ginsburg: yes. mr. feigin: or in civil law? justice ginsburg: i'm talking about criminal law. mr. feigin: so, in criminal law, your honor, there is no non-mutual collateral estoppel. the court said as much in standefer. and this issue hasn't come up, of course, because the court has understood that federal and state crimes are not the same offense under the double jeopardy clause. chief justice roberts: don't all your problems go away if you're the first to file, if you win the race to the courthouse? and i would assume the same is true with the states. and so what's most likely is that you and the states are going to sit down and develop a way of coordinating which cases you're going to file in first and which ones they're going to file in first? mr. feigin: well, your honor, i'm not sure that's true, because i'm not sure that we're always going to cooperate. i think the history of this nation has shown that the federal government and states do not always see eye to eye on matters of criminal law enforcement, and there are going to be cases in which each has separate interests to

up in court justice cavanagh makes history and justice ginsburg given credit for it.t is next. family. we had a lot of leftovers...[chuckles] i couldn't have asked for better parents, but like most people they didn't have anyone to teach them the best financial habits. so we changed that. as a financial health coach, i help people every day. i try to put myself in their shoes from my own experience. i connect to them because i've been there. helping families like mine save a little money changes everything. this is personalized guidance. this is wells fargo. the first survivor of ais out there.sease and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. visit alz.org to join the fight. shannon: brett kavanaugh being praised by an unexpected source, ruth bader ginsburg gives them credit for keeping a promise from contentious confirmation hearing bring on an all female group of law clerks but not everyone agrees he should get a pat on the back, let's discuss this with the chief counsel of the judicial crisis network, good to see

let me read what justice ginsburg said.aid justice kavanaugh made history by bringing on board and all-female locker crew thanks to his selections the court has this term for the first time more women than men serving as law clerks. keeping that promise. >> he deserves a little bit of credit for it. it's nice when you can find a few graduates of ultra-elite law schools who have clerked for ultra-elite judges. like all of the clerks. almost all the clerks. i think it's nice he did this. i think we remember supreme court justice not for their clerks. i'm less interested in who he's hiring and more interested in whether he's going to apply the law fairly to everyone. >> shannon: i think we agree that should be the way going to assess her justice. above the law.com, writing the headline is i don't give a flying thing how many women law clerks brett kavanaugh harris. she goes on to write it doesn't matter how many women he surrounds himself with. it can't make me forget the testimony of christine blasey ford. i don't know if his

chief justice roberts: justice ginsburg. mr. clement: i'm sorry? justice ginsburg: exactly what you said, just what you said now, that was the exact same argument about don't go to one person/one vote, the courts are going to be flooded with cases and they'll never be able to get out of it. that's not what happened. mr. clement: but, justice ginsburg, sometimes an argument that's not a great argument in one context turns out to be pretty darn good in another context. and here is the thing: state legislatures can deal perfectly well with a one-person/one vote requirement. legislatures that are literally divided down the line in the middle with an aisle. if physical aisle between democrats and republicans. if you tell them that they can't take partisanship into account, then you're really either telling them to get out of the business of redistricting entirely or you're opening yourself up for case after case after case. i'd like to reserve my time. justice kavanaugh: on proportional representation, can i ask a question, which is, first, isn't propor

justice ginsburg: how is -- how is that determined, that a substantial composite of the general public would find the -- the mark shocking or offensive? i mean, if -- considering what's involved in this case, if you were to take a composite of, say, 20-year-olds, do you think that that answer would be they would find it shocking? mr. stewart: i -- i think not -- i think there are certainly some segments of society that are more likely to find particular marks shocking than others. i -- the -- the pto, it -- its initial determination was that this mark would be perceived by a substantial segment of the public as the equivalent of the profane past participle form of a well-known word of profanity and perhaps the paradigmatic word of profanity in our language. justice sotomayor: so why are you using a subjective standard? why not just something like obscene, vulgar, even profane? but once you get to shockingly offensive, you get to viewpoint. one way or another, it's always subjective. i -- i -- i can deal with a limiting principle that has its own substance, like obscenity. mr. stewart:

and then justice ginsburg and sotomayor were like what do you mean the cross came to symbolize world war i? that was a symbol of christianity, period, full stop. >> right. beth, let me ask you to weigh in with a little bit of discussion of one of the things the court seems to be trying to figure out is how to get rid to the federal administrative state. the gunby case seems to really hold a promise of a really radical readjustment of the balance between what legislation has to say and what regulation can do. >> yes, and indeed justice kgan's opinion suggestions if this is not okay, then a vast majority of the federal government is unconstitutional. it involves the nondelegation doctrine. it's really a doctrine that explains the constitution, gives the legislative authority to congress, and that they cannot just turn all of that over to the administrative agencies. there has to be some kind of principle that's discernible a principle that tells the agency how to exercise that power. but this nondelegation doctrine has not caused much problem for a long time. there were two cases in 19

. >>> a warning from justice ruth bader ginsburg about hotly anticipated upcoming decisions that could split along 5-4 votes in the supreme court. there are five conservative and four liberal justices on the court. she spoke to a judicial conference in new york and hinted at harsh divisions. one critical case on the docket is a white house decision to add citizenship questions to the 2020 census. the court concludes the session the last week of june. >>> and firefighters are working to contain a fast-moving wildfire in the tonto national forest in arizona. the fire has burned 6200 acres northeast of phoenix. officials say the cause of the fire was human-related. >>> and heavy rain could cause flash floods in parts of the south today.

justice ginsburg: why not? in this have intent, case, all the leaders say yes, that's what we want to do, and the public representation then buy one, and then they tell the mapmakers to achieve that result, the result is achieved, and as a result of the map, this will continue into the future. why isn't that -- a. sullivan: well, there are number of things wrong with that. the into the future is not proven at all. the map that was developed, the expert testimony agreed it was a competitive map. independent sources that it was a plus two democrat. in the last election before the redistricting, democrats across the country won 52 congressional seats in districts that were more democratic than the sixth district in maryland, so it wasn't a map, it was a lock for future democrats. it was very vulnerable if you look at the results of the 2010 elections where the republicans swept to victory in district after district with more democratic compliments, but the reason this test doesn't work, as the council revealed, is

justice gorsuch: justice ginsburg's point takes us back to justice kavanaugh's, i think, which is you look at the -- the seven words at the end of the red brief and there are shocking numbers of ones granted and ones refused that -- that do look remarkably similar. how is a reasonable citizen supposed to know? what notice do they have about how the government's going to treat their mark? mr. stewart: well, i -- i think one of the -- i think the notice is in --in part the -- based on the pto decisions, but, obviously, whatever the court says, if it upheld the provision, the court can say what it wants to say about the permissible -- justice gorsuch: no, no, but let me -- we -- we can fix your problem for you, i got that. but -- but -- but the government, presumably, the pto is supposed to be doing this itself and without our interference. and it's allowed a lot of marks with these words, and it's

. >> how -- said in many ways also noted justice ginsburg once in defending roe said part of the reasongrowth in particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. >> that wasn't necessarily her view she was quoting. >> i don't think quoting just saying this is the concern. right? >> but justice ginsburg didn't like that she came back, at thomas in this decision. >> and the question is is it coming back. the disappointing thing about this those of us that are skeptical of roe, this was thought the law that you could uphold without entirely overthrowing roe this was thought the incremeantalist path justice roberts maybe kavanaugh would favor the other one heartbeat measures alabama go more directly at roe alabama would basically rule out all abortions. >> right. >> what do you make of justice ginsburg's reply to clarence thomas issuing another warning roe v. wade would be in jeopardy. >> one most interesting thing about it language shows how on the court the left and the right, are just as polarized as americans are throughout his concurrent upon justice thomas ta

justice ginsburg: mr. letter, the -- congress has the primary control over what the census will be, not the executive, and congress has been alerted to this citizenship question for some time, and it has done nothing about it. so one question is who should decide? congress is silent. should the court then step in? mr. letter: it's a very fair question, your honor. two responses: one, i think that this is a very ironic point for general francisco to be making. he has said -- he has emphasized in his brief congress knows about this. congress should do something. this -- the court can take judicial notice of this because it's in the public record. the secretary of commerce has been called before congress to explain what he did here, and assistant attorney general gore, the one, you know, about the -- the author of the -- the request by the justice department has been called to congress. they have been declining to answer. they're not giving congress the information it requests because they say there's litigat

justice ginsburg: and then what happened? mr. sullivan: in this case, it was taken to referendum, and the people overwhelmingly approved it. including and counties where republicans outnumber democrats. justice ginsburg: it is to be understood that from reading it, that most would not understand at all. mr. sullivan: two points on -- three things, first that was not litigated in this case. it was litigated in the court of competent jurisdiction in maryland state court, and our immediate appellate court said it was apparent especially in light to explain that referendum question. in the washington grange court, it said that such notices remain in the threat of the voter constituents. justice kavanaugh: you brought it up. you are going to dispute justice ginsburg and say most voters knew what they were voting for? mr. sullivan: this court has not presumed that voters don't understand. in the end, the court is going to assume that people are informed them of that they've read the paper. you will find unrebutted testimony that the "w

justice ginsburg. is a poster of the other supreme court justices. the second circuit in commissions. very proud to have chief justice roberts as a justice with second circuit connections. he is connected in two ways. one he was born in buffalo. secondly he thinks for family. one that is called the creating space. he does podcasts and videos. there is a lecture space. there is a library space. how to use the material. opportunities. >> you see, above the line of things that are happening in the world. 1958. this is a case. >> i think we have to think about these children and their parents. these children that went through this everyday. the parent that stayed home wondering what was happening to their children. listening to the radio about the bomb threats. i do not see how anybody under the sun to say that after those children and families want for years. all you have done is gone. which are considered to be democracy. we go back to the segregated scope. i just do not believe it. >> if you are a student and you listen to it. off of the teacher's poi

ginsburg: you have a strange position on potential jurors who lie because it was the case of a white to juror who said he had no knowledge of the flowers case when in fact he was 2007 panel. you said that doesn't matter that he lied because he didn't admit to lying. i think if someone lies and didn't admit to it, that would be a count against that person rather than in that person's favor. ag davis: the trial court made the distinction the juror struck for lying on a questionnaire admitted on the stand she lied intentionally, not the case with juror huggins. it would seem it appeared that his participation in the panel, and he was dismissed before he got anywhere near selection, that he either forgot that or completely left his mind at the time he was questioned. jus. sotomayor: let's go back to that. if we are looking at whether this is pretext, mr. evans was willing to give an excuse to this juror and keep him, despite the fact there was direct evidence he knew about the case. he was willing to accept the white line but not under oath in front of the judge. -- the white lie but not

ginsburg: you have a strange position on potential jurors who lie because it was the case of a white to juror who said he had no knowledge of the flowers case when in fact he was 2007 panel. you said that doesn't matter that he lied because he didn't admit to lying. i think if someone lies and didn't admit to it, that would be a count against that person rather than in that person's favor. ag davis: the trial court made the distinction the juror struck for lying on a questionnaire admitted on the stand she lied intentionally, not the case with juror huggins. it would seem it appeared that his participation in the panel, and he was dismissed before he got anywhere near selection, that he either forgot that or completely left his mind at the time he was questioned. jus. sotomayor: let's go back to that. if we are looking at whether this is pretext, mr. evans was willing to give an excuse to this juror and keep him, despite the fact there was direct evidence he knew about the case. he was willing to accept the white line but not under oath in front of the judge. -- the white lie but not

justice ginsburg. is a poster of other supreme court justices with second circuit connections. so, we are very proud to have chief justice roberts as a justice with second circuit connections. he connected in two ways. he clerked for henry friendly in this building. , called the space create space where kids do -- students do podcast and videos. the year's election or space. this is the lab space where students use this material and is all kinds of touchscreen opportunities. so, let's say thurgood marshall over the years, ok? we enter the space. so, you see he was born in 1908. of of all the line are things -- above in the world the line are things happening in the world. cooper v aaron, 1958. this is a case that marshall argues when he is a lawyer. we have to think about these children and their parents. these need grow --negro children who went through this every day and the parent to state a home wondering what was happening to their children, listening to the radio about bomb threats and all of this business. i do not see how anybody under the sun could say that after those

justice ginsburg in her accident said there's no doubt it's all about christianity. this adds to frankly a muddle of the supreme court's views on what constitutes state endorsement of religion. the court has said the cross can stand because it's a symbol of sacrifice. you can have ten commandment monuments if there are other monuments in place. you can open legislative sessions in prayer, have one nation under god on currency, under god in the pledge but can't post in the courthouse. the supreme court muddled jurisprudence in this area. as predicted, the supreme court was not going to say this cross had taken taken down or moved or the county was going to have to be moved or taken down from the property it stands on. >> a couple of cases we are waiting on decisions this term, sometime in the next week or so from this court? >> the court has a week left in this term. yes, we're still waiting for the biggest cases including whether the government can put a question about citizenship on the form. the partisan gerrymandering case when state legislatures draw political bo

justice ginsburg in her dissent shared some of that same sentiment.s not suitable to honor christians, a cross is not suitable to honor those of other faiths. so strong dissent from justice ruth bader ginsburg but this was a 7-2 decision to allow the cross to remain standing. we're in the final days of the supreme court, the home stretch here awaiting very big opinions on partisan gerrymandering and whether or not the trump administration can add that citizenship question to the 2020 census. we'll have opinions at 10:00 tomorrow morning. erica. >> jessica, thank you. >>> any moment now we are expecting an update regarding the escalation with iran. we'll bring that to you, that briefing for you live as soon as it starts. stay with us. can't see what it is yet.re? what is that? that's a blazer? that's a chevy blazer? aww, this is dope. this thing is beautiful. i love the lights. oh man, it's got a mean face on it. it looks like a piece of candy. look at the interior. this is nice. this is my sexy mom car. i would feel like a cool dad. it's just really c

of hot political topics and what's interesting, poppy, just a few weeks ago, justice ruth bader ginsburg gave a speech and she said she expects that we will see closely divided opinions on these closely watched cases. so that is exactly what we could see here for weeks. we've been on edge waiting for these cases and it's wait and see. >> they are coming today. in this hour. we know that. jessica, before you go, the supreme court has never truly defined partisan gerrymandering, what's too far. they've never drawn that line. today we expect they will? >> reporter: it's possible. a lot of proponents would like the supreme court to establish a test as to when politicians go too far in drawing these congressional and state district lines for political gain. it's possible that the supreme court will finally issue this test but it's a very difficult test to establish. the supreme court may, in fact, dodge it and issue a decision on different grounds. it all remains to be seen. there's really a lot of ways these cases, the census case, the partisan gerrymandering case, a lot of different ways th

justice gorsuch wrote the majority opinion enjoined by justice ginsburg, justice breyer, just a soda mayor and justice kagan. the newest member justice kavanaugh wrote the dissent that justice thomas and justice alito joined. john roberts joined in part of the dissent this argument runs about one hour from april. >> we argue first 18431 united states versus davis. >> thank you mister chief justice may it please the court. tore

this is framed by justice ginsburg questioning what is the interest if i that has an indept interest not having to go government associated with certain words or is it an interesting debate could interest in following what is scandalous or amoral at a particular point in time? >> it is somewhat both with the second interest we would emphasize that the interest is protecting unwilling viewers from material that they find offensive and at the point i was making about the monologue is there are ways in which that can be made readily available to people who want to see the court and listen to it without forcing it upon others. others. the trademarks can't work that way because it is a source identifier. >> the words can be used with the sale of goods even if you are righyou'reright they just ce registered trademarks so why isn't it the first interest? >> even though the government cannot prohibit it, they use can attempt to distance and devise or remove the creation of artificial. >> why are you resisting, justice alito, why can't the interest not being associated with sexually explicit

ruth bader ginsburg course. justice on the supreme court but the documentary about her called r g b she is is is also about her image as a as a pop culture icon because she's become the known as the notorious r g r b g and has been as been start thousands of internet means but my personal favorite is the other tiny ruth dr ruth westheimer jewish german immigrant who's been teaching america about sex for a generation still going strong at. sure you would like heard she's a you know she's the pioneer of. liberalism of these these feminist movements and i think it's amazing that these 80 plus year old women are become sort of pop stars for younger gen and thank goodness that credit is coming where credit is due to they did so much groundwork but you know talking about. margaret atwood count as literary icon has to be kind of included i would say and we're not in the in that in that kind of i don't know it's an area that you see 79 i think but yeah i mean she's almost the beyond say of the feminist literature in my

>>superman black panther wonder woman and now ruth bader ginsburg.t out in the world of fiction but mtv says it celebrating a real life hero. the supreme court justice won the best real life hero award at the mtv movie and tv awards that aired a last night. ginsburg got the nod thanks to the cnn documentary about her life called rbg the 86 year-old liberal legal icon was the second woman afford to be confirmed to the supreme court. she has been on the bench, 25 years graduates of marjory stoneman douglas high school are on capitol hill today, hoping their business idea. >>helps others deal with stress and trauma. the former students have experience living through a traumatic event a gunman killed 17 people inside their high school. back in 2018 the students who graduated from the high school or competing in the junior achievements national student leadership summit since 2009 the competition has brought students together from all over the country to showcase their business skills. each team designs and original product with the hopes of being named t

>>was batman superman black panther wonder woman and now ruth bader ginsburg.ebrating this real life hero the supreme court justice won the best real life hero award. at the mtv movie and tv awards last night, their shoes. the war celebrate the best on screen work of the past year and people voted online for their favorites and justice can forgot her war, thanks to that documentary about her. named. >>our gp i saw that good yeah rbg to haven't done it yet. yeah, this worth of fortunately for the audience ginsburg wasn't there to receive the award. she was. it and yes. >>let's take a look at the 7 forecasts as we head dagan and through today and it looks like we're going to have the hottest today and then a gradual cool down for the weekend ahead looking pretty good that's it for now we'll be back here tomorrow morning at 04:00am the meantime stay connected with our website kron 4 dot com. our mobile app or you can get kron you go to kron on dot tv to sign up you'll see news 24 seconds. fact: some of your favorite foods stain teeth. unlike ordinary whitening too

ginsburg said to expect more 5-4 decisions in high-profile cases as the court wraps up their term this ask about citizenship. ginsburg said one of the biggest dinss from this term and last is the retirement of justice anthony kennedy. he was replaced by more conservative justice brett kavanaugh. >>> utility officials in california are taking the nurnl step of turns off the power and gas in three counties where conditions are darps for wildfire. pg&e is making the move with triple-digit temperatures in the region as well as wind and humidity levels which are triggering a red flag fire warning. thousands of residents are being warned they might not have air conditioning or refrigeration for days. >>> the toronto raptors are one win away from making basketball history. in game four, kawhi leonard scored 36 points and 12 rebounds to help the raptors win over the warriors. the raptors lead the series, three games to one. that series shifts back to toronto for game five on monday night. now, if toronto wins, they'll be the first team based outside the u.s. to win an nba championship, and the

. >> it was justice ruth bader ginsburg wrote for the majority.y justice sonia sotomayor and elena kagan but then also by justice clarence thomas and neil gorsuch. and then you had the chief justice sam alito part of the conservative block, but then also steve breyer and brett kavanaugh on the other side. but, you know, i think what people are really going to remember about this term are the decisions that we still haven't gotten yet. >> peetd, what's your take on how the chief justice is trying to position himself both on the court now as we watch it every day but also kind of for history. and this comes as ruth bader ginsburg is saying that many of these cases that are still to be decided are likely to be very deeply divided and possibly along partisan lines. >> no great separate. we will see how he votes on the census case. we will see how he votes on the partisan gerrymandering case. my guess is he will be in the majority. my guess is the supreme court will say we just can't -- we just don't know what the test is for partisan gerrymandering. t

you think you're going to dispute justice ginsburg saying most voters knew what they voted for? >> i'll agree with the intermediate appellate which had more of a record than justice ginsburg does. this court did not presume voters didn't understand. in the anderson case, the court said it will assume people are informed and read the paper. here you find at page 70 of joint appendix unrebutted system "the washington post" ran three lead editorials urging the people of maryland to reject this plan so it was not a secret ballot. it was simply a big issue in the state and the people overwhelmingly approved it. >> what i read there is the exact words of the thing they voted for or against, that this referendum petition "establishes the boundaries for the state's eight united states congressional districts based on recent census figures as required by the united states constitution." end quote. >> right. >> all right, now, is that sufficient? >> if that were the only thing the voters knew but this court presumes that they read the paper, they watch tv, they talk to each other, they ha

so you had senior liberal ruth bader ginsburg being joined by clarence thomas.erent than what we company for coming further in the term. and, you know, the way it works, the justices can't just rule on any case or controversy unless somebody has actually been harmed. and what ruth bader ginsburg said for the majority is that the house by itself, as just one chamber of the legislature, could not show harm to it. >> and further in the term, we're now at the end of the term. >> right. >> there are some 20 cases left, including a major jergerrymandeg case, the census case. how will they fit that in, get to those, and also maintain what chief justice john roberts has tried to call an apolitical court? >> well, first of all, it's like anything with a deadline. you know, you with a deadline, with a story. me with a deadline with a story. a senior with a deadline with a term paper. they tape until the last minute. so over the next couple days, actually the next ten days, we will see about 20 rulings come down. and the ones you mentioned where it's just so politically ch

that is what justice ginsburg is bringing up. no more. we are a different country. we are a different country now and there are 50 more different religions and therefore, no more. we are not going to have people trying to tear down historical monuments even here. okay? what you think of that? i am not suggesting i am for it i want to know what you think of it. >> sure, your honor, two things. the exaggeration that is going on that there are some how 50 or 100 crosses that are on public land. they cite, for instance, something that is not across. it is a boot with a rifle and a helmet and it is cited in the petitioner's reply brief on page 17, they refer to a cross in louisville, north carolina and it is not across. they cite crosses on private land like counted about 15. i would say this comes closer to 10- 20 that is inclusive of crosses that are quite small. with respect to history, there are a lot of reasons why religious minorities and christian dominated societies would not feel safe challenging and actively used war memorial that is the town's most prominent s

>>> ruth bader ginsburg is hinting that some of the courts upcoming rulings will be decided narrowly. two dozen buildings yet to be announced this month. she knows the votes all the public does not she noted in the conference the more than a quarter of the cases the supreme court heard this year were decided by a 5-4 a5-three vote for the more anticipated rulings yet to be announced are this is citizenship question on the u.s. census and the gerrymandering cases. another round of court opinions will be announced on monday. >>> wells fargo has agreed to pay $385 million to settle a class action lawsuit they were accused of signing up customers for expensive car loan. the agreement was filed inside a federal court based on the judge's approval. >> timeout is 7:26. >>> for cisco taking another step banning cigarette and vaping in the city. the two pieces of legislation are going for the board of supervisors the first measure would ban the devices until they are approved by the fda and the second would prohibit the sale and manufacturing and distribution of tobacco baking products on any

the courts current term and it ends in about two weeks and earlier this month justice ruth bader ginsburg suggested split decisions on the court to be announced before the end of the term and one highly anticipated ruling will determine whether the 2020 census can include a question about citizenship and another high-profile case focuses on partisan gerrymandering >>> also new this morning, iran says it will break the iranian stockpile limit it agreed to under the nuclear deal in the next 10 days and this helmet follows the suspected attacks on oil tankers last week in the persian gulf. the us blamed those attacks on iran and secretary of state mike mayo says the us is considering a response at all options are on the table including military action at the same time he says the us doesn't want war with iran>> we do not want war and we had done what we can to deter this, iranians should understand we will continue to take action to deter iran from engaging in this kind of behavior.>> secretary pompeo says us is evidence proving iran is behind the tanker attacks and the us already released s

the first jump ever made by -- >> ruth bader ginsburg. ( laughter ) ( applause ) >> trevor: yeah, i thinkworks. i think it works. ( applause ) now, now, you see, if we had more time, we could redub every movie with offensive civil war references but we've got to move on. because there's one civil war reference that deserves to be saved. >> the treasury department sees inspector general is launching an investigation into why the trump administration has delayed placing harriet tubman on the $20 bill. treasury secretary steve mnuchin blames the delay on features to prevent counterfeiting. but the inspector general has been asked to investigate. >> trevor: that's right, the inspector general is going to investigate as to why the harriet tubman $20 bill is not yet being made. good question. what's going on with the tubman 20? taking its time? can i say how fun it is to say the tubman 20? ( laughter ) it sounds like the weight you put on in your first year of freedom. that's what it sounds like. seriously, they announced this bill how long ago and now they're coming up with all the weird stori

in another case, justice clarence thomas joining ginsburg and gorsuch rejecting virginia republicans appeal over alleged racial gerrymandering. and a temporary victory tonight to the owners of a bakery in oregon, reracing a rules against them for refusing to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple. a lower court will re-examine that case. >>> there's still a lot more ahead on "world news tonight" this monday. celebrating gloria vanderbilt. >>> also, the extreme turbulence. the flight attendant thrown. more on this flight in a moment. >>> also, the recall tonight involving several flavors of a popular pasta sauce. why the company is concerned. >>> and then that shooting scare in downtown toronto today. more than a million were in the middle of celebrating the raptors' championship when gunshots begin. the scene from toronto in just a moment. a lot more news ahead on and mo night. i didn't have to run for help. i didn't have to call 911. and i didn't have to come get you. because you didn't have another heart attack. not today. you took our conversation about your chronic coronary ar

the graven powerful supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg says women belong in all places where decisions are being made it shouldn't be that women are the exception. so let's sit down with some women make some decisions and step into the gallery. thanks. thanks. for more than a century hysteria was the most common medical diagnosis for women exhibiting things like having opinions of their own or as the doctors of the time described it on government ungovernable emotional excess it would take until 1980 for hysteria to cease being a formally studied psychological disorder and to be removed from the american psychiatric association is diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders however in the years since women have still struggled to get doctors nurses and mental health care providers to move past these antiquated notions of what's going on in a woman's mind however new guidelines from the american psychological association could speed that process up just in time for the fall of the patriarchy the guidelines ask that psychologists strive to assign diagnosis to girls and women on

the people of san francisco, so i am just excited to be here today, and to say thank you to fill ginsburgtion and park, to the fix-it team, to do the department of public works, to all of the volunteers and community members, and i will say that d.p.w. and the downtown streets team, they can't do it alone. it is all of our responsibility to take care of our city. so let's roll up our sleeves, let's get to work, let's make san francisco a more green and clean city, more than anyplace else in the rest of the country. thank you also much for being here today. [cheers and applause] >> now i want to take the opportunity to introduce your supervisor, hillary ronen. [cheers and applause] >> thank you so much. it is such a pleasure to be here on this gorgeous, gorgeous day. i love downtown streets team! i want to tell you a story. so i don't know if you guys saw it there or read it in the media reports, but for a good part of the year, the barge director and i cleaned the 16th street b.r.t. station because he needed help, but also because we're trying to make a point that they didn't have enough