givner, thank you. colleagues, i ask for your support. >> with that, the last item we voted on being unanimous, colleagues, can we take this same house same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted. [gavel] >> madam clerk, why don't we go now to roll call. >> first up to introduce new business is supervisor cohen. >> thank you very much. i just want to take a moment and recognize a woman who dedicated her life to san francisco. her name is omega harden. i'd like to close the meeting out in her memory. ms. harden was born on march 9, 1927 in texas. she what the ninth sibling out of 13 children and she lived in san francisco for 65 years. spending most of her time in double rock. ms. harden spent the majority of her life as a cook working at the huntington hotel. the former le me ridian hotel in san francisco. churches included evergreen baptist church, bell chapel cme baptist church as well as providence baptist church. to me ms. harden was known as the godmother of [speaker not understood] ro

givner. >> sure, deputy city attorney jon givner. i would just ask that understanding supervisor kim's amendment that we may want to just tweak the language a bit consistent with what you're going for here. but i wanted to clarify that the -- so, three years after the effective date is going to be sometime in the end of august 2017. going forward after that time, each annual report that dph produces should include the external evaluation data. is that the purpose of the amendment? >> i hadn't anticipated going beyond because initially this was envisioned as something that, you know, would accompany a pilot program. being that the legislation as it's moving forward would be an ongoing program, i think it's important at the three-year mark we're able to look at the data and demographics just so we can evaluate the efficacy of the program. so, my amendment is only on the first three years. >> thank you. >> okay. supervisor kim has made a motion. seconded by supervisor farrell. colleagues, can we take the motion without objection? withou

givner? >> that is right. >> my question is that it's heard on the 10, so we're not jammed up with charter amendments and have the maximum flexibility as a board. >> i will take your request into consideration. as i talked to you before, we'll try our best to juggle it in there. as you have already said, there seems to be a lot of charter amendments coming through the pipes and we'll get it all through regardless. so if we have to have rules committee every day. >> okay. i just -- i made my point, i just want to make sure we don't get into a situation that we have a bunch of charter amendments that we have more than one that needs to happen by the 29th, because we're not allowed to that. >> okay. >> my request is to agendaize it to the 10th and as can you see it's not a massive public comment kind of situation, awn it's something had a won't take an enormous amount of the committee's time. i appreciate your consideration. >> okay. madame clerk is there anything else on the agenda? >> just is

. >> deputy city attorney john givner. >> supervisor tang, do you have other comments? >> sure, my second question has to do with the memo we were issued per the controller's office about the potentially unfunded liability. just wanted to -- unfunded costs to government. so i wanted to see if could you speak to that as well. >> sure, we're working on getting the correct answer for the time. but mr. rosenfeld, i was wondering if you could speak to supervisor tang's question. >> thank you. good afternoon, supervisor, ben rosenfield, controller. we have distributed our first draft on the measure. this is a complicated measure and in a lot of ways, we'll continue to revise our analysis as we work through the process. we find that the charter measure as proposed will likely increase the cost to government. but there is a number of caveats to that analysis. really it affects costs in two direct ways and then a third way that is more difficult to determine. the first two -- the first relates to retiree vesting for the group of employees in question here as we understand you ri

and i also want to thank our city attorney's office to city attorney dennis herrera, to jon givner, and to mr. malmet for making this a priority. we held a hearing last week at the neighborhood services and public safety committee regarding the proposed closure of the university mound ladies home which is located in the portola district that i represent. the proposal is that this institution that for more than 130 years has been providing compassionate senior care for individuals, mostly women of modest means, there is right now a proposal to close this institution. and, in fact, dozens of women have received a notice of eviction that is supposed to go into effect july 31st. the importance of providing affordable and compassionate care for seniors is not something that can be overestimated. it is simply a basic human right that we allow seniors, most of them women, who have dedicated their lives to making san francisco the great city that it is. and as they reach their 80s, and 90s, they want the opportunity to age in place, near their home, near the community that they have lived all o