it, to stop the most basic kind of financial regulation, and that is really raising a question about who was the cop on the beat, and how much more power should we give these people if they can't do regulation 101? jon: jon corzine was the head of goldman sachs, he was a united states senator, he was the governor of new jersey before he went on to head mf global. is it possible that he could go to jail? >> i think given the legal language he used in that testimony yesterday, it's very obvious to me that his lawyers are conscious of that vulnerability, and jon corzine is conscious of that vulnerability. jon: the answer seemed a little reh

john paulson, george soros, $1.2 billion in 2010 off of in the west bank.d one guest: as the budget is currently structured, it does not pull money from the general fund. it gets a percentage of the operating expenses of the federal reserve. right now, it gets about 10% of the federal reserve's operating expenses which is going to ratchet up in the next couple of years to about $600 million by 2012. what proponents say is we need to keep it away from the appropriators because we need to keep bank regulators free from the process so they are not swayed one way or the other. if we do not have a say in how they spend their money, how are we going to exert oversight? host: the financial times has a story today, saying -- guest: exactly. that is the fundamental concern. we are still trying to figure out exactly what we are doing after that. there is a wide number of regulations that regulators are trying to put in place. the overall marketing concern, and it is not something that will be relatively apparent, is how significant of the role of those new regulations are going to play on everyd

george soros supported it "occupy wall street" and angela merkel has talked about it and nicolas sarkozyce talked about it. two congressman here in the united states, tom defazio and tom harkin talking about it. the creator of the tobin tax, the robin hood tax was created by james tobin. he was an economist in early '70s. he wanted it to stop speculators in the currency market. he said he didn't want it used to create jobs or pay down government debt. back to you, jon. jon: the devil is always in the details. >> that's right. jon: who administers the fund and who pays it out? >> reporter: that's right. would you need more government officials to collect the tax? is that where a lot of dollars raised by the robin hood tax would go to creating jobs in government. back to you. jon: jobs in government, we sure need more of those. liz macdonald thank you. >> reporter: sure, deer lighted. jon: december 7th, 1941 is a day that will live in infamy. exactly 70 years later we have never-before-seen footage of the japanese attack on pearl harbor. a first-hand account from a navy photographer who wa