. ♪ shake it off, shake it off oooh-ooo♪ i'm sorry, gineed to zip back in there ever so often. >> i understand>> stephen: but what is the value of doing this? now korea and north korea and china have said america is a hypocrite. >> that's the funny thing, these techniques were taken from the chinese communists. they did it to our p.o.w.s, they waterboarded them to make them make false confessions. our military started training our guys, resist captivity, and it's a couple of these survival shrinks, the scolses who ran the air force survival training program -- >> stephen: the guys trying to help our soldiers resist torture-- >> they sold it to the c.i.a. >> stephen: the two guys, dr. mitchell and a dr. jensen-- >> jeffson jim and bruce. >> stephen: they got how much money to do this? >> $81 million. that's one of the facts you can find out in here. >> stephen: $81 million to design this thing. i'm going to be out of a job soon. is there any way i can get some of that money? >> you needed to be a friend of theirs. they hired all their friends. they didn't know what they were doing. they had nev

so it developed markets generally that it gined. two. they bring it back in the form of oil. germany, france, you know, they et a bigger boost. . and of course that will weaken the area fort worther, >> so that will be further. germany looks right. it has very little exposure. there are many wise why. weapon live in the straight world where all that is good for the economy isn't good for markets. >> i like. we've had a lot of pushback from clients because we don't like it. it's a very liquid market. we e are already a lot that see the defaults. 17% of the issues are actually energy issues and higher market veraget so if dwow some some chuckee. and this is a market in which we ell investors through mutual funs. . now if they do pull out afpblet of course you'll set the liquid stu. so i think there's a risk of contagion here. what is the can't list because when i talked to the guys butished do we have to wait for your folks? >> i think so. i wouldn't underestimate your thought. they tell nea there's a massive bit of yield from their clients. they know that there's a problem fro

bill that gine a kraots a lot of improvements in surveillance but only for u.s. citizens in this country and people in this country would not be protected. the kind of something that is elf-discriminatory even though it is better. us. would be a red line for on balance you add these considerations and it was easy support the u.s.a. freedom absolute number of frank admissions by things it idn't do that we wish it did and things we welthink need to and there much things you would think we didn't try to like 702 and we will do with it later. laura, do you think the coming congress will start with freedom and do you see a chance to improve on it? o you think the prospect is that it will actually be weake weakened are greater? do you think that this is something congress is not likely o act on until the very end until the sun sets upon them? > it is hard to know exactly how this will play out. still in session today and there are people rying to deal with the final days of this congress. there t year i'm sure will be a range of legislation in various directions. hard