. >> george stephanopolis, paul o'neal, they have all done this, but my point, my question to you, does it affect the long-term reputation of the person who is being written about? i say "no." >> stephanopolis was going back to the clinton years and, rice, of course, in the wake of lewinsky, that bill clinton was not fit, and he was self deinstructive. >> bill clinton is an elder statesman and george stephanopolis is the "good morning america" anchor but it didn't really make a difference. it did the at the time and maybe others canning a again that but it doesn't now. >> >> ezra: it have the potential to tarnish a little bit gates' reputation. >> i think so. as much as on the question of whether he should have written the book at all at this stage, as on the question of why he stayed. the question of whether he should have written the book doesn't go to veracity. the question of why he stays, goes to his character. the book says he came close to quitting. but he didn't. that question hangs in the air. >> naturally, the press has pounced on the stories such as hillary clinton according