. >> basically we should have gichben you a copy of this. it looks like a [inaudible] when we were here i believe supervisor campos asked us to do because we have a-we have been working on giving out tokens or seeing what the issues were with clients not receiving tokens so we are trying to find out why they are getting them and if not [inaudible] the token survey is a little bit short of what we have now. we have a couple more included than this buzz at of 6-11 these tr the numbers. we did [inaudible] throughout the shelter. mainlly what you see is a lot of people don't know they have tokens at the shelter so that is a problem for people getting them is they don't have the knowledge they are actually there and then a lot of people when they are given tokens or ask for tokens it seems like more people said they had not been-a policy hadn't been explained. a policy is they give out tokens for medical appointments and housing appointments and things someone may need to go to. people are so far from we can see they are not aware that the tokens

if at some point we are gichben a application that involves demolition of that building we would consider the whole of that project. if it is demolition of the building with now relacement building we would look at the environmental impacts of that action. even though you take a building away it is still a action that could have physical impacts, one of them being it could change the wind environment, another being what construction related impacts there are from the demolition. if all they proposed is demolition that is all we look at. if they proposed a replacement building we would also consider whatever impacts are associated with the replacement building so we look at the entirety of all the actions considered. >> okay, and if you are to conduct a separate environmental review based on if there is demolition, is there still [inaudible] for appeal at that time? >> that would be a separate project and there is whatever the appropriate routes for appeal were based on the kinds of document that we were preparing and the approvals that were associate would it. yes, that would be subject-t

i appreciate the attention you have gichben me and appreciate to answer any questions if there are any. thank you very much >> thank you. any public comment? seeing none, commissioners >> thank you ken and appreciate very much that you have made the time to come here today. it is always good to know and know commissioner adams has been in touch about the opportunities for the port and i guess i'm just curious to know since you have been-we haven't been here that long but in terms of the history of the office are there transactions that you can tell us about so far so we have a sense of the flavor either side? >> sure, happy to do that. just at the top of my mind, i mentioned the port one which wree considering it is still in the preimallinary stages. i good example i think that covers a variety of things is a small start up but well funded 3 or 4 years old in the east bay, head quarter in oakland, they produce a device a product that actually goes on electrical wires to better distribute more fishly distribute energy and so that product is being sold in europe and the chinese would lik

if at some point we are gichben a application that involves demolition of that building we would consider the whole of that project. if it is demolition of the building with now relacement building we would look at the environmental impacts of that action. even though you take a building away it is still a action that could have physical impacts, one of them being it could change the wind environment, another being what construction related impacts there are from the demolition. if all they proposed is demolition that is all we look at. if they proposed a replacement building we would also consider whatever impacts are associated with the replacement building so we look at the entirety of all the actions considered. >> okay, and if you are to conduct a separate environmental review based on if there is demolition, is there still [inaudible] for appeal at that time? >> that would be a separate project and there is whatever the appropriate routes for appeal were based on the kinds of document that we were preparing and the approvals that were associate would it. yes, that would be subject-t