and as we move people from gitmo, and i think, as we move to close down gitmo, and open up a prison, whether it's in thompson or elsewhere, we also want to make sure we have a legal mechanism in place, if there are cases we lose and, you know, there have been cases detainees at gitmo's webpage is our being successful, we need of a legal mechanism to make sure that they are not released into the united states. i look for to working with you on that issue as well. finally, raise one last thing, if i could, mr. chairman, and that is the dna backlog in los angeles. it's imperative we work with you. we would like to establish a pilot in los angeles where samples that have been analyzed by private labs can be uploaded into code is by the public lab and the technical review can be done after there is a match and will save millions. it will take violent people off the street. and l.a. is ready to be the test area for this. and love to work with you on that. i thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you. attorney general holder eric holder, a graduate of columbia university, appointed by president

from gitmo? >> we put into place a very comprehensive program that looked at the 240 people to go but it is not working if anybody that has been transferred does return to terrorism as you it knowledge might have been the case. it seems to me you would want to stop the program. >> i am confident that what we did by putting together law enforcement, our military people, our intelligence people and looking at those 240 people in making determinations -- >> it is clearly not working if you have people return to terrorism that you transferred to other countries that you did not need to transfer. >> let me the clear. i have not said that on the basis of anything i know that is credible or authoritative that anybody we have released. >> you set one may have. >> i said i have read reports in newspapers. i am not in a position to say that in fact that is accurate. i would not comment on the intelligence to cut the gentleman's time has expired >> i yield myself five minutes for questioning. you have had i

former gitmo detainees often return to terrorism. trine them and civilian courts is a dangerous proposal with no legal precedent. once in the u.s., the terrorists can argue for additional constitutional rights, making a harder to obtain convictions. treating terrorists like common criminals make america less safe. giving them the right to remain silent limits our ability to interrogate them. according to, news to you recently said you now want to work with congress to limit terrorist miranda writes. that is surprising since it is this a mission that has insisted on extending constitutional rights to them in the first place. fourth, the opposition to real id weakens national circuit. the administration wants to repeal the law which was enacted after 9/11. it would give terrorists cover to plotting carry out attacks inside the u.s. fifth, the push for amnesty make america less safe. the rest of the times square bomber, a recently naturalized american citizen, is another reason to reject giving amnesty to millions of illegals. how can w

from gitmo?>> we put into place a ver comprehensive program that looked at the 240 people to go but it is not working if anybody that has been transferred does return to terrorism as you it knowledge might have been the case. it seems to me you would want to stop the program. >> i am confident that what we did by putting together law enforcement, our military people, our intelligence people and looking at those 240 people in making determinations -- >> it is clearly not working if you have people return to terrorism that you transferred tother countries that you did not need to transfer. >> let me the clear. i have not said that on the basis of anything i know that is credible or authoritative that anybody we have released. >> you set one may have. >> i said i have readeports in newspapers. i am not in a position to say that in fact that is accurate. i would not comment on the intelligence to cut the gentleman's time has expired >> i yield myself five minutes for questioning. you have had innumer

. >> you clearly said you wanted to shut down gitmo. in the speech, there was never a reference to chinese uighers. the second part of your question is about abortion. on abortion, he started the campaign in clearly stated that he supported a state only -- >> i will ask you to not talk under your breath and that it is difficult for the viewers. >> i know. >> they are attacking each other. >> they know that. please let him finish. >> he changed his web page. he answers the question saying that he disagrees with the positions. a incurious, when did he have this conversion? >> it is hard to debate anything with tray because he makes up the tax. i made my first statement in my church when i was 17. my disagreement was with my church that did not take a political role. if you believe it is wrong, you should say something about it. when i was in medical school, i refused to do abortions. i refused to participate. i have been a member of a group for 20 years, american association of physicians and surgeons. i have always supported state and fe