they understood what georgia is. saakashvili well, we have our own experience. and at the same time they said, what are you talking about georgia without russia yes, we will live what is now in moldova they say we say georgian wine here, everyone in italy in spain, here in rioja somewhere in catalonia in bordeaux in burgundy. eh, they're just waiting for the georgian wines to come to the mirrors asking the german burger, where is it? i want it kindzmarauli hovanchikara. there seemed to be none of that. but when they removed the imbargo on in trade between georgia and russia, russia rose from 11th place in trade turnover to leader, entered the top two and georgian wines returned, er, to the market and so on. and what is being done to restore air traffic is that georgia has almost 11% economic growth. these are the results of the norm of still non-stabilization, but the gradual normalization of relations with russia is the fairy tale that westerners offer the post-soviet space. and here is the reality . the same applies to moldova exactly the same applies to the ce

and where, i apologize , is the president of the republic of georgia, mykhailo saakashvili, in prisonemlin for mykhailo saakashvili, who was ready to resist their violent actions against georgia . saakashvili can be treated differently, he is a complex person with an authoritarian streak, and zelenskyi can be treated differently by many. we are not talking about that. we are talking about the fact that zelensky is a symbol of how ukraine today resists russian aggression , who are the other people who are responsible for this sector of resistance today , and this means that these political forces who want to change the vector from resistance to finding a balance with all neighbors in order to prevent more of it especially since we are not being taken anywhere so far , they can consider that a good reward for russia so that it does not do anything bad again will be the imprisonment of those people who fought with moscow they will find corruption for the abuse of various official decisions, and it seems to me that, taking into account the experience of mikheil saakashvili, the current pr

georgia. saakashvili is everything it's all, uh, the same.types the american military presence in the dominican republic ended in the twenty-second year. however , after themselves, the americans left an unstable government, which changed power passed from hand to hand, and as a result, in the thirty-first year, the trujilla dictator came to power. e, a native of the american military e, programs and truhil. in fact, until the 1960s, the dominican republic remained under the control of washington, and then when the dominicans could not put up with this state of affairs, then in the sixty-sixth year the second american occupation of the dominican republic began. i also emphasized this, uh, a multi-layered multi-factorial policy that uses leverage and military leverage, but also the so -called soft power tools. the term coined by the american political scientist joseph naim, which includes, among other things , a huge network of existing american centers of science and culture in latin america, not only in the capitals, and teaching english. th

because this is what comrades from the kremlin wanted for mykhailo saakashvili, who was ready to resist their violent actions against georgiahvili you can treat zelensky differently. he is a complex person with an authoritarian streak, and many people can treat zelensky differently. we are not talking about that. we are talking about the fact that zelensky is a symbol of how ukraine today resists russian aggression. are responsible for precisely this sector of support, which means that these political forces who want to change vector from resistance to finding a balance with all neighbors for the sake of preventing more of it, especially since we are not being taken anywhere so far, can consider it a good reward for russia to she didn't do anything wrong, those people who fought with moscow will be imprisoned. that's why she's a simple politician, not for that, and it will be very wrong for that, but for corruption, for the abuse of various official decisions, they'll find her for what. and it seems to me that taking into account this experience of mikhail saakashvili, the incumbent president should not think about preservi

the territory of the ukrainian state, saakashvili says that these two interlocutors, two americans , just looked at him like a madman, because at that time georgia was already about the period of the war against russia august 2008, and they thought that it was just a syndrome in saakashvili. after this war, such a uh -huh is appropriate for russia. now saakashvili is talking about the fact that as soon as the ukrainians try to regain crimea, the russians can strike a tactical nuclear weapon attack on the decision-making center in kyiv means the center of kyiv and, as saakashvili writes, a strike on one of the logistics centers on the territory of poland is also possible, because there are a lot of weapons and ideas, many humanitarians go through this center , how do you feel about such conclusions saakashvili and before such a development of events , i understand that the russians are obsessed and it is very difficult to predict their actions, especially after the explosion of the kakhov dam, but still, well, without rio, you see what saakashvili said to his to american interlocutors er, in the part that concerned crimea, i spoke to condoleezza

now former president of georgia mikheil saakashvili a. efremov and the boguts speak tightly.r chief prosecutor of one of the districts of the region. yuriy bozhko bozhko was connected, and remained connected. um, his close friend became the assistant prosecutor’s umbilical cord with the prosecutor’s office, and when criminal cases of fraud appeared against efremov and bubucidze , the prosecutor general’s office unexpectedly interfered with the work of the investigation as a result of the lipetsk regional prosecutor. konstantin kozhevnikov was sent to resigned that there were no problems. but how what? i will change will not change anything. unfortunately, now those who arranged all this in the prosecutor general's office do not work, but the efforts made were not in vain for the stop managers of the free sokol, all charges were dropped with amazing wording, allegedly in the actions of efremov and bagutsidze, there was no mercenary intent, no theft, they say it was like catching a thief with your wallet by the hand, and he would say his purse and that's it, a non-trivial theft

saakashvili georgian yes, georgian politicians. they understood what georgia is. ryone in italy in spain, here in rioja somewhere in catalonia in bordeaux in burgundy. uh, they're just waiting for the georgians to come to the target door to ask the german burger, where is it? i want it kindzmaraule. quanch-kara. there seemed to be none of that. but when the embargo on trade between georgia and russia was lifted , russia rose in six months from 11th place in the trade turnover to the leader, entered the top two and georgian wines are back, uh, on the market and so on. and what is being done to restore air traffic is that georgia has almost 11% economic growth. these are the results of the norm of still non-stabilization, but the gradual normalization of relations with russia is a fairy tale that westerners offer the post-soviet space. and here is the reality. it's straight. the same applies to moldova exactly the same applies to the central asian countries, and armenia and others, and this certainly applies to security issues, therefore, in reality, maybe for someon

saakashvili about georgia you are an example of georgia. see some change in their policy. had enough of western promises and so on and want to return to our market again, because no one will let you in their market with milk, meat, or wine . the markets have long been divided and there is a tough fight for them. this is the second. why should we stick together? yes, our developed market is overseas usa or in the west, that means in exchange for resources or for some kind of policy. there they will give something with three fingers, if you run after them. and he supports the policy that they are pursuing. therefore, while we are together, based on such an opinion of the people, based on our common approach, we lived in one state. we must stay together from each other, especially in this difficult time, at the same time, alexander lukashenko urges not to close and deepen the interaction of the dkb with such organizations. how will these threads of international security help to keep the world from problems such as drug trafficking and terrorism, but a blow from countries. th

that’s exactly the conversation i had with mikheil saakashvili about georgia . see a certain change in their policy. they ate from western promises and so on and want to return to our market again, because no one will let you into their markets with milk, meat, or wine . the markets have long been divided and there is a tough fight. this is the second. why should we stick together? this is our developed market there, if something is offered abroad by the united states or in the west, this means in exchange for resources or for some kind of policy. there they will give something with three fingers, if you run after them, silk your heels and support the policy that they are pursuing, therefore, while we are together, based on this popular opinion, based on our common approach, we lived in one state. no need to rush to make things worse for each other and try to somehow get away. from each other we need to stick together, especially in this difficult time, alexander lukashenko urges not to close and deepen cooperation in the csd with organizations such as the un hi

right there, such a conversation was with mikheil saakashvili about georgia.mple , you see a certain change in their policy in georgia. they are full of western promises and so on and want to return to our market again, because that no one will let you into their markets with milk, meat, or wine. the markets have long been divided and there is a tough fight for them. this is the second. why should we stick together? this is our developed market there, if something is offered abroad by the united states or in the west, this means in exchange for resources or for some kind of policy. there they will give something with three fingers, if you run after them, silk your heels and support the policy they are pursuing, it turns out, how often in life is an old friend the best of the new two without unnecessary diplomacy alexander lukashenko says about washington's plans in the name of holy democracy , the united states now and then interferes in the internal affairs of other states. hoi ignite the flames of conflict. no need to rush to make things worse for each other

exactly such a conversation was with mikheil saakashvili about georgia , you are an example of georgiahange in their policy. they gorged themselves on western promises and other and want to return to our market. again , because no one will let you in their market with milk, meat, or wine . the markets have long been divided and there is a tough fight for them. this is the second. why should we stick together? yes, our developed market is there, if something is offered abroad by the united states or in the west, this means in exchange for resources or for some kind of policy. there they will give something with three fingers, if you run with a heel and support the policy that they pursue, it turns out, as often happens in life. old friend of the best of the new two without unnecessary diplomacy alexander lukashenko talks about washington's plans in the name of holy democracy usa internal affairs of other states. to move away from each other, we need to stick together, especially in this difficult time, and the point here is not that the main core of our organizations is russia in diffic

. directly, putin also forgave the visa regime for citizens of georgia, and we still remember, of course, and the fact that hill saakashvilizen of ukraine, is now dying in the prison of the georgian prison camp, is simply dying live, and once again, he personally blames ah, the government of georgia in the fact that they make decisions in favor of the kremlin, we can talk about the dependence of the georgian government on the kremlin, and what this can mean for us in the confrontation with russia, and it does. i would not say that there is such open support and they have already explained in georgia that this is their strategy of being patient with regard to russia. well , i can say that according to our surveys of russians, this would not help the georgian authorities very much if there was a decision to carry out military aggression against georgia again. for example, how some successful so-called special operation well, in order to somehow present something to the russian society, russian society, by the way, is very ready for this according to our survey there. well, a little less than the baltic countries would agree

cramped for him, well, it's not a very correct comparison, but how mikheil saakashvili was cramped in odesa region after georgia belarus here another question well, someone there predicts that he will fly to turkey, sees a role there erdoğan as a mediator i don't see such a big role for erdoğan because i don't know whether it is in turkish terms for him to communicate with the victim, but still, it is, well, i don't think that his friendship with putin is comprehensive as far as i am concerned. i want to ask you one more thing about the circus-shapito, they started the circus-shapito, every circus shapito goes on tour and every tour has its own name. what name would you give to these tours of this prigozhyn shapito ? so and so unitedly determined, of course, if you can call it understood , thank you mr. yevhen thank you very much for participating in our program yevhen magda, director of the institute of world politics, talked about and what could be behind all that prigozhyn wanted to convey to us and to everyone else during the day, i think i will remind our viewers that it is really correct yevhen er reminde

territory the ukrainian state tells saakashvili that these two interlocutors, two americans, simply looked at him as if he were crazy , because at that time georgiaas already talking about the period of the war against russia in august 2008, and they thought that this was just a syndrome in saakashvili . after this war, such a saakashvili, who corresponds to russia, now says that as soon as the ukrainians try to regain crimea and the russians can strike a tactical nuclear weapon on the center of decision-making in kyiv, he means the center of kyiv and it is also possible, as saakashvili writes, on one of the logistics centers on the territory of poland, because there are a lot of weapons and ideas, many humanitarians go through this center , how do you feel about such conclusions saakashvili and such a development of events? i understand that the russians are obsessed and it is very difficult to gnosis their actions, especially after the blowing up of the kakhov dam, but still. well, without rio, you see what saakashvili said to his american interlocutors, in the part that related to crimea, i spoke to rice in december 2008 and convinced her so t

saakashvili, worked for a long time on the territory of ukraine. and in ukraine, she appeared so directly called the georgian team. a lot of them came from georgiand they took their high positions in various structures of the ukrainian government. here is the prosecutor general's office to the ministry of health alexander kridashvili. he was a close friend of mikhail saakashvili, he headed the ministry of health of ukraine for about a year and a half. well, there were a lot of georgians. usa then everything went the devilish way of those guys who were buried at the entrance to artyom. recorded as missing , it turned out that they were simply killed. uh, no consents were filled out and their relatives were not paid anything. and it was sandra who kept calling and calling. demanding to fulfill the order during the shelling of the city popasnoy. she cut out the kidneys and spleen from a 12-year-old girl who lost consciousness from a mine explosion and her own father, i even remember the name vladimir lyashevsky. he heated his hand on their organs. uh, sons, as they say, whose ukrainians simply had the opportunity to be seriously injured and instead

saakashvili, uh, saying to the post-soviet leaders through the heads of the special services, guys, don't rush, don't fuss, don't run somewhere. you think about the future. what the example of georgiaw, just a picture of a super successful country in reform. they have there, either the ministry of justice or the ministry of internal affairs made of transparent glass, they dispersed the traffic police there and it turned out that there allegedly they don’t take bribes, and it’s just that the picture of the world is such a showcase of this western way of life, which is not an institution after the soviet space, which turned out, then, that simply corruption was transferred in increased volumes to another level. it turned out that behind all this is the destruction of the industry. it turned out that there were some new e under the carpet.

there are many times to stir in georgia and i will say frankly there, uh, the population is absolutely loyal absolutely loyal, if it weren’t for this provoked saakashvili'sprovoked by the us in 2008, to put it mildly. they would be absolutely fine. uh, in general, to all countries in the soviet space, especially to russia with which there is such an economic turnover, but today the mayor of the city of tbilisi, yes, the former football player is the prime minister. these are young politicians who, thank god, think exclusively about national interests, which, in principle, everyone ascribes to our president. in any case, this is unambiguously and is attributed to erdogan, yes, who is on the wave national interests. actually won, no matter what, well, i said the president, of course. in ukraine, he spoke a lot, including about, uh, for what reasons , when, in his opinion, the war began, in fact, not and this is not 2014, as it seems to many, what he was talking about. vadim frenchevich. we also talk about this a lot in the summer here in the editors' club. i remember from the fourteenth fifteenth year. then we predicted that everything would end in a war .