this is the remarkable ginsberg marriage. toward the end of his life, marty, a renowned tax lawyer told a friend that the most important thing that i have done is enable ruth to do what she has done. see ruth not live to rock and roll. i'm sure he would have applauded that too. my personal story about ruth and marty has to do with in her campaign. this was for the d.c. circuit d.c. circuit. ruth didn't ask me, marty did. he asked me because he assumed that we were on the same team. part of the same movement for women's rights. part of an increasing band of l aw professors. law professor feminists. aid marty engaged me to ruth, i was an attorney general for the civil division. the attorney general asked me to find some women for the president to appoint to federal court. as if this involved a harrowing and difficult search. [laughter] when it came to the d.c. circuit judge attorney general said that for once there were aplenty of available women. he was tired of hearing ruth sug gested. in his papers, i did not know about this

the remarkable ginsberg marriage. toward the end of his life, marty, a renowned tax lawyer , told a friend that the most important thing that i have done is enable ruth to do what she has done. marty did not live to see ruth rock and roll. i'm sure he would have applauded that too. my personal story about ruth and marty has to do with participating in his campaign for her appointment to the d.c. circuit. which then led to the supreme court. ruth didn't ask me, marty did. he did not argue her case, but simply assumed that i would do all i could because ruth and i were on the same team. part of the same movement for women's rights. one of the small but ever increasing band of law -- feminist law professors. law professor feminists. when marty engaged me to aid in ruth's appointment to the d.c. circuit i was an attorney general for the civil division. the attorney general asked me to find some women for the president to appoint to federal court. as if this involved a harrowing and difficult search. [laughter] professor b

. >>> ruth bader ginsberg has told an audience in new york she plans to stay on the bench another five years. she has battled cancer during her years on the bench.

rule making a twisted reference to ginsberg's reluctant to answer questions in her hearing in 1993. the situation is entirely different because it wasn't happening against the backdrop of present clinton issuing a litmus test. in any case, come back and look at the record and read what justice ginsburg said at her hearing. she said this, this is something central to one's life into her dignity. the decision to must make for yourself government controls the decision for her she's being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices. that is a straightforward eloquent answer into us the actual ginsberg world means testifying unequivocally and clearly in support of the woman's right to choose. on the informal care act the nominee was be equally clear in the law has been upheld by the supreme court not once but twice. the nominee should be not be allowed to avoid sharing their views on these past cases speaks back to hear the nominee will consider these cases having been really decided it would uphold the photo care act difficult for them in the future. this is

so in this case, you have justice ginsberg joining a dissent. we have the decisis and overruling the court in the same term. >> so let's get to that one. the supreme court reconsidered the precedent in the internet sales tax case. neil, you want to talk about that? >> sure. it is called south dakota versus wayfair. and it had enormous implications for the economy. but it does as willie suggests has a lot to say about starry decisis and the hearing of judge kavanaugh, the president is going to loom largely in that hearing. and here you see two perspectives on how to think about precedent. so you've got this 1992 supreme court case called quill. and in quill, it basically stood by the 1967 decision of the supreme court in the case called national ballis. and there in 1967, it said that states can require a retailer to collect sales tax only if that retailer has a, quote, physical presence in the state. so amazon has to buy from amazon. and you have to pay the sales tax that you would have to pay for the very same book if you bought it from politic

you referred to ruth bader ginsberg. that was the start of the nonanswer hearings. both sides got good at it. so they get to be very general, vague affairs. i'm wondering if that's what we're looking at here. >> it's going to be an interesting confirmation process. we know the left decided to go to war on this issue. they view the supreme court as a policy-making arm of the federal government. for a long time, they ignored congress or losses at the ballot boxes and decided to promote judges that would make policy or legislate from the bench. judge kavanaugh is not that kind of person like neil gorsuch is not that kind of person and he believes policy should be made by the executive and legislative branch and they're the only ones held accountable to the voters for their decisions. so you might say this is going to be not as exciting as it might be if we're talking about he's hot button issues. i think it's appropriate to look at the judge's experience, his record. he has a lengthy record and to make a decision based on h

ginsberg: let me begin by expressing the society's gratitude to justice ginsburg. you have always been a generous -- very generous in giving of your time in your efforts to the society, when we have called upon you. and thank you for taking time from your really enormous schedule at this particular time of year. this evening comes about because of my deep and abiding connection to our two hosting organizations, the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim foundation. my history with the historical society goes back over 25 years. my history with the guggenheim goes back a little over 10 years. each of these organizations has become a touchstone for me, for our collective american history. what could possibly be the common thread? it would be the constitution itself. my late husband howard purchased the dunlop and claypool copy of the united states constitution, september 17, 1787, nearly 30 years ago. during my stewardship of this document, i have attempted to provide much greater access to the public, the students, and to academics. it is mag

i found out that justice ginsberg is as big a fan of judge lerned hand as i am. judge who should have made it to the supreme court in new york. he gave a famous speech in world war ii. i am a naturalist of american citizens. when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it. i discovered that when i was a third year law student at harvard in the lounge saying, what am i going to do with my life? you know, if you like baseball, you'll love being a lawyer. that's -- you got to like baseball. you have to like all those rules. i'm a football girl. i like, you get up, you get down, there's a lot of action. so when i came across that quote, i thought, that's what i'm supposed to do, liberalize in the hearts of men and women. i knew that growing up in the segregated south, right? did segregation end in the south and it's still in the south and elsewhere, you know? did it end because of brown versus board of education? no. did it end because of the 1969 decision that says that all deliberates must come to an end? no. it ended because of slavery in massach

the ginsberg rule. that was by joe biden when he was chairman. the nominee in that case ginsberg, would not be required to give her answer to how she would rule on an issue that might come before her. to the discretionary court, anything could become before her. it is been used since then, it will be used again. we will see what will happen. the worst argument that i have seen put forward was by a couple of senators come a couple of academics. they said because of the mueller investigation, it is simply improper for the president to nominate anyone. that argument is unfounded. there is no support for that. president trump has every right to make this nomination. >> jason: when amy coney barrett came up, they started to touch upon some of the religious aspects. is there a litmus test that they will try to put in front of this nominee? >> that was a particularly raw moments. when senator feinstein made a comment about her catholic dogma as she referred to it. amy coney barrett could make for the most interesting hearing. the fact is that she has no

lou: supreme court justice ruth bader ginsberg. he's got three names and we get to say them all. announcing she plans to retire from the supreme court three years into president trump's second term in office, if we can put it that way. she is 85 years old. she's the court's oldest member. she said over the weekend she has at least five more years left on the bench, we did a little math, we worked it out and president trump will have a lot to celebrate in his eighth year in office. >>> the board of directors at cbs has decided to keep les moonves on as ceo and chairman for now. but the board is not entirety confident, launching an investigation into the sexual assault allegations that they have heard against him. cbs releasing a statement today saying that the board is in the process of selecting outside counsel now to conduct an independent investigation, no other action was taken today on the matter. joining us gregg jarrett, fox business legal analyst and author of the newly released book, wait for it "the russia hoax. the illicit scheme to clear hillary clinton and frame donal

ginsberg: let me begin by expressing the society's gratitude to justice ginsburg. you have always been a generous -- very generous in giving of your time in your efforts to the society, when we have called upon you. and thank you for taking time from your really enormous schedule at this particular time of year. this evening comes about because of my deep and abiding connection to our two hosting organizations, the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim foundation.

, justice ginsberg. and why didn't she retierp r tire when president obama was there to assure the left of another seat on the high court. it's because she didn't trust the man. >> well with good cause. the reality is judge kennedy who served well, i've known him for a long time. basically had great confidence the president would appoint someone who could carry on the conservative agenda. lou: he should. he's demonstrated every reason for that confidence with justice gorsuch. let's turn to -- i was mentioning the left. i'm sort of annoyed by them. >> still there. lou: and so is dick durbin. this is dick durbin on the president's supreme court nomination. >> the men and women that i work with on the democratic side really take this seriously. they understand it's an historic decision. it's about more than the next election. it's about what in the country, the united states of america is going to chart as its course in the future on this supreme court. i think each and every one of them take that seriously

so justices ginsberg and sotomayor agreed 95.8% of the time and justices thomas and alito agreed 93% of the time. but justices sotomayor and alito disagreed 49% of the time. so did mayor thomas, 50.7% of the time. so you do really see this term in the data shows some pretty stark things. i think with some of the things staying the same, justice thomas continued the tradition of writing the most opinions, which i think there's some, particularly along the left, like, oh, this guy is not up to the job or something. i mean, every year, writing these incredibly detailed opinions separately offense. 31 opinions this time compared to justice kagan's 9 opinions that she wrote. i don't think numbers necessarily tells you too much, but to the extent anyone is saying, like, you know, some justices are not working, that's obviously not the case. just one other number i would to give you before i get to the travel ban. and that's just the number of women who argued that the supreme court this year. some of you saw judge cavanaugh's remarks yesterday who went out of his way to talk about somethin

then a discussion on women in law with supreme court justice ruth bader ginsberg. and then later, vice president pence speaks to government employees at their headquarters in washington, d.c. >> next a look at the impact of mass incarceration and efforts to reform the criminal justice system. this discussion hosted by the eastern state penitentiary took place at the former eastern state penitentiary, now a national landmark. it is 90 minutes. >> we want to welcome our friends for the world affairs council. thank you for coming here to eastern state. can i tell you there is a quick history of this building and what we are doing today. eastern state penitentiary was built on farmland outside of philadelphia. it happied in 1829 when this was farm land. it was built with the belief that people are inherently good and if kept in solitary confinement, they would look into their hearts and become pen tent. this is the world's first penitentiary. a building designed to inspire remorse. it was built in a wagon wheel floor plan. it was copied all over the world. it was copie

wade decision, even judge ginsberg said that it was not a good decision and the the way that they gotthe constitution does not say in there, that there is a right to privacy which is what this really hinges on but i will give you your point, 63% of people in the poll say that they are -- well, do not want to see roe v. wade overturned. and so there is a lot of activity. i know that you are planning ads in all 50 states and a lot of activity that you will put into the effort and what do you hope would be the ultimate good outcome for you on this if the president actually has the votes? >> well, sure, absolutely. well, you know, because the bar is so high and there is so much at stake we introduced the personal liberty standard where we encourage everyone in the senate to hold justices to a higher bar. in the past we've seen people kind of give vague answers on the question of roe v. wade or even, you know, kind of say blanket statements about respecting precedent but we are asking it to go a stop further, asking for people to affirm that they believe that the constitution protects the

my sense justice ginsberg loves her job. i think she is fighter. i think she will hang in there. i argued before the court this term. she is not slowing down. we'll see. supreme court seats are always unpredictable. you never know when vacancy will happen. it is possible president trump will get a third shot at some point down the road. trish: tom, always great to see you. >> thank you, trish. trish: the dow is on a roll, four days up in a row. we'll follow markets. don't go anywhere. president trump is on his way to brussels for the nato summit. vowing to stop the u.s. from footing the bill, having our allies pay up. they need to, right? why are we paying for everybody else's security? larry korb, former secretary of defense under president reagan. he will weigh in on all that next. alerts -- wouldn't you like one from the market when it might be time to buy or sell? with fidelity's real-time analytics, you'll get clear, actionable alerts about potential investment opportunities in real time. fidelity. open an account today. fidelity. when it comes to travel, i sweat the details

ginsberg says is spot on. i spent hundreds of hours listening to tapes. sometimes you can't make out a word or two or sentence or two. transcript is not evidence. evidence is the tape. but the evidence -- this is really important -- is also the testimony of the person who authenticates the tape. the witness. michael cohen. >> how significant is it if a president or presidential candidate is involved in something like this? i'm no the trying to be sassy but he's not the first president to have an affair. not one person who voted for him thought he was a moral or honorable person. they knew he was a sleazy business guy and in spite of that voted for him. so what are we learning here that's going to change anyone's view or cause real problems for the president and his former fixer? >> i think the issue is conexit. we heard some things. tape of grabbing women by certain parts during the election. it didn't have an effect. that was in the context of an election and people didn't have everything we've learned about russia. didn't have stormy daniels, didn't hav

so justice ginsberg last year said, "one could safely predict that next term will be a momentous one." and i think the cases you're going to hear about today, travel ban, cake shop, redistributing, all the different cases really do underscore it. it was a very, very big term. numerically it was not. there were only 60 cases decided, which is a historically low number, but in terms of what they decided, it was a big deal. and it was also a big deal because i think the roberts court, ever since his confirmation hearing, he's really tried to steer the court toward unanimity wherever possible. i think three years ago they agreed two-thirds of the time. you have to go back to 1940 the finest similar example, or two terms ago when it was 59% agreement, but this term was not like that. this term, the rate of unanimity was only 39%, and you would have to go back to the year 2008 to find a similar low rate of unaninimity. the court was divided along somewhat predictable lines. we have seen these kind of voting lineups in the past. we know who agrees and disagrees with each other. it happened a

. >>> ruth bader ginsberg has told an audience in new york she plans to stay on the bench another five years. she has battled cancer during her years on the bench. >>> enri cperstown including chipper jones. congratulations all around. those are some of our top stories on this monday, july 30th. >>> from abc news, this is "world news now." >> we do say good morning once again. we're going to start this half hour with president trump threatening to shut down the government as he tries to fulfill a signature campaign promise. >> president says he won't sign off on a spending bill unless it includes money for his border wall. but fellow republicans are making it clear they have no appetite for a shutdown ahead of crucial mid-term elections. tara palmeri has more. >> reporter: president trump threatening to shut down the government if he doesn't get a border wall. >> we're going to build the wall. it's going to be a great wall. >> reporter: tweeting, i would be willing to shut down government if the democrats do not give us the votes for borde. they need to lock in the votes before the mon

they should save their powder for ruth bader ginsberg. >> they're doing a hail mary as stll sugg that mr. cavanaugh, if he's confirmed, he should recuse himself from any cases coming up that involve mr. trump. but president trump, what are ce the ch of that? because there's, doesn't that usually require some kindob of ous conflict of interest? >> yeah. >> i think it's very unlikely this came up a lot with justice scalia. when he was on the cower. should he recuse himself. it's come up i terms of justice thomas and his wife who is an operative th a conservative think tank in washington. it never goes anywhere but it's a lot of political theater. >> it's strictly up to them to decide whether to recuse . themselv >> scott, we know that on the republican side, w have sue colins of maine and lisa murkowsky, they're perceived as key swing votes. what about democrats, what kind of pressure is there or democrats running for re-election in states that president trump won in 2016. >> joe manchin, jim donnelly in indiana. heidi heitkamp, these are all states that trump won. they're going to have

the ginsberg rule as i mentioned is rather poorly named. it has come to be a shorthand way of capturing the idea that nominates should not answer thations on the grounds they need to avoid making pre-commitments were having an appearance of bias. broadlyeen used quite in a way that does not reflect what justice ginsburg did that her testimony. responsivenesse by looking over time at two distinct answers that nominates give. we looked at situations where nominees give firm answers. they said in the current tents, i agree or disagree. with the rate at which the nominated refused to answer on these types of grounds and developed a responsiveness ratio and looked at both banks. how often a nominee refuses to answer and how often they choose to. what we saw is what justice is had a very high rate of responses. gorsuch in his recent hearing, and lower response rates. i just want to ask the chairman if i could put into the , i would like to have in opposition to the circuit. >> thank you mr. chairman. i appreciate you having this hearing. i think

hello i'm richard ginsberg and you're at the listening post here are some of the media stories we're covering this week turkey president and the once a party wins the election with more than a little help from their friends in the news business and the challenges and dangers that come with trying to cover political unrest in the democratic republic of the congo as elections approach in pakistan and certain news outlets are coming under pressure and it looks like.

justice ginsberg wrote the dissent and accused the court of engaging in a form of lochnering and gorsuch vehemently disputed that characterization. lochner is an important case. everyone agrees it was incorrectly decided but there seem to be differing reasons as to why lochner was wrongly decide. for justice gorsuch, it is about the court imposing economic policies over the people's representatives. it was a form of judicial activism particularly in the realm of the economy. if i read justice ginsberg correctly, she is suggesting that there was a deeper harm at issue in lochner which is that the court in lochner avoided the issue of differing levels of power and treated employees and employers as they were coming together for a meeting of the minds about how long they wanted to work and it was wrong of the court to step in and you know, reverse that. she said that employers required their employees to sign these measures and so if you view lochner as one of the problems there having a fairy tale conception of the relationship between employers and employees, possible to view epic systems

supreme court justice ruth baeder ginsberg was honored with a lifetime acevement award.that award her legendary advocacy on behalf of gender equality a advancement of women. she's 85ears old was the second fale justice. >> straight ahead a popular social media app wants to help you curb your digitalio adn. is there irony in that? you be the judge. >> a pk at the white house. the fourth of july with all celebrations. it's 6:13 rightt' now and i warm. 80 degrees. >> ♪ y family i love... saving people money on car insurance. in y family i love... (birds cg, a running ahh.k,) the new deer park sparkling is made with real spring water. ♪ it's so refreshing and delicious, you don't need slo-mo mreal spring water, real fruit flavors and refreshing bubbles.s just what' refres. >> reagan national airport just in case maybe you want to experiencing here thie bit- week or so. hint tucker. maybe you want to getwh away somee cooler. >> i tried to go somewhere cooler. i went to new engla and it was 93 trees ever 93 degrees ev. probably got to get to the north pole. we're in the thick

if i read justice ginsberg correctly, she is suggesting that there was a deeper harm at issue in lochner which is that the court in lochner avoided the issue of differing levels of power and treated employees and employers as they were coming together for a meeting of the minds about how long they wanted to work and it was wrong of the court to step in and you know, reverse that. she said that employers required their employees to sign these measures, and so if you view lochner as one of the problems there having a fairy tale conception of the relationship between employers and employees, then it is possible to view epic systems where they are getting together deciding what they want to do. that doesn't really describe reality on the ground. this is a matter of employees being forced to sign particular measures. it seems difficult to escape the conclusion of they are very hard on the rights of employees and they do help employers. the masterpiece cake shop was -- the masterpiece cake shop was written by justice kennedy. there was a gay couple who sought to buy a wedding cake and a baker

ginsberg made the comments after a play about the late justice antonin scalia.ournalists she is 85 and justice john paul stevens was 90 when he retired, so she thinks she has at least that long. she was voted onto the supreme court back in 1993. >> they call her notorious for a reason. she set the standards working out and being smart in her 80s. >>> many new pet owners are being targeted by a controversial leasing scheme. i didn't like this one bit. ahead, how animal lovers think they are taking out a loan to buy their new pets only to find out they may have to pay up to triple the money to keep them. what? see what happens if they don't pay up. >>> and if you're on the go, subscribe to our "cbs this morning" podcast which is available wherever you like to download your podcasts. here's what's happening in your world in less than 20 minutes. watching "cbs this morning." (vo) ovewhelming air fresheners can send you running. so try febreze one. with no aerosols and no heavy perfumes. so you can spray and stay. febreze one. but it's tough to gete enough of their n

from the united state's supreme court, ruth beta ginsburg, alayna kagan -- ruth bader ginsberg, elena kagan, and member from the supreme court of canada. please enjoy the trial. >> all rise! oh ye, oh ye, oh ye, the supreme court of the kingdom of camelot is now in session. [applause] [raucous cheering] ruth bader ginsburg: everybody, please be seated. >> madam chief justice. may it please the court, as you know, the perfect weather is decreed by law, but no doubt, things have become a bit "stormy." [crowd cheering] >> yes, there has been in insurrection and the kingdom is in peril, but the prosecution of my client has been nothing but a "witch hunt." the conviction rests on three things, his enthusiastic and the possibly politically motivated investigation of treason, the expression of political ideas, and associations with knights who have a habit of stupidly whacking each other. none of that advocates a forcible overthrow the government. to comply with the first amendment, the kingdom has to prove that mordred had a specific intent to overthrow and engage in speech with a clear and

the conversation that just happened to heart and definitely will be contacting my colleague phil ginsberg and perhaps even the school district to come together to figure out how to better work together. so i already thank you for your feedback when i was sitting here earlier. so just very quickly i want to share with you who we are. we were established -- i'm sorry -- let's see -- so we are the department that works with other city departments to serve children, youth and families from birth to age 24, transitional age youth in our city. we are the stewards of the children and youth fund. it is a special fund that was created through property tax set asides and we bring together the government agencies, school districts, community leaders, and other stakeholders to strengthen our communities so that everyone in our community can lead lives full of opportunities and happiness. we believe that if we work together that we will be able to make san francisco a great place to grow up. and we are a strong voice for our children, youth and families in the city. so the fund was created in 1991 thr

in fact for president obama's picks, ruth bader ginsberg was 44 days. the average is 66.like about our system, this is up to brett. brett will have to perform. america will get to watch. the senators will get to watch. i know brett. he will take it extremely seriously, work hard and do a superb job. that more than anything is the most important. >> maria: the democrats are making it about abortion, roe v. wade. do you have any sense that brett kavanaugh is going to move to overturn roe v. wade? >> no, as we heard brett say before, it's settled law of the land. there's areas in the middle that will whittle away at things. establish more regulations. but the democrats are making this about the kitchen sink. they're making it about every issue under the sun. if you do that, you'll never win. you'll appease your base but never win the middle. i don't think there's one issue on brett. but if i'm a democrat, i don't throw the kitchen sink. >> maria: is there legitimacy about the trade, defense spending? >> 100%. i say this as a george w. bush republican. i believe in nato. nato

whether it's ginsberg or sotomayor, this kind of mind can bring these arguments together and help makeons that everyone can relate to and appreciate. that's the kind of person we need at this point. >> i think that's right. >> it's a brave thing to do. thank you both. a new york city councilman. he was arrested while protesting the nomination of judge kavanaugh. he joins us next up. >> [shouting]. wednesdays. at outback, they're for steak and beer. walkabout wednesdays are back! get a sirloin or chicken on the barbie, fries, and a draft beer or coca-cola all for just $9.99. hurry in! wednesdays are for outback. outback steakhouse. aussie rules. hurry in! wednesdays are for outback. i've been making blades here at gillette for 20 years. i bet i'm the first blade maker you've ever met. there's a lot of innovation that goes into making our thinnest longest lasting blades on the market. precision machinery and high-quality materials from around the world. nobody else even comes close. it's about delivering a more comfortable shave every time. invented in boston, made and sold around the wo

she was being into the ginsberg fool which was future cases which had not yet come before the court. ruth peterginsb said, women should be afforded this right to privacy. and it is absolutely what most americans want to. >>dana: this is an ad you created running in many of the cities all across maine because of pressure you want to put on senator susan collins. what other strategies and tactics will you use and at the end of the day, there will probably be a vote. how do you think it will go? >> we are really trying to channel our members and the flood of calls were getting into our office who aren't even our members into the senators either which is basically to take president trump at his word. don't put someone on the court that will overturn roe v wade and criminalize abortion. we think that's a compelling message. do we think susan collins is the only one that needs - -, absolutely not. this is a be careful what you wish for four republicans with spent decades even to campaign against abortion. but reading the same polls, which is most americans support this. >>dana: what about

. >> one of the loudest voices of dissent came from an ad man turned counterculture hero, allen ginsbergycerin streaks of the fairies of advertising. >> the larger critique of advertising was that it is the sort of propaganda arm of the mass society. so, we were all becoming mindless consumers being told what to buy. >> show me. >> we were being depersonalized, dehumanized. advertising was taking our soul away and replacing it with packaged desires. >> and for those who saw in this consumer craze a kind of fascist conformity, a new symbol was about to roll on to american shores. ladies and gentlemen, the bug. >> the volkswagen beetle was such an anomaly when it hit the american shores in the late 1950s. they had an enormous challenge, which to to sell it to the american people who were used to driving cadillacs. >> it was small. it was humble. and its origins were without a doubt un-american. >> officials speaks by hitler, they roll back on germany's motor show. >> it was developed by the nazis. it was originally called the strength through dray car. >> adolf hitler himself asked ferdina

justice ginsberg said the biggest effect would be to restrict access for poor women in red states. that would increase the pressure to fund it. >> the reference we just made, we just played kavanaugh's response to being questioned for his nomination to a federal court. that's different. the idea that a federal court judge says i respect established precedent as established law is a little bit different when you're a supreme court justice. you're looking at different things? >> it's completely different. lower court judges are required to respect federal precedence by the supreme court whether or not they agree. the real is what do they do as roe as a precedent. when the justices faced a choice about whether to overturn it, three justices joined the liberals in affirming re for three reasons. they said firsts the accepted by society and people came to rely on it and organize their lives around it. second, it wasn't unworkable and nothing changed on those scores and third, there was no facts or underlieings society changes that called the premises under question. those are the criter

progressives have worried if ginsberg does reti that could tip the balance even further right. >> he's been helping parents startamilies for over two decades. >> next, a beloved local fertility doctor killed in a tragic accident over the weekend. >> and a special incentive to donate blood. details on a gift card offer from amazon. >> we're watching he have rain closing in on the i-95 corridor. we'll time out this rain for you and time out the rain tomorrow for eac of yourh you know when you're at ross shopping for backpacks... ck.and mom also gets a o-school bag? that's yes for less. b ross has tnds you want for back to school. and it feels evehebetter when you find tfor less. at ross. yes for less. z2x54z z16fz y2x54y y16fy ...and you suddenly realizes you're really into art? that's yes for less. every trend. every room. on any budget. it feels even better when you find it for less. at ross. yes for less. >>> right now we're tracking rain chances on the storm team 1 radar. how long will it last and who is at the highest risk forod flos. amelia and lauryn are back in less than five min

ginsberg to resurface the playground. if all the former school board members would join me for a picture as we give ms. segal our certificate of honor. [ applause ] >> president breed: thank you, ms. susie siegal. supervisor yee, you are next. >> supervisor yee: thank you, colleagues, last week we had a showing to honor chinese american veterans who fought in world war ii and i thank you for supporting and passing to award these heroes with a congressional gold medal. one of the special guests we invited was unable to attend. like many veterans he is now in his age, in his late 90's with limited mobility issues. however his family made an effort to be here today to accept his commendation on his behalf and ensure his story is told. this is the least we can do to remember and share a part of history that has been forgotten. so today we want to honor mr. su wong. a member of the 14th service group who fought during world war ii. mr. wong came to the united states at the age of 17 and because of our country's racist exclusio

. >> one of the loudest voices of dissent came from an ad man turned counterculture hero, allen ginsbergycerin streaks of the fairies of advertising. >> the larger critique of advertising was that it is the sort of propaganda arm of the mass society. so, we were all becoming mindless consumers being told what to buy. >> show me. >> we were being depersonalized, dehumanized. advertising was taking our soul away and replacing it with packaged desires. >> and for those who saw in this consumer craze a kind of fascist conformity, a new symbol was about to roll on to american shores. ladies and gentlemen, the bug. >> the volkswagen beetle was such an anomaly when it hit the american shores in the late 1950s. they had an enormous challenge, which to to sell it to the american people who were used to driving cadillacs. >> it was small. it was humble. and its origins were without a doubt un-american. >> officials speaks by hitler, they roll back on germany's motor show. >> it was developed by the nazis. it was originally called the strength through dray car. >> adolf hitler himself asked ferdina

again, clarence thomas, ginsberg and a llito and gorsuch and perhaps now cakavanaugh that's pretty evenspan over the presidents we've had. what we have to insist on in our daily politics, which is now minute-to-minute politics, is understanding that every vote counts. i understand why senator warren was out there with the quickly printed stop kavanaugh signs. i understand why senator booker was on television, senator harris. this is in many ways not the beginning of the 2020 race, but it certainly is related to it. but the court certainly does have a tendency to surprise. i say to those who are about to set their hair on fire, at least wait until morning. of the justices that nixon appointed justin renquist recused himself. the other three voted to make nixon turn over the tapes, which was the precipitating event that actually led to nixon's resignation. three of his appointees went that way. earl warren went in -- eisenhower wasn't quite sure what he was going to get. things do unfold. these are human institutions. if you're really concerned about judge kavanaugh, you need to get out a

. >> ruth bader ginsberg is one of the best justices on the court. you try to make sense of what congress intended. i do agree we don't decide the constitution by popularity polls. i think the most respected supreme court justices are the ones who try to get to the heart of the matter. you have someone like justice suitor, who would have been a great supreme court associate justice, merrick garland. and a very important part of this fight is now, of course, you have the majority flip-flopping. that's going to be a big issue in all this. >> should they have seen what the decision is and then decide on the import. >> okayingen was done in similar days merrick garland was not voted upon. it's the president who picks, not the senate. they either approve or disapprove. >> one last point. americans don't vote on process. they don't vote on process, it's a basis to argue, democrats are using it now. i would too if i were them. >> 50, 50 say it should happen before or after the election. >> does kagan kill the argument? they gave you okayingen during a midte

chuck grassley's office said there's the ginsberg standard. before she was a justice came before the senate and talked about things. she demured on a number of things when pushed saying it's not appropriate as a judge and a justice to make any kind of pronouncement on it. i don't want to deal in hypotheticals. you'll hear that from in person that is the nominee because it's dangerous. every case is fact specific. they don't want to be boxed in. good luck getting any answers on anything. that's why you have to pour through the decades worth of opinions and writings to see if you can really get a close about how they will decide a case like roe v. wade. right now there's nothing in the pipelines but that doesn't mean it won't come in the years to come. >> shepard: thanks, shannon. great to be here. state waiting for mitch mcconnell. i mentioned the money coming in from the left. money from the right, to. the judicial crisis network which advocates for conservative justices spent $10 million on the confirmation process for neil gorsuch. they have