gibner >> john gibner. the rent ordinance currently defines the tenants that's the term that's used 80 so it's divided equally among tenants the tenant is by an oral agreement or sub tenants to come up a residential opt so it includes sub tenants that have been proved by landlord >> since a lease is technically required so if the sub tenant is not paying rent to the landlord they're paying is to the master tenant their included. okay. supervisor campos >> i'm going to turn it over to. i know there are a number of people who came out to speak on this item. i know many are here i know that one of the individuals may have to leave >> ongoing thank you companionships we'll open this up for public comment when you have 30 seconds left you'll hear a soft bell and a harder billion when your time it up. i'll call the names and we'll start with (calling names) also i'll say if there's anyone because of a health or physical irrational or childcare issue if you need special consideration please let the clerk know and

gibner to the chair. deputy city attorney jonas the board mention they've placed the reserve on is reading from and hadn't been done in many years the process for realizing that the supervisor would introduce another motion to schedule a reserve as a whole and at following boards meeting the boards sits to take public comment and adapt a motion to release the reserve >> i'm comfortable with that process. if we were to go that route and end up being a long drown u drawn out process so i don't know which i could maybe ask for an amendment >> a motion and make a motion. >> i make a motion that we change the statement where we're putting the money in reserve for the budget committee to put in the reserve at the full board of supervisors. >> we have a motion any supervisor yee and second by supervisor cowen any comment. >> we obviously have a lot of comments so we do the public comment at the full board of supervisors for decision. that is something i will support i know there's been a level of discomfort and

gibner clarify again what the language would be we'll be amending. >> deputy city attorney john gibner again. on page 2 of the ordinance line 21 provides that the funds shall be placed on budget and finance reserve and rather than budget and finance committee reserve the ordinance will read board of supervisors reserve and the title of the ordinance will change according >> okay. so that's supervisor yee's amendment described by the city attorney and second by supervisor cowen once this is amended one of us will introduce a motion we sit as a committee as a wholesome weeks later and we'll make that decision collectively. any more discussion on that amendment without objection >> supervisor kim. >> i want to respond to some of the colleagues first of all, thank all for this robust discussion. our office supported this nonprofit dismramentd work group this is only one piece of the fund and this is not the only thing they're looking at the planning code and pro bono services from realtor and rents throughout the city so there's a lot of avenues we're looking at point. we're looking at the

reading record what he proposes and thank you for your work and dbi >> deputy city attorney john gibnergain. we suggest adding language to the end of section one 06 a point one .3 b titled imminent

. >> you don't think gibner. i think the challenge here is the legislation would require the applicants to submit information about their property including some evidence that the unit currently exists and information on the check list that the department will prepare and other other information that the department requires. i think it's a largely a practical logical question whether the department can review all the materials without knowing that the location or the name of the property owner. it maybe something that the department has to work out and practice to see how much they can do without the legislation. maybe the legislation can have language that says the department will make efforts toward that end >> in the meantime supervisor kim do you have a question on this topic. >> that's a question on the dbi and let me see if rosemary. >> i'd like to resolve this. >> members of the board. chief housing inspector a couple of thoughts the first is the prescene of the crime situation is much is can be presented

. >> deputy city attorney, john gibner. yes. you have to. >>supervisor mark farrell: all right. colleagues any questions for mr. rose. okay. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. all right. so, as to item no. 6, we have amendments recommended by mr. rose? >> motion to approve amendment. >> to send -- line item for no. 6. >> as recommended. >>supervisor mark farrell: item no. 7? >> item no. 7 forwarding to the full board. item no. 8 you are adopting the motion to rel -- release the funds after approved by ceqa. >> item no. 7 we can move to the full board. >> so moved. >> item no. 8 release pending approval by the board of supervisors to the full board. >> okay. approval of item 7 to the full board. can i take that without opposition? okay. so moved. >> okay. madam clerk, any other business? city clerk: no, sir. we don't. >>supervisor mark farrell: okay. we are adjourned. [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> >> >> good afternoon, everybody let me please call this meeting of the san francisco public utilities commission at the 1:40 p.m. sfgovtv re

reading record what he proposes and thank you for your work and dbi >> deputy city attorney john gibner again. we suggest adding language to the end of section one 06 a point one .3 b titled imminent subsequential hazards. based on information provided by applicant unless the standard a identified. so colleagues, i think that addresses the concerns i've heard from folks so if there are additional questions if this works i'll be happy to support that amendment >> that's definitely stronger language. is there a motion to adapt without objection >> on the rh n d i'll say a couple of things i absolutely ago with the density diversity. we have many parts of city that are being tremendously taxed. and it is the intense it neighborhoods we have so far we have technical in law that are dispersed throughout the city i'm uncomfortable with carving out a set of neighborhoods that being said i'm okay with supporting an amendment that says that nothing in the ordinance is intended to change the property owners under the current rocky mountain u agreement. i think we should carve out rh one d i prefe

deputy city attorney is there anything not record that would impact cc rs >> deputy city attorney john gibneressentially no cc n are private. they're separate from the city land use regulatory powers and this legislation is an exercise of the city's regulatory authority and didn't change the terms of cc and rs. so given that again colleagues if folks feel like this needs to be clarified i'd be likely if there's an amendment that nothing in this ordinance is going to change the cc and rs i'd be willing to entertain that language. again, that's nothing i'm trying to impact with this legislation >> anything he will. >> i want to thank everyone who come out on this issue it's been around city hall for decades it's on a vigorous topic of discussion for many, many years i want to thank president chiu for his leadership. >> i think one thing that everyone agrees on but i think a lot of people agree on is that the current system is not working for i don't think anyone. we have many, many tenants in this city who because they live in an illegal unit they're living in constant fear and uncertainty whet

. >> john gibner again. this is provided understate law and requires that the members of the commission either must work in the city or reside in the city so that charter position usually requires a waiver position does not apply in this case. >>supervisor norman yee: motion passes. thank you. congratulations, once again. bye now. madam clerk. item 4. city clerk: item 4: 140134: [appointment, graffiti advisory board] hearing to consider appointing one member, term ending april 10, 2015, to the graffiti advisory board. clerk of the boardd vacant seat 14, succeeding debbie shea, term expired, must represent a business that operates in san francisco, for the unexpired portion of a two- year term ending april city clerk: sf 41234 >>supervisor norman yee: ms. deedey workman. >> good afternoon, i'm with the san francisco chamber of commerce. the chamber of commerce represents over 1500 businesses in san francisco. i would like to thank you for considering me in the graffiti advisory board and i have had the experi

our city attorney has arrived, herrera, white, gibner and advocates for strong ethics and transparency laws. we have worked together for a number of was no put this packet together and attend this hearing to let folks know that we are kicking off this discussion and hopefully in the coming weeks we'll be able to have some clarity over a few remaining issues that are outstanding before we come back to this committee and ask for our committee to move this out to the full board. with that, i would like to invite up our city attorney mr. herrera for some comments. >> thank you, mr. president and members of the board and thank you for the opportunity to come and spend a couple minutes to talk about this legislation forum today. first i want to thank and congratulate president chu for all of his hard work over the last year. you may recall that supervisor chiu and i introduced this legislation last year and at the time announced it was our belief that thises the most important ethics legislation to advance before the board of supervisors in its generation and i happen to believe that that re

>> deputy city attorney john gibner, you can make the amendment orally and the department should submit a revised version to the resolution after the meeting. >>supervisor mark farrell: okay. >> it was sent over and we are trying to find a copy of it. and we do have this. i don't know exactly where it is. >> when you say send in, city hall is a lot of people here. when you say send in, as a budget director i haven't seen it. >> certainly, i believe we received at an amended legislation. an as i understand the police department has received subsequent grant amendment from kahlo yes that would increase the sides size of the grant from the number before you by $71,000. so that's the amendment that we were hoping could be made today so that you didn't have to hear two accept and expense. >> if we can do this orally, change the dollar amount by the additional $71,000? >> you can make that change orally and the department should submit a paper copy to the clerk's office and the committee will need to continue the item and hear it again next week because the amount is increasing. >> regardless

our city attorney has arrived, herrera, white, gibner and advocates for strong ethics and transparency laws. we have worked together for a number of was no put this packet together and attend this hearing to let folks know that we are kicking off this discussion and hopefully in the coming weeks we'll be able to have some clarity over a few remaining issues that are outstanding before we come back to this committee and ask for our committee to move this out to