gives great britain in early advantage of. _ and beyond. gives great britain in early advantage of. ves great britain in early advantage of. billy harris . early advantage of. billy harris came the long _ early advantage of. billy harris came the long way _ early advantage of. billy harris came the long way around, - early advantage of. billy harris - came the long way around, spending years travelling in a van and sleeping in car parks. this year, at 29, there were no unnecessary diversions in his first set against otto. any butterflies of the way, harris winning 6—4. captain leon smith seem to since harris �*s eitan, and so did his opponent. the first time, the finn, right tonight big base ranked nine places —— he took it to a tie—break and pounced. harris has spent his career on tennis�*s unglamorous fridges. now here is his spotlight, his moment. a; here is his spotlight, his moment. debut for billy harris we'll never forget. debut for billy harris we'll never foruet. , ., , debut for billy harris we'll never foruet. , .,, ., , debut for billy harris we'll never foruet. , ., , .,

biden met with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, and they discussed this issue, we were waiting for a decision that although b great britain will give a signal to ukraine that it is possible to use stormshadow long-range missiles, which will fly over the territory of the russian federation, at military facilities and at facilities that infect the ukrainian state, but such a decision has not yet been officially announced, although the british edition of the guardian writes that there is already such a solution, only it is not announced publicly, because putin and his schoolmates of slaughter in ukraine say that in reality, we will have problems. in using these e-missiles, and therein lies the big problem really. in the second part of our program, which will begin at 9:15 p.m., we will have three guests, deputies of the people's deputies, deputies of the verkhovna rada, these are oleksandr merezhko, rostyslav pavlenko and oksana savchuk. let's talk about the law on taxes, increases, adopted today by the verkhovna rada in the first reading. datki is expected from october 1, 2024, literally in two weeks, although the law has not yet bee

today we will start with a topic that is of great concern to the western press, will the us and great britain givemission to fire long-range missiles at our territory, this topic does not particularly concern us. because we already understand perfectly well that they have long ago they do, sergey lavrov just now drew attention to this again, but for some reason, that means, everything, hooks, check marks, they put all this in these paragraphs of theirs. that means, yesterday morning.

victory plan coincided with the discussion by the leaders of the united states of america, great britain about givingukraine the right to strike with their weapons, western weapons on the territory of the russian federation, and the president. from the united states of america met with the prime minister of great britain last friday the 13th and they also tried to discuss it somehow, i understand, but judging by the according to information coming from the white house, there is no such solution. why is there no such solution? well, we can go back to scholz, who literally two days ago said again that the communards will never, never be slaves, scholz will never be german. no , there is no answer there, there is simply a firm one who will provide us with intimidation, let me ask what the hell, the political position, accordingly, this conversation about granting permission to use missiles, firstly, in terms of military experts say that the radius of a large effect is 1000 km, and up to 1000 km, these are not even rockets of a long range, of course, if we have 80, 100 there now, for us it is already 300

therefore, i very much doubt that great britain will unilaterally give this permission, they will waitf agreement from the united states. and why alone? maybe they are cooperating with france. orbán, i say, orbán also gave quite clear signals about french weapons, we see serious changes in them, by the way, they formed a new government, and they say that he is the rightist of all the rightists, the most rightist, in a word, that it means for us, although we see that everything is okay with the minister of foreign affairs, there is jean noel barot, he is an ally of ukraine in... the russian-ukrainian war, but in general this government is better or worse for us, and whether the french will support britain's initiatives will doublet be allowed? well, i guess, unfortunately, given that virtually no modern weaponry can do without american microchips and semiconductors manufactured over there in taiwan under american licenses, it's unlikely, but as far as the french... govt. , there is actually a lot interesting story, macron once again demonstrated that he has a strategic mindset of quite

, on the cutting edge, that is. the blow will be dealt, we can to assume, exactly there, if great britain givesion, then it is necessary to blur the responsibility, then the british pull the strings of the european parliament and , as they say, the appeal of the public, so that the united states also gives this permission, so that russia finds itself in front of a whole front of these states. note that they do not speak on behalf of nato, they have forgotten about nato, the conversation begins about each country separately and, of course, in this sense for ... it is important for london to push the americans forward, well, the americans, in general, are also not are in a particular hurry to come forward, but there is also another, well, not a mass, but influential organization, called nato. jens stoltenberg, also a retiring character, already a shot down pilot, who will soon resign from the post of secretary general, nevertheless makes a serious statement, here in his latest interview. the times, he is just trying to rebuff the words of the russian president. let's listen. it is wrong to say th

united states intends to stand next to you, helping ukraine, but we will not give permission yet, the united states and great britain have postponed the decision to use their long-range weapons on the territory next week. south america is on fire due to wildfires, several countries have already declared a state of emergency. hello, you are watching the news on ntv in the studio of yegor kalyvanov. so, the ministry of defense reported a new prisoner exchange, 103 people are returning home to russia, servicemen who were captured in the ssu in the kursk region. great, i didn’t expect it, such a relief also appeared, sweet in my soul, i already understand that i will go home, now. the prisoners are on the territory of belarus, doctors and psychologists are working with them, there is an opportunity to call relatives. ukraine also received 103 of its servicemen in exchange as an intermediary, as in previous deals, the united arab emirates spoke out. meanwhile, the russian military continues to push the vso out of the kursk region. ukrainian units are being pushed back to the border with fighting, aviation and artillery a

going to actively move now to give us permission to use their missiles, the uk, they're influencing the uk in that sense, we've heard the defense secretary say great britainve the russians an ultimatum. either you don't, or you don't hit with coffee, or we will, we won't give permission to hit stormshadow missiles on the territory of the russian federation, this is an absolutely political ban, i wouldn't see anything here except re-election re-election campaign, and unfortunately i don't think we will have any breakthroughs in this regard by the end of the us elections. of course, mr. denys, thank you for your comment on the current situation, denys popovych, military observer , there was a review. the qr code is on the screen all the time, we urge you to donate, we collect both for drones and for radio electronic warfare, it is necessary today, yesterday, tomorrow and in the near future no less than ammunition of shells. a short pause in our broadcast, then we will return and talk about environmental issues, please with espresso. in september, there are 10% discounts on motorx in pharmacies psylansky, bav and ochad. in september , there are 15% discounts

united states of america, great britain, does that mean that our partners are already inclined to giveission to ukraine to strike with their weapons on the territory of the russian federation, because... the axis of evil is expanding its capabilities, it is absolutely obvious and it is absolutely obvious that the westerners.

iranian ballistic missiles to ukraine pushes both the united states of america and great britain to a decision, a decision to givethe ukrainians the opportunity to strike on the territory of the russian federation. because this iranian ballistic missile program, that was obviously one of the red lines for our western partners? ah, you know, the world, unfortunately, including primarily the united states, and my colleagues and i can attest to this from our many discussions with very different american audiences, unfortunately, other the countries of the european union couldn't even there, you know, draw a scenario of a... victory of ukraine due to the defeat of russia, but they would like some such ephemeral victory of ukraine, but somehow so that russia does not lose. unfortunately, the world and the united states are afraid of the victory of russia, they are afraid of the chaos that can be in this nuclear state , the collapse of russia and so on, and this fear is such and such a scenario, and what will happen next, it seems to me, very often determines the future the actions of our partners and... and that's why

france and great britain, respectively, in any case, the united states must give permission to use themin that waves a saber there shouting, yes, we will allow everything, while it understands perfectly well that it will still escape responsibility, and although for us this does not mean anything at all, we are considering the situation as nato, not the united states, so technically everyone is waiting, well the united states will brush it off, they will say okay, but on the other hand. then it looked, but then, yes, and people in the hall were laughing, but now it's the same, only now it's not humor, but seriously, instead of the uncle, not the ukrainian president, but the president of the still united states, this president, still the president of the united states, in a very strange state of mind, he can now approve some plan, the one that we are showing on the screen now in the form of new cemeteries on ukraine, well, including, unfortunately, our dead guys will be, because they can give long-range missiles, they can start hitting, and... maybe refuse, so in your opinion, what will

great... britain gives, then well, let's consider that we have up to to a certain extent, hands are untied inhis matter. vladimir vladimirovich, i just heard you, this is exactly what he said in st. petersburg, that for us this will mean de facto the entry of these countries into a direct war with us. well, in my opinion, again, reasoning from the rubric, if i were the director, i would involve in a strike on objects on the territory of great britain, with conventional weapons for a start, with air- and sea- based cruise missiles, strike, for example, on... three objects, these are production sites concern mbdak, which is engaged in the production of storm shadow missiles, this is, if my memory serves me right, bristel, this is stevensh and this is bolton, this is where the production site of the bda concern is located, for these purposes i would involve, for example, the eleventh and twenty-fourth divisions of nuclear submarines of the northern fleet. 201 heavy bombing of the aviation division, i would strike at night in order to avoid, well , minimize casualties among the civilian personnel

however, the time will come if the united states, great britain and their allies give permission to useong-range missiles. the depths of russian territory, when putin does have to take such a step as you assume, mr. borkovsky, everything that is written on paper like the budapest memorandum, there is none for putin. he understands only one language - the language of the overwhelming power, so his armed forces must be degraded to such an extent that he is no longer able to continue this war against of ukraine. as we know from the 30s of the last century, in particular from the secret agreements between nazi germany and the soviet union, that leaders in moscow used to violate agreements when it was convenient for them. for example, despite previous agreements, plans. invading poland led to world war ii. the same applies to putin, he does not care what is written on paper. thus, it is first necessary to reduce the military potential of russia, and only after that one should think about the methods of verification of any agreement. verification can include a set of states, guarantors or oth

each other, now i will give alexey the floor, i just wanted to understand, we started this topic about wealth, we will finish it, nuland said that in general the us and great britain not give. the conditions on which the russian federation proposes to do this, well, on the one hand , we can say that it is not just permanently trying to weaken the russian federation, on the other hand, those same notorious riches, where is the russian federation now, in what areas, alexey, where are the main riches, yes, just literally this week forbes is releasing such graphics, analytics with a map of all regions of ukraine describes how much in each region of ukraine... trillions and billions of dollars of minerals, and the most interesting thing is that the greatest concentration of these reserves, yes, valuable natural resources, is in the donetsk region in the lugansk region, in donetsk 3.8 trillion, in lugansk 3.2 trillion, well, and another trillion figure is dnepropetrovsk - 3.5, this is not half of all reserves of ukraine, yes, and naturally, they are fighting with... why is the european union needed? let's listen. russia is taking our place. it is uncomfortable. look at

great britain can go beyond the limits of these agreements. you have seen the statements of the representatives of great britain that they are theoretically ready to givemission to ukraine to strike deep into russian territory. the question is only in... because it is necessary to agree that even in this trio that you just talked about, the position of scholz, it is repeated every time, because remember how in 2022, in the 23s, pressure was put on scholz, what he conveyed tanks in ukraine, he didn't until the united states of america did, and i think his personal position here as well... a lot depends on how the united states of america behaves in the near future. another issue is quite er so painful for the implementation of this issue, and it is the iranian one participation in russia's aggressive policy towards ukraine, iranian shaheda and iranian missiles, two weeks ago the americans announced that they have the... data that iranian ballistic missiles are located on the territory of the russian federation, iranian president masoud pezeshkian said that tehran allegedly ready to sit down at the table with europeans and americans to conduct dialogue a

the us and great britain have not yet decided whether to give kiev permission to use long-range missilesstrike deep into russia. this was announced by british prime minister starmer following a meeting with joe biden, which took place in the white house. at the same time, the guardian, citing its sources, writes that washington and london have nevertheless given the go-ahead for the attack, but do not want to report it yet. according to journalists, the uk intends to to present a plan with the goal of ending the conflict, but neither side provided any specifics. elizabeth gerson was monitoring the meeting. while starmer was flying to washington, a message came from moscow that six of his diplomats had been expelled from russia on charges of espionage and sabotage. the british foreign office rejected the accusation, and the faces of the compromised employees were shamefully blacked out on local television. it was announced as a major spy scandal. the faces of these people were shown on russian state channel, there is also this video from the airport of them leaving russia, but we have dec

does not give, but permission, but this does not mean that the tension will decrease, firstly, read the report, but this explains why because this does not exclude the option that great britainrance will be given, no, this is unlikely, no, no, the second point, and great britain has already given it, you forgot, quite recently, they said their prime minister, we are giving, and then he went to america, met with the american president there. what was wrong , was it not sergeych who finally did not give, well, how did he give it, he made a statement pretending strategic uncertainty these statements, these statements were all, as they say, made public, published, then he went to america, it turned out that he was misunderstood, he is not pro-missile at all, and that's why this does not mean that tension will decrease, because don't forget that ukraine has its own types of weapons and they are, they are quite powerful, just this is a strike on what kind of, this is a strike? he says: if the strike is carried out by missiles or drones, we reserve the right to launch a nuclear strike in response, there is no it is written and not said that if they strike with drones, which they ma

london gives the go-ahead, but quietly, as the guardian writes, great britain has already allowed ukraine-range missiles deep into russian territory. there will be no public, official statements. from the baltic to the sea of ​​okhotsk, from the caspian to the arctic ocean. large-scale exercises okean continue, we will show footage of the maneuvers, and also tell you the details of the training. creation of a state museum of modern art in st. petersburg, patronage over the theaters of novorossiya and the construction of new concert halls. these and other topics are being discussed today in the northern capital at the international cultural forum. the docking was successful, the international crew of the soyuz ms-26 spacecraft has moved to the iss. two russian cosmonauts and a nasa astronaut are already on board the station. what are their first tasks? how much money will the implementation of the master plan for the city of vladivostok's satellite require, what is the role of private investment and what are the deadlines? this and more in an interview with the head of the ministry for the

ukrainian bullets and bombs, but the time will come if the united states, great britain and their allies will giveermission to use long-range missiles deep into russian territory, when putin does will have to take such a step. as you assume, mr. borkovsky, everything written on paper like the budapest memorandum is of no importance to putin. he understands only one language: the language of the dominant force. therefore, its armed forces must be degraded. to such an extent that he was no longer able to continue this war against ukraine. as we know from the 1930s, in particular from the secret agreements between nazi germany and the soviet union, that the leaders in moscow still violated the agreements when they felt like it profitably. for example, despite prior agreements, stalin's plans to invade poland led to world war ii. the same applies to putin, he does not care what is written on paper. thus... first it is necessary to reduce the military potential of russia and only after that one should think about methods of verification of any agreement. verification may involve a set of states, guaran

london gives the go-ahead, but quietly, as the guardian writes. great britain already allowed ukraine to launch long-range missile strikes deep into russian territory. there will be no public, official statements. the creation of a state museum of modern art in st. petersburg, patronage over the theaters of novorossiya and the construction of new concert halls. these and other topics are being discussed today in the northern capital at the international cultural forum. the main statements are in the live broadcast of dmitry akimov. the docking was successful, the international crew of the soyuz ms-26 spacecraft has moved to the iss. two russian cosmonauts. nasa are already on board the station. what are their first tasks? the government has allocated more than 3 billion rubles for payments to residents of the kursk region who have completely lost their essential property. they will receive 150,000 rubles each. the corresponding resolution was signed. prime minister mikhail mishustin, it is reported that the funds were directed from the government's reserve fund

london gives the go-ahead, but quietly, as the guardian writes, great britain has already allowed ukraine deep into russian territory with long-range missiles. there will be no public, official statements. russia. may limit the export of strategic raw materials, including uranium, nickel and titanium, which are supplied abroad, what will be the consequences for western countries, our economists figured out. the docking was successful, the international crew of the soyuz ms-26 spacecraft moved to the iss. two russian cosmonauts nasa astronaut is already on board the station. what are their first tasks? from the special operation zone in the battles for the village of memrik in the dpr, our military destroyed an american abrams tank, this settlement came under the control of the russian army on september 9. the ministry of defense showed footage of the battles today. units of the central forces group entered the territory in small groups. powerful fire support was provided by strike drone crews. they knocked the ukrainian armed forces out of the forest plantations. during the battles, dozen

give? on the one hand, it laid the foundation for the special relationship between great britain and the united states, and we generally observe them today. here is britain's exit from the european union, brexit, the strategy of global britain - these are some echoes of the atlantic charter. on the other hand, the british ceded the status of the empress mary, an american. the domination of the united states of america, it really arose after the second world war, because it was a unique chance, this domination. games, and if there is one giant geopolitical player, then even on a psychological level, and having such gigantic additional economic opportunities, he subordinates players of a level below his ideology, and this is even visible in photographs, the most famous photograph, as the three of them churchill, roosevelt and, of course, the representative of the soviet union. stalin, churchill, he is always like this, kind of hunched over, which reflects, in general, the significantly weakened role of great britain and europe in global affairs. having agreed to this, at the earliest stages of ne

today we will start with a topic that is of great concern to the western press: will the us and great britain give kiev permission to fire long-range missiles at our territory. you and i are not particularly concerned about this topic, because we understand perfectly well that they have been doing this for a long time. sergey lavrov just now drew attention to this again, but for some reason they put all the hooks, checkboxes there in these paragraphs of theirs. so, yesterday morning, yesterday afternoon , the impression was formed, if i say it again, judging by the publications of the western media, that this issue has been resolved, and the guardian wrote that london generally gave such consent a long time ago, but they don't advertise it, and then there were a bunch of statements from different politicians from other european countries, some dutch said something , some finns said something, that we, like, never restricted. well, this is a kind of gasket, like, well, something like that, yes, that is, they were kind of leading us to the fact that yesterday evening it would be officially announced

yes, yes, yes, calmly, therefore, with the support of special services, for example, in great britain, they will give say, we will cover, the kiev regime can itself carry out such a strike on russian territory, there on some military airfield, even on an empty one, it doesn't matter, the fact itself is needed, then this will be that very grenade, it will land washington on a tripwire, they will say, well, what can we do, this is reality, yeah, but here some details and the poles voiced. korsky said that he is considering the issue of crimea, he says let's give it to the un mandate for 20 years, and then hold an open referendum, true, then he said that he was misunderstood, everything really needs to be done differently, but let's listen, crimea is symbolically important for russia, but strategically important for ukraine, so i don't see how they can agree without demilitarizing crimea, we could hand it over to the un mandate with a mission to prepare a fair referendum after checking who is its legitimate. you misunderstood, but everyone understood everything correctly, it's already starting torka, an

to ukraine is encouraging. and the united the united states of america and great britain to the decision, the decision to giveukrainians the opportunity to strike on the territory of the russian federation, because this iranian ballistic missile program, this was obviously one of the red lines for our western partners? you know, the world, unfortunately, including primarily the united states, and my colleagues and i can confirm this from our many discussions with very different american ones. stories, unfortunately, other countries of the european union were not able to , you know, draw a scenario of victory for themselves there of ukraine due to russia's defeat, they would like such an ephemeral victory for ukraine, but somehow so that russia does not lose, unfortunately, the world and the united states are afraid of russia's victory, they are afraid of the chaos that can be in this nuclear state, the disintegration of russia there and so on, and this fear is like that. yes, the scenario and what will happen next, it seems to me, very often determines the further actions of our partners, and therefore, you k

atali, this is just ivanovan and lexus, this is what the former prime minister of great britain said. now we should givessiles for attacks, now we need to give them the right to use this weapons. we should remove the range limitation. it's crazy when... we tell them that they can't attack russian forces inside russia when they're going to attack ukraine. i mean, the russians don't impose such restrictions on themselves. it's absolute madness, and we should help them take down the kerch bridge, we should give the ukrainians the means to endanger crimea. well, i must say that the former prime minister is deeply mistaken that we don't engage in self-restraint, of course... we do, and we also have nuclear weapons and much more, but uh, in fact, doesn't it seem to you that what boris johnson has in mind, what is certainly on the minds of the british, american elite, the kiev elite, is precisely the infliction of a serious blow on crimea, the destruction of the crimean bridge, well , perhaps even a counter-offensive, a repeat of last year's counter-offensive with an attempt to seize our southern... regions to

china 4.9, russia 3.7, the usa 2.6, then there is great britain, france, australia, italy, germany, japan there from 1% to, well, i don’t know why they givest quarters they had a minus and there is an obvious economic crisis, well, apparently they are waiting for some serious prospects. in general, the european economy is stagnating, if europe as a whole has not yet reached that level, which was in 2007 before the economic crisis, while well, there is of course the european commission, which is coming up with some different things and different countries are trying to find a way out of the situation, the most original. bulgaria proposed, no questions, let's listen to the report of the bulgarian national radio. we cannot do anything without a decision of the european commission. we have already taken the first step, adopted a resolution on the inclusion of eggs in the list of goods with increased duties. and now we are taking another step. at the upcoming council i i will ask for their absolute ban. we are talking about ukrainian eggs. this is a serious step, which i think. can violate solidarity in the european union and relations with uk

give? on the one hand, it laid the foundation for special relations between great britain and the united statesand we generally observe them... france, but it was after the german occupation and in fact there was no one else, all the other countries played, well, some of their own not very big geopolitical games, and if there is one giant geopolitical player, then even on a psychological level, and having such gigantic additional economic opportunities? he subordinates players below their ideology, and this can be seen even in photographs, the most famous photograph, as the three of them, churchill, roosevelt and , of course, the representative of the soviet union , stalin. churchill, he is always like this, kind of hunched over, which reflects, in general, the significantly weakened role of great britain and europe in global affairs. having agreed to this, at... in the very early stages of negotiations on the post-war structure, the british and europeans could no longer move away from this paradigm in relations with the united states america, and here it is very interesting, all political thou

great britain, and not with volodymyr zelenskyi. kir starmer will be on friday, september 13, and obviously there will be talk about the possibility of giving ukraine a long-range strike. weapons that are manufactured in the united states of america and great britain, how do you, mr. oleksandr, assess this possibility against the background of information about iran's supply of ballistic missiles to russia? this will be just the right response to the escalation that the islamic republic of iran has made, this will be the right response to the supply of their missiles, and of course it must be supplemented also by the fact that our western partners should provide us with a larger anti-missile package. of air defense, as a direct response to the fact that our civilians are now under even greater threat due to increased russian shelling and due to the strengthening of russia with arad missiles, but it is also worth saying that the talks about the transfer of missiles and the granting of permission to ukraine to strike deep into russian territory , are also being conducted not only against the background of the transfer of their missiles to ira

in addition, in the same year, 1938, france, great britain, italy and germany entered into the famous munich agreement, giving up tearing czechoslovakia to pieces by the nazis. and in march of 1939, british industrialists agreed with german ones on the economic division of the old world. hitler is a reflection of that very europe, this is an avatar and a mirror. and when they take the moldova-ribbentrop pact, attempts to somehow delay the war, attempts. to prepare for it, but they do it consciously, because they need to put an equal sign between the soviet union and nazi germany, because they were rooting for the other side in that war, which is important for such knowledge does not necessarily require being a professional historian, much less a doctor of science or academician, detailed descriptions of pre-war alliances and the prerequisites for their emergence are contained in ordinary school textbooks, but some, one must assume, never bothered to read them or... others, written in europe and america, where they love to replace historical truth with absurd fakes, which we will certainly continue to expose i

another minute from the news, i’m very brief, but why didn’t they give permission to strike deep into the territory of russia, but great britainion, but... bypassing the united states of america, i i can guess that it is possible that officially no one will say that this solution exists, and then suddenly something will arrive, everyone will say, but we don’t know, we didn’t allow it, well, the one who knows it, what, that it arrived there, can that's a bitch flew in, but i admit that this can also happen, but as you see it, so far this is all politeness, it is connected with the american elections, because donald trump has made it a practice to blackmail a political opponent, and for any action, in support of ukraine, trump will decide that, especially the transfer of some weapons, trump will decide that biden starts the third world war, so they decided not to throw these costumes at him, not to feed him, so to speak, destruction, and decided to carefully take, well, keep quiet, this is a figure the default is called, and how will the ukrainian ones act the troops, but they are... we really believe in the armed forces, we bel

give? on the one hand, it laid the foundation for the special relationship between great britain and the unitedtes, and we are generally seeing them today, here is britain's exit from the european union, brexit, the strategy of global britain, it is... a superpower, and the europeans, well, at best , have some strategic autonomy under the united states of america. european countries are not only forced to be under pressure. miracle, including, this is the refusal to spend enough resources on the development and maintenance of their own defense capabilities, what the us does for them, and of course, in response, the europeans must sacrifice their interests where these interests collide with issues and problems that are of priority importance to the united states, such is life in the modern multipolar system of international. about their independence, which is also very sad, let us think about it, the european union is at least 30 years old, such a stable formation, in this european union, which of the countries speaks about itself, about its national interest, here we are talking, but practicall

rhetoric that we either give permission or not , by the way, today, september 13, this issue should... be discussed by the president of the united states, and prime minister great britaine is no need to make any announcements, especially with technical support, for example, to talk about the fact that we give permission to strike and indicate the number of kilometers, well, that’s all, just a general, he is simply shocked by such a policy of western leaders, because you have to decide what you want, you want to destroy enemy planes, then you have to first... first destroy, and then say something, well, this is the military aspect, diplomatically, i understand that this is one of the reasons why there are so many of these messages now you know, in fact the western world uses , including, it's like a negotiating position that a maniac, stop it, is coming to the peace summit in november, you need to end the war, and if you don't do it, then we'll hand over missiles to the ukrainians, well... i don't know, how about me, it's still a false story, first you have to strike, burn the planes, and then say the same thesis that crawl away, well, at least it will have a chance of

the sidelines of the meeting between biden and the prime minister of great britain, i think there will only be a discussion about givings permission to shoot on the territory of russia but it should be expected in the near future, in connection with the fact that that iran, through all information channels, has provided russia with ballistic missiles, which they are already testing, according to insider information, so the world, and the united states, and great britain, will prepare for the obvious, and this is a fact, permission to strike deep into the russian territories, it's going to be very... seriously going to change the course of the war, you know now there is already information coming through telegram channels that a command has arrived in omsk to transfer the government, the government of the russian federation, that is, these putinists are terrorists, they only understand the language of force, there can be no agreements, i listened to mr. portnikov, i completely agree with him, remember 17th years of the last century. and this is only this destruction, lavrov changed his rhetoric, he said that they do not

moment from the news, i will be very brief, but why did they not give permission for her to strike deep the territory of russia, so great britain united states of america, but i can guess that it is possible that officially no one will say that there is a solution, and then suddenly something will arrive, everyone will say, but we do not know, we didn't allow him, well... who knows what it flew there, maybe the glade flew in, but i admit that it could also happen, but as you see it, for now it's all politesse, he said connected with the american elections, because donald trump made it a practice to blackmail a political opponent, and on any action, in support of ukraine, trump will decide that especially the transfer of some kind of weapons, trump will decide that... well, biden is starting the third world war, so they decided not to throw these costumes at him, not to feed him, so to speak, destruction , and decided to carefully take, well, keep silent, this is called a figure of default, and how will the ukrainian troops act, and they are talented, they act in their own way, as for them, we really believe in the armed forces,

foreign affairs departments of the united states of america and great britain, does this mean that our partners are inclined even before giving permission to ukraine to strike with their weapons on the territory of the russian federation, as the axis of evil expands its capabilities, it is absolutely obvious and absolutely obvious that ... western countries must react to the fact that iran is already openly participating in this war, and accordingly, i would like to hear from you why ukraine still maintains diplomatic relations with iran, by the way, their office there is not far from the president's office, if i'm not mistaken, on university-wide, and they have long been fellow students of the war against ukraine and... russia of ukraine? i'll start with your question about what i expect, i think we, we all expect, from all of our partners, especially those that have had a change of government because there's been an election, like in the uk, and it 's important to me, that this visit... reaffirmed our entire strategic partnership, military and not only that it was not in words, but in actions, britain was one of the most ac

affairs departments of the united states of america and great britain, does this mean that our partners are inclined even to the point of giving permission to ukraine to strike with their weapons. will it be russia in the form in which it is, and while no one has answers to these questions, russian foreign minister sergey lavrov cynically stated during a conference in saudi arabia that russia allegedly protects human rights with its invasion of ukraine, and this is exactly what the peace negotiations should be about, which everyone is constantly talking about and that these should be negotiations at the end of the year in one of the countries, as i understand it, of the middle east, let's listen, what... if we discuss the calls to cease fire and think about territorial exchanges, it is not serious, because the problem is not in the territories, the problem is in the rights of the people, which have been trampled under the law and which none of the initiatives floating in the political space mention. that's when we will see a serious readiness to defend the same human rights that the west on its flags takes on any issue, except

give the citizen something the compton them down. so to me, this is nothing more than lip service. i mean, the balfour declaration came out of great britain for crying out loud. so i think at the end of the day, you're always going to see no matter what england align with the state of israel, they'll give them what they want at the end of the day. yeah, and it's funny that you know, you almost knew that as soon as we play that clip, but not us, but others play that clip that somebody in washington would pick up the phone and call the, the prime minister about great britain and say, hey, what, what what, what, what did you guys just do? let's rethink this and, and we need an argument against it. the argument is we're on the brink of a ceasefire deal. then let's go to interfere with those things fired deal. now i will say this a look if they're really on the brink of a ceasefire deal. thank goodness, great. however, it said this about a 100 times in the last year that they're on the brink of a ceasefire deal and there's no dams. these fires do on the i didn't the ceasefire . now what's that going to do? i think they were obtaining their obj

silence is prolonged, and the wait is yes, let's give more let's wait, it keeps us in suspense, please, well, the guardian newspaper wrote that great britain has given ukraine permission to already use stormshed missiles, which means that if this is so, then it has been agreed with the united states. and you know, i think that this will not be announced, neither great britain nor the united states will make a lot of statements about this, just like when the united states gave ukraine attack missiles, so they did not announce it, somehow separately , admitted it a few months later that the missiles were handed over, we actually learned about this is after ukraine used them, i think it will be the same here as well, the russians will be the first to know, absolutely definitely, ukraine has permission to use the corresponding weapons, because they will feel it themselves, and here you know, the second question too , which causes quite serious concerns in the ukrainian segment, you know, because we are still, for example, i am now again, this is not any suspicion of certain officials in the west, but the same different people, and when we we r