but with gingrich he had the same problem. so to some extent it was a difficult situation for anyone. would have been difficult no matter who the speaker was. but there was another more personal aspect, which is that gingrich was the kind of speaker who believed in being the general, the leader of the troops and the folks would follow, and the things i mentioned earlier about the importance of listening and understanding where members are coming from, not necessarily gingrich's strong suit, and so because of that, i think it exacerbated tensions in the party and led some republicans to question his ability to lead past the first couple of years of his speakership. and so those elements of his personality made it -- contributed to a relatively short nature of his tenure. had be been a different kind of leader or acted differently after the first two years, then possibly we might have seen gingrich last longer at speaker than we did. >> host: john boehner recently said after the government shutdown that he didn't really want to

there's a guy named newt gingrich who disagrees with you. i want to hear you listen to yourself talk about this issue a few years ago. >> what would you say to senator inhofe and to others in the senate who are resisting even science? what's your message to them here today? >> my message, i think, is that the evidence is sufficient that we should move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon loading of the atmosphere. >> and do it urgently, now. >> do it urgently. >> this, i love, this newt gingrich guy, he's great. i would hate -- he uwas talking to somebody who used to be called a flip-flopper. i would hate to thing that newt gingrich is competing with john kerry for the title of flip-flopper in chief. >> it was in a debate in the senate conference hearing room talking about taking effective steps and suddenly elevating this -- i'm happy to say this is a serious topic and debate seriously. to then elevate that to more important -- remember, the phrase he uses is very clear. that's why the speech matters. not a press relea

on the right newt gingrich. in the cross fire, granderson who is against the bill and ken kucuccinelli who is for it. is arizona trying to protect religious freedom or legalize discriminati discrimination? tonight on "crossfire". >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. >> i'm van jones on the left. tonight the nfl, american airlines, marriott and even mitt romney and john mccain all agree with me. arizona governor jan brewer needs to veto this so-called religious freedom bill that would actually legalize discrimination against gays and lesbians. she has until saturday to make her decision. governor, one of the greatest achievements we ever had in america is simply this. we got rid of six words. those six words, we don't serve your kind here. now, we take it for granted today but it took a civil war and the civil rights movement, a century of struggle to get rid of those six words. and now you have some folks in your state that want to take those six words, they want to wrap them in religious garb and reinscribe them

i think cl many my nateing -- culminating in gingrich who vetted quite a bit. nancy pelosi did as well. but boehner, again i mentioned before, has moved back from that partisan role. he votes very, very, very rarely on the house floor, and i think that is in part a reflection of his belief that the speaker needs to move himself or herself out of these debates and conflicts in order to be seen as someone who really has the whole house and the interests of the whole house at heart. >> host: and we've been talking with catholic university professor matthew green about his book, "the speaker of the house: a study of leadership," published by yale university press. here's the cover, you're watching booktv on c-span2. >> visit booktv.org to watch with any of the programs you see here online. type the author or book title in the search bar on the upper left side of the page and click search. you can also share anything you see on booktv.org easily by clicking share on the upper left side of the page and selecting the formassachusetts booktv -- format. booktv streams l

i've seen it with reagan and gingrich. there are men and women out there who are waiting in the wings who can lead this party and make a case. but i want to say this because it happens a lot on your

newt gingrich told business lobbyists that clinton democrats are the enemy of normal americans.s first reported today, and rich promised the lobbyists that if republicans win control of the house and senate, they will use their newfound subpoena power to spend the next two years investigating corruption in the clinton administration. >> i do not know of any administration in modern times with as many different potential scandals. to the president or his wife for any individual. i said the total behavior of the administration is a threat to the american people. >> that is 20 years ago. what has happened since then? mentality hasf infected the political process. now it has become standard operating procedure. sort of ironic and counterintuitive, where you are weak, that is where you attack your opponent. people who are ethically weak attacking others on ethics. >> where do you come down on, money is speech? let's all theeech corporations in for jury duty and make them subject to draft registration if they are people. i think it is a totally phony thing. was totally inrt the tank o

i'm van jones on the left. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. in the "crossfire" tonight two governors who met with president obama today. and moments after that meeting, a handful of governors rushed to the microphones for their own mini edition of "crossfire." >> this president in the white house seems to be waving the white flag of surrender after more than five years in this administration. the obama economy is now the minimum wage economy. >> i don't know what the heck was a reference to white flag when it comes to people making $404 a week. i mean, that's the most insane statement i've ever heard. >> so not satisfied with creating gridlock just in washington, president obama now is poisoning the traditionally nonpartisan governors ocean meeting and he started doing it thursday when he told democratic governors their republican colleagues are, quote, pursuing the same top-down failed economic policies that don't help americans get ahead. they're paying for it by cutting investments in the middle class. van, i thought this was a chance for t

newt gingrich is how i goat refer to you now. listen again. taking you back to 2007. this is you and john kerry discussing. >> what would you say to others who are resisting science. what's your message. >> my message is that the evidence is sufficient. we should move towards the steps. >> and do it urgently. >> so newt, this is 2007, it is such a threat and requires urgent action. you have john kerry saying hey, we need to take action. you say he should resign. >> there is a huge difference. i think we can have a serious rational conversation. we can adopt positive policies and we have. i recently wrote about a brand-new plant in mississippi that does a dramatic job that the southern companies developed. there things we can do. what john kerry said on sunday in indonesia, jakarta is profoundly wrong. >> how so? >> he said this could be the greatest weapon of mass destruction and the greatest threat that we face. now, you just showed kiev. russia is a neighbor to kiev and has several thousand nuclear weapons. the iranians announc

then that was the basis of the book. >> host: could newt gingrich speakership have them under? >> guest: it is difficult to say. there was no way in which he had a similar problem to speaker boehner which was a fairly large group of new you own members and this is not unusual, both parties have this, they are zealous, they know how to fix things do that first that creates the enthusiasm and energy which is useful but invariably that group or members get disillusioned and feel things they were elected on not done then it becomes a challenge. this happens to carl albert in the '70s in the ways to use speaker boehner but with king bridge he has the same problems was a difficult situation for anyone. but there was a more personal aspects that he was the kind of speaker who believed to be the general, a the leader of the troops in the importance of listening understanding were members are coming from but not necessarily his strong suit. because of that i think it exacerbated the tensions the the republicans to question his ability to feed pass the first couple years. his personality

the cross-fire of co-host newt gingrich.getting ready to weigh in on ted nugent's very shocking slurs against the president of the united states. >>> also, i'll talk to newt about his call for the secretary of state john kerry to resign. ♪ [ male announcer ] how did edward jones become one of the biggest financial services companies in the country? hey. yours? not anymore. come on in. [ male announcer ] by meeting you more than halfway. it's how edward jones makes sense of investing. come on in. [ male announcer ] by meeting you more than halfway. my dad has aor afib.brillation, he has the most common kind... ...it's not caused by a heart valve problem. dad, it says your afib puts you at 5 times greater risk of a stroke. that's why i take my warfarin every day. but it looks like maybe we should ask your doctor about pradaxa. in a clinical trial, pradaxa® (dabigatran etexilate mesylate)... ...was proven superior to warfarin at reducing the risk of stroke. and unlike warfarin, with no regular blood tests or dietary restriction

a gradual first three years of had gingrich's speakership a lot of people scratching their hands. was a ve -- whoever talked to his total had support. -- it was a sort of of tic time of a lot movement and not necessarily progress. his best to h did destroy the old committee system that lies in ise committees. e tried to centralize everything in the speaker's office. congress as down he did by abolishing the office assessment and cutting the -- at the time it was called the general office and now the officeent accountability these are support arms of intelligence give in both the factual and the cognitive sense. 1994 here's tom broke on newt gingrich becoming a speaker. >> election year politics now it when you thought couldn't get any uglier it does. he's p house republican already declared war on president clinton and his latest the white house aroused. all out war the republican whip attacked the president. over lunch in this republican tkpwreufp rinning ist. lobby he promised the lobby kwreuft if win they'll use their new found subpoena power two years e next investigating corr

years after newt gingrich and john mccain and george w.arming, climate change denialism is the de facto position for the republican party. an amendment was voted down that would have stated that climate change is occurring. to be clear, all the republicans present voted no and all the democrats present voted yes. joining me now is a political report at "the national journal." thank you for joining me on a subject that causes me no ending amount of distress. let's talk about the debate. it was brought to my attention to my great producer who works on this show and on this segment that in 2003, there was a memo that said the following. the scientific debate is closing against us, but not yet closed. there's still a window of opportunity to challenge the science should the public come to believe the scientific issues are settled, their attitudes will change about global warming. now 11 years later, alex, that's exa exactly what the gop has done to the degree there's now a "quote/unquote, debate over whether climate change is real. how did tha

actually do that on the federal level as well as demonstrated by bill clinton, camelot, and newt gingrich. they all got serious about doing that, too, instead of just talking about it. max can i just add something? -- >> can i just add something? what he says is really important. the fiscal cliff and he should -- and the shutdown were not good, they were not good for washington, d.c. kin to wanting to lose weight and you just chop your foot off. that being said, the states are stepping forward, as you heard our chairman, mary fallin, talk about, and john hickenlooper talking about flexible federalism. we will take less money from the federal government in utah if you will take away the strings in the red tape. we can build roads better with less money if we do not have all of the federal strings and red tape. we can educate our kids better if we don't have all the red and strings attached to it. health and human services, medicaid expansion. fox gets a presentation issues. he is a local guy and understands that strings sometimes get in the way of efficiency. so we are proposing to the evi

and didn't newt gingrich have a pretty bold agenda with the american people? i don't think if i asked people what the republican party stands for today, i don't think i would get a coherent answer. i don't think most people know. >> that has been the pattern over and over. listen, the battle for who the republican party is, is not new. you go back to the rockefeller republicans, back to reagan in '76, and newt gingrich. the pattern is, there were always voices in d.c. who said don't pick a fight. don't stand for anything. that is the path to victory. but they keep losing elections. we win elections not when we fight everything. i don't think we should fight everything. i think we should take principled stands with the american people on things that matter and not bankrupting the country is right up at the top of that list. >> i've been suggesting five things, one, the penny plan to balance the budget because that reins in spending. we ought to duplicate north dakota and that means open up energy production all over the countr country, fracking, you tell me, th

on the left, sally kohn, on the right, newt gingrich.h and nutrition activist and rick berman, who opposes government overreach. should washington help you be healthy or is it wasting your time and tax money? tonight on "crossfire." >>> welcome to "crossfire." i'm sally kohn on the left. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. in the "crossfire" tonight guests on opposite sides of this country's food wars. it is a legitimate concern to wore be the health of the american people. michelle obama's done all of us a favor by starting a conversation about nutrition. but the food labels she unveiled today are nothing more than symbolic liberalism. >> we're overhauling these labels to make them easier to read and understand. >> we've been ignoring government labels for 23 years. so now we're going to spend an immense amount of money on a multi-year process to rearrange the information, make it larger and add even more that you'll never read or use. because it makes liberals feel good. it is pure symbolism. >> actually, it's not symbolic at all. it ma

gingrich voted quite a bit. so boehner has moved back a little bit he votes very, very very rarely of the house floor as a reflection of his belief the speaker needs to move himself out of the debates and conflict in order to see in -- you had the whole interest of the whole house apart. >> host: we have been talking toots teeeighteen about his book "the speaker of the house" a study of leadership" published by a yale university press. you are watching booktv on c-span2. >> host: in catholic university professor what is the thesis of your book? activist alliances and into u.s.-based protest. >> guest: the u.s. has senator bases around the world as reported by the pentagon and over the last years there are more anti-bays protest opposition to military presence abroad -- a broad. so with this activism when do they make a difference or affect policy you second question is our allies on one hand they face pressure of civil society and a domestic level but also pressure from the united states so how do they balance b

though i had very serious -- obviously -- disagreements with bill clinton, and even though newt gingrich was speaker had serious disagreements with bill clinton, we were able to get things done. that atmosphere, that willingness is lacking. and the reason -- the main reason that i'm running to return to the congress is to do my little part, as i can, to get us back to being able to work these things and move our agenda forward, to shrink government. >> all right. i will have to leave it there. former republican congressman bob barr. we'll be watching in the campaign trail. stay safe. and we'll keep track of the campaign. good luck to you. >> thank you, chuck. >>> up next, the obama administration's take on the new unemployment report. >>> plus, cashing in on my takeaway. who's bringing in the big bucks for the midterms? >>> first, white house soup of the day. it's friday. we're back to a seafood, after that odd chicken decision of last friday. we're back to seafood and fish on friday. seafood gumbo. we'll be right back. 3. afghanistan, in 2009. orbiting the moon in 1971. [ male announcer

i think cl many my nateing -- culminating in gingrich who vetted quite a bit.nancy pelosi did as well. but boehner, again i mentioned before, has moved back from that partisan role. he votes very, very, very rarely on the house floor, and i think that is in part a reflection of his belief that the speaker needs to move himself or herself out of these debates and conflicts in order to be seen as someone who really has the whole house and the interests of the whole house at heart. >> host: and we've been talking with catholic university professor matthew green about his book, "the speaker of the house: a study of leadership," published by yale university press. here's the cover, you're watching booktv on c-span2. >> visit booktv.org to watch with any of the programs you see here online. type the author or book title in the search bar on the upper left side of the page and click search. you can also share anything you see on booktv.org easily by clicking share on the upper left side of the page and selecting the formassachusetts booktv -- format. booktv streams li

michele bachmann, herman cain, rick santorum, rick perry commended gingrich, chris christie. now, a lot of you have kids. remember the sesame street songs. one of these things is not like the other. it is really, really hard to sort of look at all of these desperately wanted to nominate and then jump ball the way over to chris christie. and i just -- we have seen parties make huge swings, but it was usually after they had a crash and burn election. of course after goldwater in '64 republicans moved to the middle and nominated richard nixon and won the presidency, but they have a crash and burn election first. democrats have a crash and burn election in 72 with george mcgovern. republicans have not had their crash and burn. and so i just have a hard time seeing them do that. the other super big name is jim bush. i think he was a terrific governor of florida. i think he would be well-positioned and all of that. there is of less than thing. when push comes to sell that would cut down if he runs. is live despises politics. and you think, a running for president with a non support

. >> from the right, i am newt gingrich. monday for another edition of "crossfire," and erin burnett "out front" starts right now. >>> next, breaking news. growing protest in arizona at this hour over a bill that legalizes discrimination against gays and lesbians. >>> the phumunchies. a girl sells cook out outside of a pot store. >>> good evening, everybody. out front tonight, breaking news.

. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. in the "crossfire" tonight guests on opposite sides of this country's food wars. it is a legitimate concern to wore be the health of the american people. michelle obama's done all of us a favor by starting a conversation about nutrition. but the food labels she unveiled today are nothing more than symbolic liberalism. >> we're overhauling these labels to make them easier to read and understand. >> we've been ignoring government labels for 23 years. so now we're going to spend an immense amount of money on a multi-year process to rearrange the information, make it larger and add even more that you'll never read or use. because it makes liberals feel good. it is pure symbolism. >> actually, it's not symbolic at all. it makes us liberals thinner and that's our secret trick to living longer, then winning more elections. that's what you won't see on your food labels. >> you do lead a rich fantasy life. >> in the "crossfire" tonight, director of nutrition at the center for science in the pu

campaign i never forget when sheldon adelson put ten million dollars into a campaign to benefit newt gingrich. i mean sudden he's a star. like well i mean there is something very wrong with that and it's amazing to me that the supreme court in in in the most recent case citizens united sort of acted like that doesn't happen you know it's naive or cynical. legal argument i've ever heard that that money doesn't buy political influence in the various way and that the first for tax money right in the fourteenth amendment protects corporations and i thought we fought the civil war to free the slaves well. what are the red carpets conversations of great minds of minnesota congressman keith ellison. i marinate joining me on the desk in park and financial reporting commentary interviews and much much. only on the bus and on our. and welcome back to conversations with great minds i'm speaking with keith ellison representative from minnesota's fifth congressional district and author of the new book my country tis of thee my faith my family our future i want to go back to you if i can i just because the

boehner is not the kind of speaker you can compare to nancy pelosi or newt gingrich. he always operated from the bottom-up, said he was going to listen to everybody and do things in the sort of democratic way, which is unusual for a house speaker. so things have always been a little bit up and down with the way things go in the house. i think he's -- if he is stronger, it's only because he showed his tea party faction he was willing to go the distance for them. they lost their leverage when the government shut down, hurt their credibility, and now he is back in control. he's got them piped down a little bit on some things. they are are still voting against a lot of legislation, but he's got leverage. [ overlapping speakers ] >> he's got maneuvering room here and it looks like he's going to use it, maybe, to push through immigration reform. and the tea party has lost some of their steam and yet i think he's got boehner has a little more influence with them. >> let me say this. >> here comes the grassroots implosion. >> let me say this. if he goes with immigration refor

and they would talk about it you know, i'd be listening to, you know, a gingrich or even some well-meaning liberal. and i would think, i would love to have these guys in my volkswagen passat and just kick them out on the corner at monroe and fayette and you know, and just leave them there for a month, you know, and just see if they can you stop them from saying this stuff with just a little bit of aware-- >> what would they see? >> they're not going to-- >> what would they see at the corner? >> well, they'd see human beings for one thing. they'd see the america that they've left behind and have left behind for generations. and now increasingly it's not all just people of color. now the economy has shrugged again and again and we're leaving white people behind. and so all of a sudden, it's encroaching in a way that people are getting a little bit more frantic. and it's making some people more inclined to reflect on what the system has wrought. and it's making other people more inclined to just dig the trenches deeper. >> the best analysis of obama's speech that i read came from the writer m

. >> from the right i'm newt gingrich. join us tomorrow for another edition of "crossfire."nett outfront" starts right now. >>> next breaking news. airports and airlines around the world on high alert tonight. u.s. officials linking a credible shoe bomb threat to al qaeda. >>> plus, how colorado is making a killing on weed. the numbers are in, they may mean pot is coming to your state and pretty darn quickly. >>> why are republicans, some of them, defending him. let's go out front. >>> good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett and "outfront" breaking news. tying the new threat of shoe bombs on airplanes to al qaeda. indications the threat could ultimately be tied to the

this woman does gingrich benjamin works for a the think tank the most fertile you want $10?reat start. washington state has the minimum-wage and their economy is no worse than ours so yes. it is great. john: what is wrong with that? >> that is washington state. we need to let companies decide what it is correct. john: you made a comment that it is good to raise the wage to attend and wine at 100? >> exactly. at its very core hiking the minimum wage distorts the marketplace to dictate it is a government dictating to business what is the correct wage. that is a dangerous and slippery slope. why not raise it at $1? >> some people had their way especially corporations than why not those zero? john: no minimum-wage. >> have people volunteer. john: why not? if people want to miss. >> we don't land pay raise to the bottom. we want a robust middle-class in order for that to happen we have to pay folks on the order of $10 per hour. so then why not on the low end? john: if government can artificially make government better off then why are you so cheap? >> $100 is the extreme that wou

bachmann, herman cain, rick santorum, rick perry, nude gingrich, chris christie. a lot of you have kids so remember the sesame street song -- one of these things is not like the others. [laughter] to look at alld these people that they desperately wanted to nominate at various points in 2012 and then jump all the way over to chris christie. we have seen parties make huge swings but it was usually after they had a crash and burn election. incourse, after goldwater 1964, republicans moved to the middle and nominated richard butn and won the presidency they had a crash and burn election first. democrats have a crash and burn -- in 1972 1970's to with george mcgovern. republicans have not had a crash and burn election since then. the other super big name is jeff bush -- jeb bush and i think he was a terrific honor of florida and would be well-positioned. is that whole last name thing and i think he would love to run but when push comes to shove, i doubt if even would run. there is a lot of family reasons. his wife despises politics and hates every moment he spends doi

on the right, newt gingrich.man adam schiff from the intelligence committee and u.s. senator ron johnson from the foreign relations committee. in a dangerous world, can we count on putin to protect americans? tonight on "crossfire." >>> welcome to "crossfire." i'm newt gingrich on the right. >> i'm sally kohn on the left. in the "crossfire" tonight, a democratic congressman and a republican senator. holding the olympics in russia was already wrong, now it's scary and wrong. and getting scarier by the second. we just learned the u.s. is banning carry-on liquids on airline flights to russia following warnings about toothpaste tube bombs. and if that sounds like a joke, watch what one of them does to this car. now listen to what senate intelligence committee chair dianne feinstein just told cnn's jake tapper. >> i think people going to the olympics should be careful. i think they should watch their backs. i think they should stay out of crowds if they can. >> like that's doable. the olympics is one giant crowd. if i

to be left, van jones, on the right, newt gingrich.the democratic governor of illinois, and rick perry, the republican governor of texas. the great divide, red states versus blue states tonight on "crossfire." >> welcome to "crossfire." i'm van jones on the left. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. tonight we have two guests who represent profoundly different philosophies of governing. here in washington in weekend democratic governors who believe in high taxes, ironclad unions and greater indebtedness are gathering with republican governors who are relentlessly cutting spending and taxes and letting the private sector fill the gaps. today in the theater of absurd watching president obama in a meeting with only democratic governors attempting to reach tout republicans will be one of the more farcical events of republicans looking back on the ineptitude of this administration. be honest, wasn't that a bizarre moment? >> if you're looking for humor you're bragging on the red states, the red states are actually taking money from the blue s

leader in the senate, trent lott,, you had a republican speaker of the house by the name of newt gingrich, and you had a democratic president by the name of bill clinton, and erskine bowles, his chief of staff, over to the leadership to sit down and start talking about how to we attack the national debt, had we attack annual deficits in an effort to get to the national debt, and for several weeks, according to erskine, nothing happened because everybody was waiting for somebody to run to the press, beat their chest, disclose, try to gain points and after a few weeks when they all kind of realized that they were all serious and nobody was trying to take political advantage, they got serious. the end result of those conversations was that we had three years worth of surpluses that approached one third of $1 trillion. $340 billion annual surpluses. some suggest that at that trend continued for a few more years we would not have had a national debt for the first time since andrew jackson. it can be done. it is not like oh, those were different times. that was the 19th century, you cannot do t

you know did that jamie's point i mean i was here in one nine hundred ninety seven with john newt gingrich we balanced the budget and we did it in a republican way by slowing growth and to say that we are facing a government shutdown regardless that's that's just not so i voted for sequester but the failure is it was a document in the washington post from the white house flying in to tell us and i don't use the washington post amy as my gospel so i really don't know that i'm going to go there but i'm going to tell you right now that that the sequester cuts were the unfortunate consequence of the deadlock in washington you've got the democrats that won't touch one fairhair on the entitlement programs and you've got republicans that won't even put any revenue on the table i'm not talking buzzword for taxes i'm talking tax simplification that needs to revenue so the super committee couldn't come up with this little itty bitty savings and as a result you got sequester and i don't think you know you don't get to call the crazy on the president for saying i'm not going to negotiate when you're c

this woman does gingrich benjamin works for a the think tank the most fertile you want $10?. washington state has the minimum-wage and their economy is no worse than ours so yes. it is great. john: what is wrong with that? >> that is washington state. we need to let companies decide what it is correct. john: you made a comment that it is good to raise the wage to attend and wine at 100? >> exactly. at its very core hiking the minimum wage distorts the marketplace to dictate it is a government dictating to business what is the correct wage. that is a dangerous and slippery slope. why not raise it at $1? >> some people had their way especially corporations than why not those zero? john: no minimum-wage. >> have people volunteer. john: why not? if people want to miss. >> we don't land pay raise to the bottom. we want a robust middle-class in order for that to happen we have to pay folks on the order of $10 per hour. so then why not on the low end? john: if government can artificially make government better off then why are you so cheap? >> $100 is the extreme that would not wor

campaign and never forget when sheldon adelson put ten million dollars into a campaign to benefit newt gingrich. i mean sudden he's a star. i mean there is something very wrong with that and it's amazing to me that the supreme court in in the most recent case citizens united sort of acted like. that doesn't happen you know it's the most naive or cynical. legal argument i've ever heard that that money doesn't buy political influence in the various way and that the first amount for tax money right in the fourteenth amount to protect corporations and i thought we fought the civil war to free the slaves well any of that was about the large rich parties conversations with great minds of minnesota congressman keith ellison at this point. is the media lead us so we need to. either see bush and see to the other your party physical. issues that no one is asking with the guests that you deserve answers from it's all on politics only on our t.v. . i've got a quote for you. that's pretty tough. stay with substory. let's get this guy like you would smear about john stead of working for the people both issue

campaign and never forget when sheldon adelson put ten million dollars into a campaign to benefit newt gingrich. i mean sudden he's a star. i mean there is something very wrong with that and it's amazing to me that the supreme court in in in the most recent case citizens united sort of acted like that doesn't happen you know it's naive or cynical. legal argument i've ever heard that money doesn't buy political influence in the various way and that the first for tax money right in the fourteenth amendment protects corporations and i thought we fought the civil war to free the slaves well. it's conversations with great minds of minnesota congressman keith ellison. you know the united states has as many think tanks as the next ten countries combined yes one thousand eight hundred twenty eight takes to tell three hundred million people how to think. but deal with the location of it is to know it's still remember. how to do that well there's of the high tension said you would stop this story we might be more my people will die. and welcome back to conversations with great minds i'm speaking with kei

campaign i never forget when sheldon adelson put ten million dollars into a campaign to benefit newt gingrich. i mean i sudden he's a star i'm like well i mean there is something very wrong with that and it's amazing to me that the supreme court in in in the most recent case citizens united sort of acted like that doesn't happen you know it's naive or cynical you know legal argument i've ever heard that that money doesn't buy political influence in the various way and that the first amendment protects money right in the fourteenth amount of protects corporations and i thought we fought the civil war to free the slaves well any. conversations of great minds of minnesota congressman keith ellison the spirit. join me. in part and. very concerned and much much. only on. i would rather ask questions to people in positions of power instead of speaking on their behalf and that's why you can find my show larry king now right here on our t.v. question for. that's worse. than the dish line up. on. line. and welcome back to conversations with great minds i'm speaking with keith ellison representative fr

on the right, newt gingrich., and stephen moore, a conservative economist. will raising the minimum wage help the economy or cost jobs? tonight on "crossfire." >>> welcome to "crossfire." i'm newt gingrich on the right. >> and i'm van jones on the left. in the "crossfire" tonight we have a consumer advocate and a conservative economist. now you would thing that everybody would be happy about 25 million americans potentially getting a raise, especially if you're one of them. that's why president obama wants to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour. look, that's just keeping up with inflation, folks. but that plan would also lift about a million people out of poverty. so what's stopping us from doing this? the republicans. they never like the minimum wage in the first place. and now they are happy they can hide behind this report that came out this week. the report said the minimum wage might, might cost 500,000 jobs, might maybe. but then again the same report also said that it might cost zero jobs. now, the re

newt gingrich refused to condemn nugent when pressed by wolf blitzer to take a look at this. phrase subhuman mongrel you're familiar with this because you're a student of world war two when the genocide that occurred during work when the nazis were one or two jews mr speaker as subhuman mongrel zz there is a history do not have races. you cannot have it both ways you can't say on how not saying this is how does this is raise mr speaker what i am saying is that the republicans so in the minute we have what you guys really wanted news you're representing the republican party on television doesn't represent the republican party but to dream represent some conservative perspectives and if we're going to call all the people that said bush equals hitler and all. the swastikas that were placed upon because they opposed his position on iraq we're not going to have that discussion and when i'm going to condemn those people i don't want to add this to them in america if you don't like the president you can call them whatever name you want that's all right i'm not a republican so i coul

i have the gingrich of the publication put out by the italian government campaign that has a lot of illustrations it is a way to enlist for the anti-semitic campaign. what do those long as the? you may have seen the film or read the book which portrays some of this all too wished kids were kicked out of school teachers and professors were performed -- fired they cannot practice their profession and national honor society was thrown out. this cave as a shock to the world community because unlike hitler fascism and mussolini had not been previously known to be anti-semitic. there were jews who were fascist. accord to the accounts italy they fought against those racial laws as to the pope but yet as a show in my book this is inaccurate in to the campaign, a large part with the official publication the pages that have to be approved in advance through this time call for withdrawing the equal rights in the middle of august the daily newspaper publishes an article that says there needs to be restrictions on the pernicious view it is taken up by fascist publications to justify the campaign. but this sai

we're very pleased to have former speaker of the house newt gingrich and former director of central intelligence under jim clinton, jim woolsey as our coach here. we pulled together the best minds in this country, i think, on the vulnerabilities of the grid and what needs to be done to fix it. the military, as you know, jeanine, has been spending billions of do years hardening key parts of the military. so what do we use? surge protectors to protect the key things like these transformers that were nearly blown up in san jose. we use capacitors to shunt the surge around them and we could use physical cages or barriers to protect them as well. these are practical measures. we know how to do it. we've got to protect particularly these 2,000 other so transformers that truly are the critical component of our 21st century society survival. >> all right. frank gaffney, always great to hear your insight. thanks for being here tonight. >> thank you. >>> joining me, ray lahood who is joining us from peoria, illinois. secretary lahood, in your view, how vulnerable is the american power grid? >> well, i thi

it was ted cruz, senator cruz and newton gingrich. >> that's a great one. >> you were breaking bread.verybody. we went to the dinner after the state of the union. willy gomert was there with his wife. and most of the team that traveled to put the show on, we all went together. i'm a loser. i'm a her met. i rarely go out. >> are you not a loser. >> i am a total hermet. i just work and hang out with my kids on the tennis court. i have been going out though and it was so fun and i love willy and cory and cruz was great. >> that was one of the questions, overall the best part of your trip was the dinner? >> by far. newt got up at one point and said something so deep and profound. i said something that was not nearly as deep or profound and you know how "duck dynasty" they pray at the end of the show? willy said a prayer and it was like the coolest thing that happened. it was like i was at the robertsons at dinner at the end of their show. that's amazing. >> this is not so special. i'm curious about this. how many other representatives had plastic surgery? >> i have no idea. >> some look a

. >> i'm newt gingrich. erin burnett "out front" starts erin burnett "out front" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >>> next breaking news out of k kiev tonight. we have exclusive footage. facebook pays a jaw dropping $19 billion for an app. is it worth it. ted nugent calls the president a subhuman mongrel. let's go "out front." >>> good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett. breaking news. military forces and ukraine on the move ready to defend bases and weapons depots. there is word of a truce after bloody and violent clashes in kiev. how fragile is this? take a listen. that was the scene less than 24 hours ago in kiev. as you can see, this violence and bloodshed has been incredibly difficult could control. 26 people have been killed since the government's decision to align with russia instead of the west. president obama made it clear where the united states stands. >> we hold the government primarily responsible for making sure that it is dealing with peaceful protestors in an appropri

it was ted cruz, senator cruz, newt and calista gingrich.t to dinner. and louie gohmert. i'm a loser, you know that. i'm a hermit, i rarely go out. all i do is work and hang out with my kids on the tennis court. but i've been going out lately and having the time of my life. this dinner was so unique and special and so fun. i loved willy and corey and cruz was so great. >> that was one of the questions, overall the best part of your trip. would you say it was the dinner? >> there were amazing moments. newt got up at one point and said something so deep and profound. and i said something not nearly as deep and profound. you know how duck dynasty, they pray at the end of the show. willy said a prayer and it was like the coolest thing that happened. it was just like i was at the robertson's at dinner at the end of their show. it was amazing. >> that is special, i'm curious about this. you were at the state of the union. how many of the representatives and the you think had plastic surgery? because some of them look a little tight. i mean the men

newt gingrich was forced out of the speakership by his own party.dn't work against bill clinton then. it's a question whether it has traction with the younger set but certainly something that i think republican elders can backfire on republicans again. >> i think republicans want to talk about benghazi. in our book we talk about how shawn spicer, the communications director says get used to seeing these ads on benghazi over and over again. i think they are also going to use her as a result of our book that people are lobbying on to health care as an issue to pin her to. i think that's an issue that republican see something that they can hold her to. >> a new report from house republicans today on the armed service ts committ services blames for heightened threat to benghazi. the military is basically cleared of any wrongdoing. what did you learn in the course of your research for this book about the decisions that secretary of state hillary clinton was involved in when it came to benghazi? aime? >> i think that's a big question. expeditionary diplom