general manager ginsburg, you had something short to add? >> i sure. one reflection and just a thank you. the reflection is, it is interesting-this is not the only example of departments passing costs on to other departments. this one is particularly surprising and painful and it does raise some legitimate city wide policy questions about how the city budgets, and what is happening is it is all most like a little bit of a wee bit of arms race in which everybody is looking to pass their cost to other agencies. it is very challenging. this one is--the amount of money we are talking here is really closes rec centers. it does lay off gardeners, it is significant. >> we shall flush it all out. >> yes. to that end and well done by the way, bravo-i wanted to just take a second to thank antonio and tiffany and dana who is very involved in the budget. diana from our new fabulous director of people and culture and all of the leadership team. the budget is a collaborative effort that is captained very very gracefully and successfully by antonio and tiffany who is

justices ruth bader ginsburg. elena kagan. sonia sotomayor. and as i mentioned we live among legends like dr. hazel dukes, who is still, to this day, at 91, saying we still have that march toward justice. it is not finished yet. we are still working together. each of the women i mentioned redefined leadership in their own way and paved the way for others to follow. and to be clear it wasn't just because they are women they made their mark. they embod dwhrid courage and the character that still defines new yorkers to this day. and above all, they were fighters. and now as i stand before you, humbled by this honor i am ready to take on the fight. one of our former governor, teddy roos vel you've heard of the man in the arena, now there's a woman in the arena. that man and woman are willing to be mired by dust and sweat and blood to strive valiantly and spend herself in a worth -- herself in a worthy cause. the sign says, i didn't come here to make history, i cam here to make a difference and pursue the worthy causes, pursue them together. and as

look dower and looked down and you're going to look to see what will happen one year, ruth bader ginsburg apparently fell asleep one year famously. nancy pelosi tore up her copy of of donald trump speech. it's going to be terrific. then afterwards you get to hear sarah huckabee sanders, who was the press secretary, but now she's the governor of arkansas. she will give the re bottle and it will be night and day mister person. that shows whom bad still it will be in the future. so i was gonna ask and to see what happened for the aforementioned re well, a little bit of an issue just with the connection, but we will at will, will continue on. hopefully litle can hear us. ok. because i will put the point to him that he mentioned that democratic at voters. i think we've actually just lost line layers. it's unfortunate because we want to double bit deeper into the general situation as regards not just democrats on republicans, but the american people as regards the state of the union on the timing at we'll speak to him. busy offer and get that to you over the next few hours. been speaking to leg

colleagues had a portrait, antonina ginsburg, hanging on the board of honor of the enterprise. shock worker of labor for a small lepelgu of affairs. people could not believe that a respected person in the city, a traitor to the motherland, the punisher, on whose account the lives of thousands of people. what was it like for a husband who lost his entire family at the hands of the nazis, yes, and they lived a santonina from above, their daughters were married for 30 years. knew her. well, i will be shocked immediately and even believed. are you kidding. yes, it can not be, but she is a respected man tanina and not a thin drink learns. this was some kind of two-faced person who could strike two completely different lives. here she will hustle. and now she is beautiful, mother, beautiful, wife, wonderful mistress, worker. i personally knew one of her daughters. she worked in the lepel department store. and you know, when this story surfaced, we went there to see it, because we were very scared. agentsburg family, via for some time she left lepel to live in a small town. after this

president obama's right to fill the seat and they basically stole the future an opportunity to fill in ginsburg's seed to sow the court has been basically stolen in terms of the legitimacy of who is actually on the court. so we need reform because these folks are in their early 50s mostly. they will be out here for 30 years each. something has to be done to undo this attack on the legitimacy of the court. first thing i think we should do is add to seats. the congress and president can add to seats. it's not something you want to do but given the theft of these two seats we think other people are beginning to think that needs to happen. a second, we do support having term limits. one of the callers said the conservatives were the first toe talk about these. they propose to the federal society an 18 year term limit. we don't weigh in on the exact same time. people could continue as other federal court of appeals judges but in this limit most people think that is an amendment that is hard but there's a lot of scholars that think they could do without so we support that as well and the kind of reform

donating a signed opinion that she route -- >> whether it was ruth bader ginsburg or any justice, whydo you believe they should not be subject to a code of ethics? >> i didn't hear a democratic congress talking about the code of effort -- >> i'm talking about it. now sometimes relay. >> the lady's time has expired. >> we are not talked about in the past. that is my objection to this discussion. >> i haven't heard a reason why you really believe they should not be subject. mister chairman, thank you for your indulgence. i yield back. >> having recognizing him as consent request. of >> the gentleman is recognized for the purpose. >> thank you, gentlemen. i offer for the record the daily signal may six 2022, our piece entitled left attack on conservative justice's attempt to delegitimized supreme court. article from the federalist entitled, new york times knowingly printed false mayor of justice thomas's wife. from the wall street journal, opinion piece, the hypocrisy of supreme court ethics journalism. from the federalist, the new yorker lies again, about claire thomas and his wife. and

we could get fact-checked for saying the ninth circuit court overruled the death of ruth bader ginsburgrated false, they try to cast it in a negative light, where these aren't just jokes, they're not harms jokes, they're misinforming people and it's malicious, and that's our motivation. >> my concern is when you start defining content that intends to degrade, my goodness. >> you know, big tech companies kind of leverage that, use that, as a reason to threaten us with deplatforming, demontiization, whatever, and work in concert with each other. we see that we've been treated differently. the difference is, we have different values, we have different views, and make jokes at the expense of the popular narrative instead of in an effort to promote the popular narrative. they want you to be silenced or join them in affirming these things or celebrating these things, and anything else is unacceptable. >> twitter's censorship of the babylon bee caught the attention of elon musk. musk understood when they silenced the comedians civilization is at stake. >> comedy is illegal? you want a humorles

my cochair was bent ginsburg, who had represented the mitt romney campaign. and all the rest of the commissioners we had were experts, including, because we were talk about expediting lines, the vice president of disney in favor of theme parks. no organization manages lines better than disney. we actually got the general services administration to agree that we got to go to disney world to study lines. the recommendations made were all recommendations about management, better polling place management, poll worker recruitment, all the fundamentals of election administration. so that is all good. at the same time, the distinction between access and what i call the suppression versus product conflict continue to simmer. if first took the form of identification statutes that were passed around the country. everybody here knows the thought was to accelerate until we got to the election and everybody is familiar with the extraordinary controversies with the president refused to concede. the goal of the commission was to emphasize that elections are a facet of publi

phil ginsburg, the director of sf park and rec, and marcy a. contreras the deputy executive director for mission housing. on behalf of the friendship house staff and our executive director gabriel pimentel. we want to thank you guys for joining us. your collaboration makes all of this possible. my grandmother came here into the bay area during the relocation period and my mother lived in alcatraz during that really hard time. the famous occupation. i'm a mother and a strong native woman in recovery. who found my own? oh who found my own through a healing and healing through cultural and community connection. it is always felt like home here. the village s f is a realization of even a bigger community and i couldn't be prouder of what we are accomplishing here as native people, we are building this together. i would like to introduce my brother peter brad , who is also one of the village project leads. relatives. what a great day. actually uh, recognize my sister, virginia headrick from sakura, who is also here today. great partner and ally of u

aside and not do this need to remember the playbook of what happened when they did it with justice ginsburg. if anything, she dug in and said this is my job. this is my position. i feel very much at strength in this position, mentally and physically. i will stick around as long as i can. the more you publicly goad this president the more you may push him to decide to run in 2024. that's a sense i get of him. >> mike: makes you wonder who can say mr. president they aren't that into you? i guess we'll see. >> dana: who do you have coming up on fox news sunday. >> we'll talk with katie hobbs, pulled out a narrow win here and now dealing with issues that everybody is dealing with across the country. many of these governors, the border, education choice and debt ceiling. we'll talk to her about that and the nfl fox sports analyst with us. michael, howie, the coach, terry. the panel to tackle the politics of the day includes the one and only bill hemmer and clay travis to break down the hottest stories of the week and one more plug, a doctor one of my favorite players to come through florida stat

president for the national organization for women, ran the iclu's women rights project with ruth bader ginsburghe author of not one of the boys, living live as a feminist. thanks so much for being here with us. so i understand a majority of abortions are now done using pills, and these drugs are safer than surgical abortions, how consequential is this effort to stop the mailing of these abortion pills. >> it's extremely consequential because if i have the numbers right, there are 20 attorneys general who think it's wrong for cvs and walgreens to be sending abortion pills out to women. and that means that you can't get an abortion in a lot of places because a lot of states prohibit abortion. so -- and i just want to point out that the people who are getting the shaft in this are poor young women. they're not people that have private doctors who can help them with abortions. they're people who need to have these pills that are so safe and so easy to use. and just the fact that these 20 attorneys general are ganging up, and threatening cvs and walgreens, i find shocking. >> and that republican eff

the late justice ginsburg advocated for very long time, both as an advocate and ultimately as a supremestice, her finding some protection agast discrimination on the basis of sex and the 14th amendment. she was successful. but given the move within the supreme court, i think that win, that protection is vulnerable. the late justice scalia was very explicit about that, and he said he did not recognize any protection against discrimination on the basis of sex and into constitution. that is exactly why we need -- amy: what would it mean if the equal rights a minute were actually ratified, were passed? in the case, for example, what is about to come down any day now that texas judges decision that could block access to the common abortion medication but prestone? this abortion pill, vacation abortions, are used more than half the abortions in the u.s. so how would it affect this and overall reproductive rights in this country? >> that is a great question and also it is a question tt will be decided by the court. but we think reproductive health is part of equality and if there is a statute

what to pay attention to in this will tell us our constantly expert mikhail moiseevich ginsburg , nutritionistiences, you are not empty-handed. in this case, it is a vegetable oil rich in alleic fatty acid, what is the use of oleic acid in lowering blood pressure ; oleic fatty acid has a pronounced anti-inflammatory action, and it significantly reduces the amount of cholesterol in the walls of blood vessels. that is, it makes the vessels more elastic. that is, it turns out that a person who uses products with lionic acid in his diet. his blood vessels are more elastic. they are less traumatized, and a person who uses some other options, where kalinic acid is low in such a person , the vessel is less elastic and at some point a so-called vascular catastrophe may occur, remember friends. my go further beneficial effect on brain function, yes. the hadith is the same anti-inflammatory mechanism, if we correct the nutrition, we reduce this is inflammation, as i said, oleic fatty acid has an anti-inflammatory effect. you just notice a good positive mood, with which it is easier for us to live easier

>> for, justice ginsburg, justice breyer, justice sotomayor, and justice kagan.actually, and justice ketanji brown jackson, our newest justice. >> this looks like a mummy don't want to talk about here. >> it's actually kind of a funny moment. that's getting ready for the 1996 vice presidential debate. and we are in the final stages are preparing for the debate. and all of a sudden, the senior staff in the white house showed up to kind of audit our preparations. and you can see, leon panetta, kind of in fuzzy view there, -- and vice president gordon, we were pretty well prepared. so kind of as a joke, when we threw him a first question, he said i'm not prepared, i'm not ready. any kind of laughed. it was a funny moment there, actually. >> he was funnier than people realized. >> he was. people don't realize that al gore was hysterical. he's got a fast wit, and a cutting wit. and he's very, very. funny >> i saw a picture of him today that our friend eli absent from 2015. and it's eli and you and al gore laughing like i have never seen him before. >> that's great. >>

he took advantage of the opportunities we never ascribe action to a roof bet to ginsburg. as someone who's white on the court, it's always ascribed to blacks. and when someone gets an opportunity and they achieve, somebody will say, well, they got that because of affirmative action. what affirmative action does not only does it maligns but it marginal lies is the true success of what parents do like my parents did the bus their to work hard the pay for my early college education. well i got scholarships my parents felt they did a very decent living on the family ranch and my parents paid to park money out of pockets for me and any of my brothers and sisters who wanted to go to college. affirmative action, absolutely nothing to do with it. and i had bust my chops in the classroom to, get those grades, and they continued success trajectory that i continue to to the day. so while affirmative action may help some don't allow it to marginalize people whose parents who put the sweat equity in educating their and affirmative action is absolutely nothing to do with it. okay. i wan

justice ginsburg, we know you deserve a seat at the table.ors don't get what they need to get. then of course audrey lord said, refuse to stay silent. in homeland security, we say, see something, say something. john lewis said, if you see something that ain't right, do something about it. if you see something that needs to change, mayors can make a difference. i wanted to come today to focus briefly on the federal dollars. you've heard a lot of congratulations for the mlu, with the small business administration and the administrators doing an excellent job. would you do me a favor and give her another hand, please? they are doing an excellent job. i just want to give you a list, and give you the idea that all that we do in washington is really for all of you. it is for where their people are. we have already heard, cities, the heart of civilizations, where the action is, cities where the people are, and you are absolutely right. my one editorial comment -- and there are many of us who have come from city government in our prior life. what it

checked for saying, you know,yig the ninth circuit court had nin overruled the death of ruth bader ginsburg or somethinge det like that, or aoc goes on , the price is right and guesses toerything is free. we'll have these jokes fact t checked and rated false. you know, they try to cast itn' in some kind of negative light where these aren't just jokes,e they're not harmless jokes. they actually are likee an misinforming people and it's malicious. >> and that's actually our motivation. my concern ouron.>> m is when yt defining content that intense to degrade, my goodness, you know, big tech companies kind of leverage that.te they use that as a reasonformin, to threaten us with the platform, demonization demot whatever . wettho they work in concer with each other. so we've seeeen that we've beenw treated differently. and the difference is we haveffn different values, we have different views and we make mak jokes at the expense of the popular narrative instead narrn an effor it to promote the popular narrative. they either want you to bethey w silenced or they want you to join them in affirming

justice ginsburg, we know you deserve a seat at the table.eed. of course audre lorde says refused to stay silent. and only to get a reset "if you see something, say something." john lewis says if you see something that ain't right, do something about it. if you seeou something that nees to change, mayors can make a difference. i wanted to come today to focus briefly on the federal dollars. you for a lot, congratulations for the m.o.u. with the small business administration and the administrator is doing an excellent job eric would you do me a favor and give her another hand please? doing an excellent job. [applause] i i just want to sort ofo giveu a list and giving give ya that although we do in washington is really for all of you. it is for where the people are and we've already heard cities, the heart of civilization, city where the action is. cities where thele people are. you're absolutely right. my one editorial comment and there are members of us who have come from city government in our prior life, and what is is we want more direct fu

we think that the history shows that ese programs can -- in the early, programs as justice ginsburg has mentioned, the program in backey, and the federal program co explicitly included asian americans as among the beneficiaries. it would reach a point now where we feel that we are able to mentlyonsider race. >> i don't see how you can say that the program will ever end. your position is that race matters, because it is necessary for diversity, which is necessary for theort of education you want. it's not going to stop mattering at some particular point, you always ve to look at race because you say atace matters to give us the necessary diversity. >> i think there's two different questions there. we don't think thatompelling interest in diversity will ever expire. i think the question is whether race conscious measures need to be taken in the admissions process to reach our goals. >> but you'll have to check, right? y wl not know whether you have a sufficient number of african americans to give y t diversity that you say is necessary if you don't look and check. >> i think that there wi

hgppy ginsburg's programme this morning. happy sunday to you laura. you are absolutely right.ivor after five days under the rubble, and we will be talking about the earthquake in the studio this morning with the minister for foreign aid andrew mitchell, who sits on the cabinet, talking to him about what the uk is doing to try to help that terrible situation in turkey and of course also in syria, and also on the programme, everybody�*s favourite bag ofjudge, pru will be here to talk about our new channel for series which raises some difficult but a very important discussions about how to live well and die well, so we will be hearing from her about that programme, which is coming soon, but plenty of politics and other things too, i hope to see you at nine.- politics and other things too, i hope to see you at nine. good mix, laura, hope to see you at nine. good mix, laura. really _ hope to see you at nine. good mix, laura, really nice _ hope to see you at nine. good mix, laura, really nice to _ hope to see you at nine. good mix, laura, really nice to see _ hope to see you at nine