the two cases this year i want to focus on, the union leader case and the case called gillman. the first union leader versus the u.s. department of homeland security, the summary that starts on page 22 of the materials, the first circuit held that the names of aliens with criminal records arrested in immigrations and custom it is enforcement or ice is held to exemption 6 and 7 c. the first circuit panel held that they had a coginizable interest rejecting the argument that no individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding public arrest by government. nevertheless the panel found the interest continuing given that convictions and arrests for union lead er they noted that oe of the arrestees they kwkded of criminal trespassing in 1993. they explained that the union leader point to evidence by a reasonable third narn ice had acted in handling the removal duties. they concluded disclosure of the yoon yon leader to investigate public records pertaining to the arrestees of convictions and unless bring to light the reasons for isis in removing these. on 25, in that case o

so gillman although i know he probably isn't an experienced litigator basically again got stuck in the situation of having to accept something that she probably really didn't want to accept in the short-term. the other case, let's see if i can find this one. the other case i wanted to talk about because there have been some interesting decisions in the last year or year and a half or a couple of years actually on what's known as exemption three. exemption three is a provision that allows other statutes that meet the criteria of exemption three to be considered as prohibitory to our restrictive provisions and provide confidentiality in their own right and they're applied through exemptions through foia. in this case, the argus, this is a case called argus media versus the department of agriculture. the argus leader which is the newspaper in sioux falls south dakota had asked for information on foodstamp redemptions. indeed the statute protects redemption information, redemption data when it comes directly from retail. and unfortunately the district court said okay well this information

this past week in my feminist theory class i was teaching gillman from 1920 and women and economics wherehe basically makes a very strong argument against marriage and envision something we've never even yet achieved in terms of new forms of living, and the students are really struck by how does this compare with the kind of me -- main more stream gay rights agenda today? i think this tension is there and again its ongoing and i guess again as an activist you to take a side on where you're going to fight by also love that these are, these tensions are there in whatever feminism or gay-rights our today. >> i just want to respond to your question about black feminism and white feminism. that are discussions of it in the book, and i surely won't try to summarize those for the authors who are sitting here, but i did want to make a point that i think there's a danger in posing black feminism and white feminism as two entities that we know each do what each of them think the i love bringing cooper's work but i worry that there's this tendency to have these categories as the white feminism is al