the gic is a more the gic is a lot more established and has a longer record, as well.how did he get that 900 billion figure? in short, the 7 7 ambitions and the speed7 7 ambitions and the speed7at —: = -: he is trying to achieve which he is trying to achieve them are hallmarks of his them are hallmarks at his but the them are hallmarhs at his but the is presidency, butthe question is �* he will balance with how he will balance this with the commercial reality. and how he will balance this with the commercial reality. how he will balance this with the he nmercial reality. how he will balance this with the he balance , reality. how he will balance this with the he balance the lity. how he will balance this with the he balance the books? i hoof how he will balance this with the he balance the books? with how he will balance this with the in balance the books? with how he will balance this with the in mind, e the books? with how he will balance this with the in mind, how: books? with how he will balance this with the in mind, how he ioks? with how he will balance this with

gic of the court's opinion in the earlier line was defining seal material harmful to children. this category of matia kids can be prohibited from seeing was a content-based restriction. this get to complete my answer to yrlier question abo why i am more worried about the second categorlover. that starts to bring in not just this particular corner of th first amendment law but also the court's cases from all the other places where the court has laid down this is what it to have a content-based law i worry if you start now trying to cark on ashcroft and the other cases you would have spillover into those broader areas of amendment law when recognizing strict scrutiny functions differently here and is limited to this corner of the law. >> thank you. >> justice gorsuch. >> i want to follow up on ashcroft just a little bit. you seem to thinkhat is the major impediment. >> the most direct one, sure. >> that was a p.i. where the government did not contest the level of scrin does that help? >>nk it was a p.i. i think the court was self-consciously tentative in sots of its analysis, esp