like ginsburg. what gives you such confidence in the race for the presidency?assing for the family to answer, and biden remained silent, so the decision, no matter what, to stay in the race is framed as his pre-election opinion. horses are sometimes shot, already 72% of american voters do not believe that biden’s mental and cognitive health will allow him to be president, so it’s up to cnn make-up artists alone, because of whom at the debate he looked like a mummy, you couldn’t knock him down. moreover, they are increasingly writing that a secret movement of resistance to biden’s nomination is led by obama, and judging by the kind of people who have begun to open their mouths after several years of silence, this may well be true. i had to bring a chair, then there was a conversation with donors, their last meeting with the head of the white house, held last saturday at the luxurious hamptons resort, again ended in embarrassment. biden read a speech from a teleprompter without answering any of the dozens of unpleasant questions, lady. among money bags of the dem

many award winning, mostly published random house topics include ruth bader ginsburg, roberta willie mays, sonia sotomayor. barack obama. muhammad ali. hillary clinton. thurgood marshall, etc., etc. what of children's books do you write? mr. winter well, i write on about a broad range of topics, but generally what i have been writing about until few years ago, i should say i had been writing about were books about people who don't share my identity. so a lot of books on people of color and books on women books about racial and social justice. i write books about baseball players and artists and musicians. i write children's book, nonfiction picture picture book biographies, picture book nonfiction, specifically and recently the, last few years, i've been writing more fiction for reasons having to do with certain changes in publishing world and in my career. but that's generally the sort of books i've been writing. my first book was the ego about diego rivera, published in 1991 and and that kind of was before there was a category in bookstores, a section in bookstores called picture b

ginsburg was an idol for liberals, but despite requests to resign under obama, who could replace herne, which are the first to foresee a catastrophe, are already threatening to stop the monetary supply if biden does not leave voluntarily; in response, his entourage turns to blackmail, they say, if the us president agrees to withdraw from the run, then all the funds already collected will go to the even less popular kamali harris , and this is a doubly catastrophe for donors. valentin bogdanov, ivan udkin and anna lvova, news from new york. a detachment of ships of the northern fleet consisting of the frigate admiral gorshkov and a tanker academician pashin made a call to venezuela, after completing the tasks of the long voyage , the crews will be able to rest, then the sailors will continue to carry out their assigned tasks in the equator of the atlantic ocean. the campaign began on may 17. the main task is to ensure a naval presence in operationally important areas. the frigate, among other things, has high-precision weapons. not only degrades, but puts the gazovites on the brink of

ginsburg was an idol for liberals, but despite this. senseless and merciless. and trump's debate responses have concluded that biden won by a landslide, and those who watched the debate without paying attention to anything other than what the candidates looked like were choosing appearance over substance. joe biden never was. the message is clear, horses are not changed at the crossing, but there are driven horses, shoot. already 72% of american voters do not believe that biden’s mental and cognitive health will allow him to be president, so you can’t blame cnn’s make-up artists alone, who made him look like a mummy at the debate. moreover, they increasingly write that he is leading a secret movement of resistance to biden’s nomination. the president of the united states suddenly became stiff; he had to bring a chair. that was a conversation with donors. their last meeting with the head of the white house took place last saturday at the fashionable hamptons resort and again ended in embarrassment. biden read the speech from the teleprompter without answering an

they do not understand the work of polly murray, who was a predecessor to ruth bader ginsburg, aaron carmen, before ginsburg there was polly murray who graduated first in her class from howard law school who wrote papers that were later on central to the argument of brown v. board of education and to the liberty we see in terms of women's equality and her book, race laws in america, nearly 800 pages tells us about jim crow in america where in parts of mississippi you cannot swim in the swimming pool, walk through the park, play checkers, play chess, play billiards. and in the second part is when we talk about reproductive health rights imagine what it means to be parents and your kids cannot go to the park. yet you are paying taxes. your kids cannot swim in the pool but you are playing taxes. your kids cannot play checkers in public and you think who were the people making the laws and who are the judges upholding the laws? it is not just rosa parks. that said, let's open the conversation on the 70th anniversary of brown v. board of education and if the matters of brown were being li

play each other all day long i think that joe has been out there over the years and so has phil ginsburg when not busy running. but rec and park department will be defending the championship so we won last year the fire department no longer has it's star- >> (multiple voices). >> shortstop so they are not the same squad yeah. >> and now rec and park has the bay sock. >> infusion and the general manager plays second and pitched a little bit, you know he's leading the young ones do their thing so maybe that's why we're winning anyway we're outer there from saturday june 22nd. (laughter). >> never easy but never. >> all right. um, and the jfk promenade good has a splash any new name you heard gene friend recreation center pod pod whales tail give credit to l is on the promenade west of the rose garden will be opened from noon to 6:00 p.m. an saturdays and sundays all summer and the new name suggested by day of was inspired before the installation along the promenade and what this year in addition to beer and wine serving cocktails and fire trucks and perfect stop to drop anchors and thank y

take us into your reporting about ben ginsburg. >> i'll tell you, ben ginsburg was the most feared ontough. he plays the law as far as he can to win elections. that's been his job. so when ben ginsburg says that this effort, this is look at certification, this thing that's been taken as a given, he thinks it's a radical thing and he's worried about it. but you know, the hope of people like ben, they -- people hope that the law will kick in because these things are illegal. the question is does the law hold firm as it did in 2020 when we get to january 6th of 2024. >> you know, nick, i think this reporting is one of the markers that has been put down, right, and the people that you get to talk to and the story that you're able to tell in -- in this piece is one of the flashing yellow lights. i think it was burt gel man who wrote about the election officials who felt like the lights were flashing yellow ahead of the 2020 election. this is the flashing yellow lights ahead of the 2024 election. and one of the anecdotes you tell which is harrowing is what's happening in washoe county, neva

the book is dedicated, ruth bader ginsburg. this is her kennedy center. was there. nina was someone when i saw her, ion't know how to do this. i got a little sequined purse get my phone'm it. and my friend said, john, noor don't do that i said okay. well i took her picture and that's that's is that's as good as i could as i could get it. but i will tell you that, when she was going to kennedy center, you would go and you wouldt, the opera house, they would dim the lights. everybody would be waiting the would come back up a little b and, here we come, ruth bader ginsburg down center aisle with an usher on each arm. and i mean, she was just a little bitty woman. the whole opera house would stand up and cheer. e take her seat. they would dim the lights and then the music glory way to to cia. this is ruth. this is louise, our first superstar w secretary. the cia first began and. that's the end of my ta and i think we have time questions and we do. thank you. we've we've about 10 to 15 minutes for your question. if you could bring the to this mike, go to that mike over t

ginsburg will will started by recognizing the praise that hung in her chamber. justice, justice, we shall pursue. that is why we are here in pursuit of justice and defense of our democracy. so marc thank you so much for being here. let's dive in. after this week supreme court ruling you wrote that you fear that that is change the course of american history in the dark and dangerous direction. please elaborate for us. how has this decision endangers our democracy and changed the course of american history? >> first of all, thank you for having me. i am always happy to talk to groups of jewish voters and democrats. there's no group i like talking to more and buy more rewarding than talking to jewish democrats at the tremendous work, halie, you and the entire team to to both promote democratic candidates but also through the lens of jewish values and jewish history. i think that you, in order to understand the recent supreme court decision of the ruled in of donald trump on the claim of immunity, you need to do it through two lenses. the first is the lens of the la

it's really hard for me too believe the skull leah and ginsburg were almost unanimously approved given now. >> it is a good .96 votes i think for scalia at 97 votes for ginsburg opposite ends of the pole in terms of how you look at being a judgment both qualified. so it started with ted kennedy trying to destroy the clarence thomas what they tried to do to kavanaugh. liberals tried to destroy conservatives. they could care less about the rule of law unless the rule of law is working for them. when the rule of law is used to advance or liberal agenda it is great, like you said before if they see a constitutional conservative judge about too go into court they will destroy this person if they can get away with that they tried it with thomas, they try to kavanaugh it did not work i'm proud of the role i played of helping to make sure conservative judges get on the court when it comes to trump and trump are judges there are no rules. here's what we have we have the chevron case overturned that is a really big deal. courts no longer are bound by administrative rulings that make no sense. th

and in 2021, marc became the first recipient of the ruth bader ginsburg justice award.nd in honor of justice ginsburg, we'll start today by recognizing the phrase that hung inre her chamber -- [speaking in native tongue] justice, justice, you shall pursue. that is why we are here, in pursuit of justice and in defense of our democracy. so, marc, thank you so much for being here. let's dive in. after this week's supreme court ruling, you wrote that you fear it has changed the course of american history in a dark and dangerous direction. pleasese elaborate for us. how has this decision endangered our democracy and changed the course of american history? >> yeah. so, first of all, thank you for having me. i am always happy to talk to groups of jewish voters and democrats. there's no group id like talking to more and find more rewarding than talking to jewish democrats and the tremendous work, halie, that you and the entire team do to both promote democratic candidates, but also through the lens of jewish values and jewish history. and i think that you -- in order to underst

but then, when justice ginsburg died in 2020, republicans rushed to push president trump's nominee athe same time votes were being cast in any election that trump would lose. it is outrageous. [applause] i know i don't look it, but i served in the senate for 36 years. [laughter] including as chairman and ranking member of the judiciary committee. i have been told that i have ever seen more supreme court nominations as senator, vice president, and resident than anyone alive today. -- senator, vice president, and president than anyone alive today. [applause] i have respect for institutions and the separation of powers laid out in the constitution, but what is happening now is not consistent with that doctrine of separation of powers. extremism is undermining the public confidence in the court's decisions. as soon as i came into office, i could meet with a bipartisan congressional commission on the supreme court in the united states, comprised of meeting with constitutional scholars, liberal and conservative, to provide recommendations on potential reforms to the court. i have been caref

it so transparent and an election issue, it's not a principle, they do not care when ruth bader ginsburgy more funded trips, no one gave a, because they were likelier treat taken the trips in a coequal branch of government and the issue that is popular, medicare for all was popular too, 88%, no, we are not for that, so i'm not buying that either, what i am buying this there is a ton of left wing dark money on this issue, it's been going on for several years, look at the cavanaugh hearings, i was a spokesperson for john roberts and alito when they became -- when they were going through their confirmation hearings and it really started to like right after that and they were like wow, we have to do something, and now that group, those dark money groups when a return on their investment. what do they do, they wait until joe biden says i'm going to cure cancer and fix the supreme court in six months. so here's my idea, he has this op-ed in "the washington post" that obviously somebody else wrote for him and there's no way that if those decisions had gone the way that they wanted that they wou

second, ruth bader ginsburg, one of the most renowned jurists we have had the plee served with, she doesn'twas now we have joe done more in onm than any other president that i can remember■m, but he's old. you can't un-see you see. we g to make the same mistake again when we have a onto power and doesn■'ow it's going to kostas the election again. biden doesn't have the capability to beat him again. thank you so much. host: bernie, so who should replace -- as aem and one who sounds loyal to the president -- who should replace him? are you there? caller: yes, i host: yes. who should replace president bin? caller: gavin newsom. host: why? caller: he's progressive. he comes from a state that has a gross national product bigrhe i. that's a voice of the democratic party. i love joe is past his prime, it's as simple as that. ■ 74 years old. i know what it's like to grow old. you lose mental abilities, physical abilities. if you got thealould you want hm waking up in the sameacit he had in the debate? it's scary. host: what do you make of that? guest: a rough place, democrats are in a rough place.

you look at ruth bader ginsburg, others reached an age, where the only thing that took them out was death. i don't think that is fair to the american people, not fear air to the complexities. it is something that should apply. term limits should apply to congress. i hope that we will get there one day. host: a few minutes left with congressman ralph norman, the house coming in at 9:00 eastern. we will go there for gavel-to-gavel coverage when they do. congress already starting its day. we will let you go when congress comes in. emma is waiting for you in baltimore, maryland. independent. good morning. caller: good morning. i noticed the gentleman would make a response about what the trump or biden administration when due, and he answered after they hung up. i will answer briefly. he reduced medicaid, expanded medicare for the elderly, got rid of student debt, burning debt, who could not find jobs after going to college. he reduced the number of people coming over the border by 50%. even though it is not the best, it did happen. your statement about biden's family crying in the background,

ambassador to morocco mark ginsburg.l be delivered to a very fractured congress right now. what are we expecting this afternoon? >> reporter: i think you're right, ana, there is no doubt his appearance here today is divisive, polarizing, there are some members of congress who strongly support netanyahu and the reason behind his invitation here by house speaker mike johnson. but there are many democrats and even some republicans, frankly, who feel that this isn't the right time for him to be here, that his political future in israel is in doubt, and his prosecution of the war is very controversial and shouldn't just be outrightly embraced by the united states government. regardless, it has led to a very chaotic atmosphere here on capitol hill. you're right to point out that security on this campus is at extreme levels. there is fencing up and around the capitol, there are bike racks that extend beyond the office buildings, they are limiting who can come in and out of the capitol to only official business so that means tou

die ginsburg died in 2020 republicans rushed through the president is trump's nominee at the very same time, votes are being cast in election that trump would lose it's outrageous i know i don't look it, but i served in the senate for 36 years in including his chairman and ranking member of the judiciary committee i've been told that i've overseen more supreme court nominations as senator, vice president, and president anyone in history, anyone alive today, i should say i have great respect for our institutions in the separation of powers laid out in our constitution but what's happening now is not consistent with that doctrine. >> of separation of powers extremism is undermining the public confidence in the court's decisions as soon as i came to office, i can mean to bipartisan presidential commission on the supreme court of united states comprised of leading constitutional scholars, both liberal and conservative, provide recommendations on potential reforms to the court i've been careful these deliberations because these are serious, serious decisions in the face of increasing threat

but then when justice ginsburg died in 2020, republicans rushed through the president trump's nomineebeing cast in an election that trump would lose. it's outrageous. [ applause ] i know i don't look it, but i served in the senate for 36 years. including as chairman and ranking member of the judiciary committee. i've been told that i've overseen more supreme court nominations as senator, vice president and president than anyone in history, anyone alive today i should say. [ applause ] i have great respect for our institutions. and the separation of powers laid out in our constitution. but what's happening now is not consistent with that doctrine of separation of powers. extremism is undermining the public confidence in the court's decisions. as soon as i came to office i convened a bipartisan presidential commission on the supreme court of the united states comprised of leading constitutional scholars both liberal and conservative to provide recommendations on potential reforms to the court. i've been careful in these deliberations because these are serious, serious decisions. in the

and we we've had a raft of them recently, ruth bader ginsburg, particularly, was someone who, you know, had cancer in her early 80s, did not leave leave perhaps when she should have. and democrats i think rue that, but also other politicians, recently dianne feinstein, also charles grassley is a is a serving senator from iowa who ran for reelection, as, i think, an 88 year old, and so this is an ongoing problem, but i don't know that there's an easy solution to it unless you put in some kind of age limits. >> certainly a lot to talk about. thank you so much. casey sullivan from cal state east bay presidential historian. appreciate your taking some time today. >> thank you. all right. here's a look at time magazine's cover posted out there on social media today. it shows president biden walking out of the frame and vice president kamala harris walking into the center of that photo. >> so take a look at the weather today. pretty noticeable how much cooler it was today than yesterday, a good 5 to 10 degrees cooler today. and then we go back the other way. so it was hot last week. then it

peter: contemporary justices, ruth bader ginsburg, well-known, antonin scalia a, well known. fair?> absolutely. they gave rise to the great scalia-ginsberg opera and much more. and justice ginsburg did have that great movie made after her, so maybe we are continuing in that great tradition. peter: let's hear from jack from davenport, iowa. go ahead with your question. >> what would holmes think about the internet, where people are looking for rooms full of people so they can get them all stirred up, and then they yell fire to stir up a lot of anger? beck's great question, so important, the question gets to the heart of homes incitement test. in the abrams decision he not only said that speech had to be strongly protected, but he endorsed a version and it was arculated that speech could ly be restricted if it's intended to and likely to cause imminent violence. so it's not enough to say something that someone may be, possibly in the future might react badly to, it has to be intended to create imminent violence in the violence has to be imminent and serious. the supreme court embrace

they are going to blast kamala harris, blasted joe biden for waiting until this ruth bader ginsburg momentof waiting until it's weigh too late. he finally caved to doing what they demanded. >> jesse: you know what most weak presidents do, they have someone challenge them in the primary. sometimes that makes them more competitive, sometimes you get a new nominee. that's what's called healthy or if you know you're down in the polls as sometimes happens with incumbents, they work harder, they fire their campaign manager. they change message. they change strategy. they don't just say goodbye we're going to pick somebody else in the back room, that's crazy. that never happens. >> and disenfranchise all of your base voters, the people who supported you. black lives matter is even upset because they feel disenfranchised. they don't get to have a say in who the democrat nominee is going to be because with the superdelegates the party elites are picking this. that's the antithesis of democracy. that's not what it is. they are not following that process in this republic. all of the things that they

justice ginsburg something close to that, maybe 96 to 3, something like that. and that was always the philosophy i brought to when i thought about confirmation and so on. elena kagan i was her deputy solicitor general when she was nominated. i was aghast at senate republicans who said she wasn't qualified. i mean, first woman solicitor general, first woman d.a. and of harvard law school, brilliant scholar, just, you know, just phenomenal on every level to say she wasn't qualified. it hurt me. so to hear that and then i saw the games played justice scalia's unfortunate passing with the merrick garland nomination. and that, you know, broke my heart. and when president trump, in his first week or two, nominated neil gorsuch to the court, i looked into my heart and i said, look, you know, he's not the person i would recommend by any stretch. you know, he's not going vote on things that i would. but if i apply the yardstick of is this person qualified, that person was qualified to be on the supreme court much as i disagree. but trump won the election. and so that's

and iron if you had term limits to supreme court, justices, famous liberals like ruth bader ginsburg would not have been around to be famous liberals, a lightning round on war against the supreme court. highwayhow bad is that. >> terrible this administration is most radical, joe biden and kamala harris decided they are willing to destroy the supreme court to undermine its legitimacy and the rule of law, because it is the one branch of government they don't control, they are angry their justice is willing to defended the constitution and bill of rights and free speech and religious liberty and second amendment, they are willing to burn it to the ground, thithis an assault on protection of our constitutional rights this is from people that bang their chest and say they are about democracy, they are actions they indicate a contempt for democracy. larry: last one, jd vance, good, man? bfabulous story up from nothing yale law school, you went to harvard you -- a decent law school. you know. can't get him yet -- cannot get him to say that he is in favor of pro growth tax cuts or extending

the old story where justice scalia and justice ginsburg went to the opera together. at least those two were collegial. we have lunch together. for reasons i will say, that is important, but we talk about some of my colleagues share a great love of baseball. some of my colleagues share a great love of golf. all of this is welding good for us. if you are hated by your colleagues, we would have a more miserable existence. there is a bug bite noah feldman about the 1940's court which is called "scorpions," and they just despise each other and i cannot imagine how they went into work every day. i cannot imagine that the public would care. the public should care about is where i am going to say collegial -- if the collegiality brings about a certain kind of decision-making process, in other words if it means people listening to each other and talking about the law and making decisions, if it leads to people being able to step into each other's shoes and see the world to another person's eyes were see different legal issues through a different perspective. so to the extent

waiting for the would come back up a little bit and everybody wou and, here we come, ruth bader ginsburgdown ce each arm. and i mean, she was just a little bitty stand up and cheer. would dim the lights and then the music would start glory way to to enj l louise, our first superstar woman was bil secretary. the cia first began and. that's the end of my talk. time questions and we do. thankwe've we've about 10 to 15 minutes for your question. if you could bring ere. would be appreciate it. hi. hi love. argo, i haven't read your book yet, but looking forward to it. having to keep reporting with were when you worked for the cia. and my first husband told me about that, but i had already said yes, his proposal. so there wasn't any wiggle room left. what happens have friends of the ciae cia, and you find that without go of the outsiders, thfriends home who who don't understand are or why you're traveling or what you're doing. story has to be so boring. that it's real boring. and nobody ever wanted nobody ever. exactly do you do? they just knew i worked for the military i for the government at

one is i saw with ginsburg, she related to her colleagues.hen they disagreed tremendous. and i'm just not seeing that now. the republicans have voted based on the courts and democrats have not. to our detriment. and some of us, and i suspect all three of us on this show this evening, has urged our fellow countrymen to think about the court as a primary issue as we are choosing presidents. democrats just thought that it would be fine and it is way not fine. i think the only solution is time. honestly, we have got to elect presidents and senates that will give us better justices than we have. that is the real solution. if you pack the court, the next judge, the next president will pack it more. that is not a solution. >> yeah. what about term limits, jamie. is that something that should be discussed or debated or does that lead to the same challenge? >> so, i think that is a fair question. that is a fair question. -- was designed to insolate members of the judiciary from pressure. the term on it, particularly if it is a long one, wouldn't make

that was famous with all of his friendsth dedicated, ruth bader ginsburg.his is her kennedy center. i was there for an opera. she was there. nina was there. my i was a guest of someone when i saw her, i started out you know, i'm i don't know how to do this. i got a little sequined get my phone. i'm getting it. and my friend said, john, noey don't feel embarrassed or don't do that i said okay. well i took her picture and that's that's is that's as good as i could as i that, when she was going to kennedy center, yowould go and you would take your seat, the opera house, they would dim the lights. be waiting for the music. and then the would come back u bit and everybody would turn and, here we come, ruth ba down center aisle with an usher on each arm. an woman. the whole opera house would stand up andshe take her seat. they would dim the lights and ld start. i thought, what a to to enjoy life. and this is fors louise, our first superstar was bill donovan's secretary. the cia first began and. that's the end of my talk. and i think we have time questions and do.

bader ginsburg. this is her kennedy center.en i saw her, iknow, i'm i don't ko this. i got a little sequined purse get my phone getting it. and my friend said, john, no, no, they don't feel embarrassed or don't do that i said okay. well i took her picture and that's that''s as good as i could as i could get it. but i will tell you that, when she was going to kennedy center, would dim the lights.would everybody would be waiting for the music. and then the would come back up a little turn and, here we come, ruth with an usher on each arm. and i mean, she was just a little bittyera house would stand up and cheer. she take her seat. they would dim the lights and then the music glory way to to enjoy life. and this is for cia. this is ruth. louise, our first superstar woman was bill donovan's secretary. the cia first began and. that's the y talk. and i think we have time questions and we do. thank you. we've we've about 10 to 15 minutes for your qst the to this mike, go to that mike over there. would be appreciate it. hi, love. argo,

would've never handed down some of his most famous ruling spirit ruth bader ginsburg. all of these people would've been cut off at 18 years. for over two centuries presidents have had trouble with the courts. but they have not tried to do this. the question we have today is not whether this will pass, it won't, but what will it do, as you said, for the election. vice president harris has indicated that she might be in favor of packing the court and there are other rather extreme proposals out there. >> john: when you take a look at what he is proposing it requires two constitutional amendments and just to remind folks at home, those are high bars that you have to jump because it requires first of all a two-thirds vote in the house and the senate and three quarters of state legislatures must ratify. even if republicans were to lose the house and democrats were to maintain control of the senate, you will never get to two-thirds and i highly doubt you will get three quarters of the states. >> we will get more details if we are trying to do the court term limits legislativ

justice ginsburg said how do you like being a judge? it is a privilege i really enjoy but i miss being an advocate and she said without missing a beat, you are still an advocate. that was not a description of a judge. for you to say -- it was tempting to say it takes want to no one but like i actually -- >> did she say it as a sort of she was making a comment about you or was she making a comment about judges in general? >> i think she was making a good point which i took to be a compliment and i think the point was how could you be a judge for a while and not have a perspective? that's what she meant, advocating that perspective when precedent doesn't control and there is something gray. that makes perfect sense to men i can be a blank slate every case. i did not taken as a compliment initially but i'm so good at rationalizing get i turned it around, how thoughtful. so we talked about justice scalia and disagreement and not to takeo it personally, hard t do but good advice. is there anything else you could recommend it to lower court j

they're going to blast joe biden for waiting untilais,l this like ruth bader ginsburg moment of leaving when it's way too late and they're going to blame them for costing the election. he they're they're only liking him right now becauseo he finally came to doing what they demanded. >> because you know what most weak presidents do? they havt e someone challenge them in the primary. sometimes that makes them primarmore competitive. etimes y >> sometimes you get a new nominee. that's what's called healthy, right? or e. that's w if you know, you're don in the polls, as sometimes happens with incumbents, they work harder, they firer cap campaign manager, they change wey. ge, they change strategai they don't just say goodbye. we're going to just pick somebody else in a smoke filleds back room. >> that's crazy. that never happens . yeah. and disenfranchize all of, th your base voters, the people who supportehod you. i mean, it's no wonder that out of all it's crazy. and i'm even saying this black lives matterk is even upset because they feel disenfranchized that they don't th have a say in wh

don't do damage to it now and do a repeat of ruth ga ruth bader ginsburg.t is how the psychology is working among democrats. when you talk about the poll numbers, john, a lot of this has to do with not how anybody would do against the republican nominee, likely donald trump, but how they would do among democrats who are, you know, let affections in there. progressives, moderates, conservative democrats, and right now no one who would come closest to unity at this late date is kamala harris. >> john: all right, so, we are still hearing from the campaign that corey comperatore is the nominee. tj pokes on a poetics, he is the nominee to go forward and the white house at this after the conversation on hakeem jeffries and chuck schumer, the president told both leaders see as the nominee of the party and plans to win and looks forward to working with the both on the agenda to help working families. you know, if you work for the white house and if you are on the president's comps team and the comps team of the campaign, your job is to say, he is the nominee right

justice ginsburg once said howsw do you like beingng a judge andi said i really enjoyud it but i o missbeing an advocate and she said without missingng a beat yu are still an advocate. that is not the description of the judge. [laughter] i was tempted to say it takes one to know one. i think the point was how could you be the judge for a while and not haveve perspective and of course that's whatt she meant, advocating that perspective when there's something gray and it makes perfect sense. i'm so good at rationalizing. as we talk about justice scalia the end of the objective to not take it personally, hard to do butal it's really good advice. is there anything else you could recommend to the lower court judges? so, the other 970 of us out there. and we are really focusing on the court of appeals judgesn for now anyway because we are the ones having the disagreements. so the 200 of us, you know, we still have disagreements. we stillw,e have courts there ss to be some block voting and something about that doesn't seem right. >> that never happens at the supreme court. [laughter] it's a ch

had term limits on the supreme court justices famous liberals like william douglas and ruth bader ginsburgld not be around too be a fame must liberals. give me a lightning round against the war on the supreme court, how bad is that? >> this is terrible. this is the most radical administration we have ever seen, joe biden, kamala harris. they were willing to try to destroy the supreme court, your honor mine its legitimacy, undermine the rule of law. why? because the one branch of government they don't control right now and they're angry justices willing to defend the constitution, defend the bill of rights, defend free speech and religious liberty, the second amendment. so they're willing to burn it to the ground. this is an assault on the protections of all of our constitutional rights and the irony is this is from the people that bang their chest and say they're all about democracy. these are actions that indicate a contempt for democracy. larry: last one, sir, i promise, last one, 30 seconds, jd vance, good man, fabulous story, up from nothing, yale law school. i don't think you went to

but yes, justice ginsburg once said how do you like beingju a judge and i said it's a privilege.njoy it, but i miss being an advocate. she said you're still an advocate. i thought that is in the description of a judge. [laughter] >> who are you supposed to advocate for? >> i wanted to say it takes one to know one. [laughter] >> did she say it asll kind of like she was making a comment about you, or about judges in general?en >> i think she was making a really good point, which i took to be a compliment. and i think the point was how can you be a judge for a while and not have a perspective, and of course that's what she meant, advocating the perspective when there's something gray and that makes perfect sense to me. i'm not going to be a blank slate every case. i didn't take it as a complement complimentinitially, but i'm got rationalizing -- [laughter] thinking how thoughtful. so, we talked about justice scalia into disagreement and the objective to not take it personally, hard to do, but it's really good advice. is there anything else you could recommend to the lower court judg

>> only if i i had two weeks d of time, my guess i missed -- justice ginsburg one said jeff, how do you like being a judge? i said it's a privilege i really enjoyed forgiveness being an advocate. and she said without missing a beat, jeff, you're still an advocate. that is that the description of a judge. [laughing] >> what he supposed to say? >> i was tinted satan takes one to know one. [laughing] but actually speedy did she e it as a kind of like she was making a comment about you, or was she making a, about judges in general? >> i think she was making a really good point which i took to be a compliment and i think the point was how could you be a judge for while and and i have a perspective? and, of course, that's what she meant. you are advocating that perspective when president doesn't control under something gray. that makes perfect sense to me. you will not be a blank slate every case, so i did not take it as a couple but initially but i'm so good at rationalizing. [laughing] i turned it around in a thinking wow, how thoughtful. so we talked about justice scalia and disagreement a

then in 2020 when justice ginsburg passed away, from september 26, 2020 two october 26, 2020, they wereoney barrett. you can do it in the blink of an eye with the fear that joe biden might win the election. so they stole two seats. we are now seeing the consequence of it. the dobbs decision is the first installment, followed by the chevron decision, followed by an evisceration of gun rights. followed by presidential immunity. so everything that happened thus far is just a preview of coming atrocities from the supreme court. so my bill would expand the supreme court. it would say that to supreme court justices must be reclaimed, so it makes up for the stolen seats and two additional justices must be given to president harris next year so she can expand the court out of 13 and then begin to restore the balance on the court, otherwise we will live for a long time with this illegitimate court that is based on two stolen supreme court seats. >> it is such an important topic because the presidential race is everyone's focus, but the justice system is a branch of the government and that is why