gibner? >> i would defer to the clerk on what the motion that was adopted. >> it was just the amendment to item 15. >> supervisor: do we need to take another vote? >> you'd need to take a vote to pass items 14 through 18 minus 15. item 15 would be adopted on first reading as amended. >> what about my request to duplicate items 14 through 18 picking out item 15. >> clerk: that would be a different stand alone request on your behalf, madame president. >> supervisor: what is the procedure? is there a seconded needed -- >> clerk: to duplicate the file, no, madame president. have you an independent right to duplicate the fight -- file but you need a motion to amend. >> supervisor: why would we be duplicating the file? >> in my opinion to make sure the amendment we'll be hearing or be in sync with what will be finally passed. >> so what the city attorney was clarifying is whether we want to hold all the tight -- items to be read and passed next week or pass the others today and item 15 next week as

>> deputy city senior, john gibner. it's a provisional call to have it in the charter.the board cannot adopt an ordinance that requires city college to provide reports because city college is an outside entity. so this charter amendment would explicitly tie the reporting requirement to the city's funding with the amendment. if the board does not adopt supervisor stefani's proposed amendment, you can still request reports from city college or hold hearings and ask city college to attend. but the board couldn't withhold fund from city college because city college didn't provide adequate information to the board. >> unless this is in the charter? >> correct. >> supervisor mandelman. >> there was a question of the oversight committee and if we want to have an oversight committee the thought was we'd have to have an ordinance we'd work on in the spring. this seems parallel or similar to me. >> the board has adopted an ordinance creating an oversight committee or approved an m.o.u. and could outside of the charter amendment, create an oversight committee. you cannot require c

>> deputy city attorney, john gibner. the 10-year question whether the $10 million question is whether the city anticipates the contract will cost $10 million over its term. your question about a five-year contract with multiple extensions, if there are extensions built into the contract when it's first signed and the term is going to be over 10 years, that contract comes to the board for approval. if there's a five-year contract without extensions or options to extend built in goes to the board but if it extends by two years and in year nine wants another two-year extension the department must come to the board that the point to approve because that's when it goes over 10 years. >> supervisor: okay. thank you very much. >> the target numbers and it comes out to 1,300 clients for the beds. >> supervisor: thank you. so my question is just to pivot off this, are we increasing our reach or meeting 1300 this year, how many last year and how many the year before? i'm trying to understand more a little bit more clearly how we'r

. >> supervisor: deputy city attorney john gibner. >> it's the section of the municipal code where we place ordinance regulate private conduct that don't fit into any other codes. it's an exercise of our police power which is why we put in the police code. >> supervisor: thank you. and supervisor safai, why are you continuing the item? >> because we would like to provide a little more time with the california growers association. they're supportive but want the opportunity to sit down with us one last time. also, the state is getting close to finalizing the state apprenticeship program at the state level and could happen in the first week but for no other reason than that because we're very confident this is going to be a successful program. >> thank you very much. colleagues, can we take it without objection? a motion's been made by supervisor safai to continue for one week to the december 11. is there a second? supervisor peskin made the second. without objection. this item is continued to december 11. madame clerk, item 26. >> clerk: ordinance amending the police code by making a n